By Alfred Lambremont Webre, JD, MEd
VANCOUVER,
BC - The objective of the attack on the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal described
in this article was to use “Meme warfare” to start an internecine war upon
targeted Judges of the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal, and thereby
destabilize the Tribunal, a non-profit NGO citizen’s tribunal of conscience sworn
to carry out a vision architected by former Malaysian Prime Minister Dr. Tun
Mahathir Bin Mohamad.[1]
That internecine war, induced by a standard covert operating
Cointelpro procedures of U.S., U.K. and Israeli intelligence agencies known as
“Meme warfare”, had the specific objectives of (1) destabilizing the Tribunal
by making it a “shooting gallery for shooting down or disqualifying Judges” so
that multiple Judges could be disqualified as “Zionists” on specious grounds;
(2) discrediting the Tribunal as an objective adjudicatory body in the area of
war crimes; (3) discrediting it as a functioning body to deliver credible justice
in the area of Israel war crimes in Palestine 1948 – Present.[2]
The Tribunal to date had issued two important judgments
against former Prime Minister Tony Blair, former U.S. President George W. Bush
and his cabinet members Cheney, Rumsfeld, Gonzales and their lawyers for war
crimes and torture in Iraq.[3] The
Tribunal had scheduled the trial of Israel’s war crimes in Palestine for August
20-24, 2013 and for November 20-25, 2013. I had participated in both trials of
the Tribunal against Bush et al. and the first hearing on Israeli war crimes in
Palestine. I was scheduled as a Judge on the Tribunal for the hearing on
November 20-25, 2013.
Meme Warfare: How to overthrow the powers
that be on a low budget
According
to author “Meme Warfare” author Stephen DeVoy,[4]
- Meme - "A meme is a mental construct that
copies itself from mind to mind. It reproduces by inducing its carrier to
engage in behavior that causes the meme to copy to other minds. It is a mental
construct conjoined with a set of instructions which compel its host to engage
in activities that increase the probability of the entire instruction set being
copied from a host’s mind into the minds of others."
- Memeplex - "A meme may have a higher chance
of replication across a longer expanse of time if it aggregates with other
memes. When aggregated, complementary memes enhance one another’s probability
of replication. Thus, just as DNA found advantage in aggregating into complex
aggregations of genes, some memes find advantage in aggregating into complexes
of memes. This more complex form is called the memeplex."
- Meme Warfare "Meme warfare is the
subversion or destruction of a memeplex by means of memetic engineering. Meme
warriors design memes targeting existing memeplexes. Such memes are intended to
infect an existing memeplex, hinder an existing memeplex, or form a part of a
competing memeplex. In the later case, the goal may be to create a new memeplex
intended to replace the old memeplex."
Meme Warfare against the Tribunal Judges
& against Tribunal
The memeplex “Zionist”, falsely applied, was the weapon of
choice in the Meme warfare designed to destabilize the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes
Tribunal.
On analysis of the evidence below, it appears that there are
four primary individuals who were overtly involved in the initiative to engage
in “Meme warfare” and destabilize the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal. These individuals appear to have consciously
or unconsciously engaged in Meme warfare to a varying degree with the objective
of destabilizing the Tribunal. It remains to be seen whether any of these
individuals was covertly influenced to do so by outside intelligence agencies
or groups, although some there is suggestive evidence of a coverup and a
conspiracy to destabilize the Tribunal. The individuals are present or past
members of the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Commission or present or past
Prosecutors.[5]
The four individuals who, by the evidence, either consciously
or unconsciously engaged in Meme warfare to destabilize the Kuala Lumpur War
Crimes Tribunal are (in alphabetical order):
- Former Prosecutor Francis Boyle, academic and
former Judge on the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal and Prosecutor on the War
Crimes Commission; Former Legal Counsel to the Palestinian Authority and Lt.
Ehren Watada.
Website:
http://www.law.illinois.edu/faculty/profile/francisboyle
- Former Prosecutor Matthias Chang, former
political adviser to Tun Dr. Mahathir bin Mohamad when Dr. Mahathir was Prime
Minister and former Prosecutor of the Legal Team of the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes
Commission. Self-professed high-ranking freemason inducted by a Grand Master
freemason in the UK.
Website:
http://futurefastforward.com/
- Commissioner Michel Chossudovsky, Canadian
academic and journalist, Member of Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal. Voted
against having Tribunal trial of Israeli war crimes in Palestine.
Website: http://www.globalresearch.ca
- Secretary-General Dr. Yaacob Merican, Secretary
General of the Kuala Lumpur Foundation to Criminalize War
Website: http://www.criminalisewar.org
Secretary-General Yaacob Merican & the
Kuala Lumpur Foundation to Criminalize War
The timeline of the Meme war against
the Judges of the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal starts for me when the
Foundation Secretary-General Dr. Yaacob Merican, began in May 2012, for some
unknown reason, to lean on me for outreach to recruit Judges and Prosecutors
for the Tribunal when that was really his job and function. Yaacob Merican
invited me to a sumptuous luncheon at a spectacular Islamic art gallery and in
front of a retinue of personnel from the Kuala Lumpur Foundation to Criminalize
War, asked me to recruit “Caucasian” Judges for the Tribunal. Internally, I felt that his request was
borderline political, but not unlawful. As I was a supporter of the non-profit peace
efforts of Tun Mahathir, I complied with Secretary-General Yaacob Merican’s
requests in good faith as part of my contributions to this charitable peace
effort. I saw my helping the Foundation
recruit non-Malaysian Judges and Prosecutors as in no way providing grounds for
my recusal as a “biased” Judge under the law.
