|
Jad Khalil, IACCO.fr
Abbas, CIFILE.org
Michael Zazzio, Peaceinspace.org
Dr. Rima Laibow, MD
Alfred Lambremont Webre
Ralph Fucetola, JD
International Coalition for Peace
Hi All - Below and Attached is a 13-page Memorandum on ICC Procedural Rules regarding Requests for Investigations by the ICC Prosecutor and on important Strategic Considerations for our Coalition. Please feel free to share the Memo with your members, legal and medical.
REQUEST: I request that we have a brief meeting in the near future after we all have had the opportunity to reflect on its contents to coordinate and plan our next action steps. Best regards, Alfred
INTERNATIONAL COALITION FOR PEACE
MEMORANDUM – ICC PROCEDURAL RULES
& Strategic Considerations For State Party ICC Actions And
Ratifying Nation State Court Action
I. ICC PROCEDURAL RULES
(1) Request for Investigation – ICC Prosecutor
As our International Coalition for Peace (“Coalition”) is now proceeding to the International Criminal Court (ICC), it is useful to set out the ICC Procedural Rules under which our filings will be made.
As our Coalition is not a State Party, we are proceeding under the authority of Article 15 of the Rome Statute, to persuade the Prosecutor to initiate an investigation on their own accord - proprio motu.
Article 15 Prosecutor
1. The Prosecutor may initiate investigations proprio motu on the basis of information on crimes within the jurisdiction of the Court.
2. The Prosecutor shall analyse the seriousness of the information received. For this purpose, he or she may seek additional information from States, organs of the United Nations, intergovernmental or non-governmental organizations, or other reliable sources that he or she deems appropriate, and may receive written or oral testimony at the seat of the Court.
3. If the Prosecutor concludes that there is a reasonable basis to proceed with an investigation, he or she shall submit to the Pre-Trial Chamber a request for authorization of an investigation, together with any supporting material collected. Victims may make representations to the Pre-Trial Chamber, in accordance with the Rules of Procedure and Evidence.
4. If the Pre-Trial Chamber, upon examination of the request and the supporting material, considers that there is a reasonable basis to proceed with an investigation, and that the case appears to fall within the jurisdiction of the Court, it shall authorize the commencement of the investigation, without prejudice to subsequent determinations by the Court with regard to the jurisdiction and admissibility of a case.
5. The refusal of the Pre-Trial Chamber to authorize the investigation shall not preclude the presentation of a subsequent request by the Prosecutor based on new facts or evidence regarding the same situation.
6. If, after the preliminary examination referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2, the Prosecutor concludes that the information provided does not constitute a reasonable basis for an investigation, he or she shall inform those who provided the information. This shall not preclude the Prosecutor from considering further information submitted to him or her regarding the same situation in the light of new facts or evidence.
Source:
https://www.icc-cpi.int/nr/rdonlyres/ea9aeff7-5752-4f84-be94-0a655eb30e16/0/rome_statute_english.pdf
(2) Request for Investigation to Prosecutor – Rules & Procedures
Please consult Section II, Initiation of Investigations under Article 15, pages 17-18, Rules 46-50 for the applicable Rules for our Coalition Request for Investigation at the following link:
https://www.icc-cpi.int/resource-library/Documents/RulesProcedureEvidenceEng.pdf
(3) Page Limits on Documents filed with Prosecutor
Please consult Regulations 36, 37, and 38 [pages 15-16] for specific page limits on documents filed with the Registry and with the Prosecutor, at the following link:
Please note that under Regulation 38 (3) (a), the page limit of the Coalition’s Request for Investigation to the ICC Prosecutor shall not exceed 30 pages, at the following link. Please note the exceptions in Regulation 36.
https://www.icc-cpi.int/resource-library/Documents/RegulationsCourt_2018Eng.pdf
II STRATEGIC CONSIDERATIONS FOR STATE PARTY ICC ACTIONS AND
RATIFYING NATION STATE COURT ACTION
Background – There are two principal methods that a State Party may activate Articles 5-8 ban in the Rome Statute against war crimes, genocide, crimes against humanity, and the crime of aggression to stop the Genocidal Technologies Pandemic.
