"In addition to commercializing the Exopolitics Institute, Salla and Whitecliffe are involved in occult activity on the lunatic fringe of UFO contacteeism. Here, beaming broadly, they participate in an 'initiation ceremony' in Zacatecas, Mexico led by self-described shaman and contactee, Don Hector, with others clad in white."
The Exopolitics researcher whose ground-breaking book Exopolitics: A Decade of Contact founded the field of Exopolitics – the study of relations among intelligent civilizations in the multi-verse – was blocked today from exposing the flawed ET-related research and gate keeping of Michael Salla.
Alfred Lambremont Webre, JD, MEd was unilaterally and without notice blocked by Michael Salla from posting onto the e-list of the Exopolitics Institute, of which he was a member. He and Mr. Salla had exchanged several posts during which Mr. Webre (1) challenged Mr. Salla’s two-year unreasonable refusal to debate the existence of life on Mars based on the NASA Mars photographs; and (2) highlighted his disservice to the science of Exopolitics with his “Source A” research in which Mr. Salla gave extended public credence to a series of hoaxed secret meetings at the United Nations on ET disclosure.
Legal Notice to Michael Salla and Angelika Whitecliff
In a January 25, 2011 legal notice to Michael Salla and his spouse Angelika Whitecliff, Mr. Webre wrote:
“Michael Salla and Angelika Whitecliff - I am writing to you as the beneficial owners of the "Exopolitics Institute."
“My position is that this originally intended community-controlled Exopolitics organization was, in fact, illegitimately absconded with by you both in a covert "run for the courthouse steps" after enrolling me and others in a false dialogue as to what was to have been a community-controlled non-profit think tank.
“In fact, this organization is de facto a part of Michael Salla's and Angelika Whitecliff's commercial enterprise.
“The illegal and improper blocking of my posting privileges was undertaken by Michael Salla in order to further protect himself from being exposed as to his faulty Exopolitics research, and his intentional gate-keeping on the issue of life on Mars research.
“These actions are to the detriment of the science of Exopolitics that my original research founded in the book Exopolitics: A Decade of Contact written in 1999 and 2000, from which, starting in 2003, Michael Salla stole intellectual property without proper crediting of copyright.
“Please remove my name and my books from any further association with your beneficially owned, de facto commercial enterprise.
“You can rest assured that your attempts to demean the science of Exopolitics will end in ignominious failure, and that a growing group of legitimate, truth-oriented researchers have caught on to your covert actions.”
Signed/Alfred Lambremont Webre, JD, MEd
Attorney at Law
Vancouver, B.C.
Exopolitics.com
Salla’s Actions Against Life On Mars Research
As part of the exchange leading up to Mr. Webre’s legal notice was Mr. Salla’s unexplained refusal to sit on a roundtable with Andrew D. Basiago and Alfred Lambremont Webre in Kona, Hawaii during the week on June, 19-24, 2011, when Mr. Basiago and Mr. Webre would coincidentally be in Kona for a weeklong seminar.
Alfred Lambremont Webre wrote to Michael Salla (on January 24, 2011),
Michael - Hi! That is very unfortunate [that you refuse to participate in a life on Mars roundtable], because we can bring our laptop with a high-quality entertainment level chip in it, the same we used for Televisa and Jaime Maussan and the documentary that was seen by millions of people on the eve of the Exopolitics Week at Colima, Mexico.
I do not understand the below back peddling. This seems like academic game-playing that may have gotten you points at American University but in our field it seems to me is directed at stifling exchange of views and research.
This is not a panel that is part of the Seminar. This would be in a room with the three of us present. You can view the images, cross-examine Andy and myself, and we can do the same with you.
All of this process can be recorded via video and we can publish it for the
public to see.
I think that after two years this is a healthy process to engage in, don't you?
What do you have to lose?
Besides, you are way off base in your misstatements about life on Mars research from the NASA Mars rover images.
Here is my response to each of your arguments:
1. Martian Plesiosaur - Andrew D. Basiago has publicly stated he has been on
Mars twice in 1981, once in the company of Courtney Hunt of the U.S. Central
Intelligence Agency. During the visit to Mars with Hunt, Andy and Hunt were
confronted by a Martian Plesiosaur a short distance from the entrance to the
U.S. underground base on Mars where both had landed via teleporter from El
Segundo, California. Both Andy and Courtney Hunt made a dash for the entrance
to the underground base and reached it safely.
Reference: Red Ice Radio:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uaQN4r78cdE
2. Richard Hoagland as NASA Mars rover image expert - Richard Hoagland has never analyzed the NASA Mars rover generation of images, and has no expertise with regard to NASA Mars rover evidence of life on Mars. In fact, Hoagland has pointedly chosen to forego analysis of the Mars rover photographs of life on Mars.
Reference:
http://www.examiner.com/exopolitics-in-seattle/new-data-law-of-evidence-support-\
view-of-mars-having-indigenous-intelligent-extraterrestrial-life?render=print
3. Tom van Flandern (1940-2009) - Tom van Flandern's image analysis was of
Cydonia and the face on Mars using the Viking generation of satellite images.