In the law, judicial bias has to do with a tangible interest
that the Judge has in the outcome of litigation. In the case of the Tribunal’s trial
of Israeli war crimes in Palestine 1948-present, I am neither Israeli nor
Palestinian nor have any tangible interest in Palestine or Israel and therefore
I am not biased according to the law. I
am Director of Exopolitics Israel, Exopolitics Palestine, and Exopolitics Iran,
and a war crimes correspondent for Press TV and have covered the
Palestinian-Israeli conflict. These
functions do not disqualify me as a Judge.
According to the law in most nations, “Laws or court rules
provide for recusal of judges. Although the details vary, the following are
nearly universal grounds for recusal.
- The judge is related to a party, attorney, or
spouse of either party (usually) within three degrees of kinship.
- The judge is a party.
- The judge is a material witness unless pleading
purporting to make the Judge a party is false (determined by presiding judge,
but see Substitution (law)).
- The judge has previously acted in the case in
question as an attorney for a party, or participated in some other capacity.
- The judge prepared any legal instrument (such as
a contract or will) whose validity or construction is at issue.
- Appellate judge previously handled case as a
trial judge.
- The judge has personal or financial interest in
the outcome. This particular ground varies by jurisdiction. Some require
recusal if there is any interest at all in the outcome, while others only
require recusal if there is interest beyond a certain value.
- The judge determines he or she cannot act
impartially.”[6]
Timeline of a Meme War
1. Feb. 11, 2013: I forwarded to Secretary-General
Yaacob Merican my report on new Judges for the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes
Tribunal, and suggested that he “consult with Prof. Boyle both as to additional
names for persons who can be KLWC Tribunal Judges as well as assisting the
Amicus Curiae team.” Former Proseutor Boyle had formerly
been a Judge of the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal before switching over to
the Prosecution. Secretary-General Yaacob’s concern at that point seems to have
been obtaining “Caucasian” Judges, who would presumably counter-balance the
predominantly “Malaysian” Tribunal Judges.
No mention was made of “Zionist”, “Pro-Israel”, or other similar Meme.
LETTER OF ALFRED L. WEBRE Feb. 11, 2013
---------- Forwarded
message ----------
From: Alfred Lambremont
Webre, JD MEd <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, Feb 11, 2013
at 12:34 PM
Subject: Re: KLFWC
Tribunal on Palestine May 2013
To: Yaacob Merican
<[email protected]>
Dear Dr. Yaacob - Hi!
Thank you very much for the news about the forthcoming KLWC Tribunal on
Palestine, tentatively scheduled for 5 to 10 May 2013. I have marked the
dates on my calendar.
My apologies for not
having written sooner. Here is my report.
I contacted the
following persons qualified to be Judges on the KLWC Tribunal.
1. Judge Baltazar Garzon
(Spain)
Bio:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baltasar_Garz%C3%B3n
2. Hon. Ramsay Clark
(U.S.)
Bio:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ramsey_Clark
3. Gail Davidson
(Canada)
Bio:
http://www.lrwc.org/gail-davidson-board-of-directors/
Gail Davidson was
honored to be invited, and indicated she felt she was too busy to take on the
responsibilities of being a Judge on the KLWC Tribunal.
Baltazar Garzon - I was
unable to get a formal response from Judge Baltazar Garzon, who until recently
was the subject of a political trial brought against him in Spain (See article).
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-16965790
You may want to evaluate
whether you want to ask him to be on the KLWC Tribunal. This is the best
address I could get for him
Fundación Internacional
Baltasar Garzón
C/ Antonio
Diaz-caÑabate, 10Madrid, 28007
011-34- 911 729 69
Ramsay Clark represented
Saddam Hussein, as you know. I have not yet been able to get a formal
acceptance from him. I suggest that the Commission contact Ramsay Clark
directly with the invitation to be a KLWC Tribunal Judge.
OFFICE:
Ramsey Clark &
Lawrence W Schilling
36 E 12th St 6th Fl
New York, NY 10003-4604
Phone/Fax: (212)
475-3232
Professor Boyle - My suggestion is that you may want to consult with
Prof. Boyle both as to additional names for persons who can be KLWC Tribunal
Judges as well as assisting the Amicus Curiae team.
Please let me know if
you need any information, etc.
Best wishes, Alfred
=====
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at
11:42 PM, Yaacob Merican <[email protected]> wrote:
Dear Alfred,
It has been quite some
time since we last heard from you. I hope that you are in the best of health
and that you are free, if things go according to plan, that is, to sit on the
KLWC Tribunal on Palestine tentatively scheduled to be held from 5 to 10 May
2013.
I recollect that
before your departure from K.L. after your last visit to Malaysia, you gave
assurance that you would forward to me some names of persons (at least two)
with international law qualifications (together with their résumés) for
consideration of the Trustees of the KLFCW to empanel two more additional
Caucasian judges on the KLWC Tribunal.
Time is getting closer
to the scheduled Palestine Tribunal Hearing and I would appreciate it very much
if I could have your nominations as soon as possible.