(1) Under Article 14 of the Rome Statute, a State Party may refer a situation to the Prosecutor for investigation:
Article 14
Referral of a situation by a State Party
1. A State Party may refer to the Prosecutor a situation in which one or more crimes within the jurisdiction of the Court appear to have been committed requesting the Prosecutor to investigate the situation for the purpose of determining whether one or more specific persons should be charged with the commission of such crimes.
2. As far as possible, a referral shall specify the relevant circumstances and be accompanied by such supporting documentation as is available to the State referring the situation
SEE:
https://www.icc-cpi.int/nr/rdonlyres/ea9aeff7-5752-4f84-be94-0a655eb30e16/0/rome_statute_english.pdf
(2) Universal jurisdiction of National Courts of 123 State Parties ratifying the Rome Statute to prosecute war crimes, genocide, crimes against humanity, and the crime of aggression in their National Courts SEE: https://asp.icc-cpi.int/en_menus/asp/states%20parties/Pages/the%20states%20parties%20to%20the%20rome%20statute.aspx
The National Courts of each of the Nations ratifying the Rome Statute is granted Universal Jurisdiction to prosecute war crimes, genocide, crimes against humanity, and the crime of aggression in their National Courts, as the Rome Statute was drafted with a view towards decentralizing the prosecution of serious crimes around the world, rather than having such prosecution centralized in one court in The Hague, at the International Criminal Court. SEE Call for a Genocidal Technologies - Pandemic Treaty Conference of the 123 Nations that ratified the International Criminal Court Statute/Treaty of Rome https://exopolitics.blogs.com/international_criminal_co/2020/09/sample-request-for-a-writ-of-emergency-injunction-of-mandamus.html
A. What is the probability of the ICC Prosecutor granting the Coalition’s Request for Investigation into the Genocidal Technologies Pandemic?
There are various factors that might affect this outcome.
1. According to the ICC website, the Office of the Prosecutor has to date received approximately 12,000 Requests to Investigate. Yet the ICC website itself shows only 14 Situations under Investigation, with 11 of the 14 being in Africa. SEE: https://www.icc-cpi.int/pages/situation.aspx Thus current Situations under Investigation by the Prosecution amount to 14/12,000 or .00116667 of the total Requests for Investigation received by the Prosecutor over time. This vanishingly low percentage of acceptance by the ICC Prosecutor of Requests for Investigation suggests that, unless an applicant is a State Party, a Request for Investigation by the ICC Prosecutor may under ordinary circumstances be just another United Nations Cabal exercise in futility.
2. NOTE – Two UK-based legal and medical professionals on April 21, 2021 issued a press release announcing they had filed a Request for Investigation of the UK’s crimes and breaches of the Nuremberg Code during Pandemic with the ICC Prosecutor.
Here is the text of the Press Release:
PRESS RELEASE
Wednesday 21st of April 2021
‘Request for Investigation’ of the UK Government and its advisers, for genocide, crimes against humanity and breaches of the Nuremberg Code, issued to the International Criminal Court at the Hague, on Tuesday 20th of April 2021.
https://www.ukcolumn.org/community/forums/topic/we-need-to-get-behind-this-man/page/22/
PRESS RELEASE
Wednesday 21st of April 2021
‘Request for Investigation’ of the UK Government and its advisers, for genocide, crimes against humanity and breaches of the Nuremberg Code, issued to the International Criminal Court at the Hague, on Tuesday 20th of April 2021.
On Tuesday 20th of April 2021 we, the undersigned, issued a 27 -page ‘Request for Investigation’ to the International Criminal Court (ICC) at The Hague, with a view to asking that our allegations of genocide, crimes against humanity and breaches of the Nuremberg Code, by the UK Government and its advisors, be accepted by the ICC and investigated.
