Probably the most well known environmental weapons system is HAARP, operated by the United States military.  In submitting their comments for the Environmental Impact Statement for HAARP, major U.S. environmental groups stated, in 1996, that new developments about HAARP had come to light, requiring an expanded statement.
Functionally, these new developments relate mainly to HAARP’s potential for Environmental warfare:
“If there remains a "major federal action" to occur, and if the new information is sufficient to show that the remaining action will "affect the quality of the human environment" in a significant manner or to a significant extent not already considered, a supplemental . . . [impact statement] must be prepared.

“II. Factual Background

“As you know, in late 1993, the Air Force, in cooperation with the Navy, began construction of HAARP in Gakona, Alaska. The main element of HAARP is a large radio wave transmitter which "utilize[s] powerful, high frequency (HF) transmissions and a variety of associated observational instruments to investigate naturally occurring and artificially induced ionospheric processes that support, enhance or degrade the propagation of radio waves." ROD at 1. Construction of the HAARP facility is currently scheduled to be completed within six or seven years and presently it runs at about ten percent of projected power levels. See O'Harra, HAARP's Mixed Signals; Solid Research Or Menace To Alaskans, Anchorage Daily News (April 7, 1996).

“As the Air Force originally explained, HAARP is aimed at studying the ionosphere, ‘with particular emphasis placed on being able to better understand and use it to enhance communications and surveillance systems for both civil and defense purposes.’ FEIS Vol. I at iii. As an example, one touted potential military benefit from the project is the development of a communication system for use with submerged submarines.

“The Air Force, in the FEIS, detailed its view of the impacts of the project. The Air Force focused almost exclusively on the local and regional impacts of HAARP, primarily on things such as impacts to animals, degradation of air quality and vegetation loss due to construction activities. FEIS at 3-1 to 3-165. The Air Force deemed HAARP's effects to the atmosphere and biological effects to be non-existent or insignificant. See id; see also ROD at Table 2.4-1. The only admitted potentially significant impact is ‘interference to radio communication systems and electro-explosive devices during transmitting periods.’ Id.

“In the years since the EIS process was completed, several groups and individuals have raised questions concerning the uses to which HAARP will be put and the likely effects flowing from those uses. Some of these assertions are set forth in a book, published in1995, called “Angels Don't Play This HAARP”. Manning, Begich, Earthpulse Press (1995).1 In this book, the authors set forth a detailed and fully-referenced description of HAARP and its potential uses and effects. During the course of their research for the book, the authors found that, rather than the innocuous project described by the Air Force, HAARP represents a technology which could lead to a new class of weapons that could change our world profoundly – an all-purpose military tool. If misused, the tool could mess up the weather. It could be used against humanity in a way that would change what people think, believe and feel.
           [HAARP could]:

          manipulate global weather;
          hurt ecosystems;
          knock out electronic communications; or
          change our moods and mental states.

“A detailed recitation in this discussion of the assertions and facts contained in “Angels Don't Play This HAARP” would serve no useful purpose; the book stands on its own as a question mark affixed to the Air Force's contrary description of the uses and effects of HAARP.2 As set out below, this request is based upon questions and concerns about HAARP raised by facts surrounding both the Air Force's current intended uses for the project and scientific evidence raising questions about HAARP's effects.”

HAARP was not developed in isolation.  Dr. Rosalie Bertell of Toronto, Ontario, concludes that HAARP was developed by the U.S. military as part of an established program of electromagnetic weapons, for application in Environmental warfare.
“It would be rash to assume that HAARP is an isolated experiment which would not be expanded. It is related to fifty years of intensive and increasingly destructive programs to understand and control the upper atmosphere.

“It would be rash not to associate HAARP with the space laboratory construction which is separately being planned by the United States. HAARP is an integral part of a long history of space research and development of a deliberate military nature.

“The military implications of combining these projects is alarming.  Basic to this project is control of communications, both disruption and reliability in hostile environments. The power wielded by such control is obvious.

“The ability of the HAARP / Spacelab/ rocket combination to deliver very large amount of energy, comparable to a nuclear bomb, anywhere on Earth via laser and particle beams, are frightening.

“The project is likely to be "sold" to the public as a space shield against incoming weapons, or, for the more gullible, a devise for repairing the ozone layer.”