Would you also be able to
propose a name or two international lawyers of Professor Boyle's calibre, to
assist the Amicus Curiae team in the aforementioned Tribunal Hearing,
please?
Warmest regards
Yaacob
Sec-Gen, KLFCW
2. June 6, 2013: The next major milestone
occurs when Secretary-General Yaacob asks me if I know of “a pro-Israeli
international lawyer with a caliber at par with the Prosecution's Francis
Boyle.” [Former U.S. Representative] Cynthia McKinney is trying her level best
to secure for the Amicus Curiae team the services of a pro-Israeli
international lawyer with a caliber at par with the Prosecution's Francis
Boyle. Time is if the essence. Would you
know of anyone personally who would agree to act as such during the forthcoming
hearing.”?
Intent of the request for a pro-Israeli
international lawyer?
This request by Secretary-General Yaacob Merican is a key
issue in Meme warfare. To understand if his
request for “Pro-Israeli defense counsel” is part of Meme warfare, one must know who issued the original
request to obtain pro-Israel defense counsel and with what intent.
- Did the request of pro-Israeli defense counsel
originate with Secretary-General Yaacob or from another individual or
organization that transmitted it to Secretary-General Yaacob?
- Who was that outside individual or organization?
What was their intent?
- Why did “Caucasian” suddenly become
“Pro-Israeli”?
- Why was “time of the essence”?
- What was the intent of this request?
- If the intent of the original request was to set
up a Meme warfare situation around the meme “Zionist” to destabilize the
Judges, then Secretary-General Yaacob’s request constitutes Meme warfare.
Secretary-General Yaacob Merican’s request - It is this
request for “the services of a
pro-Israeli international lawyer with a caliber at par with the Prosecution's
Francis Boyle” that sets up the Meme warfare against three Judges of the
Tribunal. Judge Eric David and Judge Mike Hourigan, two of the Judges
recommended by Former U.S. Rep. Cynthia McKinney were attacked as “Zionist”, and
I was to be attacked as “Zionist” because I acceded to Secretary-General Yaacob
Merican’s innocent-seeming request and searched (unsuccessfully) for
pro-Israeli Judges.
---------- Forwarded
message ----------
From: Yaacob Merican
<[email protected]>
Date: Thu, Jun 6, 2013
at 7:02 PM
Subject: Re: KLFWC
Tribunal on Palestine May 2013
To: "Alfred
Lambremont Webre, JD MEd" <[email protected]>
Dear Alfred,
Many thanks for your
e-mail.
The KLWC Tribunal
Hearing on Palestine is confirmed to take place as scheduled from Wednesday 21
to Saturday 24 August 2013 in Kuala Lumpur.
Please schedule your
flight arrangements so that you would arrive in Kuala Lumpur at the latest by
the morning of Tuesday 20 August 2013.
Cynthia McKinney is
trying her level best to secure for the Amicus Curiae team the services of a
pro-Israeli international lawyer with a caliber at par with the Prosecution's
Francis Boyle. Time is if the essence.
Would you know of anyone personally who would agree to act as such during the
forthcoming hearing.
Warmest regards.
Yaacob
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at
8:47 AM, Alfred Lambremont Webre, JD MEd <[email protected]> wrote:
Dear Dr. Yaacob - Hi! I
was recently at the Kuala Lumpur Foundation to Criminalise War website and I
happened to notice the following:
UPCOMING EVENTS
Kuala Lumpur War Crimes
Tribunal–Hearing on Palestine
Date: 21 – 24 August,
2013 at 2nd Floor, No. 88, Jalan Perdana, Taman Tasik Perdana, Kuala Lumpur
Recently my attendance
was requested at a public event scheduled for August 24, 2013. I told the host of that event I could
tentatively not attend because there was a Kuala Lumpur Tribunal hearing
scheduled for that date.
My schedule starts
filling up about three months in advance.
Can you please advise me
via return email if I should set aside the dates of 21-24 August 2013 to attend
the above hearing as a Judge on the Tribunal?
Many thanks and best
wishes, Alfred
To avoid a Pro-Palestinian “Kangaroo
Court”?
I assumed, without asking Secretary-General Yaacob Merican,
that the order for pro-Israeli defense counsel was a good faith requirement to
avoid the trial seeming to be a “Kangaroo Court” in favor of the Palestinians,
which had been a major criticism leveled at the Tribunal to date
internationally.
Therefore, with the help of my co-director at Exopolitics
Israel, I proceeded to contact Ambassador Alan Baker, former Israeli Ambassador
to Canada who lives in Israel and is an international lawyer. His associate Prof. Robbie Sabel, Professor
of International Law at Hebrew University in Jerusalem, declined to appear for
Israel. I contacted my former classmate Prof. Bruce Ackerman of Yale Law School
as well as my former teacher Prof. Guido Calabresi of Yale Law School. Both of
these scholars recommended Prof. Alan Dershowitz of Harvard, who Former
Prosecutor Francis Boyle had told me was the “default go-to person on Israel”
in the United States. Prof. Dershowitz reply, citing Former Prosecutor Francis
Boyle's libel of him and Harvard Law School as his principal reason for not
wanting to help recommend someone to represent Israel.
