At the time I was the target of an intense smear campaign that would lead the normal person to assume that I would be in jail shortly or worse. John explained that the Navy understood that it was all politics ---- they did not care.
I met with a group of high level people in the military in the process --- including the Undersecretary. According to John, the purpose of the plan --- discussed in front of several military or retired military officers and former government officials--- was to help the Navy adjust their operations for a world in which it was commonly known that aliens exist and live among us. http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL0209/S00126.htm .
The question that arises is whether the role of the Navy behind Source A's disclosure of the UN UFO/extraterrestrial meetings is related to the 2002 secret study commissioned by the US Navy. In particular, does the US Navy have a disclosure plan that would circumvent the (MJ-12/PI-40) Control Group created to manage extraterrestrial affairs through secret Presidential executive orders? The answer to this question is important vis a vis Source A's revelation of the secret UN meetings, and his participation/leaking of the meetings and what was discussed.
Source A's references to the undermining of public confidence in officials and institutions by continuing the "truth embargo" is a legitimate concern from the perspective of military officers who have a loyalty to the U.S. Constitution rather than narrow political partisan agendas or interests. I have known of Source A for approximately 18 months soon after Clay and Shawn Pickering disclosed his identity to me in 2006. Robert Morningstar's revelations of his military background is consistent with what I have been told, and of the prominent role the U.S. Navy is playing in promoting extraterrestrial disclosure.In peace
Michael Salla, Ph.D.
www.exopolitics.org
***
Source: http://www.ufodigest.com/news/0308/briefinghoagland.html
|
Comments