We believe that we have provided compelling reasons as to why our Government and its advisers are guilty of the above charges. However, at this stage it is important to note that we are not required to provide all the evidence we have (which would run to several hundred pages) and are limited to a maximum of 30 pages, simply to make an outline case as part of our Request.
The ICC will review our ‘Request for Investigation’ and assess whether they believe there is a reasonable basis to proceed with an investigation into a ‘Situation’, pursuant to the criteria established by the Rome Statute.
The ICC does not provide a timeline regarding acceptance, nor of course is there any guarantee that they will ultimately accept our ‘Request for Investigation’ due to a variety of reasons, including the fact that they are limited in their capacity to conduct investigations.
Updates will be provided as and when more information becomes available.
Melinda C. Mayne LPC LLM MBA GDL
Kaira S. McCallum JP BSc
END OF PRESS RELEASE
We have located Kaira S. McCallum as a Member of the UK Medical Freedom Alliance and contacted her as follows:
https://www.ukmedfreedom.org
“Greetings I am a Coordinating Judge of the Natural and Common Law Tribunal for Public Health and Justice at Peaceinspace.org. Together to two other International Legal and medical organizations, we are preparing to request the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court ICC to open an investigation into the Genocidal Technologies Pandemic.
We note that your Alliance Member Kaira S. McCallum has filed a Request for Investigation with the ICC Prosecutor on the same matter and we would very much like to contact her cooperatively to compare information and approaches.
We ask respectfully that Kaira S. McCallum contact our Tribunal at [email protected]
Skype: peaceinspace
Tel: +1-604-600-9203
Many thanks, Alfred Lambremont Webre, JD, MEd, CERT Public Health
Judge”
http://www.peaceinspace.org
B. How can we best pursue Universal jurisdiction of National Courts of 123 State Parties ratifying the Rome Statute to prosecute war crimes, genocide, crimes against humanity, and the crime of aggression in their National Courts, by filing our Indictment in the National Court of a specific favorable National Court?
C. The 123 Rome Statute Ratifying Nations are listed here: https://asp.icc-cpi.int/en_menus/asp/states%20parties/Pages/the%20states%20parties%20to%20the%20rome%20statute.aspx SEE BELOW:
Ironically, although Tanzania is not a ratifying Nation of the Rome Statute, through the agency of a Peaceinspace.org Tribunal Judge with direct access to the late President of Tanzania John Magufuli, known to be opposed to COVID measures, the Peaceinspace.org Tribunal for a time contemplated bringing an action in Tanzanian courts to enforce its Indictment and November 29, 2020 Final Judgment.
COALITION PROPOSAL: It seems reasonable that Our Coalition should initiate a search for favourable National Court venues in which to file our Indictment of the Genocidal Technologies Pandemic for enforcement by the National Court.
