Treaty Conference to Ban Neurotech Mind Control Weapons
MODEL STATUTE: Banning Neurotech Mind Control Weapons - 2018 VERSION Introduction
http://exopolitics.blogs.com/investigations-world/2018/03/model-statute-initiative-.html
PUBLIC COMMENT DRAFT ONLY - March 31, 2018
Introduction
The Model Statute Initiative bans the research & development, manufacture, possession, control, deployment, and/or operation of all new physics, scalar, plasma, or directed energy neurotech mind control weapons; and bans their use to torture or entrain human beings, animals, or living organisms in violation of International criminal and humanitarian law, including the Geneva Conventions and the Statute of the International Criminal Code.
The Model Statute Initiative can be adapted for adoption by international Treaty Conference (as was the Land Mines Treaty Conference that Princess Diana helped successfully create), as well as by any legislative body at the international, national, provincial, state, regional, municipal or local level, and enforcement by the designated appropriate lawful authorities.
Contents
- Scientific basis for Model Statute
- Text of Draft Model Statute, version 2018
- Legislative History
- Model Statute Pilot Project, European Parliament, 2011-15
- City Council of Richmond, CA - Passage of City Resolution 2015
- Space Preservation Act of 2001 - HR 2977, U.S. House of Representatives
Physicists Dr. Leuren Moret, MA, PhD ABD, and Dr. Katherine Horton PhD of Switzerland, founder of the Joint Investigation Team [JIT], support the broad theory and findings of the Model Statute to ban neurotech weapons.
Are you interested in being a Contact for the Model Statute in your Area of planet Earth? [Interested individuals and organizations can add their names as contacts for the MODEL STATUE by emailing their name, contact email & website affiliation to [email protected]
Thank you.
Model Statute Initiative Legislative History - European Union - EU Parliament, Brussels BE
Pilot Project - 2011-2015
The Model Statute was introduced in educational briefings in Brussels, Belgium to members of the European Parliament during 2011-2015 under the auspices of EUCACH.ORG
Nation & State/Provincial Project Phase
The Model Statute Initiative is launching a Nation & State/Provincial Project Phase in 2018 with a view toward introducing and enforcing the Model Statute at the:
- National Parliamentary level - In Nations such as the UK, Sweden, Poland, Spain, Japan, Russian Federation, People's Republic of China, the United States of America, in other nations in which there is an identified social constituency for the banning of neurotech mindcontrol weapons, and in the 118 nations which have ratified the International Criminal Court Treaty. Ratifiers of the ICC Treaty may prosecute war crimes, genocide and crimes against humanity under the ICC Statute in their own national courts. See:
https://internationalcriminalcourtnashie.weebly.com/signatories-of-the-rome-statute.html
- State/Provincial level - (1) In the state legislatures of individual States of the United States of America [thought to be a current world aggressor in neurotech mind control weapons], and (2) In the provincial or state legislatures of nations with an under-developed national social awareness and constituency for the social need to ban neurotech mind control weapons.
MODEL STATUTE INITIATIVE & SYSTEMS JUDO
Alfred Lambremont Webre and Dr. Katherine Horton talk about How to defeat a bigger system using System Judo. Broadcast live on 28th February 2013.
WATCH FULL WEBINAR & LINKS
WATCH ON Stop 007 Channel
Part I: SYSTEMS JUDO – How to defeat opponents much larger than yourself
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lqnh5acgCRY&feature=youtu.be
Part II: SYSTEMS JUDO – How to defeat opponents much larger than yourself
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PVKRuLhOdjg&feature=youtu.be
VIDEO: Violations of Human Rights by Advanced Systems of Control
Originally presented to MEP Mr. Charles Goerens
European Parliament
31 January 2013
CLICK TO WATCH VIDEO VERSION OF POWERPOINT PRESENTATION [Pause 22-second video on each of 22 slides individually as required]
https://www.bitchute.com/video/1sEkKLzSSkAM/
Are you a target of these new [DEW directed-energy] weapons?