Because of its implications for influencing predicted Earth changes, I think it is useful to thoroughly review the history of the development of environmental warfare.  Dr. Bertell’s review of the 35-year history of environmental weapons development preceding HAARP is a chilling one.
“Prepared by Military interest in space became intense during and after World War II because of the introduction of rocket science, the companion to nuclear technology. The early versions include the buzz bomb and guided missiles. They were thought of as potential carriers of both nuclear and conventional bombs.

“Rocket technology and nuclear weapon technology developed simultaneously between 1945 and 1963. During this time of intensive atmospheric nuclear testing, explosions at various levels above and below the surface of the Earth were attempted. Some of the now familiar descriptions of the Earth's protective atmosphere, such as the existence of the Van Allen belts, were based on information gained through stratospheric and ionospheric experimentation.

“The Earth's atmosphere consists of the troposphere, from sea level to about 16 km above the Earth's surface; the stratosphere (which contains the ozone level) which extends from about the 16 to 48 km above the Earth; and the ionosphere which extends from 48 km to over 50,000 km above the surface of the Earth.”

“The Earth's protective atmosphere or "skin" extends beyond 3,200 km above sea level to the large magnetic fields, called the Van Allen Belts, which can capture the charged particles sprayed through the cosmos by the solar and galactic winds. These belts were discovered in 1958 during the first weeks of the operation of America's first satellite, Explorer I. They appear to contain charged particles trapped in the Earth's gravity and magnetic fields. Primary galactic cosmic rays enter the solar system from interstellar space, and are made up of protons with energies above 100 MeV, extending up to astronomically high energies. They make up about 100 percent of the high-energy rays. Solar rays are generally of lower energy, below 20 MeV (which is still high energy in Earth terms). These high-energy particles are affected by the Earth's magnetic field and by geomagnetic latitude (distance above or below the geomagnetic equator). The flux density of low energy protons at the top of the atmosphere is normally greater at the poles than at the equator. The density also varies with solar activity, being at a minimum when solar flares are at a minimum.

“The Van Allen belts capture charged particles (protons, electrons and alpha particles) and these spiral along the magnetic force lines toward the Polar Regions where the force lines converge. They are reflected back and forth between the magnetic force lines near the poles. The lower Van Allen Belt is about 7700 km above the Earth's surface, and the outer Van Allen Belt is about 51,500 km above the surface.   According to the Encyclopedia Britannica, the Van Allen belts are most intense along the equator, and effectively absent over the poles. They dip to 400 km over the South Atlantic Ocean, and are about 1,000 km high over the Central Pacific Ocean. In the lower Van Allen Belt, the proton intensity is about 20,000 particles with energy above 30 MeV per second per square centimeter. Electrons reach a maximum energy of 1 MeV, and their intensity has a maximum of 100 million per second per square centimeter. In the outer Belt, proton energy averages only 1 MeV. For comparison, most charged particles discharged in a nuclear explosion range between 0.3 and 3 MeV, while diagnostic medical X-ray has peak voltage around 0.5 MeV.
Project Argus (1958)

“Between August and September 1958, the US Navy exploded three fission type nuclear bombs 480 km above the South Atlantic Ocean, in the part of the lower Van Allen Belt closest to the Earth's surface. In addition, two hydrogen bombs were detonated 160 km over Johnston Island in the Pacific. The military called this "the biggest scientific experiment ever undertaken." It was designed by the US Department of Defense and the US Atomic Energy Commission, under the code name Project Argus. The purpose appears to be to assess the impact of high altitude nuclear explosions on radio transmission and radar operations because of the electromagnetic energy, and to increase understanding of the geomagnetic field and the behavior of the charged particles in it.

“This gigantic experiment created new (inner) magnetic radiation belts encompassing almost the whole Earth, and injected sufficient electrons and other energetic particles into the ionosphere to cause worldwide effects. The electrons traveled back and forth along magnetic force lines, causing an artificial "aurora" when striking the atmosphere near the North Pole.

“The US Military planned to create a "telecommunications shield" in the ionosphere, reported in 13-20 August 1961, Keesings Historisch Archief (K.H.A.). This shield would be created "in the ionosphere at 3,000 km height, by bringing into orbit 350,000 million copper needles, each 2-4 cm long [total weight 16 kg], forming a belt 10 km thick and 40 km wide, the needles spaced about 100 m apart." This was designed to replace the ionosphere "because telecommunications are impaired by magnetic storms and solar flares." The US planned to add to the number of copper needles if the experiment proved to be successful. This plan was strongly opposed by the Intentional Union of Astronomers.

