What the Anti-Vax Movement Doesn't Tell You About Measles
http://m.thenation.com/article/198609-what-anti-vax-movement-doesnt-tell-you-about-measles
Annie Sparrow on February 19, 2015 - 6:08PM ET
Mennonite girls gather at the health and safety clinic in Ohio (AP/Tom E. Puskar)
In Part 1, this article introduced basic information on vaccines and all the varied communities who question them, Part 2 offered historical information and studies on vaccines, Part 3 covered the Wakefield controversy, those behind it, and suggesting the attack on him may be about distracting from the GMO alteration of human DNA
Here we pick up where we left off:
TN: but [the Lancet] did not retract [Wakefield's] paper until 2010. Meanwhile, the rise of measles in the United Kingdom and United States reflects the damage done, and the consequences extend well beyond the West.
Merck, which makes the MMR, the vaccine Wakefield was concerned about, has connections to Elsevier Publishiers which puts out the Lancet which withdrew Wakefield's paper many years after they had accepted and after his findings had been confirmed by numerous other peer reviewed studies. The removal of Wakefield's paper was a political. You mention below how vaccines should not be politicized. This is true and why Wakefield's paper should never have been retracted.
http://adventuresinautism.blogspot.com/2010/02/anatomy-of-witch-hunt.html
What damage is being done by the rise of measles? No one has died and it would take quite a few deaths (over 108) to equal the deaths from the MMR).
The rise in measles is actually beneficial:
It allows medical people to see measles is not a terrible disease unless children are living in squalor and malnourished.
It allows medical people to see the measles vaccine (MMR) is failing to immunize and is killing children.
It allows children to get over measles naturally so they end up with lasting immunity.
It indicates there is a deficit of vitamin A and C in those groups, which should encourage knowledgeable medical people to inform parents that good nutrition is preventive of measles and supplements of A and C can help treat it.
The only damage done has been people acceptance of the MMR vaccine.
TN: In Nigeria in 2014, Ebola was successfully stopped
Why is there mention now of Nigeria and ebola? The article is supposed to be about measles.
And where is there any evidence of any kind to ebola being stopped in Nigeria? And why is there no mention that the US government invented ebola and patented it to say nothing of using it as a justification to going into West Africa with troops? And how could anyone be pleased with the martial law and quarantines imposed on West Africans, where medical help and food were not even allowed in? This is what the medical help West Africans have gotten looks like.
Ebola is a man made bioweapon that can be set loose at will in Nigeria or anywhere else the US wishes to create an emergency and an excuse to send in troops where it could not otherwise do so.
Given that nutrition is what almost eradicated all the infectious diseases, why is the WHO and US not helping provide it to West Africans so they would be stronger in fighting ebola?
From VITAMIN C CAN CURE EBOLA: So Why Are The WHO and CDC Creating A Crisis? - EbolaGate
"Why is vitamin C so effective in killing viruses?" http://www.naturalhealth365.com/natural_cures/ebola-virus-thomas-levy-1095.html#sthash.tHcRqlX5.dpuf
"A primary way in which vitamin C destroys viruses, or sets them up for destruction by the immune system, is by activating the ‘Fenton reaction’. In a nutshell, this reaction can proceed inside the virus, inside cells in which viruses are replicating, and on the surfaces of the viruses themselves.
"The result of this reaction that is stimulated by the presence of vitamin C, one or more transition metal cations, and the local presence of peroxide is the immediate production of hydroxyl radicals. These radicals are the most reactive oxidizing agents ever identified. As such, they radically upregulate oxidative stress and end up destroying whatever is in their immediate environment.
"The effects of vitamin C in “mopping up” after it inflicts its viral damage are further supported by its potent and multifaceted support of the immune system. There is no other substance that singularly does as much to promote increased and strong immune function as vitamin C.
"Among many other effects, vitamin C directly stimulates interferon and antibody production, while effectively supercharging the functions of the white blood cells by becoming very concentrated inside those cells.
"To be balanced, it is also important to note that the effects of vitamin C on chronic viral infections, such as chronic hepatitis, AIDS, or HIV-positive states are less profound, as the virus works its way into physical locations much less accessible by vitamin C than when the viral infections are acute. Nevertheless, long-term, highly-dosed protocols of vitamin C often completely control and even occasionally cure these diseases."
TN: and polio seems to have been eliminated,
Not unless we ignore that Bill Gates is causing polio all over Asia and Africa. It's not "visible" because the WHO has simply renamed it. A child crippled immediately after getting the Gates' polio vaccine, doesn't have polio now. The child has NPAFP. The WHO says "There is no polio in India." It doesn't add, there are now an incredible number of paralyzed children with what looks exactly like polio.
From the Indian Journal of Medical Ethics Vol IX No 2 April - June 2012 Page 114-7. http://www.issuesinmedicalethics.org/pdfs/202co114.html.pdf
".... while India has been polio-free for a year, there has been a huge increase in non-polio acute flaccid paralysis (NPAFP). In 2011, there werean extra 47,500 new cases of NPAFP. Clinically indistinguishable from polio paralysis but twice as deadly, the incidence of NPAFP was directly proportional to doses of oral polio received. Though this data was collected within the polio surveillance system, it was not investigated. The principle of primum-non-nocere was violated.
What's more, Bill Gates' polio vaccine caused 10,000 deaths of children in Pakistan.
http://www.occupycorporatism.com/home/the-shocking-truth-about-syrian-polio-resurgence-regime-change/
TN: Measles, like polio and smallpox, is a horrible disease.
The author repeatedly conflate measles with much more serious diseases, never once pointing out to The Nation readers that there have been no deaths from measles in the US in over a decade. Why is that? Instead The Nation author's effort appears to be to frighten readers by pulling in the big classic disease threats. However, even those threats are not what we were taught to believe.
"Polio" epidemics may actually have been neurologic reactions to DDT spraying, and interestingly, the Rockefellers were involved in DDT, making the vaccines, running the March of Dimes. They did not inform anyone that the polio vaccines contained SV40 which causes cancer. the CDC admits that 98 million Americans were exposed and doctors are linking vaccination to cancer now.
"The chief, if not the sole, cause of the monstrous increase in cancer has been vaccination." - Dr. Robert Bell; V. President International Society for Cancer Research, British Cancer Hospital.
Here is a list of doctors, studies and articles linking vaccination with cancer.
http://www.whale.to/m/quotes28.html#Childhood%20diseases%20prevent%20cancer:
And there there is the flip side, the childhood diseases may be preventing cancers.
"On the basis of observations by the Vienna surgeon Professor Schmidt, which took place over decades in his practice 16, studies in the last 100 years have shown consistently that people who experienced childhood diseases accompanied by fever were less likely to suffer from cancer in later life 17, 18,19,20."---Anita Petek-Dimmer
"A study by Ronne (Lancet, 5/5/85 1-5) showed that adults who had had natural measles with a rash had a decreased incidence of various cancers, including cervical. Another study showed that women are less likely to contract ovarian cancer if they have had mumps during childhood."--Dr Jayne Donegan
We know now that polio is easily cured with mega doses of vitamin C and pesticides such as DDT, neutralized in just the same way.
http://orthomolecular.org/library/jom/1991/pdf/1991-v06n02-p099.pdf
As to measles being a horrible disease, most people over 50 in the US would likely disagree, since they either had it themselves or have seen children with it, and know that spots and itching don't qualify as horrible. What's more, measles is easily prevented by vitamin A and is uncommon in well nourished children. It is, however, common among measles-vaccinated children.
But wasn't this whole debate ended with the FOIA-requested secret UK government documents, in which the government and vaccine industry people themselves indicated that vaccines don't work and cause the diseases they are said to prevent?http://childhealthsafety.wordpress.com/2012/03/14/government-experts-cover-up-vaccine-hazards/
TN: Second only to smallpox in the total number of deaths it has caused over the past two millennia,
Where is there any information to support that? As one can see here, medical history is not filled with measles epidemics with vast numbers of deaths which is not to say that measles didn't use to be more dangerous prior to public health measures.
http://www.relfe.com/history_1.html
TN: it's still a major killer of children under 5 years of age in the developing world.