Alan Dershowitz
[email protected] via shaw.ca
Jun 7 to webre
“Thank you. I will think
about it. Part of me doesn't want to add any legitimacy to Boyle who is an
extreme supporter of terrorism and an extremist anti Israel agitator with no
credibility. . . He has called me a war criminal and has accused harvard law
school of complicity in war crimes. But I will respond to your inquiry.”
“Who appointed him to
prosecute the case?”
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 7, 2013, at 4:42 PM, "[email protected]"
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Dear Prof. Dershowitz - Hi! My classmate Prof. Bruce
Ackerman of Yale Law School suggested that I contact you with a specific
question.
> I am a Judge on the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal. The
Tribunal has a hearing scheduled for August 21-24, 2013 on alleged Israeli war
crimes in its invasion of Gaza in January 2009.
> The Prosecutor is Prof. Francis Boyle of the Univ of
Illinois who has tried cases before the International Criminal Court.
> I was asked to locate a pro-Israel lawyer of Prof.
Boyle's stature who would like to serve as amicus curiae representing Israel.
> This is the website of the Tribunal.
>
http://criminalisewar.org/the-foundation/judges-commissioners/
> I would very much
appreciate your letting me know if can you kindly suggest of any names of
qualified lawyers who may be interested and contact info via return email.
> Best wishes,
> Alfred Webre
>
> Alfred Lambremont Webre, JD, MEd
> Vancouver, B.C. V6N3E5 CANADA
> Tel/Fax: 604-733-8134
> Skype: peaceinspace
> Email: [email protected]
>
Meme warfare distortions and falsehoods
With that outreach my effort to recruit pro-Israeli defense counsel
ended. Please notice that I did not ask Prof. Dershowitz to participate in the
trial, merely to suggest the names of Pro-Israeli counsel who might be
interested in representing Israel. I asked Prof. Dershowitz, “I would very much appreciate your letting me
know if can you kindly suggest of any names of qualified lawyers who may be
interested and contact info via return email.”
In the heat of Meme warfare against me, both Former
Prosecutor Francis Boyle and Former Prosecutor Matthias Chang would falsely state
that I was a Zionist by falsely alleging that I had “asked Dershowitz to
represent Israel.” That is an
exaggeration and distortion of the facts that is standard in Meme warfare, and
demonstrative of how the minds and persona
of Former Prosecutor Francis Boyle and Former Prosecutor Matthias Chang had
become thoroughly infected with the “Zionist” Meme in this attack and how they
sought by Meme warfare to attach the Meme to me in people’s minds.
Through Judge Eric David, one of the two Judges that Cynthia
McKinney had recommended to Secretary-General Yaacob Merican, I later learned
that Cynthia McKinney had contacted Prof. Alan Dershowitz who had declined
to participate. Clearly both former U.S. Rep Cynthia McKinney and I were both
set up to search for “pro-Israel” defense counsel as part of Meme warfare
against the Judges of the Tribunal.
3. August 20, 2013 – Orchid Room, Hotel
Majestic, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Conversation with Former Prosecutor Francis
Boyle – I am seated next to Prosecutor Francis Boyle at a luncheon prior to
the trial of Israeli war crimes in Palestine 1948- present, which was to start
the next day. I casually mention to Former
Prosecutor Francis Boyle that I am very proud that the Kuala Lumpur Foundation
to Criminalize War had reached out to pro-Israeli Counsel to balance the trial
and tell him that I had contacted counsel in Israel, Professors at Yale and
Harvard Law School who had recommended Alan Dershowitz, but that Prof.
Dershowitz had chosen not to recommend anyone. Former Prosecutor Francis Boyle launched
into a lengthy, detailed dissertation on the feud between himself and specific professors at Yale Law
School and Harvard Law School including Prof. Dershowitz. At no time
during the luncheon did Former Prosecutor Francis Boyle raise any objection to
my having searched for pro-Israeli defense counsel on behalf of Israel or of having contacted Prof. Dershowitz.
August 20, 2013 - Meme Warfare against
Tribunal Judges The evening before the trial, Commissioner Michel Chossudovsky, a
controlling member of the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Commission, and Former
Prosecutor Boyle began to secretly conspiring to engage in Meme warfare and seek
the recusal of three Judges on false Meme warfare grounds of “Zionism” or New
World Order affiliations. We now know
this because Cynthia McKinney leaked the emails in which Chossudovsky stated he
wished to purge three of the Tribunal Judges (See emails below).
(1) Judge Eric David, a Judge that Cynthia McKinney had
nominated, on grounds that he was a Mossad agent, without providing any
evidence thereof;
(2) Judge Mike Hourigan because he had been at one time been
associated with the UN Tribunal on Ruanda; and
(3) Chief Judge of the Tribunal because he had been associated
with the UN Tribunal on Yugoslavia.
Chossudovsky and
Boyle Meme warfare against Tribunal Judges
Readers can download the full email
exchange (PDF) leaked by former U.S. Rep. Cynthia McKinney showing clear Meme
warfare against Judges Eric David and Michael Hourigan in the day before the
trial on Israeli war crimes in Palestine at the following:
Download CHOSSUDOVSKYemail scan
CLICK TO DOWNLOAD PDF: http://bit.ly/HLIwme
4. August 21 – 22,
2013 - Meme warfare against Judges at hearing
Former Prosecutor Francis Boyle and Commissioner
Michel Chossudovsky waged continual Meme warfare against Judge Eric David during the two-day hearing,
demanding his recusal on the grounds of being a Mossad agent without offering
any evidence thereof other than repetition of the Memeplex “Zionist”. Vowing to shut the Tribunal down, Former Prosecutor
Francis Boyle staged a sit-in of the Palestinian witnesses in the courtroom,
playing on their minds with Meme warfare as well.