     Project Starfish (1962)

“On July 9, 1962, the US began a further series of experiments with the ionosphere. From their description: "one kiloton device, at a height of 60 km and one megaton and one multi-megaton, at several hundred kilometers height" (K.H.A., 29 June 1962). These tests seriously disturbed the lower Van Allen Belt, substantially altering its shape and intensity. "In this experiment the inner Van Allen Belt will be practically destroyed for a period of time; particles from the Belt will be transported to the atmosphere. It is anticipated that the Earth's magnetic field will be disturbed over long distances for several hours, preventing radio communication. The explosion in the inner radiation belt will create an artificial dome of polar light that will be visible from Los Angeles" (K.H.A. 11 May 1962). A Fijian Sailor, present at this nuclear explosion, told me that the whole sky was on fire and he thought it would be the end of the world. This was the experiment that called forth the strong protest of the Queen's Astronomer, Sir Martin Ryle in the UK.

"The ionosphere [according to the under-standing at that time] that part of the atmosphere between 65 and 80 km and 280- 320 km height, will be disrupted by mechanical forces caused by the pressure wave following the explosion. At the same time, large quantities of ionizing radiation will be released, further ionizing the gaseous components of the atmosphere at this height. This ionization effect is strengthened by the radiation from the fission products... The lower Van Allen Belt, consisting of charged particles that move along the geomagnetic field lines... will similarly be disrupted. As a result of the explosion, this field will be locally destroyed, while countless new electrons will be introduced into the lower belt" (K.H.A. 11 May 1962). "On 19 July... NASA announced that as a consequence of the high altitude nuclear test of July 9, a new radiation belt had been formed, stretching from a height of about 400 km to 1600 km; it can be seen as a temporary extension of the lower Van Allen Belt" (K.H.A. 5 August 1962).

“As explained in the Encyclopedia Britannica: ‘.. Starfish made a much wider belt [than Project Argus] that extends from low altitude out past L=3 [i.e. three Earth radiuses or about 13,000 km above the surface of the Earth].’ Later in 1962, the USSR undertook similar planetary experiments, creating three new radiation belts between 7,000 and 13,000 km above the Earth. According to the Encyclopedia, the electron fluxes in the lower Van Allen Belt have changed markedly since the 1962 high- altitude nuclear explosions by the US and USSR, never returning to their former state.     According to American scientists, it could take many hundreds of years for the Van Allen Belts to restabilize at their normal levels. (Research done by: Nigel Harle, Borderland Archives, Cortenbachstraat 32, 6136 CH Sittard, Netherlands.)

     SPS: Solar Power Satellite Project (1968)

“In 1968 the US military proposed Solar Powered Satellites in geostationary orbit some 40,000 km above the Earth, which would intercept solar radiation using solar cells on satellites and transmit it via a microwave beam to receiving antennas, called rectennas, on Earth. The US Congress mandated the Department of Energy and NASA to prepare an Environmental Impact Assessment on this project, to be completed by June 1980, and costing $25 Million. This project was designed to construct 60 Solar Powered Satellites over a thirty year period at a cost between $500 and $800 thousand million (in 1968 dollars), providing 100 percent of the US energy needs in the year 2025 at a cost of $3000 per kW. At that time, the project cost was two to three times larger than the whole Department of Energy budget, and the projected cost of the electricity was well above the cost of most conventional energy sources. The rectenna sites on Earth were expected to take up to 145 square kilometers of land, and would preclude habitation by any humans, animals or even vegetation. Each Satellite was to be the size of Manhattan Island.

     Saturn V Rocket (1975)

“Due to a malfunction, the Saturn V Rocket burned unusually high in the atmosphere,  above 300 km. This burn produced "a large ionospheric hole" (Mendillo, M. Et al.,Science p. 187, 343, 1975). The disturbance reduced the total electron content more than 60% over an area 1,000 km in radius, and lasted for several hours. It prevented all telecommunications over a large area of the Atlantic Ocean. The phenomenon was apparently caused by a reaction between the exhaust gases and ionospheric oxygen ions. The reaction emitted a 6300 A airglow. Between 1975 and 1981 NASA and the US Military began to design ways to test this new phenomena through deliberate experimentation with the ionosphere.