First, the US is not the developing world.
The US is not infectious diseases wards in poor, black South Africa, either. Yet it is to a US audience that The Nation author is strongly pushing the MMR (measles) vaccine, as though there were similar threats here.
Yet, for some reason, The Nation doesn't say what does threaten US progressives, here and now. It is the measles vaccine that poses the threat:
1) it is associated with autism,
2) the CDC hid the autism data surrounding it,
3) it causes measles, and
4) it has caused 108 deaths in the last 10 or so years, according the VAERS which only picks up 1 to 2% of the actual number of events.
Measles caused no deaths and no autism in the same time period.
Second, yes, diseases are killing children in the developing world where nutrition is poor. That is why there is so much criticism of the WHO for investing money in profit making vaccines that should not be given to sickly malnourished children in the first place, but are being. Instead the WHO should be providing children worldwide with standared public health measures" good nutrition, clean water, and sanitation. Those are what brought down all infectious diseases in the West to the most minimal levels, and without vaccines.
The Rockefellers, Gates and the vaccine manufacturers who control the WHO are driving the neoliberal policies that are causing poverty and thus the diseases they then use as an excuse for their profit making vaccines.
From Institute for Science in Society
http://www.i-sis.org.uk/LULALTD.php
"Social scientist, Alison Katz has left the World Health Organisation (WHO) after 17 years of devoted service, condemning its “Let us live and let them die” attitude, which sums up the neglect of millions of people over the past three decades, suffering and dying from diseases of poverty .... She believes that the narrow and totalitarian approach by the WHO not only has had negligible effect, but also has betrayed public health principles and perversely forbidden exploration of any alternative perspectives. ....
"She believes that the WHO has fallen victim to neoliberal globalisation, and by default, to the economic interests of powerful nations and the transnational corporations. In an open letter .... addressed to Dr. Margaret Chan, the incoming Director-General of WHO, Katz set out .... the critical importance of addressing the commercialisation of science, and the close relationship between industry and academia as highlighted in ISIS' Discussion Paper Towards a Convention on Knowledge [4]. ....
"According to Katz, the dominant neoliberal perspective reinforces the structures of hegemony that create poverty and powerlessness which are themselves the root causes of avoidable disease and death. ....
"In order to neutralise the entrenched neoliberal bias within international agencies Katz believes that the WHO must return to its founding principles and advocate for attention to root causes – the social and economic determinants of health and disease . In today's world, this implies denouncing unfair rules of trade and commerce, the exploitation of national resources, and ruthless liberalization foisted on developing countries, all of which have been shown to have devastating effects on the health of populations. Furthermore, the WHO must take the lead in providing scientific research with independent scientists free of vested interests. To achieve its mandate of “Health For All”, the WHO must support serious science based on sound evidence. Millions of people's lives are at stake. ...."
The narrow and totalitarian approach of the WHO, describes perfectly the mandating of vaccines now being sought to the US by the neoliberal pharmaceutical interests that the Rockefellers and Gates control.
TN: The development of a vaccine was widely welcomed.
By the manufacturers. People are waiting on clean water and adequate nutrition. In the west, that eliminated measles as a threat. Yet the multinational corporations are working to take control over all water and the pharmaceutical industry (not distinct from the big water interests) are working to eliminate adequate nutrition through their malignly designed Codex. Why is The Nation not speaking out vociferously for affordable and non-patented measures that have been proven to save millions of lives or exposing Codex?
TN: It is usually delivered jointly with vaccines for mumps and rubella, known in combination as MMR. One shot provides at least 95 percent protection and offers enduring immunity.
Does The Nation author assume its readers know so little about vaccines that they don't know that vaccines do not provide "enduring" immunity, only exposure to the disease itself does that. But surely the author must give The Nation's some credit for knowing there are questions about whether the MMR is failing?
But that claim about "enduring immunity" doesn't really matter in the context of a CDC whistle blower researcher reporting that data showing the MMR causes autism, and at especially high rates among African American little boys, and the CDC hid the data. Most parents would see the risk benefit analysis between enduring immunity against measles and a vaccine proven to cause autism, heavily weighted against such a vaccine. But clearly, The Nation's claim that the vaccine offers "enduring" immunity is belied by constants outbreaks among vaccinated groups as well as by the CDC itself saying people need additional doses of the MMR.
TN: But because of vaccination lapses, measles is now on the rise.
Here is some data of just how ineffective the MMR (measles vaccine) has been, having nothing to do with lapses.
From Measles Outbreaks: A Failing Vaccine, Not AFailure to Vaccinate.
"Throughout the real (not imaginary) history of the measles vaccine, failure after failure has been recorded." [There were measles outbreaks in communities that were 98% vaccinated, 98.7%, over 98%, and 91% vaccination with only 79% efficacy. And that is still occurring.]
So, the outbreaks are not about "lapses." The measles vaccine either doesn't provide immunity or it causes measles itself. The UK documents say both are true - the vaccine don't work and cause the diseases they are alleged to prevent, and that's not counting the dangerous toxins in them.
TN: There were twenty separate outbreaks in the United States in 2014, involving 644 individual cases—a record number since measles was eliminated from the US in 2000.
A vaccine that doesn't work or causes measles will do that.
TN: So far in 2015, there have been 141 cases in seventeen states, 80 percent of which are linked to Disneyland. Blaming it on Mexico and porous borders, as some opportunistic politicians have done, has no basis in reality; there were only two cases in Mexico in January, both imported from the United States.
No, let's blame it on Disneyland and think a little about Disney being connected to the CIA and the CIA running the CDC and controlling media.
From Measly Measles versus Fascism: California and the Unleashing of the Vaccine Corporations
"Was the measles outbreak related to Disneyland a false flag?
"It has the characteristics of one -
- yet media immediately accusing suspects (unvaccinated children) without any evidence
- the reality was upside down - no one has died of measles in the US in 10 years while over 100 people have died from the measles vaccine, yet the media which is controlled by pharmaceutical industry, is strongly promoting agenda of more vaccines
- a totalitarian vaccine bill was immediately introduced in California to remove people's human rights to protect their children from something can be lethal
"Is this far-fetched? Not so much, if people know that Disney actually worked with the CIA who helped him create Disneyworld and two cities in Florida that are above the law. And they taught Disney disinformation techniques.
.... "According to CIA informants opposed to the NWO, CIA contractors were brought in to build the underground tunnels under Disneyworld in 1977.
"These contractors were sworn to secrecy, but were only informed on a need to know basis why the CIA was involved with an amusement park. To work on the secret tunnel project took an "Above Top Secret" clearance. A major programming control center [for mind control] was constructed under Lake Holden . ....
TN: Globally, the number of cases rose from 122,000 in 2012 to 146,000 in 2013, reversing a twelve-year downward trend. In November 2014, the World Health Organization (WHO) gave up on meeting its target for measles control.
Where is the evidence? Why no links to anything this article says?
But evidence itself is an issue. From Pentagon-CIA-CDC: Depleted Uranium Conspiracy
"But the CIA [Rothschild/Rockefellers] also had other agencies around the world cooking their books to cover up the illegal activities they were engaged in which included fomenting wars, preventing people from having water safe to drink [e.g. Iraq], preventing people from having access to food, medicines, distributing vaccines with Bio-warfare germs such as HIV, infertility drugs, toxins like mercury, anti-human chorogonaditropin antibody inducers [prevent pregnancy], etc. for the purpose of genocide. To cover up these many crimes against humanity around the world, meant that they had their agents, often CIA and MI6 officers, committing black ops to bribe and coerce officials throughout the world to cook their books.
