What The Hell Kind Of Vaccine Is That?

 

 

This generation of vaccines is not the vaccine people imagine in which a bit of antigen from some disease is injected into the person to stimulate antibodies. 

 

Skipping over whether that ever worked or not, people might want to know the current vaccines are DNA vaccines. 

 

They shoot patented genetically modified stuff into people, intended for "uptake" by the person's DNA.  Skipping over whether once someone has patented material in them the corporations might claim ownership of organs or blood.  This is just what Monsanto does of crops in which their patented DNA shows up in farmers' plants, even if by accident of wind and pollen, or caused to be there by Monsanto itself. 

 

Whether a corporation which owns the patent on what is being injected into people's children might make claims on that child's body or not, people might want to stop and consider what the genetically modified stuff consists of in the first place.

 

They might especially want to do that since the genetically engineered material is specifically meant to alter their DNA, their body's blue print.  (Would you let someone come in and alter the blue print of the house you are building without permission, and without seeing what's in their plans?) 

 

So, what's in these DNA (GMO) vaccines? 

 

There is SV 40 there, for a starter.  It causes cancer.  But it's just a starter.

 

From Wikipedia on DNA vaccination:  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DNA_vaccination

Another consideration is the choice of promoter. The SV40 promoter was conventionally used until research showed that vectors driven by the Rous Sarcoma Virus (RSV) promoter had much higher expression rates.^[1] More recently, expression rates have been further increased by the use of the cytomegalovirus (CMV) immediate early promoter. Inclusion of the Mason-Pfizer monkey virus (MPV)-CTE with/without rev increased envelope expression. Furthermore the CTE+rev construct was significantly more immunogenic than CTE-alone vector. ^[16] Additional modifications to improve expression rates have included the insertion of enhancer sequences, synthetic introns, adenovirus tripartite leader (TPL) sequences and modifications to the polyadenylation and transcriptional termination sequences.^[1] An example of DNA vaccine plasmid is pVAC, it uses SV40 promoter.

 

SV 40 was in the polio vaccines in the 1950s.  It was banned in vaccines in 1961 because it causes tumors.  But they are still using it though it led to an epidemic of soft tissue cancers. 

 

SV40 was the 40th virus found in rhesus monkey kidney cells when these cells were used to make the polio vaccine. This virus contaminated both the Inactivated Polio Vaccine (IPV) created by Dr. Jonas Salk and the Oral or "Live" Polio Vaccine (OPV) created by Dr. Albert Sabin.

Children being fed sugar cubes with the oral polio vaccine. Circa 1961.

In 1961, SV40 was discovered by Dr. Bernice Eddy of the National Institute of Health, Division of Biologics when she took the material used to grow polio vaccines and injected it into hamsters. Tumors grew in the hamsters. Her discovery was subsequently validated by Drs. Maurice Hilliman and Benjamin Sweet of Merck.

Upon the discovery that SV40 was an animal carcinogen that had found its way into the polio vaccines, a new federal law was passed in 1961 that required that no vaccines contain this virus. However, this law did not require that SV40 contaminated vaccines be thrown away or that the contaminated seed material (used to make all polio vaccines for the next four decades) be discarded. As a result, known SV40 contaminated vaccines were injected into children up until 1963. In addition, it has been alleged that there have been SV40-contaminated batches of oral polio vaccine administered to some children until the end of the 1990's.

Rhesus Macaque (Macaca mulatta)

 

 

 

 

 

Poor monkey.  He didn't make the polio vaccines.

 

And he didn't get those cancer causing polio vaccines containing SV 40 mandated, either. 

 

 

 

SV 40 was a problem.  But now there are new problems starting with but not limited to the rather astounding fact that most of vaccines now are DNA vaccines.  And DNA vaccines have never been approved in the US for human use.

How have the vaccine corporations been able to go forward with selling those vaccines?  How can the CDC urge parents to let their children be injected with vaccines unapproved in the US for use in humans? 

 

But shocking as it is that the DNA vaccines (most of what's on the market) have not been approved to be given to people, when one looks at what is included in these new DNA (GMO) vaccines, it's hard not to think "Good God, are they out of their minds?"

 

 

So what else in these DNA (GMO) vaccines?

The Rous Sarcoma virus (RSV) is also there, being used as a promoter.  It's quite a nasty cancer-causing virus, .just like SV 40, but maybe more so.  (Is a sarcoma - a connective tissue cancer - harder to treat that a soft tissue one?).