SPS Military Implications (1978)

“Early review of the Solar Powered Satellite Project began in around 1978, and I was on the review panel. Although this was proposed as an energy program, it had significant military implications. One of the most significant, first pointed out by Michael J. Ozeroff, was the possibility of developing a satellite-borne beam weapon for anti-ballistic missile (ABM) use. The satellites were to be in geosynchronous orbits, each providing an excellent vantage point from which an entire hemisphere can be surveyed continuously. It was speculated that a high-energy laser beam could function as a thermal weapon to disable or destroy enemy missiles. There was some discussion of electron weapon beams, through the use of a laser beam to preheat a path for the following electron beam.

“The SPS was also described as a psychological and anti- personnel weapon, which could be directed toward an enemy. If the main microwave beam was redirected away from its rectenna, toward enemy personnel, it could use an infrared radiation wavelength (invisible) as an anti-personnel weapon. It might also be possible to transmit high enough energy to ignite combustible materials. Laser beam power relays could be made from the SPS satellite to other satellites or platforms, for example aircraft, for military purposes. One application might be a laser powered turbofan engine that would receive the laser beam directly in its combustion chamber, producing the required high temperature gas for its cruising operation. This would allow unlimited on-station cruise time. As a psychological weapon, the SPS was capable of causing general panic

“The SPS would be able to transmit power to remote military operations anywhere needed on Earth. The manned platform of the SPS would provide surveillance and early warning capability, and ELF linkage to submarines. It would also provide the capability of jamming enemy communications. The potential for jamming and creating communications is significant. The SPS was also capable of causing physical changes in the ionosphere

“President Carter approved the SPS Project and gave it a go- ahead, in spite of the reservation which many reviewers, myself included, expressed. Fortunately, it was so expensive, exceeding the entire Department of Energy budget, that funding was denied by the Congress. I approached the United Nations Committee on Disarmament on this project, but was told that as long as the program was called Solar Energy by the United States, it could not be considered a weapons project. The same project resurfaced in the US under President Reagan. He moved it to the much larger budget     of the Department of Defense and called it Star Wars. Since this is more recent history, I will not discuss the debate that raged over this phase of the plan.

“By 1978, it was apparent to the US Military that communications in a nuclear hostile environment would not be possible using traditional methods of radio and television technology (Jane's Military Communications 1978). By 1982, GTE Sylvania (Needham Heights, Massachusetts) had developed a command control electronic sub-system for the US Air Force's Ground Launch Cruise Missiles (GLCM) that would enable military commanders to monitor and control the missile prior to launch both in hostile and non-hostile environments. The system contains six radio subsystems, created with visible light using a dark beam (not visible) and is resistant to the disruptions experienced by radio and television. Dark beams contribute to the formation of energetic plasma in the atmosphere. This plasma can become visible as smog or fog. Some has a different charge than the sun's energy, and accumulates in places where the sun's energy is absent, like the Polar Regions in the winter. When the polar spring occurs, the sun appears and repels this plasma, contributing to holes in the ozone layer. This military system is called: Ground Wave Emergency Network    (GWEN). (See The SECOMII Communication System, by Wayne Olsen, SAND 78- 0391,Sandia Laboratories, Albuquerque, New Mexico, April 1978.) This innovative emergency radio system was apparently never implemented in Europe, and exists only in North America.

Orbit Maneuvering System (1981)

“Part of the plan to build the SPS space platforms was the demand for reusable space shuttles, since they could not afford to keep discarding rockets. The NASA Spacelab 3 Mission of the Space Shuttle made, in 1981, "a series of passes over a network of five ground based observatories" in order to study what happened to the ionosphere when the Shuttle injected gases into it from the Orbit Maneuvering System (OMS). They discovered that they could "induce ionospheric holes" and began to experiment with holes made in the daytime or at night over Millstone, Connecticut, and Arecibo, Puerto Rico. They experimented with the effects of "artificially induced ionospheric depletions on very low frequency wave lengths, on equatorial plasma instabilities, and on low frequency radio astronomical observations over Roberval, Quebec, Kwajelein, in the Marshall Islands and Hobart, Tasmania" (Advanced Space Research, Vo1.8, No. 1, 1988).