His conclusions supported Hoagland's thesis that while there was an ancient
civilization on Mars, there is no present civilization on Mars. Tom van
Flandern wrote:
"We've shown conclusively that at least some of the artifacts on the surface of
Mars were artificially produced, and the evidence indicates they were produced approximately 3.2 million years ago, which is when Planet V exploded. Mars was a moon of Planet V, and we speculate that the Builders created the artificial structures as theme parks and advertisements to catch the attention of space tourists from Planet V (much as we may do on our own Moon some day, when lunar tourism becomes prevalent), or perhaps they are museums of some kind. Remember that the Face at Cydonia was located on the original equator of Mars. The Builder's civilization ended 3.2 million years ago. The evidence suggests that the explosion was anticipated, so the Builders may have departed their world, and it produced a massive flood, because Planet V was a water world. It is a coincidence that the face on Mars is hominid, like ours, and the earliest fossil record on Earth of hominids is the "Lucy" fossil from 3.2 million years ago."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tom_Van_Flandern
Tom van Fandern did not engage in image analysis of NASA Mars rover photographs and he had no hypotheses about or expertise in the analyses of the Mars rover generation of images of life on Mars.
3. Standing of Andrew D. Basiago as Mars rover image analyst - Andrew D. Basiago has examined the raw data from the NASA Mars rover photos and has identified images of indigenous Martian humanoids, animals, statues and structures in these. Moreover, he has been to Mars twice and has personally experienced a number of these species, structures, and statues while on Mars. Andrew has assembled a group of active Mars rover life on Mars researchers. That you have never heard of eminent researchers like Andrew R. Stec (who was invited as an honored guest to the 2009 X-Conference in Washington, D.C.) or Lewis Michael Rhinehart bespeaks of the state of your knowledge of the field of life on Mars research.
Ref:
That
http://www.projectmars.net/docs/research_papers/2008-12-12_MARS_Andrew_D_Basiago\
_The_Discovery_of_Life_on_Mars.pdf
http://www.projectmars.net/docs/research_papers/2009-09-18_MARS_Clif_High_identi\
fies_Andy_as_Planetary_Whistleblower_predicted_by_ALTA.pdf
I do not understand your reluctance to sit in a room across from each other with the actual images on a state-of-the-art screen and let the world judge the state of expertise of each of the participants.
After all, it is rather serendipitous that we are in Kona.
In Light, Alfred ;-)
Salla Cuts Off Debate That Would Expose His Hoaxed Research About ET UN Meetings
The specific post of Mr. Webre’s that led Michael Salla to illegitimately suspend him raised issues of Michael Salla’s extensive public research on a supposed secret series of extraterrestrial briefings at the United Nations that were eventually shown, more probably than not, to be hoaxes, to the great embarrassment of Exopolitics.
In order to stem any public discussion of the Source A research debacle and his role in perpetuating public hoax, Michael Salla quickly and unilaterally cut off all posting privileges and further debate, resulting in Mr. Webre's legal notice.
Alfred Lambremont Webre wrote at 12:34 pm PST on January 25, 2011,
Hi, All - I happened just now to be researching the issues of ET disclosure, specifically the issue of disclosure as a Zero Sum Game.
Serendipitously, I came across the following article by Capt. Robert Salas, who as many of you know like myself was a Disclosure Project witness.
The title of the article, which received wide circulation at the time and is still widely quoted, is:
"Exopolitics, By Its Current Methods, is Doing More Harm Than Good . . ."
The full text of the article is instructive.
"Tuesday, August 04, 2009
"Robert Salas: "Exopolitics, By Its Current Methods, is Doing More Harm Than Good . . ."
Exopolitics
"By Robert L. Salas
8-2-09
Robert Salas
Dr. Salla seems to be saying that we should take in and analyze all input from every source in order to fully understand both the scientific and social aspects of the phenomenon. First, I don’t know how that is possible and I don’t understand what he means by `flexible social scientific techniques.' Does he mean accepting questionable witness testimony or documentation and using it to conjecture about a possible event? That seems to be what he has done with his Exopolitics Journal article (July 1, 2009) - Kennedy's Deadly Confrontation with the CIA & MJ-12.
"In this `research article' he links Kennedy's death with his fight with the CIA over UFO information. I do not claim that this is false or true but I reject the approach to drawing such a conclusion or implying such a conclusion through these `flexible social scientific techniques.' This is the kind of output from Exopolitics that I find objectionable because it creates fodder for those who would denigrate the UFO phenomenon.
"I admit I had to look up the word existential in order to try and understand what he meant by his accusation of ‘existential hysteria.’ The American Heritage Dictionary (1982 edition) defines existentialism as: "A philosophy that emphasizes the uniqueness and isolation of the individual experience in a hostile or indifferent universe, regards human existence as unexplainable, and stresses freedom of choice and responsibility for the consequences of one's acts." While I would not necessarily associate myself with the first part of this definition, I do accept the concept that we have freedom of choice and are responsible for the consequences of our acts. I am normally not hysterical about that but I suppose I could be driven to hysteria under the right circumstances.
"Michael Salla
"When I wrote my recent article criticizing Exopolitics I did not do it in a moment of poor judgment. Soon after the 2007 Exopolitics Conference, I contacted Dr. Salla by phone and in writing to express my disappointment with the Exopolitics movement and to emphasize that I no longer wanted to be associated with his group. I essentially gave him the same reasons then as I have done here.
"In those two years, I have not changed my opinion that Exopolitics, by its current methods is doing more harm than good in the effort toward disclosure. I thought about it a long time before deciding that a public critique of Exopolitics was in order.
"I am certainly not insisting on `strict scientific filtering mechanisms for witnesses and sources.' No one has any control over what people will say or what they will present as evidence. What I do ask is that each of us be responsible for what we present as fact, fiction or other when we make public statements about the phenomenon.