Targeted Individuals Canada
The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms is part of Canadian Constitution that protects its citizens from human rights violations.
https://targetedindividualscanada.com/2010/06/26/direct-energy-weapons/
http://exopolitics.blogs.com/files/byron-belitsos---weapons-of-coercion-1.pdf
Planned "Microwave & Chemical Sedation" of the Population
http://www.stopthecrime.net/COMM%2012%20BRIEFING001%20(1).pdf
PROJECT MKULTRA - THE CIA'S PROGRAM IN BEHAVIORAL MODIFICATION
WORKING DRAFT OF MODEL STATUTE [2018 version]
CASE STUDY: UK PARLIAMENT
[Drafting Note: Please adapt to requirements of applicable legislative jurisdiction of the Nations or States where you are seeking legislative enactment & enforcement of the Model Statute. ]
BACKGROUND
UK Parliament - 2013
Rejected petition Electronic Harassment - Directed Energy Weapons (TI)
More details
https://petition.parliament.uk/archived/petitions/49171
"This Petition was formed in order to protect UK and International citizens from Covert Terrorism and Mind Control Experimentations currently in place in the World! Thousand's of Targeted Individuals globally are claiming they are being Tracked, Stalked Tortured and Harassed by the illegal usage of Satellites, Cell Towers and Perpetrators with Electronic Energy Weapons (what is now listed by the military as "Electronic Weapons" or "Less than Lethal weapons" including 'High-Powered Microwave Energy Weapons). So far there are well over 10,000 victims who claim they have been randomly selected and possibly illegally implanted with RFID Microchips for illegal and non-consensual experimentations. They believe it is done by Secret Government Intelligence Services. We want this to STOP NOW!"
ACTION: "This petition was rejected
Why was this petition rejected?
It’s not clear what the petition is asking the UK Government or Parliament to do.
We only reject petitions that don’t meet the petition standards."
Date submitted 23 April 2013
Science & Technology Technology Committee
https://www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/commons-select/science-and-technology-committee/
Joint Committee of Human Rights
https://www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/joint-select/human-rights-committee/
MODEL STATUTE [2018]
Draft Bills [UK Parliament]
https://www.parliament.uk/about/how/laws/draft/
Draft Bills are issued for consultation before being formally introduced to Parliament. This allows proposed changes to be made before the Bill's formal introduction. Almost all Draft Bills are Government Bills. Government departments produce Draft Bills and issue them to interested parties. MPs and Lords can also consider them in committees.
Why are there Draft Bills?
The practice of publishing Draft Bills has become more frequent in recent years. It allows examination and amendments to be made to texts and made more easily - before their formal introduction to Parliament as a Bill proper.
Parliament's role in Draft Bills
Most Draft Bills are examined either by select committees in the Commons or Lords or by a joint committee of both Houses. Draft Bills considered by Parliament are available on this website.
Government's role in Draft Bills
The consultation process on Draft Bills may involve the government issuing a paper for public discussion and response. The best-known examples of this are White and Green Papers.
Although not formal definitions, Green Papers usually put forward ideas for future government policy that are open to public discussion and consultation. White Papers generally state more definite intentions for government policy.
Related information
Government Bill: This is a term for a type of Public Bill, introduced by government ministers.
Draft Bills before Parliament
Scrutiny Unit - The Scrutiny Unit forms part of the Committee Office in the House of Commons. It provides specialist expertise to select committees, especially (but not exclusively) on Draft Bills.
SAMPLE DRAFT BILL [UK PARLIAMENT]
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Draft Animal Welfare (Sentencing and Recognition of Sentience)
Bill 2017 December 2017
https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/666576/draft-animal-welfare-bill-171212.pdf
DRAFT BILL
MODEL STATUTE: Banning Neurotech Mind Control Weapons - 2018 VERSION
Introduction
The Model Statute bans the research & development, manufacture, possession, control, deployment, and/or operation of all electronic, energy, DEW directed-energy, new-physics, scalar, plasma, and/or directed energy neurotech mind control weapons, MKULTRA mind control weapons, chemical, bioweapons, land-based, atmosphere-based, space-based, solar system, galactic, universal, multiversal and or omniversal and/or interdimensionally/or extraterrestrially controlled or deployed weapons; and bans their use to torture or entrain human beings, animals, or living organisms in violation of International criminal and humanitarian law, including the Geneva Conventions and the Statute of the International Criminal Code.
The Model Statute Initiative can be adapted for adoption by any legislative body at the international, regional, nation-state, national, provincial, state, regional, municipal or local level, and enforcement by designated lawful authorities.