The irony is that on August 20, 2013,
the Judges of the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal had held an initial chambers
discussion of the case, structured around a Defense motion to dismiss the
charges against the State of Israel. On the basis of the discussion, Judge Eric
David drafted a brilliant opinion in favor of the Palestinians, denying
Israeli’s motion for dismissal of the State of Israel as a defendant. Because
of the Meme warfare of Chossudovsky and Boyle, the Judges never got to consider
this motion publicly as a Tribunal.
Moreover, the internal discussion of
the Judges on August 20, 2013 showed that (1) the Tribunal would have voted
unanimously to find that Israel’s war crimes in Palestine constituted crimes
against humanity, and (2) the Tribunal would have voted 6-1 to find that
Israel’s war crimes in Palestine constituted genocide, the one dissenting vote
being Judge Eric David, who beleived the acts amounted to crimes against humanity, not genocide (consistent with his public positions).
Facts and actual judicial impartiality does not matter to
Meme warfare, however. What matters is the
destabilization of targeted Judges the Tribunal.
Final Judgement of the Tribunal
The Meme warfare of Former Prosecutor
Francis Boyle is documented in the Final Judgment of the Tribunal, which
readers can download and read (PDF).
Download KLWCT-Judgment-22-August-2013
DOWNLOAD PDF BY CLICKING HERE: http://bit.ly/1fuDndL
After
the conclusion of the trial, Former Prosecutor Francis Boyle resigns as
Prosecutor.
5. November 1, 2013 – The next event
for me in the timeline of the destabilization of the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes
Tribunal is my receipt on Nov. 1, 2013 of a letter from Former Prosecutor
Matthias Chang demanding my recusal as a Judge, again using "Zionist" Meme warfare
against me. The timing of Former Prosecutor Matthias Chang’s letter is remarkable as
it is sent 20 days prior to the next scheduled hearing of the Kuala Lumpur War
Crimes Tribunal, as if a convenient legal maneuver to set up "Zionist" Meme warfare for my
recusal on the Nov. 20-25, 2013 trial of Israel’s war crimes in Palestine.
Former Prosecutor Matthias Chang’s letter is also includes a telltale Meme warfare
fundamental error – the same error that Former Prosecutor Francis Boyle stated -
that I had attempted to recruit Alan Dershowitz to represent Israel. In fact, I only asked Prof. Dershowitz if he could suggest postntial counsel for Israel.
The only person
I had told that I approached Prof. Alan Dershowitz to suggest names of possible
defense counsel for Israel was Former Prosecutor Francis Boyle, in the luncheon
at the Hotel Majestic.
1. Therefore was it
former Prosecutor Francis Boyle who contacted former prosecutor Matthias Chang
with erroneous information about me to continuing Meme warfare against me as a
Judge of the Tribunal?
2. Was this how former Prosecutor Matthias Chang who then took up
the Meme warfare against me on this false premise?
3. Or did former Prosecutor
Francis Boyle tell someone else in his network, such as Kuala Lumpur War Crimes
Commissioner Michel Chossudovsky who then contacted Former Prosecutor Matthias
Chang to continue Meme warfare?
Meme Warfare Mind Map
A Meme warfare mind map of the destabilization of the Kuala Lumpur
War Crimes Tribunal will be most enlightening and illustrative for all
tribunals of conscience worldwide to illustrate for informed citizenry how Meme warfare is used to destabilize tribbunals of conscience and NGOs.
Former Prosecutor Matthias Chang states, “It has come to my knowledge that you attempted to get the
services of Derzhowitz (sic) to represent Israel in the hearing which was
postponed and now to be reconvened in November.”
After this initial
falsehood, Former Prosecutor Matthias Chang’s subsequent emails degenerate into
a Meme warfare rant. Readers are welcome to access them by downloading the
following PDF. What is clear is that Former Prosecutor Francis Boyle and Former
Prosecutor Matthias Chang are conspiratorially engaged in Meme warfare to
destabilize me as a Judge as well as the Tribunal.
Download MATTHIAS.CHANG.LETTERS
DOWNLOAD PDF BY CLICKING HERE: http://bit.ly/18k3i2I
6. November 4, 2013 – The next milestone in the timeline of "Zionist" Meme warfare to destabilize targated Judges is a letter from the
Chief Judge of the Tribunal stating that since I had now “openly taken the position of being an
“Applicant/Complainant” before the Tribunal for a restraining order” against
Commissioner Chossudovsky, Former Prosecutor Chang and others, "it has now become highly improper for you to be
part of the panel of Judges at the Hearing."
The fact is that I had not served a formal motion on the
court. I only emailed a notice of
intent to file. Here the Tribunal Chief Judge, with no due
process, was apparently guided by Secretary-General Yaacob Merican, who generally presents the Chief Judge with administrative matters, into joining in the reality distortions of "Zionist" Meme warfare against the targeted
Judges.
Readers can view
the Chief Judge’s letter (PDF), which appears to be more continuation of "Zionist" Meme
warfare against me as a Judge of the Tribunal below.