"In taking personal responsibility for improving the viability of the study of this phenomenon, we are all `UFOlogical gatekeepers.'
"Nowhere in my dictionary did I find a definition for Exopolitics. I did find a definition for Exobiology. It states, "1. A branch of biology that deals with the search for and study of extraterrestrial living organisms." Dr. Salla; unless you have access to an ET life form, what gives you the credentials to elaborate on the political implications of dealing with such life forms? Certainly, as many have done before you, you can speculate about what political implications disclosure would have on the world.
"If you are talking about human politics surrounding the phenomenon, then you are dealing with assumptions and speculations. Is that what you mean by a nuanced approach to the truth of ETH? Walk into any bar in the world and you will hear that kind of `nuanced approach' to the truth."
Source:
http://www.theufochronicles.com/2009/08/robert-salas-exopolitics-by-its-current.html
I had not noticed it when the article first came out. The sole researcher whom Capt. Robert Salas criticizes is Dr. Michael Salla.
There is no mention by Dr. Robert Salas of Alfred Lambremont Webre JD MEd and his research doing more harm than good.
In my travels around the world and on the Internet - outside of the EI - many people also criticize Dr. Salla's research to me for one reason or another, some valid and some not valid.
Likewise, a great embarrassment happened to the Exopolitics community in the judgment of many in the UFO community, the Truth movement, and the Exopolitics research community outside the EI through the matter of the so-called "Source A" and the secret meetings that were to have occurred at the United Nations that Dr. Michael Salla pursued over many months.
That Source A research by Michael Salla on the hoaxed UN ET meetings was widely and publicly discredited in many sources, including the following:
http://www.realityuncovered.net/blog/2010/05/ufology-exopolitics-special-source-a-exposed/
http://www.realityuncovered.net/blog/2010/05/ufology-and-expolitics-special-%E2%80%93-source-a-update/
As a result of the Source A debacle, Exopolitics was publicly disgraced in many quarters and the name Michael Salla became a common term around the Internet for being duped in research.
My question is this - Why has not the name Michael Salla been brought up here, as mine was over the last 48 hours, and put into question as to his putative disservice to the "good name of Exopolitics"?
Alfred
Salla Acts to Cut Off Exopolitical Cooperation
Just prior to Michael Salla’s illegitimate blocking of Mr. Webre, Mr. Webre and another member of the Exopolitics World Network in Exopolitics Germany had reached a cooperative agreement on international exopolitical activism.
Alfred Lambremont Webre had written on January 25, 2011 to a member of Exopolitics Germany,
Re: Exopolitical activism and Exopolitics as a science
Dear Robert - Hi! This is excellent news. I look forward to this and I will be
covering your activities in Examiner.com and other venues including
ExopoliticsTV.
I also want to thank you Robert for engaging in a collaborative, constructive
dialogue with me that ended in a very practical solution in which each party in
in our community has a positive and "winning" role.
I am really happy that we now have a solution, and would encourage other
national Exopolitics organizations to do the same.
I am on the Board of Exopolitics Mexico and of Exopolitics Argentina and will be
meeting with our people in each country to draw up our exopolitical activist
agendas, memos and publishing these in Spanish and English.
I believe our dialogue and its proactive solution demonstrates that the dialogue
we have been having on this list for the past several days, tho beyond the
comfort zone of all of us including myself, is yielding good results.
Alfred
EXOPOLITICS GERMANY
--- In [email protected], "Koordinator \(Exopolitik.org\)"
<koordinator@...> wrote:
>
> Dear Alfred et al,
> I welcome your proposal that each international Exopolitics initiative
> develops and translates into English a position paper outlining its
> arguments and goals. It would be helpful to reach a consensus and a common
> strategy. We have a briefing document we give to journalists and
> politicians, and I'll translate it and make it available to this list.
>
>
> Best,
>
> Robert
>
ALFRED LAMBREMONT WEBRE
>
> Von: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] Im Auftrag von Alfred
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 25. Januar 2011 00:18
> An: [email protected]
> Betreff: [exopolitics_institute] Re: Exopolitical activism and Exopolitics
> as a science
>
> Dear Robert - Hi! That is a good proposition and a valid exercise.
>
> I submit one does not start the exercise of distinguishing between
> exopolitical activism and Exopolitics as a science by banning the written
> works of Exopolitical writers.
>
> That is the beginning of the road to collective failure and tyranny.
>
> Which is in turn, very bad political activism.
>
> 1. Exopolitics as political activism - One suggestion would be for persons
> who are interested in exopolitical activism to define their goals, develop
> their literature and talking points, and circulate it widely in the
> Exopolitical community.
>
> One model in this regard is what Jeff Peckman did in the 2010 Denver ET
> Vote.
>
> That way, those of us who are Exopolitical journalists have material we can
> work with in developing articles and stories.
>
> The following are the many Examiner.com articles I developed with Jeff
> Peckman on the 2010 ET Vote, all of which are responsible journalism
> (contrary to the meme that is propagating on this elist):
>
> http://www.examiner.com/search/google?query=alfred+webre+%2B+2010+Denver+ET+
> vote+peckman
> <http://www.examiner.com/search/google?query=alfred+webre+%2B+2010+Denver+ET
> +vote+peckman&cx=partner-pub-7479725245717969:9ze01gmnpyp&cof=FORID:9&ie=ISO
> -8859-1&sa=Search>
> &cx=partner-pub-7479725245717969:9ze01gmnpyp&cof=FORID:9&ie=ISO-8859-1&sa=Se
> arch
>
> Thus if Exopolitics Germany has political objectives for 2011-12, then you
> can develop position papers and talking points and circulate them among the
> Exopolitical media (English translation would be very helpful).
