The Pope has stepped in and told the media it should censor itself about Pizzagate - an investigation into a DC pizza parlor and a possible connection to a pedophile ring and satanic rituals. The Jesuit Pope's self-interest in shutting down media attention is very telling given what the Catholic Church has done to children - beyond its priests molesting little boys.
" .... forensic experts have confirmed the decapitation and dismemberment of babies in the mass grave resembled the usual signs of ritualistic murder. Last week death certificates were released on the 796 Irish children, ages two months to nine years, found in a cistern at the Catholic St. Mary’s Mothers and Babies Home near Taum."
"The horror of the genocide in Canada's Indian Residential Schools became public, as the locations of 28 mass graves of Indian children were revealed."An unknown number of Indian children died in captivity at Indian Residential Schools in Canada."
https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s
"Using striking terminology, Francis said journalists and the media must avoid falling into “coprophilia” – an abnormal interest in excrement. Those reading or watching such stories risked behaving like coprophagics, people who eat faeces, he added.
"The pope excused himself for using terminology that some might find repellent. “I think the media have to be very clear, very transparent, and not fall into – no offence intended – the sickness of coprophilia, that is, always wanting to cover scandals, covering nasty things, even if they are true,” he said. “And since people have a tendency towards the sickness of coprophagia, a lot of damage can be done.”
"Using striking terminology, Francis said journalists and the media must avoid falling into “coprophilia” – an abnormal interest in excrement. Those reading or watching such stories risked behaving like coprophagics, people who eat faeces, he added.
"The pope excused himself for using terminology that some might find repellent. “I think the media have to be very clear, very transparent, and not fall into – no offence intended – the sickness of coprophilia, that is, always wanting to cover scandals, covering nasty things, even if they are true,” he said. “And since people have a tendency towards the sickness of coprophagia, a lot of damage can be done.”
"The Vatican is our moral compass regarding supposed child abuse now?
"Someone care to explain why the pope cares about a little pizza store in DC ..."
[Emphasis has been added.]
And as for why this Jesuit pope might care about a little pizza store in DC could it be because it was the pizza-riddled pedophile code in the emails of John Podesta, a Jesuit-trained lawyer, which pointed to that little store?
Might the pope care because Mr. Podesta isn't just any Jesuit-trained lawyer but the previous chief of staff to Bill Clinton (who attended Jesuit Georgetown University) and the campaign manager for Hillary Clinton, and had been expected to be Mrs. Clinton's chief of staff. While Mr. Podesta was his Chief of Staff, Clinton incentivized Child Protective Services nationally to take children from their families and with yet more incentives for the children to be permanently adopted away from their parents.
#PizzaGate: Child Protective Service Investigation Ends In Death of Sen. Nancy Schaefer [and her husband]
This photo of Mr. Podesta in his office with a painting of cannabalism behind him.
According to the pope, it's a sin to think about Mr. Podesta, or Senator Schaefer's death, or now even about the pope himself, since he is in the media and he is associated with scandals himself.
The pope said that the media shouldn't "communicate any ugly things," even though they maybe true?" Didn't the pope just say media should not write about or broadcast the truth if it contains scandal? But doesn't scandal include crimes? So didn't the pope suggest media forget the 1st amendment and instead treat their central role in a free society - publicly investigating wrong-doing (and especially of government) - not as a fundamental right but as a sin?
Since when does anyone tell Americans (or anyone else) to stop thinking about ugly things like child trafficking and satanic rituals using children - because such thoughts are like coprophilia in which people can become sexually aroused by feces?
Is that grossly warped view of both thinking and the body, similar to the convoluted, sinful, "Jesuitical" way the Catholic Church views masturbation?
There are four reasons why everyone automatically knows by instinct and by nature that masturbation is a mortal sin against both nature and God.
The first reason is that all people know in their conscience that masturbation is a kind of rape of another person. The second reason is that it is a kind of drug abuse, since the sexual pleasure is an intoxicating pleasure that affects the person in a way similar to a strong drug. People who masturbate “look on a woman to lust after her” in order to become sensually aroused and thus, they commit “adultery with her” in their hearts (Matthew 5:28) and a kind of drug abuse that makes them guilty of a mortal sin against nature and God that will cause them to be damned forever in Hell by having their “whole body be cast into hell” and eternal torments, according to Our Lord Jesus Christ’s words in The Holy Bible (cf. Matthew 5:29). The third reason is that all people know that the sexual pleasure is a shameful pleasure, which is why all people who masturbate hide in shame when they are committing this vile and shameful deed. And the fourth reason is that masturbation is non-procreative and unnatural, and the Church’s teaching is clear that “the conjugal act is destined primarily by nature for the begetting of children” (Pope Pius XI, Casti Connubii #54) and that is why the procreation of children is the only primary end or purpose that God allows the sexual act to be used for, which makes all other sexual acts (like masturbation) unnatural and mortally sinful.
Since when does a pope, and a Jesuit at that, butt into American life and seek to turn freedom of the press into a religious sin? It is freedom of the press and of speech that form the strongest bulwark against crimes.
Why is the pope not disturbed at the possibility that children may be being harmed?
He thinks he can order people not to think - and with the threat of hell. Wasn't it the Vatican which murdered hundreds of thousands of women (taking over their property afterwards) as witches (for their alleged thoughts) and Jews for their beliefs (thoughts) during the Inquisition? Applying a similar twisted logic about sin, the priests submerged the women in water and if they drowned, they were innocent, and if they survived that proved they were witches so they were burned alive.
The office of the Iniquisition still exists. It's called the Holy Office, now.