Download KLWCT
DOWNLOAD PDF BY CLICKING ON THE FOLLOWING: http://bit.ly/HQrcvT
TEXT OF NOTICE OF INTENT
"I hereby serve notice of intent to apply to the Tribunal for a restraining order against Michael Chossudovsky, Mathias Chang, and all present and former members of the KLWCC and prosecution team, former KLWC Tribunal judges from directly or directly applying for or lobbying for the recusal of KLWC Tribunal Judges, based on a clear abuse of the recusal privilege in this case."
Very truly yours,
Alfred Lambremont Webre, JD, MEd
Member, District of Columbia Bar
JUDGE, KUALA LUMPUR WAR CRIMES TRIBUNAL
Nov. 1, 2013
VANCOUVER, BC, CANADA
FULL LETTER OF ALFRED LAMBREMONT
WEBRE
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2013 10:00:54
-0700
Subject: Denial of request for
recusal and application for restraining order
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
CC: [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected]
Dear Dr. Yaacob - Hi! I have
received this mischievous email from Matthias Chang requesting my recusal
because I carried out your request as Chairman of the KLWC Commission to make
inquiries of defense counsel for the matter of Palestine, as I had done
previously in my searches for additional Judges for the War Crimes Tribunal, in
which I contacted Ramsey Clark and Baltazar Garzon.
When you contacted me to
search for defense council for Israel, I did not see any conflict in my
capacity as a Judge of a citizen's tribunal of conscience, and I as usual did
my best to fulfill your request as Chairman of the KLWC Commission.
As you and defense counsel
Jason Kay know, I contacted Ambassador Alan Baker, former Israeli Ambassador to
Canada who lives in Israel and is an international lawyer. His associate Prof. Robbie Sabel, Professor
of International Law at Hebrew University in Jerusalem, declined to appear for
Israel. I contacted my former classmate Prof. Bruce Ackerman of Yale Law School
as well as Prof. Guido Calabresi of Yale Law School. Both of these scholars recommended Prof. Alan
Dershowitz of Harvard. My sister, Jane M.N. Webre, Esq. had defeated Prof.
Dershowitz in an appeal case and had told me about his methods, so I contacted
Prof. Dershowitz.
Prof. Dershowitz reply
Here is Prof. Dershowitz
reply, citing Francis Boyle's libel of him and Harvard Law School as his
principal reason for not appearing for Israel.
Alan Dershowitz
[email protected] via shaw.ca
Jun 7
to webre
Thank you. I will think about
it. Part of me doesn't want to add any legitimacy to Boyle who is an extreme
supporter of terrorism and an extremist anti Israel agitator with no
credibility. . . He has called me a war criminal and has accused harvard law
school of complicity in war crimes. But I will respond to your inquiry.
Who appointed him to prosecute
the case?
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 7, 2013, at 4:42 PM,
"[email protected]" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Info: Dear Prof.
Dershowitz - Hi! My classmate Prof. Bruce Ackerman of Yale Law School suggested
that I contact you with a specific question.
> I am a Judge on the Kuala
Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal. The Tribunal has a hearing scheduled for August
21-24, 2013 on alleged Israeli war crimes in its invasion of Gaza in January
2009.
> The Prosecutor is Prof.
Francis Boyle of the Univ of Illinois who has tried cases before the
International Criminal Court.
> I was asked to locate a
pro-Israel lawyer of Prof. Boyle's stature who would like to serve as amicus
curiae representing Israel.
> This is the website of
the Tribunal.
>
http://criminalisewar.org/the-foundation/judges-commissioners/
> I would very much
appreciate your letting me know if can you kindly suggest of any names of
qualified lawyers who may be interested and contact info via return email.
> Best wishes,
> Alfred Webre
> Alfred Lambremont Webre,
JD, MEd
> Vancouver, B.C. V6N3E5
CANADA
> Tel/Fax: 604-733-8134
> Skype: peaceinspace
> Email: [email protected]
> IMPORTANT - DISCLAIMER:
This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to which it is
addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and
exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is
not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering
this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
dissemination or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you
receive this communication in error, please notify us immediately by telephone
at 604-733-8134 and/or email and delete the original message. Thank you.
>
> Name: Judge Alfred
Lambremont Webre
>
> email: [email protected]
>
I do not consider my actions
to be grounds for recusal, far from it. I consider Mr. Chang's letter to be
that of a mischievous interloper, in continuation of the considerable mischief
perpetrated on the Tribunal at our last sitting in this matter by the former
prosecutor, Francis Boyle. Indeed, Mr. Boyle's reputation for libel and
unfounded slander preceded him at Harvard at Prof. Dershowitz states above. I
consider Mr. Chang's letter to be a continuation of lobbying outside the court
room by parties in the KLWC Commission (such as Michel Chossudovsky, who
lobbied extensively for the recusal of 3 Judges including the Chief Judge at
our last sitting) or formerly part of the KLWC Commission (such as Mr. Chang)
to attempt to deter this Tribunal in its difficult case in the matter of
Palestine.
Legal Authority
As legal authority, I cite the
Judgment of the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal of 22 August 2013, Case No. 3-
CHG-2013, Case No. 4- CHG - 2013, KLWCC vs. Amos Yaron and State of Israel,
www.criminalisewar.org
I point to the statement of
the Tribunal of "Deep concern and regret that there has been a serious
breach of decorum and improper conduct on the part of Mr. Boyle, co-counsel for
the Prosecution."
