The Cabal is contract crazy. One has only to see Monsanto's contracts with farmers to understand this. But less well-known is the Cabal own slavishness to contracts.
Perhaps people know that if a real estate lawyer serves you or barring being able to, posts in a local paper that their client wants to do such and so to your property, and you don't respond, you have legally consented.
That appears to be what mankind has done about vaccines, chemtrails, fluoridation, radiation, smart meters, etc. Screaming about them or protesting doesn't count. There must be a legal response to the offer of an implied contract.
Human rights, justice, civil rights, Bill of Rights, deaths, etc., are meaningless. Only business contracts count in their world.
People are now posting NO CONSENT contracts. They are meant to counter unseen contracts by the Cabal, no matter how strange they could possibly be (and trying to figure what psychopaths have included is no small task.) These contracts worksat a different level from the contracts we are familiar with but may be important since those attacking humanity are occult and, oddly, they operate very strictly by contracts. So, understanding these refusals to consent begins to open up possibilities for thinking how to deal with the Cabal around quite specific things as well.
Here is one such non-consent contract. As you will see, it covers things at the deepest level and includes penalties for not abiding by the contract..
Cabal Works By Contracts - If You Are Silent About Their Harm To You, You Consent
VACCINES
Now, keeping that in mind, let us think about contracts in relation to vaccines.
All the vaccines now GMO, that is, they are PATENTED. Because of that one can deal with them separate from any vaccine injuries and in real courts, not bogus vaccine "courts." Why? Becauese those giving the vaccines, those behind them, those mandating them, are injecting patented intellectual property into people with no contract. What's more people's priceless IP is being wrecked by the insertion of insect, pig, viral and other DNA.
Those are contract violations and that puts people into real courts with facts that are incontrovertible. It changes the whole landscape around hospitals requiring vaccines of nurses and others because while hospitals can't be sued for "health" issues, they more than likely can be sued around IP and contract violations. Those are coerced, undisclosed contracts nurses have been subjected to, never mind not receiving huge compensation for the wrecking of their IP.
There is a leading patent lawyer who represented organic farmers against Monsanto. Perhaps he could be helpful or point people toward those who might be. For from this angle, there is now the possibility of a massive class action lawsuit by anyone or by parents for IP and contract violations in not disclosing what the implied contract contained - quite literally, genetically engineering anyone taking them.
Those are contract violations and that puts people into real courts with facts that are incontrovertible. It changes the whole landscape around hospitals requiring vaccines of nurses and others because while hospitals can't be sued for "health" issues, they more than likely can be sued around IP and contract violations. Those are coerced, undisclosed contracts nurses have been subjected to, never mind not receiving huge compensation for the wrecking of their IP.
There is a leading patent lawyer who represented organic farmers against Monsanto. Perhaps he could be helpful or point people toward those who might be. For from this angle, there is now the possibility of a massive class action lawsuit by anyone or by parents for IP and contract violations in not disclosing what the implied contract contained - quite literally, genetically engineering anyone taking them.
What of the legal implications not delineated? Those would include but are far from limited to who owns the blood, organs, bones, or future children of anyone who had patented corporate DNA injected into them? What are the legal implications around anyone being so injected, wanting to mate with others also so injected, especially since, in sharing the same patented corporate DNA from mass vaccinations, and that DNA (potentially insect, pig, viral, synthetic) now being there alongside DNA from parents, making each recipient of the same vaccines, siblings. Under law, are millions of "vaccine siblings," even allowed to mate? What is the value of their unique genetic heritage under IP law and what are the financial consequences to their priceless IP of people being now related to bugs?
Those are contract issues that must be disclosed legally and those who don't are liable for not doing so.
What's more, for those who have not had their or their children's IP raped by pigs or corporations (yes, a joke, and unfair to innocent pigs) so have not become related to other species, they can construct hard and fast contracts (see the one above) to protect their intellectual property, contracts that list immense penalties (billions of pounds of gold, for instance) for violating the contract.