"However, because they also wanted to know what was really the result of their genocidal policies, the CIA usually kept the original databases "off the record" at the CIA's headquarters at Langley as well as supplying them to the Fort Detrick US Army Chemical and BioWarfare Research Labs. That Lab as well as the CIA's own labs, needed the original data to prove the effectiveness of their "interventions". [Emphasis added.]
Above, there is mention of failing vaccines, but it's time to talk about the real problem with the measles vaccines.
All the new vaccines - what are called third generation vaccines - are recombinant DNA vaccines. The are GMO vaccines. The earlier vaccines were not. Now, researchers at the vaccine corporations create GMOs combined of virus DNA, animal DNA, insect DNA, and possibly even synthetic DNA, and shoot that into the person. They are seeking "DNA uptake," for the DNA itself to be altered, just exactly as Monsanto does in shooting GMOs into seeds to alter them.
These GMOs in vaccines are highly unstable. From Vaccines are creating "Herd Contagion":
"In addition to the danger of jumping species and return to virulence, there is another frightening way for these new viruses to spread: aerosolization. It used to be that we could feel pretty safe about rabies because the chances that our dogs would trade saliva with another animal were pretty slim. Nowadays, thanks to recombinant vaccines, there is no bite required. The Center for Disease Control acknowledges that rabies can be spread via aerosolization so you or your dog need only be in close proximity to a rabies infected animal to be in danger.
Once one recognizes that the vaccines are GMO vaccines, it becomes apparent that vaccines now are not at all what people were taught about vaccines - a tiny bit of virus is injected into a person to stimulate their immune system. These vaccines go way, way beyond that and are wrecking human DNA.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombinant_DNA_Vaccine
Enzo Paoletti and Dennis Panicali at the New York State department of Health, devised a Strategy to produce recombinant DNA vaccines by using genetic engineering techniques. They were able to transform ordinary smallpox vaccine into vaccines that may be able to prevent other diseases. [So smallpox is one example of what mixed into what is shot into people.]
Here is a reaction to a recombinant DNA (GMO0 vaccine for HPV:
Pharma's Vaccines are Secretly Genetically Altering Anyone Forced to Take them
That should be a full stop for vaccines altogether. Human DNA worldwide is being damaged by vaccines. The global campaigns to eradicate diseases are not only not working but are causing those diseases and more are killing children in huge numbers. But what is not seen is that the ones who survive no longer have only human DNA.
TN: It gets worse. Measles is so contagious that it is used as the indicator disease to show deficits in immunization coverage of all vaccine-preventable diseases—which means the problem goes well beyond measles. We should hardly be surprised, then, that last year saw WHO announce a Public Health Emergency of International Concern for polio.
We shouldn't be surprised at all. The WHO is controlled by the BMGF and the Rockefellers who are promoting the Decade of the Vaccine. For them, the more emergencies to promote their vaccines, the better. Apparently the WHO does not consider 47,500 paralyzed kids in India and 10,000 dead Pakistani kids an emergency demanding suspension of Gate's polio vaccines.
It is right there, in Gates and the WHO not stopping a vaccine that can destroy children's lives and kill them outright that it's easy to see something is going on with vaccines that really has nothing whatever to do with caring about kids or saving lives. It seems quite the opposite. The vaccines seem an onslaught that moves forward despite children being run down by them. The children sickened by vaccines are even being used as reasons for more vaccines.
TN: Why is this [the increase in measles] happening?
In Syria, the government's efforts to withhold routine childhood vaccinations in areas considered politically unsympathetic to the dictatorship was one of the reasons for the popular uprising.
This is a political statement and it is false. There have been no uprisings against Assad because of demand for vaccines. As for polio, people suspect it came in from Pakistan with (US-backed) jihadis fighting against Assad, using polio as a weapon. After all, Gate's polio vaccines in Pakistan had just killed huge numbers of children while the US was fighting in just those areas. Then the US's attention is on Syria and suddenly there are "polio outbreaks" in Syria so vaccine teams were supposed to go in there, too. How many Syrian children have died from the same vaccines, in yet another US war zone?
TN: Small wonder that polio returned to Syria and that there have been more than 10,000 cases of measles in 2014.
Yes, small wonder, since it was militarily so useful.
There are no links providing evidence of your numbers?
Polio that may have been set off by the vaccines, is being used to get vaccine teams into Syria. In Pakistan, those teams included CIA. 10,000 Pakistani children died from Gates' polio vaccines.
Those deaths need to be tabulated with other Pakistani children's deaths from being killed by drone strikes because the GAVI vaccines appear to be part of the US's assault on countries it is fighting, even using CIA to help deliver them.
TN: Parents are desperate for vaccines,
That is another political statement. As shown above, in Pakistan and across Africa, people are hiding their children from vaccine teams or out and out killing them.
“The army and the police move house to house looking for children to vaccinate. At the same time, things that kill children like malaria, cholera, issues of stunted growth, sanitation, are completely untackled.”— Kihura Nkuba (Nov 2002)
Parents don't appear desperate for vaccines, if hiding their's children from vaccine teams or actually shooting them down in Pakistan and Nigeria and Kenya are any indication. Of course, attacking the Red Cross in Guinea (and not just once) may sound odd since we in the west have been taught to think the Red Cross is good but Africans see what is happening on the ground in their villages which is a different matter, and have seen Red Cross vaccines causing ebola and have been trying to warn the rest of the world. Ghanans Say Red Cross Vaccines Cause of Ebola
Africans are seeing their children die from these vaccines or be crippled by them and are trying to escape. This is the sort of situation the pharmaceutical wants to set up in the US with vaccine mandates The Nation is subtly supporting here.
From 131 African Children Vaccinated at Gunpoint: Do Bill Gates and Paul Offit approve?
"The Malawi Voice is reporting that a group of families who took their children out of the country, to Mozambique, to avoid the free measles vaccine that was being distributed, were rounded up by police and vaccinated at gunpoint upon returning to the country.
The vaccine safety/choice community has been hearing reports of this happening in Africa for more than a year now, but this is the first official story that I have heard thus far and thus been able to report. In this case the District Health Officer himself, Dr. Matchaya, freely admitted to the newspaper that this was done.
Readers can see more here
The Africans and Pakistanis aren't dumb. They can see their children and their friends' children are dying after vaccine campaigns. After all, they live in villages where all the hildren line up for vaccines, and when they start dying, the whole village knows. How can they not?
It's we in the West who haven't seen yet because children are taken individually to doctors and go home to private houses and there is no community that is watching those children. And we who have turned a deaf ear to the parents trying to tell us what happened to their children. It's worse than no community because it's more distant. It's "experts" in ivory towers distrusting the people there, the parents. It's just coincidence and coincidence, and coincidence, and coincidence and coincidence until we have an "epidemic" or damaged children and no cause because no one will hear.
Progressives who read The Nation or other progressive media that treat parents reporting on what's happening their children as a "misguided movement" or lambast Wakefield rather than investigating what is going on with vaccines, better larn quickly because the Rockefellers and Gates want mandated vaccines and progressive readers of The Nation are still in the dark about what's really been going on. Children are being damaged and dying from vaccines and progressives need to catch up on the truth of vaccines very quickly now.
From http://whale.to/b/genocide_vax_q.html#3._Polio_vaccination_a_killer:_
“I was told by this preacher that when the government introduced the National Immunization Days in 1997, most of the children after vaccination started dying. The preacher told me that they had so much death that his cassock, that he wears to go and conduct the burial ceremony, got old. He said “I buried the children and my cassock got old.” In the same room there was one mother who had four children, and she hid one and took three other children for vaccination, and three children died and that one survived. Now when I went to do my presentation and I asked most of the people who were there – about two, three thousand people – each person had the same story.