>
> That way, Exopolitical journalists such as myself and others can develop
> articles and perspectives and interviews on what your are doing.
>
> This same methodology can apply at the collective level, in Europe, Asia,
> Latin America, etc.
>
> PRG, for example, is very effective in developing talking points and
> position papers around its exopolitical activist programs, that facilitate
> the job of persons like me in the Exopolitical media.
>
> 2. Exopolitics as a science - Exopolitics as a science is, in a way,
> developing in parallel with exopolitical activism, through scholarly papers,
> courses, institutes all over the world that are being published continually.
>
> As is the case in conventional politics vs. political science or
> anthropology, Exopolitics as a science may address subject matter from the
> Exopolitics paradigm that one would not normally bring up in, say a
> Memorandum to the EU parliament or to the UN, or to the US congress.
>
> And the principle of Academic Freedom and Freedom of expression is
> particularly important in Exopolitics as a science, precisely because of the
> fact that the Exopolitical phenomena has a degree of High Strangeness and
> has been subject to state secrecy and suppression for so many decades.
>
> In my own case, I am involved in Exopolitics as a science in a number of
> ways.
>
> At the request of a University, I have developed a curriculum plan for a
> course in the Philosophy of Exopolitics, based on cosmology and ontology.
>
> I am engaged in developing ExoUniversity, an online educational facility in
> Exopolitics, PsiSciences, and ExoSciences
>
> I have a new book with original Exopolitical research appearing in 2010
> entitled DIMENSIONS: THE DIMENSIONAL ECOLOGY OF THE MULTI-VERSE
>
> My Examiner.com articles are another medium by which I can communicate
> Exopolitics paradigm issues to a wider audience.
>
> The above is a practical outline I believe of how our growing, global
> community of exopolitically active and interested activists, researchers,
> authors, etc., can work together harmoniously.
>
> I would ask for your creative and positive suggestions and feedback on the
> above.
>
> In Light, Alfred
EXOPOLITICS GERMANY
>
> --- In [email protected]
> <mailto:exopolitics_institute%40yahoogroups.com> , "Koordinator
> \(Exopolitik.org\)" <koordinator@> wrote:
> >
> > Dear Alfred,
> > we need to make a difference between exopolitical activism and Exopolitics
> > as a science / research field.
Origins of Exopolitics
Mr. Webre and Mr. Salla have had a continual dialogue as to the origins of Exopolitics, the science of relations among intelligent civilizations.
One published dialogue can be found here:
http://exopolitics.blogs.com/exopolitics/2006/05/origin_of_exopo_1.html
In fact, Michael Salla, as a contract faculty at American University on January 20, 2003 published a 10,000-word research paper entitled “The Need for Exopolitics: Implications of Extraterrestrial Conspiracy Theories for Policy Makers & Global Peace.”
In that paper, Mr. Salla misleadingly sought to position himself as the originator of the science of Exopolitics.
The methodology that Mr. Salla used in so misleadingly promoting himself as the originator of Exopolitics was to improperly cite and acknowledge the proprietary intellectual and copyrighted property of Alfred Lambremont Webre, JD, Med who had in the year 2000 published a full explication of the science of Exopolitics in Exopolitics: A Decade of Contact.
As a seasoned academician, Mr. Salla should have known that Alfred Lambremont Webre’s 2000 copyrighted work and intellectual property required him to fully acknowledge the source of his ideas in the body of his 10,000-word paper.
Instead, Mr. Salla, as is his covert style, illegally and unethically appropriated the ideas and concepts of Exopolitics without acknowledgment by placing these in exculpatory, de minimis footnotes, among other works that are not Exopolitics, to wit:
[81]. Steven M. Greer, Extraterrestrial Contact : The Evidence and Implications (Crossing Point Publications, 1999). Richard Boylan, Labored Journey To The Stars: An anthology on human responses, governmental, civilian and Native, to extraterrestrial visitation, Rev., 2002. Alfred Lambremont Webre, Exopolitics: A Decade of Contact (Universe Books, 1999). His book is available online at http://www.universebooks.com/
and
[93] Alfred Lambremont Webre, JD, Med, Exopolitics: A Decade of Contact (2000) an eBook published online at http://www.universebooks.com/exoone.html [URL no longer available].
Mr. Webre reiterated this January 20, 2003 unlawful and unethical violation of his copyright and appropriation of his intellectual property in his legal notice to Michael Salla and Angelika Whitecliff.
Salla’s Gate-Keeping Of Exopolitics: Cui Bono?
An open question that is being asked by a growing number of researchers in the Mars anomaly research field, as well as in the UFO and Exopolitics field is:
To whose benefit is the gate keeping in Exopolitics that Michael Salla is carrying out?
Michael Salla’s Exopolitics Institute, while on paper a research institute, is in fact a “mom and pop” commercial operation run from behind the scenes by Angelika Whitecliff and Michael Salla as an adjunct to their commercial Eco-Tourism and Conference businesses.
No discussions contrary to the Salla-Whitecliff commercial interests are allowed. Commentary on the Exopolitics Institute e-list slavishly follows Mr. Salla’s whim.