The office of the Iniquisition still exists. It's called the Holy Office, now.
The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (Latin: Congregatio pro Doctrina Fidei, CDF) is the oldest among the nine congregations of the Roman Curia. It was founded to defend the church from heresy; today, it is the body responsible for promulgating and defending Catholic doctrine.[1] Formerly known as the Supreme Sacred Congregation of the Roman and Universal Inquisition,[a] it is informally known in many Catholic countries as the Holy Office and between 1908 and 1965 was officially known as the Supreme Sacred Congregation of the Holy Office.
Who is this man to dare to be turn freedom of speech and the utter obligation of every society to shed light on possible crimes - especially against its children - on its head and define the 1st Amendment of the Constitution as akin to eating shit?
This Jesuit pope "sounds" concerned about the truth, saying:
"Disinformation is probably the greatest damage that the media can do, as opinion is guided in one direction, neglecting the other part of the truth. And then, I believe that the media should be very clear, very transparent, and not fall prey – without offence, please – to the sickness of coprophilia, which is always wanting to communicate scandal, to communicate ugly things, even though they may be true."
But could the pope's interest in a little pizza store in DC might be considered self-interested?
Doesn't he represent an institution found to be involved in child trafficking of hundreds of thousands of children in Spain? And aren't there questions about his awareness of child trafficking that occurred in Argentina when the pope worked with the fascist government there during the Dirty War, when thousands of the children of disappeared dissidents were stolen? And didn't the Vatican not only plunder wherever they went, and for centuries, but invent an infinite variety of tortures, and kill millions around the world?
Who is he?
He's a sworn liar. That's not hyperbole. As a Jesuit, the pope took an oath to NOT tell the truth.
He's a sworn liar. That's not hyperbole. As a Jesuit, the pope took an oath to NOT tell the truth.
".... the Jesuit Extreme Oath of Induction, or Blood Oath ceremony, recorded in the Journals of the 62nd Congress, 3rd Session of the USA, the real aims of the Society of Jesus are made crystal clear."
My son, heretofore you have been taught to act the dissembler: among Roman Catholics to be a Roman Catholic, and to be a Roman Catholic, and to be a spy even among you own brethren; to believe no man, to trust no man...and obtaining their confidence, to seek even to preach from their pulpits and to denounce with all vehemence(vē-ə-mən(t)s) in your nature our Holy Religion and the Pope; and even to descend so low as to become a Jew among Jews, that you might be enabled to gather together all information for the benefit of your Order.You have been taught to plant insidiously the seeds of jealousy and hatred between communities, provinces, states that were at peace, and to incite them to deeds of blood, involving them in war with each other, and to create revolutions and civil wars in countries that were independent and prosperous....to take sides with the combatants and to act secretly with your brother Jesuit, who might be engaged on the other side. You have been taught your duty as a spy, to gather all statistics, facts and information in your power from every source; to integrate (in-tə-ˌgrāt) yourself into the confidence of the family circle of protestants and heretics of every class and character, as well as that of the merchant, the banker, the lawyer, amount the schools and universities, in parliaments and legislatures, and the judiciaries and councils of state, and to be all things to all men.
And the oath goes on, indicating a quite remarkable lack of concern for children.
I further more promise and declare that I will, when opportunity present, make and wage relentless war, secretly or openly, against all heretics, Protestants and Liberals, as I am directed to do, to extirpate and exterminate them from the face of the whole earth; and that I will spare neither age, sex or condition; and that I will hang, waste, boil, flay, strangle and bury alive these infamous heretics, rip up the stomachs and wombs of their women and crush their infants heads against the walls in order to annihilate forever their execrable(ek-si-krə-bəl) race.
That when the same cannot be done openly, I will secretly use the poisoned cup, the strangulating cord, the steel of the poniard (pän-yərd) or the leaden bullet (JFK, Lincoln), regardless of the honour, rank, dignity, or authority of the person or persons, whatever may be their condition in life, either public or private, as I at any time may be directed so to do by any agent of the Pope or Superior of the Brotherhood of the Holy Faith, of the Society of Jesus.
These are only excerpts. Here is the entire oath.
Given the Jesuit oath ordering lying, dissembling, and many instructions on "faking it" within every group they are in and in all they do, an oath he took himself, the pope's concern about media spreading ugly things (possible wrong doing) even if they are true, and that being a sin, seems far, far beyond ironic. He's never come out with such an injunction against pedophilia.
Is it reasonable to wonder, if he obeys his Jesuit oath, whether all he appears to be and all he says, is "fake"?
People are being told not to think about missing children or child trafficking or pedophilia. They are being told that by the Vatican. Don't think, the pope says, or you'll go to hell.
People have been so stunned at the pope comparing media coverage of scandals to coprophilia or coprophagia, they have missed that the pope attacked the US Constitution and declared freedom of the press a religious sin.
Americans may not know that through legal trickery US taxes are going to the Vatican, but the pope is not the religious leader of the US and his medieval ideas about truth and poop, may be the sort of sordid and convoluted and illogical thinking that the Vatican engages in, but in the US, the press' job is the report the truth.
And the truth, from media, from alternative media, from individuals talking to each other, is what creates the outrage that will stop small children from being trafficked by the Vatican child or beheaded in their satanic rituals.
And the truth, from media, from alternative media, from individuals talking to each other, is what creates the outrage that will stop small children from being trafficked by the Vatican child or beheaded in their satanic rituals.
Did this Jesuit pope say the spreading ugly things - even if they are true - is a sin, because it just may be that the number one thing those investigating pedophile rings, child trafficking and satanic ritual abuse, should be thinking about just might be the Vatican?
Comments