123 NATIONS RATIFYING ROME STATUTE
· A
o Afghanistan
o Albania
o Andorra
o Antigua and Barbuda
o Argentina
o Australia
o Austria
· B
o Bangladesh
o Barbados
o Belgium
o Belize
o Benin
o Bolivia
o Bosnia and Herzegovina
o Botswana
o Brazil
o Bulgaria
o Burkina Faso
· C
o Cabo Verde
o Cambodia
o Canada
o Central African Republic
o Chad
o Chile
o Colombia
o Comoros
o Congo
o Cook Islands
o Costa Rica
o Côte d’Ivoire
o Croatia
o Cyprus
o Czech Republic
· D
o Democratic Republic of the Congo
o Denmark
o Djibouti
o Dominica
o Dominican Republic
· E
o Ecuador
o El Salvador
o Estonia
· F
o Fiji
o Finland
o France
· G
o Gabon
o Gambia
o Georgia
o Germany
o Ghana
o Greece
o Grenada
o Guatemala
o Guinea
o Guyana
· H
o Honduras
o Hungary
· I
o Iceland
o Ireland
o Italy
· J
o Japan
o Jordan
· K
o Kenya
o Kiribati
· L
o Latvia
o Lesotho
o Liberia
o Liechtenstein
o Lithuania
o Luxembourg
· M
o Madagascar
o Malawi
o Maldives
o Mali
o Malta
o Marshall Islands
o Mauritius
o Mexico
o Mongolia
o Montenegro
· N
o Namibia
o Nauru
o Netherlands
o New Zealand
o Niger
o Nigeria
o North Macedonia
o Norway
· P
o Panama
o Paraguay
o Peru
o Poland
o Portugal
· R
o Republic of Korea
o Republic of Moldova
o Romania
· S
o Saint Kitts and Nevis
o Saint Lucia
o Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
o Samoa
o San Marino
o Senegal
o Serbia
o Seychelles
o Sierra Leone
o Slovakia
o Slovenia
o South Africa
o Spain
o State of Palestine
o Suriname
o Sweden
o Switzerland
· T
o Tajikistan
o Timor-Leste
o Trinidad and Tobago
o Tunisia
· U
o Uganda
o United Kingdom
o United Republic of Tanzania
o Uruguay
· V
o Vanuatu
o Venezuela
· Z
o Zambia
APPENDIX
ICC Practice Manuals
Please take notice of the following important ICC Practice Manuals that will affect our Coalition filings and practice before the ICC:
A. ICC Resource Library
https://www.icc-cpi.int/resource-library#rpe
Core ICC texts
The core legal texts are the seven documents that together form the basis of the Court’s legal framework: the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (Statute), the Rules of Procedure and Evidence, the Elements of Crimes, the Regulations of the Court, the Regulations of the Registry, the Regulations of the Office of the Prosecutor and the Code of Professional Conduct for counsel. The most important of these, and first to be adopted and enter into force, was the Statute, following which the remaining six texts entered into force at various points during the Court’s history. All can be amended according to their own particular amendment procedure.
Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (Statute)
Download: English, Français, العربية,Español
The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court is the international treaty that founded the Court. Comprising a Preamble and 13 Parts, it establishes the governing framework for the Court. Adopted at the Rome Conference on 17 July 1998, it entered into force on 1 July 2002, thereby creating the International Criminal Court. See our history.
The Statute sets out the Court's jurisdiction over genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes and – as of an amendment in 2010 – the crime of aggression. In addition to jurisdiction, it also addresses issues such as admissibility and applicable law, the composition and administration of the Court, investigations and prosecution, trials, penalties, appeal and revision, international cooperation and judicial assistance, and enforcement.
Rules of Procedure and Evidence (Rules)
Download: English, Français
The Rules of Procedure and Evidence are an instrument for the application of the Rome Statute. Subordinate to the Statute, they provide for the composition and administration of the Court, setting out rules governing jurisdiction and admissibility, stages of proceedings and trial procedure, investigation and prosecution, penalties, appeal and revision, offences and misconduct against the Court, compensation, international cooperation and judicial assistance, and enforcement.
Elements of Crimes
Download: English, Français, Español
The Elements of Crimes were adopted to assist the Court in interpreting and applying articles 6-8bis of the Statute, which establish the crimes within the jurisdiction of the Court. In particular, they set out the jurisdictional, material and mental elements that must be present in order for a person to be held criminally responsible and liable for punishment for those crimes.
Regulations of the Court
Download: English, Français
The Regulations of the Court set out the framework necessary for the routine functioning of the Court. Subject to both the Statute and the Rules, they regulate aspects of the composition and administration of the Court, proceedings before the Court, counsel issues and legal assistance, victims participation and reparations, detention matters, cooperation and enforcement, removal from office and disciplinary measures.
Regulations of the Office of the Prosecutor
Download: English, Français, عربي
Like the Regulations of the Registry, the Regulations of the Office of the Prosecutor are subject to the Statute, the Rules and the Regulations of the Court. They govern the operations of the Office of the Prosecutor in relation to its management and administration, providing for divisions and sections within the Office, and regulating the handling of information and evidence, preliminary examination and evaluation of information, investigations, proceedings before the Chambers and trials.