Application for restraining
order against present and former members of the KLWCC, prosecution, and persons
associated with the Perdana Peace Foundation and Criminalizewar
I hereby serve notice of
intent to apply to the Tribunal for a restraining order against Michael
Chossudovsky, Mathias Chang, and all present and former members of the KLWCC
and prosecution team, former KLWC Tribunal judges from directly or directly
applying for or lobbying for the recusal of KLWC Tribunal Judges, based on a
clear abuse of the recusal privilege in this case.
Very truly yours,
Alfred Lambremont Webre, JD,
MEd
Member, District of Columbia
Bar
JUDGE, KUALA LUMPUR WAR CRIMES
TRIBUNAL
Nov. 1, 2013
VANCOUVER, BC, CANADA
LETTER FROM FORMER KLWCC
PROSECUTOR CHANG
---------- Forwarded message
----------
From: matthias chang
<[email protected]>
Date: Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 6:18
AM
Subject: Kuala Lumpur war
Crimes Tribunal
To: Alfred Webre
<[email protected]>, Alfred Webre <[email protected]>,
Alfred Webre <[email protected]>
Dear Alfred,
Its been a long time since I
met you and or heard from you.
So this email may surprise
you.
Correct me if I am wrong.
It has come to my knowledge
that you attempted to get the services of Derzhowitz to reprsent Issrael in the
hearing which was postponed and now to be reconvened in November.
Obviously, I agree absolutely
that Israel is entitled to the best Defence Counsel. I believe that charges
were sent to Israel etc by the Prosecution and told that they can appoint the
counsel of their choice failing which a defence counsel would be assigned in
their absence as was the case with the trial against Bush and Blair. This is so
stated in gthe Charter of the Tribunal.
This is obviously a correct
procedure that obtains even in the court of law of all jurisdiction.
However, I find it most
troubling that you as a Judge of the tribunal took the trouble to recruit
Derzhowitz as defence counsel. If it is true, it is a gross dereliction of duty
and your perceived impartiality as a Judge of the tribunal. No Judge of any
tribunal or court should be involved in the selection and appointment of any
counsel whether for the defence or the prosecution. It is not and cannot be the
duty of a Judge of any tribunal.
It is unheard of. If in
happens in the Court of Law in CANADA OR ANY OTHER JURISDICTION, the judge is
in contempt of his own court. Such a Judge may even be censured and or removed
by the Chief Justice of the country. I am sure you are more than aware this
amounts to a gross misconduct.
It is unheard of and I am
truly shock that you would do this and still remain as a Judge on the tribunal.
You should immediately disqualify yourself as you have by your action brought
disrepute to the entire proceedings.
This is a disgrace and it is
unacceptable. And you are a lawyer!
If you disagree with my views
as stated above, please cite me any case authorities or legal principle that a
presiding judge can involved himself / herself in the selection and appointment
of a counsel whether for the prosecution or the defence.
I suggest to you as a friend
and a fellow lawyer that you decline to sit as a Judge of the War Crimes
Tribunal and not attend the proceedings by informing the Registrar of the
Tribunal or the Chairman of the tribunal soonest possible.
Your action has caused grave
embarrassment to Tun Mahathir Mohamad. He cannot obviously be involved in such
matters as the Tribunal, Commission are all independent. But this independence
and impartiality has now been compromised and brought into disrepute.
Please DO THE RIGHT thing and
resigned as a Judge of the tribunal.
I look forward to your reply
asap.
Sincerely,
Matthias Chang
Meme Warfare: Denial of due process
In the end I was
denied any due process by the Chief Judge of the Tribunal that had now been
thoroughly destabilized by "Zionist" Meme warfare undertaken against targeted Judges by Secretary-General Merican, Former Prosecutor Chang, Commissioner Chossudovsky, and Former Prosecutor Boyle.
I
had in fact made no formal motion before the court and was simply replying to the
email of one of the principals in the "Zionist" Meme warfare conspiracy against the
Judges of the Tribunal, namely Former Prosecutor Matthias Chang.
My not appearing
as a Judge at the trial of the Israel war crimes against Palestine (Nov. 20-25, 2013), however, is a convenient coverup to those who set me up with the
task of searching for “Pro-Israel” defense counsel and thus set up the trigger for "Zionist" Meme warfare designed to destabilize three Judges and the Tribunal. One wonders why the Chief
Judge was pushed precipitously to rule on a legal motion that did not exist and
never was made by me? Usually these
matters were brought by Secretary-General Yaacob Merican to the Chief
Judge. If this is the case, then it is
clear the intent of this improper proceeding was yet another coverup of the
original source of the "Zionist" Meme warfare.
By the evidence, it appears
that I was railroaded in an improper judicial proceeding when no motion had been made. I was politically “pushed under the bus”, not afforded due process, as an attempted
maneuver in "Zionist" Meme warfare to destabilize me as a Judge of the Tribunal.
Nov. 8 & 9, 2013 & Meme Warfare Aftermath:
Former Prosecutors Francis Boyle and Matthias Chang continue
their Meme warfare – Former Prosecutor Francis Boyle continues to circulate
Meme warfare emails with attacking “Zionist” warfare against Alfred Lambremont
Webre and Tun Dr. Mahathir bin Mohamad, stating “What did Mahathir know and
when did he know it?”