MODEL STATUTE
MODEL STATUTE concerning weapons systems operating on new physics principles used by AI Artificial Intelligence to entrain humans and/or to torture or inflict other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment including but not limited to electronic weapons, electromagnetic weapons, magnetic weapons, directed energy weapons, geophysical weapons, wave-energy weapons, frequency weapons, genetic weapons, scalar weapons, psychotronic weapons, chemtrail aerosol weapons, implant weapons, nanotechnology weapons, high frequency active aural high altitude ultra low frequency weapons, information technology weapons, scalar weapons, plasma weapons, vaccination weapons, mobile phone weapons, and any and all frequency-based weapons.
MODEL STATUTE FOR THE EUROPEAN UNION
Council Regulation (EC) No _________________ of _________, 201_
Council Regulation (EC) No _________________ of _________, 201_ concerning weapons systems operating on new physics principles used by AI Artificial Intelligence to entrain humans and/or to torture or inflict other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment including but not limited to electronic weapons, electromagnetic weapons, magnetic weapons, directed energy weapons, geophysical weapons, wave-energy weapons, frequency weapons, genetic weapons, scalar weapons, psychotronic weapons, chemtrail aerosol weapons, implant weapons, nanotechnology weapons, high frequency active aural high altitude ultra low frequency weapons, information technology weapons, scalar weapons, plasma weapons, vaccination weapons, mobile phone weapons, and any and all frequency-based weapons.
Official Journal _______________________________________
Council Regulation (EC) ________________________________
of ______________ 201_
concerning weapons systems operating on new physics principles used by AI Artificial Intelligence to entrain humans and/or to torture or inflict other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment including but not limited to electronic weapons, electromagnetic weapons, magnetic weapons, directed energy weapons, geophysical weapons, wave-energy weapons, frequency weapons, genetic weapons, scalar weapons, psychotronic weapons, chemtrail aerosol weapons, implant weapons, nanotechnology weapons, high frequency active aural high altitude ultra low frequency weapons, information technology weapons, scalar weapons, plasma weapons, vaccination weapons, mobile phone weapons, and any and all frequency-based weapons.
(hereinafter collectively referred to as “new physics torture weapons”).
THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 133 thereof,
Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,
Whereas:
(1) Pursuant to Article 6 of the Treaty on European Union, respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms constitutes one of the principles common to the Member States. In view of this, the Community resolved in 1995 to make respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms an essential element of its relations with third countries.
(2) Article 5 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and Article 3 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms all lay down an unconditional, comprehensive prohibition on torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment. Other provisions, in particular the United Nations Declaration Against Torture and the 1984 United Nations Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment, place an obligation on States to prevent torture.
(3) Article 2(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union states that no one shall be condemned to the death penalty or executed. On 29 June 1998, the Council approved “Guidelines on EU policy towards third countries on the death penalty” and resolved that the European Union would work towards the universal abolition of the death penalty.
(4) Article 4 of the said Charter states that no one shall be subjected to torture or to inhuman or degrading treatment. On 9 April 2001, the Council approved “Guidelines to the EU policy toward third countries, on torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment “. These guidelines refer to both the adoption of the EU Code of Conduct on Arms Exports in 1998 and the ongoing work to introduce EU-wide controls on the exports of paramilitary equipment as examples of measures to work effectively towards the prevention of torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment within the Common Foreign and Security Policy. These guidelines also provide for third countries to be urged to prevent the use and production of, and trade in, equipment that is designed to inflict torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment and prevent the abuse of any other equipment to these ends.
(5) It is therefore appropriate to lay down Community rules on use and on trade with third countries in new physics torture weapons. These rules are instrumental in promoting respect for human life and for fundamental human rights and thus serve the purpose of protecting public morals. Such rules should ensure that Community economic operators do not derive any benefits from trade that either promotes or otherwise facilitates the implementation of policies on torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment, which are not compatible with the relevant EU Guidelines, the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and international conventions and treaties.
(6) For the purpose of this Regulation, it is considered appropriate to apply the definitions of torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment laid down in the 1984 United Nations Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment and in Resolution 3452 (XXX) of the General Assembly of the United Nations. These definitions should be interpreted taking into account the case law on the interpretation of the corresponding terms in the European Convention on Human Rights and in relevant texts adopted by the EU or its Member States.
(7) The Guidelines to the EU Policy toward third countries on torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment provide, inter alia, that the Heads of Mission in third countries will include in their periodic reports an analysis of the occurrence of torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment in the State of their accreditation, and the measures taken to combat it. It is appropriate for the competent authorities to take these and similar reports made by relevant international and civil society organisations into account when deciding on requests for authorisations. Such reports should also describe any new physics torture weapons used in third countries for the purpose of torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment.