SMART METERS
Are there IP issues as well with smart meters? Their machines are patented. Is what they stealing from people's homes via forced surveillance, potentially also IP as well, such as conversations around ideas, for example. Are they damaging DNA (intellectual property) with the radiation from it? I wonder if contracts about smart meters might include this and people declare in a formal way that what goes on in their homes or on their phones or computers is their IP and erect a legal wall around it just as corporations do with every email they send out, every bit of their websites and information. There may be some standard declaration of such material being protected as IP (as one sees at the end of lawyers' and corporations' emails) and not usable by anyone without a contract. THAT may be a whole additional level of contract protection.
ALL SURVEILLANCE
Contract or IP law may be a powerful, unseen argument against all surveillance.
We feel invaded and see surveillance as a privacy issue or a violation of the Bill of Right, but if we get more specific about what they are doing, they are taking everything to do with us that we create (our conversations that may contain ideas or endless information only we possess) and everything to do with us that is original and unique to us biologically. That last includes facial recognition, fingerprints, DNA, voice recognition, etc. There are no contracts for that taking, no compensation. With contracts created, they will be dealing with law they depend on themselves to keep everyone away from them and their businesses and even plots, secret. This is law they understand and that still exists.
We feel invaded and see surveillance as a privacy issue or a violation of the Bill of Right, but if we get more specific about what they are doing, they are taking everything to do with us that we create (our conversations that may contain ideas or endless information only we possess) and everything to do with us that is original and unique to us biologically. That last includes facial recognition, fingerprints, DNA, voice recognition, etc. There are no contracts for that taking, no compensation. With contracts created, they will be dealing with law they depend on themselves to keep everyone away from them and their businesses and even plots, secret. This is law they understand and that still exists.
FLUORIDATION
The same idea applies. This is not about injury or proving it, it is about an undisclosed, unsigned contract with each person or with a community, making details known, allowing for non consent.
CHEMTRAILS
The same idea applies.
PEDOPHILIA AND CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES
The same idea applies.
THE IRS
The same idea applies.
DARPA
The same idea applies. All possible technology and violations must be listed.
NSA, TSA, DHS, FEMA, CIA, FBI, ....
The same idea applies.
CDC, FDA, NIH, HHS, NIAID, ....
The same idea applies.
THE WHO ...
The same idea applies.
THE UN AND ITS AGENCIES AND RELATED NGOS
The same idea applies.
EPA, USDA, BLM, NUCLEAR REGULATORY AGENCY ....
The same idea applies.
FEDERAL RESERVE, IMF, WORLD BANK
The same idea applies.
THE CORPORATE US AND ALL ADMIRALTY LAWS AND TAKINGS EMANATING FROM IT
The same idea applies.
ETC.
Until one looks carefully at the first link containing a contract and begins to understand enough law, it may be difficult to believe that we have by our silence and according to how they operate, consented to everything they are doing. In contract law and only in contract law, not on the streets, would people be directly addressing their violations of us and the planet.
This is the ultimate peaceful response to what is happening to humanity now.
This is a time for as many people as possible who are skilled in contract, IP, or common law and who understand the immense violations against humankind, to begin crafting contracts which millions and perhaps billions could sign and post publicly. Or we could join in a class action effort in vast numbers.
Saying WE DO NOT CONSENT in a legally formal and public way is vital.
Defining WHAT THEY MAY NOT DO and listing the UNFATHOMABLE PENALTIES that come with their violations of the contracts the people establish, is also vital.
The Cabal is planning a coup in the US.
This must be delineated in detail and contractually and publicly, with CONSENT REFUSED. Penalties must be commensurate with what is planned.
The first article gives some indication of how much they have gotten away with. We believed propaganda that terrified the country and from there, we let millions be infected with cancer viruses, welcomed forced human experimentation on children under the aegis of protecting them with "the greatest miracle of modern medicine" (vaccines) and did not refuse consent.
Will we be controlled by fear that drives us irrationally toward vaccines that threaten our biology at the deepest level, allowing the genetic destruction of humanity. or will we contractually refuse our consent?
Here is what we have consented to. What we lost can not be calculated. But what we can do now for the benefit of humanity is equally without measure.
The next articles indicates what is planned that needs our public refusal of consent and explicit limiting contracts.
Comments