Regulations of the Registry
Download: English, Français, Español, عربي
The Regulations of the Registry, subject to the Statute, the Rules and the Regulations of the Court, govern the operation of the Registry by providing for its organization and management. They set out how the Registry will perform its administrative duties regarding proceedings before the Court and how it will discharge its responsibilities regarding issues of legal representation and assistance, victims and witnesses, and detention matters.
Code of Professional Conduct for counsel
Download: English, Français, Español, عربي
The Code of Professional Conduct for counsel, adopted by the Assembly of States Parties, applies to defence counsel, counsel acting for states, amici curiae and counsel for victims and witnesses practising at the Court. It governs the conduct of counsel in their representation of clients and relations with the Court, other counsel, persons who are unrepresented or represented by other counsel, and victims and witnesses. It also establishes a disciplinary regime for misconduct.
Code of Conduct for the Office of the Prosecutor
Download: English, Français
Code of Judicial Ethics
The Code of Judicial Ethics provides guidelines for general application to contribute to judicial independence and impartiality with a view to ensuring the legitimacy and effectiveness of the judicial process. To this effect the Code contains guidelines on the conduct of Judges relating both to their professional roles, for example by acting with integrity, respecting confidentiality and regulating the conduct of those participating in courtroom proceedings, and in their activities outside the Court.
Chambers Practice Manual
29 November 2019 - English, Français
Error! Filename not specified.
This update of the Chambers Practice Manual, resulting from collective discussions held at the Judges’ retreat near Arnhem (Netherlands) on 3-4 October 2019 and drawing on the preparatory work undertaken by a number of judges on this issue, adds a number of specific deadlines for rendering diverse types of decisions and judgments.
These guidelines for the timing of key judicial decisions now introduce a coherent, consistent and predictable system of timeframes regulating work at pre-trial, trial and appeal level.
They aim to achieve a significant step forward in respect of the efficiency and expeditiousness of Court proceedings.
Previous editions of the Manual
Guidelines for the Judiciary Concerning the Holding of Court Hearings during the COVID-19 Pandemic
The Guidelines are facilitative and non-binding, aiming to provide clarity on the Court’s approach to holding hearings in Court proceedings during the COVID-19 Pandemic. The Guidelines emphasise that the applicable Chamber may decide independently whether required hearings should be conducted physically, remotely or as a combination of both. A Chamber should consider the rights and protections guaranteed in the Rome Statute and the Rules of Procedure and Evidence, as well as giving due consideration to the situations and restrictions in states where parties or participants in the hearings are located.
The Staff Regulations
The Staff Regulations were adopted by the Assembly of States Parties, in accordance with article 44(3) of the Rome Statute. They broadly outline the principles and policies that apply to all Court staff. They do not apply to elected officials such as the Judges, the Prosecutor and the Registrar. The Regulations provide for the duties, obligations and privileges of Court staff and establish guidelines for matters such as the classification of posts and staff, salaries and allowances, appointment and promotion of staff, leave entitlements, social security, staff expenses, staff relations, separation of service, disciplinary measures, appeal of administrative decisions and recruitment.
Staff rules of the International Criminal Court
The Staff Rules of the International Criminal Court elaborate on the Staff Regulations and apply to all staff members with a fixed-term appointment including, subject to another resolution, to staff of the Secretariat of the Assembly of States Parties. They provide more detailed provisions on the issues dealt with in the Regulations.
The Financial Regulations and Rules
The Financial Regulations and Rules were adopted by the Assembly of States Parties in accordance with article 113 of the Rome Statute and outlines the rules and regulations that govern the financial administration of the Court. The Regulations deal with matters such as the creation of a proposed budget for approval by the Assembly of States Parties, appropriations, the provision of and management of funds and other income, internal control of the Court’s finances, accounting methods and auditing of the Court’s accounts. The Rules elaborate on these by providing detail on how the Regulations are to be implemented. An annex to the Rules and Regulations sets out the terms of reference for the auditor appointed by the Assembly of States Parties to audit the Court.