"At the main hospital in Mbarara during that month of 1977 more than 600 children had died following polio vaccination. 600 children! So even some of the timid medical practitioners who were initially afraid to come out, started coming out giving information and saying ‘Oh, we knew this oral polio vaccine was trouble because as soon as the child receives it, they get a temperature and their health goes downhill and there is nothing that you could do.’ “—-Kihura Nkuba (Nov 2002)
TN: and last year medical workers braved Assad's barrel bombs to vaccinate 1.4 million unimmunized children in northern Syria for polio, achieving 92 percent coverage, equivalent to the rate in the United States.
They may have done or not, but they did using Gate's oral polio vaccine, banned in the US because it causes polio, and the crippling in India of 47,500 children more than proved that true.
TN: Similarly in West Africa, people are begging for Ebola vaccines.
Huffington Post reports in West Africa, people are shunning treatment for Ebola.
How could it be otherwise? The WHO admits it caused AIDS with the smallpox vaccine - which was forced on people in Central Africa. Do you think people did see it for themselves or forget? The WHO, the UN, UNICEF, Doctors without Borders all were involved in various vaccine campaigns in West Africa that each coincided with outbreaks of ebola. And each group is connected to the Rockefellers. And Ghanian are not begging for vaccines.
They warning the world to avoid the Red Cross vaccines and for the same reasons.
http://exopolitics.blogs.com/ebolagate/2014/11/jesuits-run-the-red-cross-ghanans-say-red-cross-vaccines-cause-of-ebola-the-first-crusade-the-first-crusade-took-place-f.htmlNow The Nation is talking about the US.
TN: That misguided movement began with the unconscionable malpractice of Andrew Wakefield.
TN: yet this country houses the greatest number of kids not vaccinated for measles after India.
And look at the wonderful situation - no vaccination and no problem. No deaths. So vaccinations are not needed. The only deaths are from the vaccines which can simply be stopped. Then no deaths at all. Adequate vitamin and C and kids will be fine.
TN: Parents keen on protecting their children from polio are known to refuse the measles vaccine, not because of myths about "a Western conspiracy of sterilization" or fears that vaccinators are "spies for the CIA" (after the CIA's clumsy attempt to use a fake hepatitis B campaign to access Osama Bin Laden's compound);
It's no conspiracy theory - the Nigerian polio was vaccine contaminated with sterilizing agents. Good grief, they say it themselves:
"While in Pakistan, Gates and GAVI [Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunizations] teamed up with the World Bank and UN Population Fund in the 1970′s under the Task Force on Vaccines for Fertility Regulation. The Task Force, “…acts as a global coordinating body for anti-fertility vaccine R&D.” [Emphasis added.] http://www.occupycorporatism.com/home/the-shocking-truth-about-syrian-polio-resurgence-regime-change/
And Kissinger put out a report for the US government promoting sterilizing countries covertly with vaccines starting back in the early 70s.
National Security Council Document 20506: Implications of Worldwide Population Growth for U.S. Security and Overseas Interests -
This 1974 memorandum drafted by Henry Kissinger led directly to the unleashing of experimental vaccines on the unsuspecting public. It sighted countries as targets for "initial population reduction experimentation to be implemented around the year 2000". They identified India, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Nigeria, Mexico, Indonesia, Brazil, Philippines, Thailand, Egypt, Turkey, Ethiopia & Columbia for study. 3 million Filipinos ages 12-48 were given a test vaccine that ruined their health. North American Black & Native American Women were each given the same vaccine resulting in sterility rates of 25% & 35% respectively. The directive came from the WHO and was directly tied to Kissinger's report.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/6474391/Henry-Kissinger-Population-Control-Document
No one buys that Obama Bin Laden "myth" anymore. People know he died not that long after 9/1 and what hospital he died in and from what.
Official Story Of Osama Bin Laden's Death A Hoax With New Evidence Indicating Military Cover Up To Support Propaganda And LiesAlso http://12160.info/profiles/blogs/usama-bin-laden-died-in-december-2001-of-marfan-syndrome and http://www.infowars.com/top-doctor-confirms-bin-laden-had-marfan-syndrome/
The big media drama of hunting him down and killing him, isn't selling. People know that all those who were part of the Seal team died and that there was no evidence of his body since it was "dumped at sea", yet proof would be important, wouldn't it?
TN: rather, they are familiar with the anti-vaccine movement incited by Wakefield, asking, "If parents in California aren't getting their kids vaccinated, why should we?"
TN: Vaccination rates of 94 percent are needed to prevent measles transmission in high-risk areas such as child-care centers and schools.
Vaccine history says otherwise.
- 1988, Colorado, USA: According to an article published in the American Journal of Public Health in 1991, "early 1988 an outbreak of 84 measles cases occurred at a college in Colorado in which over 98 percent of students had documentation of adequate measles immunity ... due to an immunization requirement in effect since 1986. They concluded: "...measles outbreaks can occur among highly vaccinated college populations."[10]
- 1989, Quebec, Canada: According to an article published in the Canadian Journal of Public Health in 1991, a 1989 measles outbreak was "largely attributed to an incomplete vaccination coverage," but following an extensive review the researchers concluded "Incomplete vaccination coverage is not a valid explanation for the Quebec City measles outbreak.[11]
- 1991-1992, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: According to an article published in the journal Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical, in a measles outbreak from March 1991 to April 1992 in Rio de Janeiro, 76.4% of those suspected to be infected had received measles vaccine before their first birthday. [12]
- 1992, Cape Town, South Africa: According to an article published in the South African Medical Journal in 1994, "[In] August 1992 an outbreak occurred, with cases reported at many schools in children presumably immunised." Immunization coverage for measles was found to be 91%, and vaccine efficacy found to be only 79%, leading them to conclude that primary and secondary vaccine failure was a possible explanation for the outbreak.[13]
TN: Yet in Orange County and West Hollywood, documented childhood immunization rates are 92 percent, and in some schools as low as 60 percent—levels seen in Third World countries.
And yet children don't have infectious diseases, they have diseases from GMOs and GMO vaccines - autoimmune diseases, celial disease, type-II diabetes, cancers, leukemias, neurologic disorders, epilepsy.
The Lancet could help by publishing not just a retraction but also an unequivocal editorial discarding the myth once and for all.
What myth? That the MMR is a problem? But that's a reality.
TN: Using vaccination as a political tool is contrary to the public good.
Yes, and isn't that exactly what The Nation is going here, blaming Republicans, and without substantiation.
And it's not just he politicization vaccines that is a problem. It Ialso contrary to the public good to use vaccines as a military tool. So why is the CIA involved in vaccine teams, why are vaccine teams going into war zones and killing our "enemies'" children with vaccines, why did the UN, UNICEF, Doctors with Border, and the Who set off ebola in West Africa, which allowed the US to then send in troops to oil and mineral rich companies and start setting up bases there?
TN: Yet some politicians seem unable to assert collective responsibility over individualism: Chris Christie dithers about balancing parental choice and public health,
Is that not exactly what the issue is? DoesThe Nation sees only one choice, its own?
TN: .... while Rand Paul offers uniformed opinions and contradictory behavior.
How is anyone to know The Nation's opinions are "informed" since they are not substantiated by a single reference? And isn't it contradictory behavior on the part of The Nation as a progressive media to dispenses with the views of huge numbers of Americans with a word - "misguided"? And isn't it contradictory behavior for a progressive media not to stand in support of the little guy who screaming his children have died or been maimed, against a criminally corrupt, and historically fascist pharmaceutical industry?
TN: The White House spokesman said that "people should evaluate this for themselves," though he urged a bias toward "good science." Seriously?
I do not mean what I say to be in support of this president who is murdering children with drones in the Middle East and funding Israel killing more with many sorts of weapons, as to "Seriously?" the answer for any progressive would have to be "Yes" to people deciding for themselves and applying "good science" (though this administration relies on Monsanto science and corrupted science from Pharma). How could the Nation think otherwise?
