AP: Bush receives History Making Texans award, March 2, 2010
This article is the third of a multi-part series on secret technologies, their application to the events of September 11, 2001, and the consequent implications for our society.
A Memorandum
to the U.S. Congress presented to then incoming Chairman of the
U.S. House of Representatives Judiciary Committee, Rep.
John Conyers, Jr. (D-Mich), following the November 2006 mid-term
elections sets out prima facie evidence for the appointment of
an independent prosecutor to prosecute then U.S. President George W.
Bush, Vice President Richard B. Cheney, and Secretary of Defense Donald
H. Rumsfeld and numerous Jane and John Does for treason under Article
III (3) of the U.S. Constitution for acts committed on September 11,
2001.
Article III (3)
of the U.S. Constitution provides: "Sect. 3. Treason against the
United States, shall consist only in levying war against them, or in
adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort. No person shall
be convicted of treason unless on the testimony of two witnesses to the
same overt act, or on open confession in open court."
United
States v. Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, et al. is the upcoming trial of
five alleged Al-Qaeda members for “masterminding” the September 11, 2001
attacks. Regardless of whether U.S. President Barack H. Obama chooses
to have these defendants tried in a U.S. Military Commission or in a
U.S. Federal court, the Memorandum to the U.S. Congress contains prima
facie evidence that the sitting U.S. President, Vice President,
and Secretary of Defense committed actionable Article III (3) treason on
9/11. Consequently, one can characterize the forthcoming trial in United
States v. Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, et al. as a political show trial,
no different in effect – the wrongful execution of the defendants and
the attempted hoodwinking of the U.S. and world population – from other
political show trials in recent history.
There is a substantial
segment of U.S. and world public opinion that believes that 9/11 was a
false flag operation. In a 2006 paper entitled, “False
Flag
Operations, 9/11, and the Exopolitical Perspective”, Dr. Michael E.
Salla writes: “According to an August 2006 Scripps Howard/Ohio
University national survey, 36% of Americans believe 9-11 was an ‘inside
job’ with government agencies complicit in what occurred. A Zogby poll
in May 2006 found that 42% of Americans believed that official
explanations and the 9-11 Commission were covering up the truth.”
This
Examiner.com
article contains the first of two installments setting out the
compelling prima facie case of why an independent prosecutor
should be appointed to investigate actionable treason on 9/11.
Comments