In 1911, Peyton Rous discovered that cancer could be induced in healthy chickens by injecting them with a cell-free extract of the tumor of a sick chicken.

He ground up samples of the tumor and passed the material through a filter with pores so fine that not even bacteria could get through. However, the tumor filtrate was able to induce cancer when injected into chickens.

This was the first demonstration of an oncogenic virus — that is, a virus capable of causing cancer. The tumor was a sarcoma, a tumor of connective tissue. The virus was named the Rous sarcoma virus (RSV).

The Rous sarcoma virus is a retrovirus (as is HIV, the virus that causes AIDS).

As soon as RSV infects a cell, its reverse transcriptase synthesizes DNA copies of its genome. These enter the nucleus of the cell and insert themselves randomly throughout the DNA of the host's chromosomes.

Normal gene transcription within the nucleus now produces an RSV messenger RNA (mRNA) that reenters the cytoplasm. Some copies of this mRNA are then translated by the normal machinery (e.g., ribosomes) of the host cell into protein products. Other copies of the RNA become incorporated into new virus particles.

.... each end of the RNA molecule has a set of repeated sequences of nucleotides ("R" and "P") that perform at least two important functions:

• they enable the DNA copies of RSV to insert into the host's DNA and
• they act as enhancers, causing the host nucleus to transcribe the RSV genes at a rapid rate.

After looking at what RSV does to DNA, to say these DNA vaccines affect DNA seems a sizable understatement.  RSV gets into a person's DNA where it then gets the person's cell nuclei to reproduce RSV (a sarcoma - a cancer) and rapidly. 

What else is in these DNA (GMO) vaccines - vaccines which have never been approved for human use in the US? 

The DNA vaccines also use cytomegalovirus as a promoter.  And cytomegalovirus is associated with small heads (and many other severe problems) in babies (see below)r. 

The CDC refers to "congenital" cytomegalovirus as CMV that is "present at birth."  But DNA vaccines include CMV and logically they might pass this virus to pregnant women and then fetuses could become infected with it.  So for a baby to be born with a CMV infection doesn't mean the CMV is "congenital."  It could be vaccine-induced.  But it's handy to refer to CMV as "congenital" CMV as that immediately distracts from the DNA vaccines (that are not approved for human use) containing it.  It also slips past the fact that these vaccines (and they would be DNA vaccines) are being incessantly pushed on pregnant women.  So, when a baby is born with a CMV infection, rather than asking what caused the CMV infection and perhaps see this DNA vaccine connection, a baby with the infection is simply considered to have a very unfortunate congenital condition. 

From the CDC: http://www.cdc.gov/cmv/congenital-infection.html

Most (90 of every 100) infants who are infected with cytomegalovirus (CMV) at birth (congenital CMV infection) appear healthy at birth. Health problems or disabilities due to congenital CMV infection may appear 2 or more years after birth, or they may never appear—80 of every 100 infants with congenital CMV infection never develop symptoms or disabilities.

Signs and Symptoms

Signs of CMV infection that may be present at birth

• Premature birth
• Liver problems
• Lung problems
• Spleen problems
• Small size at birth
• Small head size
• Seizures

Permanent health problems or disabilities due to congenital CMV infection

• Hearing loss
• Vision loss
• Mental disability
• Small head size
• Lack of coordination
• Seizures
• Death (in rare cases)

Children with congenital CMV infection are more likely to have permanent disabilities if they had symptoms of CMV infection at birth. However, some children with congenital CMV infection who appear healthy at birth can develop hearing or vision loss over time due to congenital CMV infection. For this reason, if you know your baby was born with CMV infection, it is important to have his or her hearing and vision tested regularly.

 

Prevention - pregnant women should very wary of babies and children. 

These DNA vaccines don't stop at SV 40 or RSV or CMV but also use the Mason-Pfizer monkey virus (MPV), having apparently not learned (or learned?) that simian viruses have been a disaster in vaccines (causing cancers and retroviruses like AIDS).  The DNA vaccines with this patented (to Pfizer) monkey virus are then actually coupled with CMV for even more effect - the same viral infection that can break down the mind, vision, hearing, lungs, liver and other organs of babies and children over time and even kill them.