TN: Should we also start debating the value of safe drinking water and sanitation? Throwing mud means lost ground, which measles relentlessly gains.
Once again, The Nation, is acting as though vaccines were public health measures like safe drinking water and sanitation. It seems a kind of wolf in sheep's clothing that is going on, here, since the measles vaccine, the MMR, caused over 108 death deaths and measles none, making the measles a much better public health measure than the the MMR, and making the MMR actually an ANTI-public health measure.
The way The Nation promotes collective responsibility over individualism - which is really the state imposing a corporate product (that is, corporate/government rule or fascism) which is is damaging human DNA with patented pharmaceutical industry GMOs, over the Bill of Rights.
"Collective responsibility" sounds so benevolent and fair to progressive ears where as "individualism" sounds so selfish. But "collective responsibility" sounds suspiciously like the Rockefeller neocon language of "Responsibility to Protect" which they insist trumps national sovereignty. The US and NATO merely needed to say that Qaddaffi was hurting his own people and we must "protect" - glossing over all international law - ending with the destruction Libya,
When "collective responsibility" or "Responsibility to Protect" lie in the hands of multinational corporate power that decides what is "best" then suddenly we start to appreciate national sovereignty and individualism, neither deemed legitimate by the Rockefellers or Soros or those who keep coming up with "humanitarian" and "emergency humanitarian" and "crisis humanitarian" justifications for doing and taking whatever they want anywhere they want. They don't want to be told no, so they deem nations no long capable of looking after their people when they do such things as refuse the Petro dollar and attack, or they attack families by deeming parents unfit because they don't vaccinate.
For they have now extended their "Responsibility to Protect" which they use to go in anywhere they want by claiming there are people being harmed, to "Responsibility to Prevent" which is the Rockefeller and Gates vaccine open-door. People's children are being taken by the state if parents do not vaccinate them. The two things overlap repeatedly with military actions, as can be seen in Pakistan and Syria and West Africa. Vaccines are the "helping" forward troops of NATO that can get in where military might not, contain CIA, and are killing.
What's missed in all this bogus "saving" of others, are the actual well being of the people in Libya and the country's sovereign rights under international law and how Responsibility to Protect destroyed Libya, and, at the individual level, individual sovereignty and rights - and how polio "prevention" in Pakistan killed 10,000 children. Then there is the social and medical value of leaving societies intact and families intact.
And lest we forget that the "Responsibility to Prevent" there is the love of parents and the studies showing showing unvaccinated children are thriving, it's vaccinated ones who are so sick.
So, common goods in neocon hands, are other names for neocolonialism and fascism.
TN; In medical school, I couldn't see myself in a career in public health. (I instead became a critical-care pediatrician.) Public health seemed a "done deal" that everyone could see the value of. I returned to it ten years later, a convert to public and global health. Kids are the most vulnerable, with their poorly developed immune systems. They are also vulnerable to the politicization of the public good, the only ones without a direct say in the debates about their welfare.
Public health - good nutrition, clean water, sanitation - have been undermined by the pharmaceutical industry (that claims vaccines are for health) immense threat to world nutrition, Codex Alimentarius and by the corporate water giants. The Nation should be pushing to get both these forces out of the government and away from people.
And yes, children have poorly developed immune systems which is why (1) vaccines are such a threat and (2) why naturally overcoming normal childhood diseases teach the children's immune systems and set it in the right direction - away from autoimmunity. For details, see: Breast Milk versus Vaccines: Why Breast Milk Is Spectacular Protection Against SIDS
“Redirection of the immune response following immunization appears to be a fundamental problem ....” Pg 112, “Modern Vaccinology”, By Edouard Kurstak, Pub. 1994.
From Immunology Today:
“Vaccination replaces recovery from infections with a rather different type of immunological stimulus. ... In the measles system [for instance], both vaccination and the infection itself have profound and long-lasting effects on the immune system, but these effects are not the same.”
“For example, recovery from natural measles infection reduces the incidence of atopy ["a predisposition toward developing certain allergic hypersensitivity reactions" ], and of allergic reactions to house dust mite to half the incidence seen in vaccinated children, suggesting a systemic and non-specific switch to Th1 activity.”
The Nation has not discussed the difference between natural immunity and what occurs with vaccination.
TN: And vaccines alone don't save lives: vaccinations do. There's little point in having vaccines if parents are allowed to refuse vaccination not only "on behalf" of their own children, but also, effectively, on behalf of other parents' babies who are too young for vaccination, to say nothing of kids born with immune disorders, for whom the vaccine is ineffective.
Now, The Nation subtly seeks the mandating of vaccines.
What good is it from the pharmaceutical indusrty to produce billions worth in vaccines and have 200 or so more in the pipeline if parents are increasingly concerned or even fully disinterested? What is a corporate power to do?
The Nation says it clearly: Parents should not be allowed to refuse vaccines. This would mean, though The Nation doesn't follow the full train of logic, that no matter the threat even the child's having an allergy to the contents of the vaccines, or the child being ill, or the child having had a life-threatening reaction to vaccines, parents must not be allowed to refuse.
The reason given is that unvaccinated children threaten other children.
The Nation is supposedly progressive media. However dressed up in "government health agencies" The Nation may want to say are responsible, we know the agencies are all captured by corporations. The FDA is so corruptly controlled by Pharma that scientists there sent a warning letter to Obama when he came in, to which he never responded.
Reference https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/scientists-inform-obama-of-corruption-at-the-fda.311629
Reference https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/scientists-inform-obama-of-corruption-at-the-fda.311629/
"Currently, there is an atmosphere at FDA in which the honest employee fears the dishonest employee, and not the other way around," the letter said. "Disturbingly, the atmosphere does not yet exist at FDA where honest employees committed to integrity and the FDA mission can act without fear of reprisal."Among the charges:
• Scientists and doctors have been threatened and told, on occasion, to ignore FDA regulations.
• Devices have not been properly labeled.
• Managers without appropriate experience have been given authority to make final decisions about device regulation and have done so while ignoring serious safety and effectiveness concerns.
• FDA experts have been excluded from product meetings because manufacturers felt that they were "biased."
• Manufacturers have been allowed to market their products without FDA approval.
An internal investigation of the charges, the scientists said, has resulted "in absolutely nothing: No one was held accountable, no appropriate or effective actions have been taken, and the same managers who engaged in the wrongdoing remain in place and have been rewarded and promoted.""
http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/01/09/fda.scientists/index.html
So far Obama and his team have declined to comment.
Make no mistake, this is progressive media promoting corporate power over people's bodies.
So, let's repeat, the measles vaccine has killed over 108 people during a time period when measles killed no one. No one. Not other people's babies, not people with problems with their immunity. No one. And the 108 figure from VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System) only captures a tiny portion (1 to 2 %) of all such events so the number deaths from the measles vaccine - the MMR - is much larger.
The MMR is not only linked to causing autism, but one of researchers at the CDC who did the study that claimed that the MMR didn't cause autism has now said he "lied" and the vaccine does and the CDC hid the data. The impact on little black boys of causing autism is so skewed - a 300% greater rate of autism, that is reasonable to ask . So, there are even questions whether the MMR is a racist vaccine. Is the MMR Is A Genetically Targeted RacistVaccine?
The connection between the MMR and autism is just what Wakefield said a few years ago and for which he got tarred and feathered by global media, which coincidentally is controlled by those with major investment in the MMR. None of this Nation article brought up.
The question is not whether you should have the choice to refuse a vaccine that might destroy or kill your child or yourself. You have the human right to defend your life and your children's lives and that is what this is about. Merck's Gardasil is now being exposed by the Toronto Star because girls are dying from it in Canada, too, not just here, and even more are being paralyzed. Truth is coming out, however late and slowly.
Formal scientific or governmental admissions about vaccines:
The US government has admitted the Hepatits B vaccine causes lupus.