(8) In order to contribute to the prevention of torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment, it is considered necessary to prohibit the supply to third countries of technical assistance related to goods which have no practical use other than for the purpose of torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment by new physics torture weapons.
(9) The aforementioned Guidelines state that, in order to meet the objective of taking effective measures against torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment, measures should be taken to prevent the use, production and trade of new physics torture weapons, including parts and equipment thereof, which are designed to inflict torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment. It is up to the Member States to impose and enforce the necessary restrictions on the use and production of such equipment.
(10) In order to take into account new data and technological developments, the lists of new physics torture weapons and parts and equipment thereof covered by this Regulation should be kept under review and provision should be made for a specific procedure to amend these lists.
(11) The Commission and the Member States should inform each other of the measures taken under this Regulation and of other relevant information at their disposal in connection with this Regulation.
(12) Member States should lay down rules on penalties applicable to infringements of the provisions of this Regulation and ensure that they are implemented. Those penalties should be effective, proportionate and dissuasive.
(13) This Regulation respects the fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised in particular by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union,
HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:
CHAPTER I
Subject matter, scope and definitions
Article 1
Subject matter and scope
1. This Regulation lays down Community rules governing new physics torture weapons.
Article 2
Definitions
For the purposes of this Regulation:
(a) “new physics torture weapons” means weapons or weapons systems operating on new physics principles used to torture or inflict other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment including but not limited to electronic weapons, electromagnetic weapons, magnetic weapons, directed energy weapons, geophysical weapons, wave-energy weapons, frequency weapons, genetic weapons, scalar weapons, psychotronic weapons, chemtrail aerosol weapons, implant weapons, nanotechnology weapons, high frequency active aural high altitude ultra low frequency weapons, information technology weapons, scalar weapons, plasma weapons, vaccination weapons, automobile and vehicular-based weapons, satellite and air-based weapons, mobile phones and Internet of Things-based weapons, and any and all advanced technologies used to torture or inflict other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment.
(b) “torture” means the use of new physics torture weapons to commit any act by which severe pain or suffering, whether physical or mental, is intentionally inflicted on a person for such purposes including but not limited to intentional psychological programming, experimentation, voice to skull communication, artificial telepathy, remote influencing, remote inducement of physical or mental illness, mood management, mind control of persons or populations, remote virtual sexual assault, remote virtual rape, forced reproductive sterilization by means of chemtrails aerosol weapons, forced reproductive sterilization by means of vaccinations, (“RHIC- EDOM”) radio hypnotic intracerebral control and electronic dissolution of memory, remote transmission of images or films to brain, remote reading and controlling of thoughts, subliminal thought control, tinnitus, remote introduction of implants into body via vaccination, remote introduction of implants into body via chemtrails aerosol weapon, remote introduction of implants into body via food, water or potable liquid, remote introduction of implants into body via nanobot, remote scarring of body, remote introduction of inorganic particles into body, telephone and mobile phone terror including remotely induced epilepsy, muscle pains and cramps in neck and legs, headaches, severe toothaches, sudden falling off of healthy teeth while talking on the phone, remotely induced backaches, vibrations in various parts of the body, itching, ear tumors, brain tumors, respiratory diseases, asthma, immediate diarrhea and vomiting, remote deformation of victim’s body parts and organs including deformed bloated abdomen, deformed neck, lumps and channels on the head, shoulders widened, blown up arms and legs, deformed genitals and other deformations, remote inducement of extreme weight gain or abnormal weight loss endangering the victim’s health, remote inducement of blindness, cataracts or eye cancer, remote control of gangstalking or gangstalkers, gangstalking, commission of the following crimes in conjunction with the use of new physics torture weapons: harassment, breaking and entering of private property, ransacking of private property.
(c) “assassination” means the intentional use of new physics torture weapons to cause the death of a person by means including but not limited to heart attack; strangulation; suffocation; fast-acting cancer; diabetes; myocardial infarction; hemorrhage in brain; thrombosis in lungs; infectious disease.
CHAPTER II
Weapons systems operating on new physics principles used to torture or inflict other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment
Article 3
Use prohibition
1. Any use of a new energy torture weapon to torture or inflict other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment on any individual in the European Union or on any European Union citizen shall be prohibited, irrespective of the geographical location of such weapon, inside or outside of the European Union.