The Agreement on the Privileges and Immunities of the International Criminal Court
This Agreement between States Parties elaborates on articles 4 and 48 of the Rome Statute that refer to the legal personality of the Court and its privileges and immunities in the territory of States Parties. The Agreement provides that the Court’s premises, archives, documents and communications are inviolable; that its property, funds and assets are immune from legal processes and it is exempt from taxes and customs. The Agreement also details the immunities that various groups of personnel working with or attending the Court, such as Representatives at the Assembly of States Parties, Judges, Counsel, Witnesses and Victims, are entitled to.
The Agreement between the International Criminal Court and the United Nations
This Agreement was concluded pursuant to article 2 of the Rome Statute in order to provide for a mutually beneficial relationship between the two organisations. This is done through recognition of and respect for each other’s mandates, reciprocal representation, exchange of information and cooperation between the organisations on matters of personnel, administration, facilities and services, including access to UN venues.
The Headquarters Agreement with the Host State
This Agreement was concluded between the Court and the Netherlands to regulate matters regarding the establishment of the Court in The Hague. It aims to ensure the stability, independence and smooth functioning of the Court and the Secretariat of the Assembly of States Parties in the Netherlands. In addition to detailing the immunities and privileges that the Court and its officials, staff and related personnel enjoy, the Headquarters Agreement regulates the provision of services, such as electricity, water and fire protection to the Court as well as security of the Court premises and its personnel. It also deals with the facilitation of entry into the Netherlands of those required to travel to the Court, visitors of detainees and other stakeholders, such as NGOs and press and contains provisions regulating the transport, detention and release (interim or otherwise) of detainees.
5. At the beginning of July 2021, Respondent defendant Michael Zazzio, an Affiliate member of IACCO, sent Chief Judge Alfred Lambremont Webre a video of Respondent defendant Jad Khalil in front of the International Criminal Court in The Hague, as Jad Khalil was filing IACCO’s Article 15 Request to the ICC Prosecutor to open an investigation into the Pandemic. Upon Chief Judge Alfred Lambremont Webre’s request for a copy of IACCO’s Article 15 ICC filing, as had been agreed by IACCO, CIFILE, and the Tribunal, Michael Zazzio unlawfully and maliciously refused in compliance with a malicious plan by Respondent defendants to irreparably harm the Enforcement by the Tribunal of its lawful Judgments and Cease & Desist Orders.
6. On Saturday July 3, 2021, the Tribunal and its Judges held a Think Tank on the positive future of the Tribunal. A video of that Think Tank and its positive contents appears here.
Tribunal Future Agenda
WATCH ON TRUETUBE: https://youtu.be/99cgJnlOOy8
Unlisted Video
Private for Tribunal Judges Only
July 3, 2021
7. During and after this July 3, 2021 meeting, Respondent defendants Rima Laibow and Michael Zazzio maliciously and secretly agreed to irreparably harm the Enforcement by the Tribunal of its lawful Judgments and Cease & Desist Orders, and in furtherance of this secret and factional agreement, disrupted the Tribunal Judges meeting on July 4, 2021 with a view toward unlawfully appropriating the proprietary Cease and Desist Orders and information of the Tribunal and destabilizing the administration of Justice in a lawful Tribunal of Conscience, a felony and crime against humanity in violation of Article 7 of the International Criminal Court Statute that 123 Nations have ratified.