US Govt Admits that Hep-B Vaccine Linked to SIDS (the sudden death of infants)
https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2015/02/04/breaking-cdc-vaccine-whistleblower-given-immunity-to-testify/
Federal Court admits Hepatitis B Vaccine caused a fatal autoimmune disorder ...
Vaccine pioneer admits the polio vaccine caused cancer
Polio vaccines now the leading cause of polio
WHO Admitted in 1987 that its smallpox vaccine Caused AIDS in Africa and elsewhere it was given-but omits that it requested The Virus.
TN: Parents are understandably confused, but the increasing polarization isn't helping.
Parents in the "misguided movement" are not confused at all - they want their children to not be harmed by vaccines. They and so many others are not polarizing the issue but bringing people together with a simple unifying approach - vaccination or no vaccination, Americans have the choose and Constitutional and human right to defend their bodies and their children's from what might harm or kill them.
TN: Amid the controversy, it's easy to miss the point: a very serious disease is getting on with its job of invading, infecting and re-colonizing the country, and we are losing control of it.
No many times The Nation attempts to make measles seem threatening, it fails because of the score:
Measles deaths - 0 MMR (measles vaccine) deaths - 108
US sports enthusiasts can see quickly that the overwhelming winner in terms of deaths, is the MMR vaccine.
TN: The public good of herd immunity can afford an occasional free-rider, but when large numbers of people place their own ideologies and idiosyncrasies above public health, it's children who suffer the consequences.
The outbreaks of measles among extremely heavily vaccinate populations proves that the government's promotion of herd immunity is a fallacy. If the vaccine worked, everyone should have been "immunized" and thus not susceptible to measles, but they weren't, clearly.
The Nation now attempts to reduce a huge and important national controversy over failing and dangerous vaccines (see the list of admissions above) to "ideologies and idiosyncrasies."
People wanting to keep their own children alive and well, is not an ideology or idiosyncrasy.
TN: It is particularly because of those children that we need to take infectious disease more seriously. Pandemics didn't happen until the earth's population reached a critical mass. We think of rats on ships spreading bubonic plague in the Middle Ages, but it was the far deadlier human-to-human pneumonic version that travelled far and wide. (Both have now reappeared in Madagascar's prisons.)
The US is not a Madagascar prison. And all viruses can be killed by a sufficiently high dose of vitamin C. That being so, vaccines are actually obsolete, especially since vitamin C, as opposed to vaccines, will handle any viral strain. Vaccine with particular strains of flu or other diseases are worthless if the makers haven't picked the right strain or if the virus mutates. With vitamin C, it's an across the board viral killer that is also good for people's health is so many ways, whole websites can't contain all the evidence as more and more comes out. The Nation readers are encouraged to skim through and see the variety disease conditions vitamin is proven to improve or cure.
http://vitamincfoundation.org/
AND The Nation seems not to realize it's promoting mandating vaccines that are genetically engineering anyone forced to take them, damaging their normal human DNA and leaving behind DNA from other species, including insects, and even from viruses. And the GMOs shot into people is patented, raising immense legal issues of ownership.
So, while plague in a Madagascar prison is a terrible analogy to measles in the US, what's much more terrible is destruction of children's DNA for profit with patented recombinant DNA.
TN: Nor it is enough to focus on national health.
Back to fear.
In an increasingly crowded and connected world, we need to think of public health not simply locally but globally. Air travel now means it is impossible to stop viruses
See link above on vitamin C and all viruses.
TN: from spreading around the globe. Germs are frequent flyers. Building the homeland walls
Most progressive would never refer to the US as "homeland," like this. It has a whiff of Nazi and "Motherland."
TN: higher won't help—the only reliable antidote is building global public health.
That's absolutely true, which is why Codex, the removal of access to nutrients, is the antithesis of public health, and yet it was designed by the same fascist pharmaceutical industry that killed millions during WWII and now, just as it arranged under Hitler, it wants vaccine mandates.
It is unlikely that the neocons who run the WHO will give up profit for actual public health like nutrition and clean water, or that the Rockefellers who had half interest in IG Farben and has been obsessed with racial "purity' and genes and depopulation, or that Bil Gates who wants billions more, will shift to actually helping the poor get what they need and from there be healthy. This is not about health, no matter how many times the The Nation refers to it, but corporate profit on steroids and ownership of all human DNA if mandates can be achieved.
TN: We have to pay attention to the neglect of infrastructure in West Africa, where Ebola erupted,
Ebola erupted from dispersed vaccine campaigns by the UN, UNICEF, the WHO and Doctors without Borders which somehow each and all coincided with ebola outbreaks. Rethinking the Goodness of Doctors Without Borders Outbreaks Coincided With Their Vaccine Campaigns
TN: and the Syrian military's deliberate destruction of public-health systems in opposition-held areas, where polio emerged.
Evidence is needed. The Syrians say polio was brought in by jihadists, and Syrians have every reason not to destroy their own public health system, unless The Nation is again treating vaccines as a synonym for actual public health measures.
TN: SARS became a global threat when China suppressed word of its emergence. MERS now threatens from the Persian Gulf. All of these diseases can easily spread to the West with profound implications. Just look at the effect of a few cases of Ebola in the United States.
The US made ebola and patented it. Why did they do that and why are they hiring such criminal companies to produce a vaccine? The Criminal and Nazi Companies Making the Ebola Vaccines
Viruses like AIDS, dengue fever, Lyme disease, etc, considered untreatable by conventional medicines, all have been successfully treated by vitamin C. Here is the protocol for treating ebola.
Combating Ebola: How To Fight Ebola with Vitamin C & Ascorbic Acid
TN: Returning to measles, if the threat of that deadly disease
Measles - 0 deaths Measles vaccines 108 deaths
TN: isn't enough for you to reject anti-vax folklore,
This doesn't qualify as folklore: Top Doctors Reveal Vaccines Turn Our Immune System Against Us
Neither do government and scientific admissions, above, of deaths and diseases such as AIDS and cancer, caused by vaccines.
TN: here's a little known fact about the benefit of vaccination. The measles vaccine doesn't only protect against measles. Because it contains a small amount of a live virus, the immune system must rev up to fight it, which in turn reduces mortality from other infectious disease—including pneumonia, sepsis and others—by 50 percent.
it would be nice if The Nation would cite a single study for all its claims. The Nation cites nothing. Given how much the CDC has pulled numbers out of the air, it seems better to stay grounded and produce evidence. It is impossible to trust what is said here because there is not evidence at all.
TN: This protective effect lasts until a vaccine is administered with a killed rather than a live virus, such as the one for diphtheria and tetanus.
After a series of supported claims, after all the fear related to diseases and conditions inAfrica and prisons, and the complete rejection of anything by a segment of the US population who have lost children or seen them injured following vaccination, The Nation basically says what some TV personality did during the false H1N1 pandemic, "Just take the damn vaccine."
So do you want to protect your kids? Give them the measles vaccine.
Sorry, there is government evidence that measles are killing no one but the vaccines are killing people. And logic would compel one to see that the MMR, the vaccine associated with autism for which the data was hidden by the CDC, is dangerous and has been deadly, and measles are not dangerous. Only fools don't take note of what kills.
TN: And all of us should get educated.
Yes. That seems to be what is coming out of the rather totalitarian push to mandate a corporate product that can maim and kill.
The mandating push is boomeranging. So much information is emerging now both medically and politically, that not only does it now seem clear that one is considerably better off to their trust in a normal virus like measles than in the GMO vaccines, MMR that is meant to alter people's DNA, but one can start to measure politicians and media by the degree of their support for human rights and choice. The Nation is not looking progressive or democratic or concerned for people.
TN: Education is a social vaccine against sustained ignorance that blocks effective and responsible responses to public-health threats.