And that's leaving off all the "[a]dditional modifications to improve expression rates .... enhancer sequences, synthetic introns, adenovirus tripartite leader (TPL) sequences and modifications to the polyadenylation and transcriptional termination sequences."  It's way more than unclear what all this is, but "synthetic" introns are synthetic rather than real biology, that are meant to affect or become part of one's DNA.

 

For most people, it looks for all the world like those making DNA vaccines have been injecting people with them before getting them approved for use by humans, and are using one monkey and cancer virus after another and magnifying their impact by adding in a viral infection that wrecks babies. 

 

If two wrongs don't make a right, can multiple cancer viruses and a viral infection that destroys children, make health? 

 

Aren't cancer viruses and viruses that cause babies to be born with small heads (or to die) a bit weird (dare one say unlikely?) as a method to prevent common and usually minor childhood diseases ? 

 

And wouldn't it make much more sense to just use vitamin C which is an absolute viricide and easily kills all the childhood disease viruses?  Why get fancy or cancer-y?

 

How does vitamin C kill viruses?   First, you take 3 cancer viruses and a synthetic rabbit's foot .... just kidding.

 

The mechanism of action of high dose vitamin C is known and understood. In normal healthy tissues it acts as an antioxidant. In other tissues, it generates hydrogen peroxide, the chemical that platinum blondes use to bleach their hair. This happens in sick and inflamed tissues, for example in a malignant tumour. The process is typically a form of Fenton reaction, generating free radicals. The oxidation and free radicals arising from the hydrogen peroxide kill bacteria and inactivate viruses. In other words, vitamin C acts as a targeted bleach and antiseptic.  http://orthomolecular.org/resources/omns/v10n13.shtml

 

Just on the face of it, it seems a common sense thing to skip any technology that has never been proven as safe for humans.  And why not stick with something unequivocally safe and which cures all viruses, rather than accept just "promises" to prevent them (while we can see again and again, from all the childhood disease outbreaks in vaccinated kids, that the promises are just promises). 

 

And, just on the face of it, it seems such a greatly sane thing to ALWAYS bypass shooting any, to say nothing of multiple, cancers and other viruses into pregnant women, babies, children and adults.  Actually, it seems reasonable to bypass shooting those things into anything living.

 

But some seem to very much like mixing together and experimenting with strange things and injecting it into people.  Here is a list of some of their known experiments.

• Pathogens, disease, and biological warfare agents
  • 2.1 Late 19th century
  • 2.2 Early 20th century
  • 2.3 1940s
  • 2.4 1950s
  • 2.5 1960s

 

But most people are not very interested in being part of that.  Some even resent it.

 

Most people just want to be well and enjoy life.  They have accepted vaccines or have brought their children get them in order, they h0ped, to avoid the of risk their getting very sick and dying.  But with the new DNA vaccines including Simian Virus 40, Rous Sarcoma Virus, Mason-Pfizer monkey virus (MPV), and cytomegalovirus, and even mixed together, vaccines as a safety net to protect people from minor childhood disease and short-lived flu, appear on closer inspection, to be taking on a rather large risk of getting some of the worst diseases there are out there, or potentially even new combinations of them.

 

This vaccine situation starts to feel rather like what we've learned about food or shampoos.  When they include an endless list of things we can't say or know nothing about, they just haven't seemed to add up to anything good down the line. 

 

If people are so concerned about viruses, why bother with the risk of cancer virus-loaded vaccines, when Vitamin C effectively kills all viruses?  Vitamin C doesn't pose any risk of causing cancer or of slowly deconstructing children's physiology over time.  Vitamin C's side effects aren't more diseases, but improved health in countless ways.   http://www.doctoryourself.com/klennerbio.html

Given supplemental ascorbate (vitamin C), not merely from birth but also all throughout gestation, Klenner’s uniformly healthy, trouble-free infants were known by the staff as the “Vitamin C Babies.” (12)

In a 1978 letter to Klenner, Irwin Stone writes that he thinks that “giving levels of ascorbate for long periods of time at the daily levels you recommend. . . is equivalent to creating a new human subspecies, ‘Homo sapiens ascorbicus’ . . . with unusual resistance to disease and stress and with a prolonged life span.”

This article shows vitamin C is safe and highly effective. 

The Origin of the 42-Year Stonewall of Vitamin C

And this one shows how it was squashed by exactly those who like experimenting on people and seem so oddly interested now in injecting cancer viruses into people.

Passover: Suing the True Angel of Death

 

 

Comments

[paul]

Great insight.