8. On July 10, 2021, Respondent Jad Khalil and IACCO knowingly joined in this criminal conspiracy by Respondent defendants Rima Laibow, Michael Zazzio and Ralph Fucetola to unlawfully appropriating the proprietary Cease and Desist Orders and information of the Tribunal and destabilizing the administration of Justice in a lawful Tribunal of Conscience, a felony and crime against humanity in violation of Article 7 of the International Criminal Court Statute that 123 Nations have ratified, by releasing to Respondent defendants:
Respondent/defendant www.MarshallsofConscience.com [sic]
Luciferian 5-point Star Logo
Defendant respondent Rima Laibow
[email protected], [email protected]
Defendant Respondent Ralph Fucetola
[email protected]
Defendant Respondent Michael Zazzio
[email protected]
a copy of IACCO’s Article 15 Request to the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court for an investigation, before releasing this Article 15 Request to the Tribunal and CIFILE, its Coalition Partners as promised.
RESPONDENT DEFENDANT RIMA LAIBOW’S LETTER TO IACCO
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Rima Laibow <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, Jul 10, 2021 at 3:52 PM
Subject: Re: IACCO.pdf
To: La_jad <[email protected]>
Cc: peace peaceinspace.org <[email protected]>, Abbas <[email protected]>, Brian Burmaster <[email protected]>, Michael Zazzio <[email protected]>, Ralph Fucetola JD <[email protected]>, Caroly Hajj Chahine <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]>, Colette Emile Hayek <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]>, Karim Torbey <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]>, Jean Tabet <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]>, brianburmaster <[email protected]>
Dear Council Kalil,
Thank you for sharing your impressive and important ICC submission. OUr world wide interests are well served by it and I want to thank you and your team for your dedication and congratulate you on your success thus far.
As you know, the work of the Tribunal convened by Alfred Lambremont Webre has concluded successfully with the production of Judgements and Cease and Desist orders.
Now the issue is enforcement. The Tribunal determined that it would be useful, once the Cease and Desist orders were completed, as they now are, to create an enforcement effort by asking as many people as possible from around the world to send these documents to the convicted perpetrators.
For that reason, at the request of Chief Judge Alfred Lambremont Webre and the will of the other Judges, the Natural Solutions Foundation, of which I am the Medical Director, and of which Counsel Ralph Fucetola is the Legal Director and my co-trustee, have created an enforcement action.
I now ask you to share this enforcement action widely. Each submitted action sends 81 emails and serves the Cease and Desist Orders on each of them.
If it is useful to translate the item and related documents into languages other than English, we can easily set that up once the documenbts are provided to us in other languages.
. I am gratified that such a I am writing to ask you to join a world-wide contingent of people asserting their Right of Informed Consent and demanding that the totalitarian measures around COVID and 5G be halted immediately.
This link, https://inhere.salsalabs.org/tribunaljudgmentaction, takes those who click it to a page that allows them to send lawfully issued Judgements and Cease and Desist Orders which are the work of an international Tribunal of Conscience directly to the emails of 81 convicted perpetrators of the COVID/5G agenda of global destruction.
Those who take this action become Marshalls of Conscience, as they are permitted to be under natural and common law, as well as the international and national laws and treaties protecting humanity and human rights. Chief among those rights, of course, is the right of Informed Consent, which we are asserting lawfully and en masse.
I would be happy to speak with you or any of your colleagues about the action which we anticipated that millions of people around the world will want to take.
We see this action, which was approved by the Tribunal several months ago, as a strong companion action to the submission you have just presented to the ICC.
Pushback works, but only if we push back hard.
Yours in health and freedom,
Dr. Rima
Rima E. Laibow, MD
Medical Director
Natural Solutions Foundation
www.DrRimaTruthReports.com
www.OpenSourceTruth.com
Telegram: OpenSourceTruth
On Sat, Jul 10, 2021 at 12:55 PM La_jad <[email protected]> wrote:
Jad Khalil
www.khalillawoffice.org
President of “ The International
Association to confront Corona virus and Global Violations Officials “ I.A.C.C.O Link: http://iacco.fr//
Legal Advisor of the International Organisation for World Peace . www.iophr-eu.org
Defence Counsel for Mr Hassan Merhi STL .
Counsel for Generals Mostafa Hamdan and Raymond Azar vs. UN
Counsel for Lebanese Deportees vs. Kuwait .
