LETTER FROM JUDGE ANNA von Reitz - Alfred Lambremont Webre & Due Process
On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 5:35 PM, Anna von
Reitz wrote:
Parmjit, I am absolutely sure that the Roman
Catholic Church has perpetrated both vast good
and vast evil. For generations the Pope has acted
as both the leader of Christendom AND the leader
of Satanic worship by occupying a double office and
acting as the Pope on one hand and as the pagan
Roman Pontiff on the other.
"No man can have two Masters...."
It is possible that Kevin Annett is well-intentioned
and genuine---- possible, I will grant. I just don't
see the hard evidence supporting his specific
allegations. The evidence there is appears to be
equally well-explained by the wildfires and plagues
of communicable diseases that swept Western
Canada during the same time period as the
Residential School were operated. I don't
understand why Kevin isn't pursuing all the
churches that supposedly committed these same
atrocities and ran Residential Schools. And, last,
but not least---- I know Alfred Lambremont
Webre (excuse me I forget the correct spelling of
his name without it in front of me) to be an honest
journalist--- so maybe start with him.
I have included Alfred's email contact address in
the address line so that you can contact him
directly yourself and ask him about his coverage of
the fake juror story and related reports.
On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 1:13 PM, Parmjit
Nahil wrote:
Ana
It was so nice of you to respond to my plea
regarding Kevin Annett. I was rapt about it and
have taken time and the respect it deserves to see if
I could come up with anything.
Knocking on doors of Kevin’s gatekeepers hasn’t so
far elicited any responses so (an indirect) 2-way
dialogue has not been possible.
I’ve been looking more closely at his stuff and
cogitating, comparing what he is saying with stuff
that I’ve read or seen evidence for from other
sources. We both agree that the Catholic Church
have a lot to answer for and I totally see where you
are coming from as an impartial judge.
However my delving a bit deeper has only
strengthened my view that Kevin is a genuine man
I have no idea what went on with Alfred Weber,
Kevin and the jurors. That is something only direct
contact might, if we are lucky, give us a clue -
although not necessarily:
I was the oldest of 3 siblings and when they fought,
I could never see ‘who started it’. As a result my
brother continued use the strategy where he would
bash my sister and then look totally innocently at
me. He knew the tactics that worked. He apologised
to sis when he was in his forties. So I totally
understand the thing about having a body of proof
but I would wager that the Catholic Church is a
mite more devious even than that 6 year old was.
So here are my thoughts and cogitations. I’m sure
it’ll be all too familiar to you but in case anything
sparks off a need for further delving, let me know
Thanks again
Parmjit
From: Anna von Reitz
Sent: 16 February 2017 20:27
To: Parmjit Nahil
Subject: Regarding Kevin Annett
Sorry it has taken a while to get through my email
roster and reply to your plea regarding Kevin
Annett and his work.
I became suspicious of Kevin and his motives when,
about three years after he broke the story about
genocide at Indian Residential Schools in Canada,
he still hadn't come up with any hard evidence to
back up all that he was saying and he inexplicably
changed his attack from a logical complaint against
ALL the various churches and groups that had
allegedly participated in these atrocities to a single-
minded concentration on the Roman Catholic
Church.
Surely, my own complaints about and to the Roman
Catholic Church stand as testimony to my own
dissatisfaction with their operations, and
particularly that of the office of the Roman Pontiff,
so that nobody need wonder where I stand on
criticizing the church which allows this kind of
criminal activity to flourish in its bosom. Likewise,
it goes without saying that if they could foster and
create these other crimes of enslavement, press
ganging, inland piracy and unlawful conversion,
these same groups and parties within the Church
who are using the Church as a store front and
shield for their venal activities are surely capable of
all the other crimes Kevin Annett claims as well.
However--- (1) Where is the hard evidence? (2) Why
prosecute only one group among all those accused
of the same crime? (3) Why the falsification of jury
actions that occurred and was reported by the
jurors themselves?
Thus far, all that Kevin's efforts have turned up (to
my knowledge) is evidence that is questionable at
best. Canada over the past 150 years has seen
every kind of pandemic and natural disaster known
to man.
Read the book
Mrs. Mike written by an RCMP
officer's wife toward the beginning of last century to
get a flavor of what life in Western Canada was
like. Entire towns and many native villages were
wiped out by the scourges of wildfires,
communicable diseases, and wildfires.
As a result, finding mass graves and charred bones
is not necessarily hard evidence of any Satanic
ritual practice, but is fully explained by the known
and documented history of the places where Kevin
Annett's researches have taken place.
As to my second question--- when I go after
criminals for committing a crime, I treat them all
the same, regardless of their appearance,
nationality, religion or any other criteria beyond
the fact that they committed the crime. That is, to
me, an Anglican who murders a child is just as
guilty and reprehensible as a Roman Catholic doing
the same, and I prosecute both with equal
ferocity. Why has Kevin fallen silent on the same
atrocities supposedly committed by other churches
that ran residential schools at the same time?
Finally, it came to my attention in various news
reports and especially those of Canadian Alfred
Lloyd Weber, who interviewed actual jurors
associated with the ITCCS, who said that their
names were used as jurors and associated with
findings and orders that they never heard or
considered.
In other words, the supposed jurors who handed
down indictments and made other decisions, never
even heard the evidence.
Their names were being used as rubber stamps to
accomplish whatever Mr. Annett wanted and no
actual Due Process or lawful consideration was
being followed.
So, that--- for me--- was the icing on the cake.
For Law to mean anything, it has to follow Due
Process. Due Process is, in fact, a major part of the
Law---- like the body is part of a man, without
which the rest fails in its earthly
expression. Without full and fair and unprejudiced
vetting of the facts and the lawful determination of
the facts by a jury, there is nothing to base a
judgment upon in the Common Law.
So both Due Process and an unprejudiced and
competent jury are necessary for the Law to have
force and meaning and for any judgment of any
court to be lawful and enforceable.
And here I have jurors whose names have been
attached to official findings and judgments of
ITCCS saying that they never even heard the
cases?
That can never pass muster with me.
I am a judge, not a witch-hunter, and though I
know the Roman Catholic Church to be infested
with a most virulent and hateful form of Satanism
as a result of harboring both the office of the Pope
and the office of the Roman Pontiff under one roof,
I do not allow that knowledge to mislead me into
vain suppositions or to a disrespect of Due Process
owed.
Otherwise, we follow in the footsteps of the
Inquisition and not of Christ and become both
victims and perpetrators of the same evils that we
despise.
Comments