The network of Exopolitical organizations that the Salla-Whitecliff organization claims it runs is in fact the Exopolitics World Network, coordinated by Steve Bassett.
The More Unsavory Cui Bono?
Exopolitics.com will be following up with further investigative reports on Michael Salla and his gate keeping role in Exopolitics, including his suppression of NASA Mars rover life on Mars research.
Dear SE James - Hi! I can appreciate what you are saying about interdimensional extraterrestrial contact. That is at the core of an understanding of Exopolitics.
Posted by: UFo | 31 October 2011 at 22:30
Ginger - Hi! MIchael Salla and I had dinner along with Laura in Kona during the conference and a lot has been healed. It is very good that the Exopolitics Institute and the Mars Anomaly Research Society went their separate ways, and that Exopolitics.com is separate from the Exopolitics Institute, as we have our different perspectives. Vive la difference ;-)
Aloha and Mahalo
In Light, Alfred ;-)
Posted by: Alfred Lambremont Webre | 10 July 2011 at 11:29
Hi Alfred - am sadden to have just learned of this very weird undermining of yours & Andrew's work. While Andrew was here (in Kona) he had hinted at something negative going on against his & your work by some others (Salla & Greer), he never once spoke badly of them . . . only seemed completely baffled by their behavior. So I had no idea of the degree of their destructive intent.
Never mind. As the splitting of time lines, based upon each of our intents has begun, each of us will find exactly what we have asked for and faster than ever imagined. And so I see Andrew, Laura & you moving beyond all this old 3D lunacy in a heartbeat.
Many blessings of light & peace in Aloha,
Ginger
Posted by: Ginger Vogler | 10 July 2011 at 02:24
I think Salla to be mind controlled or a Masonic agent because of his radical behaviour and being the greatest debunker in the history of UFOs and E.T. issues. How Salla can know about a Scalar Energy Device (incl. Company) correlation to Webre?
Posted by: E.M.V. | 06 February 2011 at 06:13
Giving one measure of energy to bickering of any kind is counter-productive. If Webre is mind controlled or Salla is a masonic agent...who cares, it is all part of the play, part of this matrix, that I will remind you, we-are-all trapped in together. I hope everyone here will give their full attention to love. It is the only doorway that will produce sane results. The following is an interesting "catch?" that I made not too long ago. This is small glimpse of the actual enemy of mankind as a whole...it is a glimpse of the serpent. Showing you this is not meant in any way to besmirch Dr. Webre. In fact this is to point out that it is not hu-man against hu-man you should give your energy to.
There once was an individual who was given a ticket to ride. It did the complete prime-time talk show circuit including David Letterman, whilst peddling his "alien video". Now there had literally been thousands of people, some with even more convincing proof of alien life, trying to get this sort of recognition for DECADES before this individual suddenly popped onto the seen with his seemingly open invitation not only to mainstream media but the UFO Conference circuit as well.
You take a close look at this and you better come to grips with the fact...We have never been alone. Project Blue Beam has already begun and you folks are arguing amongst yourselves at the true enemies delight.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qcMifKyQHVk
Make of this what you will and keep in mind, this is the time when all mankind is deceived by the serpent. So much so you can not even believe it exists.
Peace be with you all,
John
Posted by: John Mitchell | 05 February 2011 at 10:24
Everyone have a piece of the puzzle.
Some more pieces or more efficient than others.
No need to judge others because no one have the big picture, for sure.
We need the contribution of everyone without internal wars...
Every pieces is good to consider, except if these ones are no parts of the big picture itself.
But when the F**K they'll land to show them up without ambiguity to the world.
They don't facilitate us the stuff...
Jesus !
Posted by: Stéphan | 31 January 2011 at 12:31
As someone who has no use for the disinformation that is "exopolitics" in its entirety (there are no "extraterrestrials among us" and no "contactees" with one exception) I will only add that Michael Salla and Paola Harris are also the shamelessly unrepentant promoters of the criminal and charlatan "Alex Collier" (see: http://www.theyfly.com/newsflash5/THE%20_ALEX_COLLIER_%20HOAX.htm).
I can also state, unequivocally, that the work of people like Stephen Bassett is complete disinformation. Unfortunately this type of escapism and nonsense, based on not a shred of real proof, is playing into the hands of those who are manipulating people with fake ET UFO sightings, fake "contacts", etc.
I challenged Bassett in person two nights ago to answer a couple of questions. He couldn't and wouldn't. I emailed an invite to debate me. He ran away. I suggest that anyone seriously interested in what's REAL look elsewhere.
Michael Horn
www.theyflyblog.com
Posted by: Michael Horn | 30 January 2011 at 12:36
Are we heading towards a positive or negative line towards the future? A question still open for debate but we can’t deny the facts about Mars. I came to the conclusion Mars to be inhabited under and above the surface. Mars was in first place portrayed as a red planet till pictures where leaked and this was also the case for the Moon. The government doing Mars disclosure is going to be difficult. Why? If the inhabitants are a hybrid race (Earthlings/E.T.) and Earth to be an observer alongside with an ET race under the surface to make sure their expensive project to be protected?