Ex-Chair of ICCBA Defence Committee,
Member of its Executive Counsil .
On the list counsels of ICC/ADC-ICT/IRMCT/ KOSOVO sp.Ch./ Central Africa /
State Counsel
+31611921426 (The Hague)
+9613272795 (Beirut)
9. In her July 10, 2021 letter, Respondent defendant Rima Laibow fraudulently and with malice aforethought falsely claims: “As you know, the work of the Tribunal convened by Alfred Lambremont Webre has concluded successfully with the production of Judgements and Cease and Desist orders.” This intentionally and tortuously misleading statement by Respondent defendant Laibow is intended to cause irreparable harm to the administration of Justice by this Tribunal of Conscience, which is a felony and crime against humanity in violation of Article 7 of the International Criminal Court Statute that 123 Nations have ratified.
In fact, far from “being concluded”, at its Judges meeting on Sunday July 18, 2021, this Tribunal of is announcing the
· Issuance of a New Indictment [the first since November 15, 2021]
· Holding of a Virtual Trial [the first since November 29, 2021]
The New Indictment and Virtual Trial was first explored in a Tribunal Think Tank on Saturday Nov 3, 2021 which many Tribunal Judges contributed to, and then expanded on in a Special Panel with Tribunal Of Counsel Ole Dammegard:
1. As we discuss in the interview with Tribunal Of Counsel Ole Dammegard below, the Tribunal is seeking 10 -15 new Judges to join it to hold a new Trial, Injunctions, and Enforcement to stop the planned unlawful implementation for Agenda 21 and Agenda 2030, the planned genocide of up to 2/3 of Earth’s human population through “Vaccination” Weapons of Mass Destruction [Spike Proteins] and 5G+ in the false flag genocidal “Plandemic”, and the New World Order ownership of Earth’s water, air, our human children, and property. Fully 50% of many nations are now vaccinated with these bioweapons, and some experts estimate that most if not all of these individuals will be dead or near dead within 4-8 years, with no social contingency planning for this catastrophe and crime against humanity.
Ole Dammegard, Counsel to International Tribunal, discusses 4D Soulutions for a New Humanity on a New Earth
WATCH ON ExopoliticsTV: https://www.brighteon.com/0a8ec841-2a5f-4de6-874c-b539eb4681c4
Tribunal-Peaceinspace.org: https://exopolitics.blogs.com/international_criminal_co/2021/07/ole-dammegard-counsel-to-international-tribunal-discusses-4d-soulutions-for-a-new-humanity-on-a-new-earth-1.html
NEWSINSIDOUT: https://newsinsideout.com/2021/07/ole-dammegard-counsel-to-international-tribunal-discusses-4d-soulutions-for-a-new-humanity-on-a-new-earth/
2. Natural and Common Law vehicles of Enforcement and Governance for 50% of non-vaxxed population that is 4D/5D Aware and human Soul-oriented.
10. COUNTER-CLAIM FOR SPECIFIC COMPENSATORY & PUNITIVE MONETARY DAMAGES IN THE AMOUINT OF $TEN MILLION CANADIAN DOLLARS
$10,000,000.00 FOR:
COMMERCIAL SLANDER, AND MALICIOUS INTERFERENCE WITH TRIBUNAL’S ENFORCEMENT OF JUDGMENT AND CEASE & DESIST ORDERS AGAINST GENOCIDAL TECHNOLOGIES PANDEMIC IN VIOLATION Under Natural Law, Common Law, Treaty Law, Articles 6 and 7 of the International Criminal Court Statute[7], the Nuremberg Code[8], the Geneva Conventions[9], the United Nations Declaration of Human Rights[10], United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples[11], the Final Judgment of the Natural and Common Law Tribunal for Public Health and Justice at www.Peaceinspace.org[12].
SO ORDERED BY THE
NATURAL AND COMMON LAW TRIBUNAL
FOR PUBLIC HEALTH AND JUSTICE
www.Peaceinspace.org
Date: July 11, 2021
|
Comments