Innovative Shuttle Experiments (1985)

“An innovative use of the Space Shuttle to perform space physics experiments in Earth orbit was launched, using the OMS injections of gases to "cause a sudden depletion in the local plasma concentration, the creation of a so called ionospheric hole." This artificially induced plasma depletion can then be used to investigate other space phenomena, such as the growth of the plasma instabilities or the modification of radio propagation paths. The 47 second OMS burn of July 29, 1985, produced the largest and most long-lived ionospheric hole to date, dumping some 830 kg of exhaust into the ionosphere at sunset. A 6-second, 68-km OMS release above Connecticut in August 1985, produced an airglow that covered over 400,000 square km.

“During the 1980's, rocket launches globally numbered about 500 to 600 a year, peaking at 1500 in 1989. There were many more during the Gulf War. The Shuttle is the largest of the solid fuel rockets, with twin 45-meter boosters. All solid fuel rockets release large amounts of hydrochloric acid in their exhaust, each Shuttle flight injecting about 75 tons of ozone destroying chlorine into the stratosphere. Those launched since 1992 inject even more ozone-destroying chlorine, about 187 tons, into the stratosphere (which contains the ozone layer). Mighty Oaks (1986)

“In April 1986, just before the Chernobyl disaster, the US had a failed hydrogen test at the Nevada Test Site called Mighty Oaks. This test conducted far underground, consisted of a hydrogen bomb explosion in one chamber, with a leaded steel door to the chamber, two meters thick, closing within milliseconds of the blast. The door was to allow only the first radioactive beam to escape into the "control room" in which expensive instrumentation was located. The radiation was to be captured as a weapon beam. The door failed to close as quickly as planned, causing the radioactive gases and debris to fill the control room, destroying millions of dollars worth of equipment. The experiment was part of a program to develop X-ray and particle beam weapons. The radioactive releases from Mighty Oaks were vented, under a "licensed venting" and were likely responsible for many of the North American nuclear fallout reports in May 1986, which were attributed to the Chernobyl disaster.

Desert Storm (1991)

“According to Defense News, April 13 - 19, 1992, the US deployed an electromagnetic pulse weapon (EMP) in Desert Storm, designed to mimic the flash of electricity from a nuclear bomb. The Sandia National Laboratory had built a 23,000 square meter laboratory on the Kirkland Air Force Base, 1989, to house the Hermes II electron beam generator capable of producing 20 Trillion Watt pulses lasting 20 billionths to 25 billionths of a second. This X-ray simulator is called a Particle Beam Fusion Accelerator. A stream of electrons hitting a metal plate can produce a pulsed X-ray or gamma ray. Hermes II had produced electron beams since 1974. These devises were apparently tested during the Gulf War, although detailed information on them is sparse.

High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program, HAARP (1993)

“The HAARP Program is jointly managed by the US Air Force and the US Navy, and is based in Gakona, Alaska. It is designed to "understand, simulate and control ionospheric processes that might alter the performance of communication and surveillance systems." The HAARP system intends to beam 3.6 Gigawatts of effective radiated power of high frequency radio energy into the ionosphere in order to:

          Generate extremely low frequency (ELF) waves for communicating with submerged submarines
          Conduct geophysical probes to identify and characterize natural ionospheric processes so that techniques can be developed to mitigate or control them
          Generate ionospheric lenses to focus large amounts of high frequency energy, thus providing a means of triggering ionospheric processes that potentially could be exploited for Department of Defense purposes,
          Electron acceleration for infrared (IR) and other optical emissions that could be used to control radio wave propagation properties
          Generate geomagnetic field aligned ionization to control the reflection/scattering properties of radio waves,
          Use oblique heating to produce effects on radio wave propagation, thus broadening the potential military applications of ionospheric enhancement technology.

Poker Flat Rocket Launch (1968 to Present)

“The Poker Flat Research Range is located about 50 km North of Fairbanks, Alaska, and it was established in 1968. It is operated by the Geophysical Institute with the University of Alaska Fairbanks, under NASA contract. About 250 major rocket launches have taken place from this site, and in 1994, a 16-meter long rocket was launched to help NASA "understand chemical reactions in the atmosphere associated with global climate change." Similar experiments, but using Chemical Release Modules     (CRM), have been launched from Churchill, Manitoba. In 1980, Brian Whelan's  "Project Waterhole" disrupted an aurora borealis, bringing it to a temporary halt. In February 1983, the chemical released into the ionosphere caused an aurora borealis over Churchill. In March 1989, two Black Brant X's and two Nike Orion rockets were launched over Canada, releasing barium at high altitudes and creating artificial clouds. These Churchill artificial clouds were observed from as far away as Los Alamos, New Mexico.