Posted by: Racoon | 29 January 2011 at 05:42
Dear Alfred,
I am so sorry this is happening to you and Andrew. I am sorely disappointed in Michael Salla's comments and his hurtful remarks made of both of you, your hard work and your dedicated research. This is definitely no way for a so called professional with a PhD status to behave. There is an old saying, when someone points a finger at you, there are still 3 fingers pointing at themself. This is clearly form of his own projection of his own shadow. I pray that God and the truth will prevail, and that this debacle will settle sooner than later for the good of all concerned. In my books, Alfred, you are the pioneer of this field, and I pray the field of Exopolitics will continue to grow throughout the world and in consciousness as we learn more about what and who we are all dealing with.
May the light and force of the Creator God shine on you towards resolution, in Peace & Justice.
Posted by: Roxanne | 28 January 2011 at 20:03
PB - If you are another of those disinformers who are propagating the meme that my reporting on life on Mars research is by definition "poor research" then you are working for the other side and against science and disclosure. THat is what I suspect you are doing as all you do is repeat the same memes that the NASA disinformers do, or even the PR director of the Hubble Telescope did in a major attack piece against my reporting in Discover magazine.
Posted by: Alfred Lambremont Webre | 28 January 2011 at 14:38
UPDATE:
Hi All - With all this hypothetical chatter about my character and my mental state I should weigh in with a comment on my own.
1. Mind Control - You may want to attend the Free Your Mind Conference in Philadelphia, PA. April 9-10, 2011.
http://freeyourmindconference.com/
FREE YOUR MIND is a unique two-day conference scheduled for April 9th & 10th, 2011 in Philadelphia, PA, featuring multiple speakers and diverse educational materials, for the purpose of raising public awareness of the critically important topics of:
* mass mind-control techniques
* covert (occult) and subversive influences upon consciousness and behavior
* trauma-based and ritualized abuse
* practical mental and emotional healing methodologies available for those affected by these devices
Featured Speakers are:
* Aaron McCollum
* Alfred Webre
* Andrew Basiago
* Bob Tuskin
* Farah Yurdozu
* Freeman Fly
* Jan Irvin
* John Nicholson
* Joseph Marra
* Larken Rose
* Laura Eisenhower
* Mark Matika
* Mark Passio
* Michael Kelly
* Paul Marko
* Suzanne Taylor
Perhaps you may learn something about mind control by attending and learn why neither myself nor Andrew D. Basiago are "mind control victims", as Michael Salla alleges.
Both Andrew D. Basiago and myself prefer the ethics of open information and debate, as in the above conference, to the tactics of refusing to debate and cutting of legitimate challenges to his Exopolitics research.
That is why we invited Salla to debate us in a round-table format in Kona Hawaii during June 19-24, 2011, an invitation Salla fled from. Salla cannot confront the truth, nor can he defend his own plagiarised or false research findings in Exopolitics.
2. Exopolitics & Michael Salla
After all, the most scurrilous scandal in Exopolitics research has come from Salla's promoting the hoaxed Source A secret UN ET meetings
That Source A research by Michael Salla on the hoaxed UN ET meetings was widely and publicly discredited in many sources, including the following:
http://www.realityuncovered.net/blog/2010/05/ufology-exopolitics-special-source-a-exposed/
http://www.realityuncovered.net/blog/2010/05/ufology-and-expolitics-special-%E2%80%93-source-a-update/
As a result of the Source A debacle, Exopolitics was publicly disgraced in many quarters and the name Michael Salla became a common term around the Internet for being duped in research.
Michael Salla plagiarized my intellectual property in Exopolitics
Certainly Michael Salla has made legally actionable and defamatory statements about two professionals - Alfred Lambremont Webre and Andrew D. Basiago - in his statement.
My own analysis of his statement is that he has used the rhetorical devise of displacement to turn attention away from the fact that he
unlawfully and unethically plaigarized my intellectual property in 2003 and violated copyright of my book Exopolitics: A Decade of Contact, published in June 2000.
In his wikipedia statement, Salla states:
"Exopolitics: The concept of Exopolitics was formulated by Michael Salla."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Salla
The above is a fraudulent statement, based on plagiarism and violation of copyright of my 2000 book Exopolitics: A Decade of Contact, on which he based his January 20, 2003 paper - his first and original foray into Exopolitics.
Between 2000 and January 20, 2003, Exopolitics became widely known because of my efforts I had talked about Exopolitics at numerous public conferences including the Exopolitics Conference at the University of Wyoming in June 2000, the U.S. Presidential UFO Forum in Santa Clara California in 2000, in 2000 on Coast to Coast in a Special Exopolitics program with Steve Bassett, Daniel Sheehan, and myself, in the 2001 Disclosure Project, where I was a Disclosure Project witness, in UFO and Exopolitics conferences during 2002.
Salla and I have had a continual dialogue as to the origins of Exopolitics, the science of relations among intelligent civilizations.
One published dialogue can be found here:
http://exopolitics.blogs.com/exopolitics/2006/05/origin_of_exopo_1.html
In fact, Michael Salla, as a contract faculty at American University on January 20, 2003 published a 10,000-word research paper entitled “The Need for Exopolitics: Implications of Extraterrestrial Conspiracy Theories for Policy Makers & Global Peace.”
In that paper, Mr. Salla misleadingly sought to position himself as the originator of the science of Exopolitics.
The methodology that Mr. Salla used in so misleadingly promoting himself as the originator of Exopolitics was to improperly cite and acknowledge the proprietary intellectual and copyrighted property of Alfred Lambremont Webre, JD, Med who had in the year 2000 published a full explication of the science of Exopolitics in Exopolitics: A Decade of Contact.