Article 4
Export prohibition
1. Any export of a new energy torture weapon shall be prohibited, irrespective of the origin of such weapon.
2. The supply of technical assistance related to a new energy torture weapon, whether for consideration or not, from the customs territory of the Community, to any person, entity or body in a third country shall be prohibited.
Article 5
Import prohibition
1. Any import of a new energy torture weapon shall be prohibited, irrespective of the origin of such weapon.
2. The acceptance by a person, entity or body in the customs territory of the Community of technical assistance related to a new energy torture weapon, supplied from a third country, whether for consideration or not, by any person, entity or body shall be prohibited.
Article 6
Absolute prohibition
1. High frequency active aural high altitude ultra low frequency weapon – The manufacture, deployment, or operation of any new physics torture weapon known as a high frequency active aural high altitude ultra low frequency weapon that uses high frequency (HF) electromagnetic or scalar wave transmission to excite the ionosphere or any other part of the Earth’s atmosphere over the territory of the Community in order to torture or inflict other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment on any individual, weather modification in the European Union or on any European Union citizen, irrespective of the geographical location of the ground component of such weapon, inside or outside of the Community shall be absolutely prohibited. The combination of those weapons from different locations is also forbidden.
2. Chemtrail aerosol weapon – The manufacture, deployment, operation, or dispersal of any new physics torture weapon known as a chemtrail aerosol weapon in or over any part of the Earth’s atmosphere over the territory of the Community in order to torture or inflict other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment on any individual in the European Union or on any European Union citizen shall be absolutely prohibited.
CHAPTER III
General and final provisions
Article 6
National Security
In any case where an individual, organisation or Member State charged with violation of this Regulation shall plead national security or other reasons for secrecy as a legal defense to its actions, that individual, organisation or Member State shall be required to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that its actions were in fact directly related to national security or other reasons for secrecy and not to an intention or negligence to torture or inflict other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment.
Article 7
Penalties and Compensation for Victims –
1. Member States shall lay down rules on penalties applicable to infringements of this Regulation imposing a minimum criminal penalty of twenty (20) years without possibility of parole to a maximum of life in prison without possibility of parole plus a fine of 1,000,000 Euros for each individual infringement and shall take all measures necessary to ensure that they are implemented. The penalties provided for must be effective, proportionate and dissuasive.
2. Compensation for Victims – Member States shall lay down rules on compensation to victims of any infringement of this Regulation which shall include:
(a) the costs of any surgery and physical or psychological therapy to fully restore the physical and mental health of the victim;
(b) financial compensation to the victim’s family for pain and suffering endured as a result of any infringement of this Regulation;
(c) financial compensation to the victim for loss of income and loss of property due to any infringement of this Regulation.
Member States shall take all measures necessary to ensure that such rules are implemented. The compensation provided for must be effective, proportionate and fair to the victim and the victim’s family. Wherever possible, the individual or organisation committing the infringement shall be held financially responsible for paying compensation, except that the victims and their families shall be entitled to compensation hereunder regardless of the ability of the individual or organisation committing the infringement to pay.
3. Member States shall notify the Commission of those rules by _____________201_ and shall notify it without delay of any subsequent amendment affecting them.
Article 8
Territorial scope
1. This Regulation shall apply to the customs territory of the Community.
Article 9
Entry into force
This Regulation shall enter into force on ____________ 201_.
This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at _____________________, ______________ 201_
For the Council
The President
NOTE:
“There are three basic types of EU legislation:
regulations, directives and decisions.
“A regulation is similar to a national law
with the difference that it is applicable in all EU countries.”
European Commission ec.europa.eu
“The European Commission differs from the other institutions in that it alone has legislative initiative in the EU. Only the Commission can make formal proposals for legislation: they cannot originate in the legislative branches. However, the Council and Parliament may request the Commission to draft legislation, though the Commission does have the power to refuse to do so. Under the Lisbon Treaty, EU citizens are also able to request the Commission to legislate in an area via a petition carrying one million signatures, but this is not binding.”
This Model Statute can be adapted of adoption and implementation in any international, regional, national, provincial, state, county, municipal, and/or local jurisdiction.