“The US Navy has also been carrying on High Power Auroral Stimulation (HIPAS) research in Alaska. Through a series of wires and a 15-meter antenna, they have beamed high intensity signals into the upper atmosphere, generating a controlled disturbance in the ionosphere. As early as 1992, the Navy talked of creating 10-kilometer long antennas in the sky to generate extremely low frequency (ELF) waves needed for communicating with submarines. Another purpose of these experiments is to study the Aurora Borealis, called by some an outdoor plasma lab for studying the principles of fusion. Shuttle flights are now able to generate auroras with an electron beam. On November 10, 1991, and aurora borealis appeared in the Texas sky for the first time ever recorded, and it was seen by people as far away as Ohio and Utah, Nebraska and Missouri. The sky contained "Christmas colors" and various scientists were quick to blame it on solar activity. However, when pressed most would admit that the ionosphere must have been weakened at the time, so that the electrically charged particle hitting the Earth's atmosphere created the highly visible light called airglow. These charged particles are normally pulled northwards by the Earth's magnetic forces, to the magnetic north pole. The Northern Lights, as the aurora borealis is called, normally occurs in the vortex at the pole where the energetic particles, directed by the magnetic force lines, are directed.

Others speak of the proliferation of environmental weapons.

“But with (HAARP's) beam-steering, the pulsing capabilities, and maybe some instigation from secret organizations or counter-proliferation groups within the U. S. government, there could be some bad effects."

The adverse human health effects of environmental weapons are also a concern.
“Possible effects of future HAARP fields on living systems is a concern that should be discussed, Dr. Flanagan told the committee. "One of the purposes of HAARP is to develop ELF (extremely low frequency) capability, for transmitting high-energy ELF waves, from .001 HZ all the way up to 40 Kilohertz, as described in (the military's) literature."

“In the meantime, new research by other scientists shows that ELF signals may have profound effects on living organisms. Dr. Flanagan cited the example of known effects of ELF on the Circadian rhythms, which is the biological clock, of all living organisms including humans.

Importantly, an international constituency against environmental weapons is beginning to build.
“Individual members of the European Parliament are among the growing number of people worldwide who have been startled to hear about HAARP. Voices expressing various levels of concern are being heard in many countries. For example, in contrast with the cautiously worded comment of Dr. Bertell, a Germany-based researcher in the field of quantum electrodynamics, Al Zielinski, paints an apocalyptic word-picture. (He says HAARP technology could trigger a disaster with a global impact - electromagnetic waves causing destruction "when interacting with protective layers of the Earth and its gravitational field".)

Two historical newspaper (New York Times) interviews with inventor Nicola Tesla – one in 1915 and one in 1940 – set a prescient theoretical vision of the forces now driving the development and deployment of environmental weapons.
Tesla is quoted in a New York Times article of December 8, 1915

          "Nikola Tesla, the inventor, has filed patent applications on the essential
          parts of a machine, possibilities which test a layman's imagination and
          promise a parallel of Thor's shooting thunderbolts from the sky to punish
          those who had angered the gods...Suffice it to say that the invention will
          go through space with a speed of 300 miles a second, a manless ship
          without propelling engine or wings sent by electricity to any desired point
          on the globe on its errand of destruction, if destruction its manipulator
          wishes to effect."

          'It is not a time,' said Dr. Tesla yesterday, 'to go into the details of this
          thing. It is founded upon a principle that means great things in peace; it
          can be used for great things in war. But I repeat, this is no time to talk of
          such things.'

          'It is perfectly practicable to transmit electrical energy without wires and
          produce destructive effects at a distance. I have already constructed a
          wireless transmitter which makes this possible, and have described it in
          my technical publications, among which I refer to my patent number
          1,119,732 recently granted. With transmitters of this kind we are enabled
          to project electrical energy in any amount to any distance and apply it for
          innumerable purposes, both in war and peace. Through the universal
          adoption of this system, ideal conditions for the maintenance of law and
          order will be realized, for then the energy necessary to the enforcement
          of right and justice will be normally productive, yet potential, and in any
          moment available, for attack and defense. The power transmitted need
          not be necessarily destructive, for, if distance is made to depend upon it,
          its withdrawal or supply will bring about the same results as those now
          accomplished by force of arms.'
Tesla continues this theme in a second article in the New York Times, on September 22, 1940.
         "Nikola Tesla, one of the truly great inventors, who celebrated his
          eighty-fourth birthday on July 10, tells the writer that he stands ready to
          divulge to the United States government the secret of his 'teleforce', with
          which, he said, airplane motors would be melted at a distance of 250
          miles, so that an invisible Chinese Wall of Defense would be built around
          the country..."