As a seasoned academician, Mr. Salla should have known that Alfred Lambremont Webre’s 2000 copyrighted work and intellectual property required him to fully acknowledge the source of his ideas in the body of his 10,000-word paper.
Instead, Mr. Salla, as is his covert style, illegally and unethically appropriated the ideas and concepts of Exopolitics without acknowledgment by placing these in exculpatory, de minimis footnotes, among other works that are not Exopolitics, to wit:
[81]. Steven M. Greer, Extraterrestrial Contact : The Evidence and Implications (Crossing Point Publications, 1999). Richard Boylan, Labored Journey To The Stars: An anthology on human responses, governmental, civilian and Native, to extraterrestrial visitation, Rev., 2002. Alfred Lambremont Webre, Exopolitics: A Decade of Contact (Universe Books, 1999). His book is available online at http://www.universebooks.com/
and
[93] Alfred Lambremont Webre, JD, Med, Exopolitics: A Decade of Contact (2000) an eBook published online at http://www.universebooks.com/exoone.html [URL no longer available].
My own assessment is that this will probably be my last post on this list, as Salla cannot tolerate debate.
It was language in this post that led Salla to illegitimately block me from the Exopolitics Institute, because he did not want a discussion of the Source A case.
However, in so doing Salla also illegitimately cut me off from discourse with the fellow Exopolitics groups in Europs and othe parts of the world. In particular I had just finished a very useful agreement with the director of Exopolitics Germany on exopolitical activism.
I am in my own right on the Board of Directors of Exopolitics Mexico and Exopolitics Argentina. So these organizations, whose interests I was representing in the negotiations and communications with Exopolitics Germany were also harmed by Salla's desire to cut off debate around the Source A UN ET hoaxed meetings he publicized.
An Eisenhower family member, Laura Eisenhower, has now spoken up to object to Michael Salla's research on her great-grand father's experiences with ETs, based on Salla's faulty ET research experience.
Michael Salla has undertaken the beginning of the public disintegration of his unethical career in Exopolitics with this unethical act.
Remember, as you read this statement of mine that I will not be able to answer any of your questions or objections.
So please read this and re-read it carefully if you want to be reality-oriented.
In Light,
Alfred Lambremont Webre, JD, MEd
Exopolitics.com
Vancouver, B.C.
Posted by: Alfred Lambremont Webre | 28 January 2011 at 13:58
As a casual observer of many websites and articles I can say I have questioned some of Alfred Webre's articles and "proof." I have even mentioned to him in the comment section of Examiner.com his lack of evidence and jumping to wild conclusions without substantive proof does more harm than good to the people that do not know and/or do not believe in ET's. We all know how sensitive this topic is and I would expect someone with decades of experience to be more mindful of that when writing about it.. YOU WILL DO US ALL A disservice by sloppy and very inconclusive evidence.
Posted by: PB | 28 January 2011 at 12:35
What a shame for exopolitics, such a confrontation.
Hope to have a disclosure soon, it will calm every ones mind...
Posted by: Stéphan | 28 January 2011 at 10:47
Chris - Hi! Thank you for the heads-up about the Scalar Energy Device.
Unfortunately, Michael Salla here is diverting away from his own unethical statements by slandering two professionals - myself and Andrew D. Basiago.
Salla's characterization of my personality is a fabrication of his own, as is the following statement in his wikipedia biography:
"Exopolitics
"The concept of Exopolitics was formulated by Michael Salla."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Salla
As I have demonstrated above, Salla violated my copyright and stole my intellectual property rights from my 2000 book Exopolitics when he authored his Jan. 20, 2003 10,000 page paper claiming he was originating Exopolitics without attribution.
This diversionary tactic is the true reason Michael Salla is trying to portray my character as he does in his slanderous attack piece.
Here is the attack piece Michael Salla put out on me today and is circulating. In it, he demonstrates he cannot even see the Mars Plesiosaur. Salla has no capability for exopolitical, multi-dimensional vision, by his own admission....
http://exopolitics.org/Exo-Comment-98.htm
In Light, Alfred ;-)
Posted by: Alfred Lambremont Webre | 27 January 2011 at 18:32
Michael E. Salla, Ph.D.
"Unfortunately, Webre shows many of the classic symptoms of a mind control victim. Brilliant and deeply insightful at times, but also with an unsteady, unbalanced, narcissistic personality that is easily provoked, and with a huge chip on his shoulders. I understand his anger, after all who wouldn't be if your career was destroyed decades ago by unseen powers that used hidden technological resources to undermine you. My experience with Andy Basiago from the time I first met him in 2006, is that he is also a mind control victim, and is currently tasked to manipulate and handle Webre by cleverly massaging Alfred's fragile personality by claiming that he, Webre, would single handedly lead an exopolitics revolution on planet Earth."
I would suggest that all should research a Scalar Energy Device registered by Magnetic Energy Limited Huntsville, AL
Posted by: Chris Greenland | 27 January 2011 at 18:14
Dear SE James - Hi! I can appreciate what you are saying about interdimensional extraterrestrial contact. That is at the core of an understanding of Exopolitics.
What is portrayed in the photograph, however, is the commercial exploitation of interdimensional contact around a UFO contact cult.
This is not expolitics, which is the science of relations among intelligent civilizations in the multi-verse.
This is a debasement of science and has no part in exopolitics except as the study of a phenomenon that people are engaging in.
My purpose in showing this photo and caption is to illustrate the commercialization of what is meant to be a non-profit scientific enterprise.