Then where are the studies in this article and how can The Nation mention the global campaign - Gates' - with any positive message given the tens of thousands of crippled or dead children in Asia and Africa that Gates and GAVI have caused unless The Nation is promoting ignorance. We need to know the truth so we can raise the level of this national discussion. PR pieces for vaccines that condemn other views are not helpful or in the progressive tradition.
TN: But education alone is insufficient to overcome self-interest.
And particularly not financial interest. Was The Nation paid by Pharma for this article so promoting of vaccines?
TN: We all need to act for the public good.
Yes.
TN: Because when public health is at stake, it's the children who take the fall. Individuals and institutions that are allowed to prioritize personal preference or financial and political gain ahead of children's health are irresponsible and unethical, and they should not call the shots.
Very interesting how health rights are first reduced in the sentence above to "personal preferences" and then are conflated with institutional financial and political gain.
If we remove the references to "Individuals' and "personal preference" (i.e. the human right to protect one's or one's child's body) - the part we are being told is negative though it is about each of us and our own families - we are left with a warning about the vaccine industry and the mandating of vaccines:
.... institutions that are allowed to prioritize .... financial and political gain ahead of children's health are irresponsible and unethical, and they should not call the shots.
Yes, they should not. Yet, that is just what Merck and other vaccine manufacturers are attempting to do with their intense lobbying to remove exemptions from people across the country. They want to call the shots. They want to give the shots. They want no one standing in their way of a immensely expanded market (profits) from forcing vaccinations on everyone in this country and the world, a market that includes their taking proprietary ownership of human DNA by shooting patented GMOs into it.
In taking about shots, Dr Thomas Levy's article called Vaccination: The Shot that Keeps On Shooting comes to mind.
TN: In the short term, children's health and lives are at risk;
Yes, children are being crippled mentally and physically and are dying, in untold numbers, from vaccines. And now with the pharmaceutical industry push for mandating GMO vaccines, their lives are at imminent risk.
TN: .... in the long term, we jeopardize the local and global control of these previously conquered diseases.
We only jeopardize the global control of human DNA and of humanity through what can be put in those vaccines that would be forced on everyone.
TN: Prevention is not only better than cure
Here is what The Nation's hollow word "prevention" looks like in real terms.
Polio programme: let us declare victory and move on
Neetu Vashisht, Jacob Puliyel
Abstract
"It was hoped that following polio eradication, immunisation could be stopped. However the synthesis of polio virus in 2002, made eradication impossible. ....
"Furthermore, while India has been polio-free for a year, there has been a huge increase in non-polio acute flaccid paralysis (NPAFP). In 2011, there were an extra 47,500 new cases of NPAFP. Clinically indistinguishable from polio paralysis but twice as deadly, the incidence of NPAFP was directly proportional to doses of oral polio received. Though this data was collected within the polio surveillance system, it was not investigated. The principle of primum-non-nocere was violated.
Prevention than maims and kills is not better than anything. It's doing to people exactly what they fear most and were promised would be prevented.
Whereas facing a natural disease that has no chance of causing autism or little chance of disabling and killing and for which support or cures are available, is better than "disabling and deadly prevention."
TN: —which isn't an option for most of these diseases—it's also more cost-effective.
Neetu Vashisht, Jacob Puliyel
and non-polio AFP shows that monthly administration of OPV must cease.
As early as 1949, polio was proven CURABLE with high doses of vitamin C.
TN: Current and past pandemics reveal that when public health is neglected, history repeats itself in an entirely predictable way.
Yes, the history does. There was an astounding reduction of infectious diseases after public health measures of good nutrition, clean water and sanitation, yet none of these is The Nation article suggesting for the developing world nor are WHO and the pharmaceutical industry providing them, though they would save millions of lives.
Instead, the vaccine industry is cripping and killing malnourished children with vaccines and making a fortune off of doing so, while broadcasting using its global media about how many children are being saved.
The pharmaceutical industry knows very well that nutrients are what maintains life and in high enough concentration, cures diseases.
From The Law of the Pharmaceutical Industry
"Throughout the more than one hundred year existence of the pharmaceutical industry, vitamins and other essential nutrients, with defined functions as cofactors in cellular metabolism, have been the fiercest competition and the greatest threat to the long-term success of the pharmaceutical investment business.
"Vitamins and other effective natural health therapies that effectively prevent diseases are incompatible with the very nature of the pharmaceutical “business with disease.”
"To protect the strategic development of its investment business against the threat from effective, natural and non-patentable therapies, the pharmaceutical industry has – over an entire century - used the most unscrupulous methods, such as:
(1) Withholding life-saving health information from millions of people. It is simply unacceptable that today so few know that the human body cannot produce vitamin C and lysine, two key molecules for connective tissue stability and disease prevention.
(2) Discrediting natural health therapies. The most common way is through global PR campaigns organized by the Pharma-Cartel that spread lies about the alleged side effects of natural substances – molecules that have been used by Nature for millennia.
(3) Banning by law the dissemination of information about natural health therapies. To that end, the pharmaceutical industry has placed its lobbyists in key political positions in key markets and leading drug export nations.
"The pharmaceutical “business with disease” is the largest deception and fraud business in human history. The product “health” promised by drug companies is not delivered to millions of patients. Instead, the “products” most often delivered are the opposite: new diseases and frequently, death."
Because pharma knows that that nutrients prevent diseases, it has been for decades to remove human access to adequate nutrition worldwide under Codex Alimentarius. It can't sell drugs or vaccines if all the public health measures that almost entirely eliminated infectious diseases continued in the West or were brought to Asia and Africa. So the WHO doesn't provide clean water and nutrition and pharma makes sure the food supply is contaminated with GMOs and pesticides and food additives and drugs, and the water is contaminated with fluoride and drugs and radiation, and there will be no nutrients to turn to heal.
This was planned by the CEO's of the pharmaceutical industry shortly after getting out of prison for genocide and crimes against humanity during the Nazi era. Those plans would slowly kill billions of people.
http://www4.dr-rath-foundation.org/PHARMACEUTICAL_BUSINESS/laws_of_the_pharmaceutical_industry.htm
Not only did The Nation encourage its progressive readers to blindly push for the "food safety" bill written by Monsanto's Michael Taylor who knows GMOs make food more and more devoid of nutrients and along with him came his wife who is working to remove nutritional supplements from our lives so there is not way whatever to be well.
"Meet the Missus — Christine Lewis Taylor
"Undermining US law for the benefit of multinational corporations is a family affair in the Taylor household. To see how the concept of “risk assessment” can be usefully abused, let’s look at how Mrs. Michael Taylor adopts the conceit to her purposes.
"Christine Lewis Taylor, a veteran FDA employee, has been busy working up the “scientific” justification for placing a cap on the level of nutrients people should be allowed to consume. To do so, she pushes a perverse concept that defines nutrients as toxins. In other words, Mrs. Taylor would like us all to believe that the vitamins and minerals needed by cells throughout the body in order to function and detoxify should be considered hazardous, requiring governmental oversight that would limit people’s exposure to them under law.
"But the good news, at least for pharmaceutical companies, is that there would be more profit to be made in treating a host of vitamin-deficiency diseases. And, once these guidelines are adopted by Codex, people would no longer have the freedom to purchase therapeutic amounts of dietary supplements to compensate for a nutrient-deficient and legally poisoned food supply to which we’re subjected. Supplements would no longer be consider food as they are under DSHEA but instead would be regulated as drugs, available only by prescription or in amounts so limited as to render them insufficiently helpful in the prevention of disease. ....
"People are subject to disease not because they are deficient in pharmaceuticals. We are subject to disease because we either do not get the nutrients we need from our food sources or because we are exposed to environmental toxins and harmful food adulterants like hydrogenated oils, high fructose corn syrup, MSG, pesticide residues, aspartame, and GMOs, falsely deemed safe by the FDA. These adulterants contribute directly to a long list of predictable degenerative diseases. But thanks to the tireless work of Mrs. Taylor, the chemical cartel will get wealthier by making us sick and wealthier still by treating us for illnesses its products cause."