          "This 'teleforce', he said, is based upon an entirely new principle of
          physics that 'no one has ever dreamed about', different from the principle
          embodied in his inventions relating to the transmission of electrical power
          from a distance, for which he has received a number of basic patents.
          This new type of force, Mr. Tesla said, would operate through a beam
          one hundred-millionth of a square centimeter in diameter, and could
          be generated from a special plant that would cost no more than
          $2,000,000 and would take only about three months to construct."

          "The beam, he states, involves four new inventions, two of which already
          have been tested. One of these is a method and apparatus for producing
          rays 'and other manifestations of energy' in free air, eliminating the
          necessity for a high vacuum; a second is a method and process for
          producing 'very great electrical force'; the third is a method for amplifying
          this force and the fourth is a new method for producing 'a tremendous
          electrical repelling force'. This would be the projector, or gun, of the
          system. The voltage for propelling the beam to its objective, according to
          the inventor, will attain a potential of 50,000,000 volts."

          "With this enormous voltage, he said, microscopic electrical particles of
          matter will be catapulted on their mission of defensive destruction. He has
          been working on this invention, he added, for many years and has
          recently made a number of improvements in it."

Let’s go back to our key question on Earth changes and Environmental weapons.
What could be the Earth changes effects of environmental, electromagnetic warfare in the period leading up to, and during intense electromagnetic shifts brought about by a possible reversal of the Sun’s magnetic fields around 2012 AD?
A possible mechanism between the electromagnetic effects of environmental weapons and the triggering of Earth changes seems relatively straightforward, based on what we know the effects of electromagnetic energy emanating from nuclear testing has been.  It is not scientifically credible that environmental weapons have no significant effects on vital Earth event systems, like its electromagnetic fields.
Environmental weapons may likely continue to distort and twist the electromagnetic field of the Earth.  They may likely continue to increase the Earth’s seismicity, its proneness to Earthquake.  Electromagnetic energy from environmental weapons may, if of sufficient strength, induce significant Earth events on their own, by distorting the Earth’s magnetic field and inducing tectonic tilt, or by inducing resonant and disruptive frequencies in the Earth surface itself.
Environmental weapon’s harm to the Earth’s magnetic field and to its tectonic balance may be cumulative.  These weapons may cause a gradual and accumulating structural and dynamic distortion, building up as Environmental weapons are used over the years approaching and subsequent to the Mayan end-cycle.
We can think of three ways that environmental weapons may cause Earth changes predicted by the Mayan end-cycle for 2012.
One way - Human Environmental weapons may gradually distort the Earth’s magnetic field, and exacerbating and predisposing the Earth changes triggered by a reversal of the Sun’s magnetic field around 2012.
Second way - Human Environmental warfare during the Mayan solar magnetic reversal may itself trigger the prophesized Earth changes.
Third way - The Sun’s magnetic field does not reverse or distort around 2012 AD, but human Environmental weapons themselves induce Earth changes, by distortion of the Earth’s magnetic fields.
An aggravating factor in each of these scenarios would be Earth’s collision with near-Earth-objects, such as asteroids.

What is a common element in each of these three Earth changes scenarios?
Human intervention is the common element.  In each of these scenarios, human intervention in the form of environmental weapons is a causal factor in fulfilling the Maya prophecies of cataclysmic Earth changes.

Comments

[visit site]

I discovered your blog site on google and check a few of your early posts. Continue to keep up the very good operate. I just additional up your RSS feed to my MSN News Reader. Seeking forward to reading more from you later on!…

[casquette chicago bulls]

A friend you pay money for by means of treats will likely to be bought from everyone. casquette chicago bulls http://ruejoo.com/

[coach outlet online sale]

Take pleasure in is certainly imperfect for start, nonetheless it spreads more robust as we grow old if it is accurately feasted. coach outlet online sale http://coachoutletonline44.com/

[coach outlet online shopping]

Happen to be endure after each and every one close friend thinks about fresh hook transcendency around the extra. coach outlet online shopping http://coachfactoryoutlet44.com/