In an expected
spasm of destabilizing Meme warfare, Former Prosecutor Matthias Chang openly
begins Meme warfare against Former Prosecutor Francis Boyle, calling Former
Prosecutor Boyle a “Zionist”.
Continuing Report on the Four Perpetrators of Meme Warfare
1. Former Prosecutor Francis Boyle - Continues to circulate Meme warfare attacks
on the targeted Judges and on the Tribunal, and now has added Kuala Lumpur
Foundation Secretary General Dr. Yaacob Merican and Kuala Lumpur Foundation Chairman
Tun Dr. Mahathir bin Mohamad to his targets of “Zionist” Meme warfare, stating
“What did Mahathir know and when did he know it?” in email broadcasts on the
Internet.
2. Former Prosecutor Matthias Chang - Has begun “Zionist” Meme warfare
against Former Prosecutor Francis Boyle, openly calling Former Prosecutor
Francis Boyle a “Zionist” in a Nov. 9, 2013 email broadcast:
Dear All,
I think no one should lose any sleep over the rabid rants
of Francis Boyle.
His latest email shows and exposes what he really is - an
outright Zionist agent of the most vicious kind trying to scuttle the tribunal
proceedings from taking place by making all kind of accusations against his
former colleagues all of whom had made tremendous sacrifices for the cause of
justice.
3. Commissioner Michel Chossudovsky - Is playing sly political flip
flop on the Tribunal. Kuala Lumpur War
Crimes Commissioner Chossudovsky (the only Jew on the Commission) first
published a vicious “Zionist” Meme warfare attack on the Tribunal right after the
August 21-22, 2013, and since then deleted that article from the www.globalresearch.ca website. Was that deletion part of Commissioner’s
coverup of his part in engaging in “Zionist” Meme warfare against the Tribunal
designed to destabilize the Tribunal?[7]
Then, on Nov. 1,
2013 (the same date as Former Prosecutor Chang’s Meme warfare letter attacking
Judge Alfred Webre), Commissioner Chossudovsky praised the Tribunal's past
judgments against George W. Bush et al. as war criminals while lamenting that Lawyers
Against the War were unsuccessful in blocking Dick Cheney’s Oct. 31, 2013 visit
to Toronto. In 2010 Cheney cancelled a trip to Toronto because of war crimes
allegations by Lawyers Against the War.[8]
4. Secretary-General Dr. Yaacob Merican – After expediting an improper
in camera decision by the Tribunal
Chief Judge on a motion that Judge Webre never made, Secretary-General Dr.
Yaacob Merican has gone into stealth coverup mode, refusing to answer questions put to him by Former Prosecutor Chang
as to why he started the “Zionist” Meme warfare attack to destabilize three
targeted Judges of the Tribunal.
CONCLUSION
It seems a reasonable
conclusion from the evidence at hand that clear from the evidence that these
four individuals: Former Prosecutor Francis Boyle, Former Prosecutor Matthias Chang,
Commissioner Michel Chossudovsky, and Secretary-General Dr. Yaacob Merican all
acted to create a dynamic of “Zionist” Meme warfare that was unrelated to any
real facts and whose purpose and mission was to destabilize the Tribunal and
three Judges thereof, Judge Eric David, Judge Michael Hourigan, and Judge
Alfred Lambremont Webre.
Who will investigate the four Perpetrators of “Zionist” Meme
warfare?
Who will step in
to investigate the roles of Former Prosecutor Francis Boyle, Former Prosecutor
Matthias Chang, Commissioner Michel Chossudovsky, and Secretary-General Dr.
Yaacob Merican and seek accountability for their roles in the “Zionist” Meme
warfare that destabilized targeted Judges and the Tribunal.
What if one or more
of these officials has acted on behalf of an intelligence agency in a
Cointelpro role, as some now have come to suspect?
As a Judge on a
Tribunal that, by clear prima facie
evidence, has been destabilized by “Zionist” Meme warfare being directed
against the Tribunal and its Judges, I feel it my duty to uphold my Oath of
Office by letting the wider public community that supports the Kuala Lumpur War
Crimes Tribunal know of the facts of this “Zionist” Meme warfare.
Thank
you,
Vancouver,
BC
Nov. 10, 2013
This is part II of a
series of articles on the covert control methods of the Illuminati used in
conjunction with other New World Order operations to target specific Truth
movement organizations and workers. The
article connects dots, and the reader, as always, is free to perceive those
dots as connected or not connected.
Readers can access Part I in “Jon
Stewart carries out Satanic Illuminati hit on Daily Show?: October 23, 2013” http://bit.ly/18XgqhG
[2]
For a documentation of the ethnic cleansing of Palestine by Israel starting in
1948, please see Paper, Ilan (2007-09-07). The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine
(Kindle Locations 41-42). Oneworld Publications (academic). Kindle Edition.
[8]
Prof. Michel Chossudovsky, "According to Dick Cheney “Canada is Too
Dangerous”. He Fears Arrest but has not Cancelled his Trip to Toronto", November 1, 2013,
http://bit.ly/1iXq1GR
How and why the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal was destabilized
by Alfred Lambremont Webre, JD, MEd
http://bit.ly/18k5Mhw