"From "Arbeit macht frei" ("Work makes you free") to "Codex Alimentarius"
|
Just fifteen years after they were convicted in the Nuremberg War Crimes Tribunal, Bayer, BASF and Hoechst were again the architects of the next major human rights offences. In 1962, they established the Codex Alimentarius Commission.
This dark period of German history is inextricably bound to one man, Fritz ter Meer:
- He was a member of the Managing Board of IG Farben from its inception to its dissolution. As the Wartime Manager, he was responsible for IG Auschwitz.
- In the Nuremberg Tribunal, ter Meer stated: "Forced labor did not inflict any remarkable injury, pain, or suffering on the detainees, particularly since the alternative for these workers would have been death."
- In 1948, ter Meer was sentenced by the Nuremberg Tribunal to seven years in prison for plundering and slavery.
- In 1952, his sentence was commuted, due to the influence of powerful friends.
- From 1956-1964, he was reinstated as a member of the Managing Board of Bayer AG.
- In 1962, ter Meer was one of the architects of the "Codex Alimentarius - Commission" and one of the main designers of the schemes that would profit from human suffering.
Progressives know Dame Judy Dench from PBS and from movies, so will recognize her narration of this exposure of Codex Alimentarius, "We Become Silent." People may also recognize that the man who orders, "Turn the camera off," is Michael Taylor, VP of Monsanto and now Food Safety Czar at the FDA, appointed by Obama, who is arranging the rapid introduction of more and more GMOs as possible - first grains, and oils, then grasses, and now fruit ....
Codex Alimentarius supports GMOs which destroy nutrients. Here is what they have done to health since Bill Clinton put Michael Taylor in at the FDA, and now Obama has put him in again to be in charge of all foods while his wife works on Codex to remove nutrition. The charts are from screen shots of the movie, BOUGHT.
First, one can see the GMOs that were unleashed starting during Bill Clinton's administration. Then one sees various diseases that had been fairly stable and low, prior to then, begin to rise dramatically, paralleling the increase in GMO crops, which have increased in numbers and in variety now under Obama.
The Nation did not attempt to stop the Monsanto food safety bill, but urged its readers to push for it to pass.
So when The Nation writes that we should care about prevention and doesn't mention nutrition and especially doesn't mention the pharmaceutical industry long time plan under Codex Alimentarius to REMOVE nutrition worldwide, it is hard to treat The Nation as having common sense or any common desire for the good of the world's people.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QWEdaAaxIH8
TN: Our common desire to protect the health and well-being of children was always the best reason to eliminate these diseases, and it remains our best hope of bringing us all back to common ground. Public health is about common sense and common goods.
Let's be very careful with the use of the word "common."
The Nation article suggests that there is a common good that comes before the individual, implying that those who see vaccines as "common threat" are thinking only of themselves, and they must not have
"Common goods" means what? What is best for everyone? Based on whose assessment? Corporations with a vested interest in a known to be deadly product? Or based on the public expressing its needs and finding consensus.
Common desire?
It's distinctly NOT a common desire of the vaccine industry and Bill Gates and David Rockfeller who are behind GAVI (Global Alliance for Vaccination and Immunization) to protect the health of children, when the pharmaceutical/vaccine industry and the Rockefellers have been involved historically in murdering millions of people under Hitler, and GAVI and Gates are currently disabling and killing tens of thousands of children in India and Pakistan (and who knows the numbers across Africa) and without stop.
The health of children does not seem a common desire when it flies in the face of a multi-trillion dollar vaccine industry that depends on the maintenance and even expansion of diseases to increase corporate profits.
http://www4.dr-rath-foundation.org/PHARMACEUTICAL_BUSINESS/laws_of_the_pharmaceutical_industry.htm
The health and well-being of children is clearly not a common desire, when the same industry pushing vaccines that kill, also created GMOs and the deadly pesticides that are sold with them, and is currently working to remove access globally to crucial nutrients that prevent diseases.
Common sense, though, is a good thing to have. It is exactly what drives the "anti-mandating of vaccines movement" - it being common sense not to let corporations or governments captured by them, force things into children and adults and pregnant women's bodies against their will - just what the vaccine industry is doing at gunpoint in Malawi.
It is common sense not to trust the pharmaceutical corporations that made GMOs which are causing endless diseases and make the vaccines they claim prevent diseases. Is this not creating disease problems that didn't need to exist - and how could they not after billions of tons of pesticides are poured onto what is eaten? - to sell vaccines for diseases that organic food without pesticides is curing, so selling vaccines as a false solution?
It's common sense not to trust the pharmaceutical industry that is removing life-giving nutrients which will kill billions, while making vaccines that it then claims will save lives. Is this not more of the creation - at great cost and immense bureaucratic planning - of diseases that were solved by exactly what would be removed, in order to sell vaccines that do not replace the body's sine qua non requirement for nutrients, so vaccines as a false solution?
It's common sense not to put mercury, aluminum, lead, cancer and other viruses, mycoplasma, formaldehyde and squalene into vaccines.
It's common sense to leave the decisions of what is best for children in the hands of their parents.
It's common sense not to let a corporate industry lobby for laws that mandate their own products that have already been proven to maim and kill. What would we think if Ford Pinto, which sometimes burst into flames, was mandated because Ford had lobbied that everyone needed one for their well-being, and Ford could add more and more such mandated potentially deadly cars?
Ralph Nader and the flaming Pinto vaccines
It's common sense to be suspicious of products from an industry that has gotten itself immunity from liability for those potentially disabling and deadly products, in advance of its increasing efforts to mandate those same products. What would we think if Ford had gotten legal immunity from liability for its Pinto, in advance?
It's common sense not mix together DNA from viruses, pigs and other animals, and shoot that into human beings' DNA, their code of life, because that would be genetically engineering people and we all know how horrifically that has turned out with plants and food.
And it's common sense for people to not let themselves or their children's DNA be contaminated with other species.
It's common sense to stop a vaccine, like Gardasil when even government data shows it's killed over a hundred girls and crippled many more and when cases are being filed showing it's causing infertility and destroying ovaries of girls. Common sense stays stop those vaccines, and don't let Merck change the law in California so kids would decide whether to take that vaccine - after watching a movie of people dying of cancer - and parents not even be allowed to know
So, yes to common sense. It would be welcome.
The Nation article's final words:
TN: Let's not allow spin doctors and myths to prevail over our shared aim of protecting the world's children from the world's oldest and deadliest diseases.
Yes, let's not allow spin doctors and myths to prevail .... over families' shared aim to protect their children from harm OF ANY KIND, including from vaccines. Or put a little more specifically, let's not allow the CIA working with the CDC and the pharmaceutical industry's control over media or the fully debunked myths that "vaccines are the greatest miracle of modern medicine" to prevail over the real history of the decline of infectious diseases from nutrition and sanitation (public health measures), not from vaccines, or over the truth of the ten of thousands of children (per country and annually) Gates has paralyzed and killed across Asia and Africa
Corporate spin doctors and pharmaceutical industry myths should never prevail over families' shared aim to protect their children from harm OF ANY KIND, and the GMO vaccines degradation of their human DNA is the greatest threat of all. Harm may sometimes be in the form of disease, but the greater danger to children comes in the form of mandated GMO vaccines that damage human DNA, backed by a pharmaceutical indsustry-captured government that is so far to totalitarian rule it takes children from loving parents for their not consenting to pharma's desire for total control over their bodies.
Spin doctors and myths should not be allowed to prevail over the Bill of Rights and democracy and the continuation of human DNA.
Progressives, as you think about The Nation article and its pushing of fear, vaccines and removal of your own rights over your body, you may want to read this article by Counterpunch for an overview of what has happened to progressives efforts to improve the world.
Comments