LEGISLATIVE HISTORY OF MODEL STATUTE
BUNDLE - Annex I
Legislative History 2011-15
1. EU Parliament - Model Statute
European Commission Regulation banning weapons systems on new physics principles
Download EC.REGULATION.HUMAN.RIGHTS
2. Letter from Chairman of Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs dated Oct. 18, 2013 - LIBE Committee
Scheduling of LIBE Hearings on EC Commission Regulation banning weapons systems on new physics principles
Download Answer-received-LIBE-on-EUCACH_REQUEST_FOR_HEARING
3. EUCACH.ORG Letter to LIBE Committee scheduling 2014 Hearings on EC Commission Regulation, dated Dec. 22, 2013
Download LIBE_answer_Mr_J_F_Lopez_Aguilar_101213-EN
BUNDLE Annex II
Legislative History 2015 - United States of America
Download Resolution 51-15 Richmond CA May 19 2015
City Council of Richmond, CA, United States of America
MEDIA & SUPPORTIVE DOCUMENTS:
Download ZPi | Richmond Against Mind Control
Download People fearing space weapons target one California town - CBS News
Download ZPi | Richmond Against Mind Control
BUNDLE Annex III
2001: Bill to ban neurotech mind control weapons
HR 2977 The Space & Preservation Act of 2001,
Download HR2977 Space Preservation Act Oct. 2 2001 BILLS-107hr2977ih
House of Representatives, US. Congress, Washington, DC
2001: U.S. BANNING OF NEUROTECH MINDCONTROL WEAPONS
HR 2977 THE SPACE & PRESERVATION ACT
OF 2001
Open admission of several theoretical weapon systems.
Complete HR-2977 (PDF)
http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/BILLS-107hr2977ih/pdf/BILLS-107hr2977ih.pdf
By Antony Pudney
This Act from the US Government contains open admissions of the existence of several weapon systems that have, in the mainstream media, been a subject only to be contemplated talking about when discriminating and discrediting so-called ‘conspiracy theorists’.
The people who have the courage to bring to public light the existence of such technologies, who have turned out to be right.
This Act contains admissions of the existence or the theoretical existence of; electronic, psychotronic, or information weapons; chemtrails; high altitude ultra low frequency weapons systems; plasma, electromagnetic, sonic, or ultrasonic weapons; laser weapons systems; strategic, theater, tactical, or extra terrestrial weapons; and chemical, biological, environmental, climate, or tectonic weapons.
The terms ‘‘weapon’’ and ‘‘weapons system’’ mean a device capable of any of the following:
Damaging or destroying an object (whether in outer space, in the atmosphere, or on earth) by firing one or more projectiles to collide with that object; detonating one or more explosive devices in close proximity to that object; directing a source of energy (including molecular or atomic energy, subatomic particle beams, electromagnetic radiation, plasma, or extremely low frequency (ELF) or ultra low frequency (ULF) energy radiation) against that object; or any other unacknowledged or as yet undeveloped means.
Inflicting death or injury on, or damaging or destroying, a person (or the biological life, bodily health, mental health, or physical and economic well-being of a person) through the use of any of the means described.
The term ‘‘exotic weapons systems’’ includes weapons designed to damage space or natural ecosystems (such as the ionosphere and upper atmosphere) or climate, weather, and tectonic systems with the purpose of inducing damage or destruction upon a target population or region on earth or in space.
Please continue reading the original Space Preservation Act if you wish to get a good oversight of anti-human technology that normally is denied, but as we can see must be legislated against.
Are you interested in being a Contact for the Model Statute in your Area of planet Earth? [Interested individuals and organizations can add their names as contacts for the MODEL STATUE by emailing their name, contact email & website affiliation to [email protected]
Thank you.
CONTACT:
www.Investigation.World
www.peaceinspace.org
Contact email: [email protected]
Web portals for the ecology and for revelations about environmental and frequencies war on the environment such as HAARP-chemtrails, Fukushima global nuclear false flag, DEW directed-energy, scalar, plasma, and DU depleted uranium weapons.
CONTACT: Alfred Lambremont Webre, JD, MEd
I think I have a implant in me. Maybe a nano mesh. I have been tortured for several years. Lost almost everything. This took place in a hospital called Holly Hill in Raleigh NC. I don't know who all I can contact to find out if I have implants or a nano mesh over brain. I felt like I was shot with a large needle in the back of the head when this happen. Please help or direct me to someone who can find out what is in me. Thanks so much.
Posted by: Selena McKinney | 04/21/2023 at 09:23 AM