My raising objections to this person leading this enterprise led to a specific harm and abuse being done to me.
Alfred
Posted by: Alfred Lambremont Webre | 27 January 2011 at 16:34
Alfred, I absolutely respect the dedication and hard work that you do in the field of Exopolitics along with many other dedicated researchers. But when you start to judge one person's perspective or expression which may be different than yours, that is causing more harm than good. I do not agree with copyright infringement or any other "rules" that are not followed in the highest of intention BUT I take umbridge with your inference of demeaning the occult or Shamansism or the claim that someone could be an ET Contactee. There are many forms of expression. Each potentially valid in it's own right. I was offended by your judgement and inference about the people in the picture many of whom I am sure are dedicated to their soul purpose and spiritual mission. Please do not allow the ego on both your parts start to manipulate you both. It is a distraction pulling you both off course from your soul focus and Spiritual Mission....Please for all our sakes, stay on track on what is important and not let the lower natures of man sneer you in its trap. SE
Posted by: SE James | 27 January 2011 at 15:50
Alfred, I am a long time reader, listener, viewer of exopolitical topics and also the things you and other researchers alike have been working to bring attention to.. I appreciate your efforts remember that everything is in accordance with divine plan and although there has been and is going to be some rough bumps in the road there is a quite a lot of inner work to be done for each individually and collectively, and we cannot force or convince anything upon anyone. They must make those steps for themselves. Let's not be so concerned about what others are thinking and believing - let's focus on what example we can set, and what light we can be and be aware and conscious in what truth we choose to play out. May we find our heart's harmony & passion in our work and play here on gaia, Much love & see you soon :)
Thinking of you all, sending you my support and calming centered radiance, thank you and be in bliss & joy! your friend,
J:)
Posted by: j | 26 January 2011 at 22:23
Carol - Hi! I placed my book Exopolitics: A Decade of Contact on the Internet as a free book in June 2000 in order to seed a new paradigm of how humanity might experience the cosmos.
When Michael Salla published his June 20, 2003 article as an American University faculty member, I immediately perceived his legal copyright violation and theft of intellectual property.
However, I had to balance taking a legally aggressive stand against Michael Salla at that stage with only 3 years into my seeding of the Exopolitics paradigm, and the Exopolitics movement just starting to come to life.
By 2011, eleven years after the start of my experiment, there are Exopolitics organizations in more than 30 nations, and I thought it was time that Salla's unethical actiona and intent could be made public without undue harm to the worldwide movement and more inportantly to the propagation of the Exopolitics paradigm.
Alfred
Posted by: Alfred Lambremont Webre | 26 January 2011 at 15:57
Not everyone is going to see Exopolitics the same way, just as all the differeing views of national politics exist, we do need to be more open minded to differing points of view. However, with that said, 'banning' someone from expressing their viewpoints is not the way to expand this field or its important conversation. But this field, just like national politics holds people who are willing to throw others under the bus just to further their own careers. That would be human nature. I wonder if ETs do the same? There is so much room for growth here, particularly in the area of discernment.
I am curious to know why Alfred Webre did not file suit against Michael Salla for copyright infringment back in 2003 or 2004 respectively when Salla's book came out?
Posted by: Roxanne Carol | 26 January 2011 at 14:41
Salla and his actions are not honourable or with integrity,end off! Fraser
Posted by: Fraser Bell | 26 January 2011 at 14:00
Salla banned me a long time ago stating that all reptilian contacts are negative when that's completely false New Age fearmongering (meme) and does NOT deserve to be representational of any TRUE serious exopolitical research. It's an unfortunate common human quality that I am not the only being to which am highly displeased by. Balance is not a common human quality. COHRA knows balance and hears all sides, expecially positive encounters that have evidence, other witnesses and those who can pass lie-detector tests. Additionally I do not fear my identity both physically as a chimera nor as a soul traveler with recall of other lives in a reptilian form. Salla needs to see ALL SIDES of true exopolitical discussion and grow a spine and learn some tolerance. I don't agree with everything I see or read, even from Alfred Webre, and I can disprove some data on occasion, but I still respect the man for what he's doing because of everything he stands for, period. I don't expect perfection, but I do enjoy a good positive and active lively debate and evidence provided for discussion. An open mind can save most people's lives one day soon.
Purple Crow
~~~~]xxx[:>~
www.COHRA.org
Posted by: Purple Crow | 26 January 2011 at 12:34
How on Earth (let alone 'else-where') are we to find ourselves to gain any credible acceptance from mainstream science, or the news reporters who continually ridicule us with the usual & worn-out & snide remarks like "Time to bust out our tin-foil hats" "Did they see any little green men flying around in those saucers? etc. when our very own leaders within, are continually fighting amongst themselves? Gentlemen, I beseech you to find a better means of handling these affairs! Exopolitics is not doing more harm than good, it's the leaders who are creating the problem, So Solve it, and bring an effective solution without destroying each others reputations! There are no "Winners Circles" in the Character assassination Arena!
Posted by: Gary Voss | 26 January 2011 at 11:26
I must admit that I have some problems with bisagio's time travel to Lincoln and encounters with Martian plesasours but not withstanding I have the utmost respect and admiration for the work and publications and indisputable integrity of Alfred
I just hate that his voice level is always to low on the video broadcasts and in order to hear him the guests become to loud to listen to comfortably
Posted by: joab kuninj | 26 January 2011 at 10:40