By Alfred Lambremont Webre, JD, MEd
VANCOUVER, BC - The objective of the attack on the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal described in this article was to use “Meme warfare” to start an internecine war upon targeted Judges of the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal, and thereby destabilize the Tribunal, a non-profit NGO citizen’s tribunal of conscience sworn to carry out a vision architected by former Malaysian Prime Minister Dr. Tun Mahathir Bin Mohamad.[1]
That internecine war, induced by a standard covert operating Cointelpro procedures of U.S., U.K. and Israeli intelligence agencies known as “Meme warfare”, had the specific objectives of (1) destabilizing the Tribunal by making it a “shooting gallery for shooting down or disqualifying Judges” so that multiple Judges could be disqualified as “Zionists” on specious grounds; (2) discrediting the Tribunal as an objective adjudicatory body in the area of war crimes; (3) discrediting it as a functioning body to deliver credible justice in the area of Israel war crimes in Palestine 1948 – Present.[2]
The Tribunal to date had issued two important judgments against former Prime Minister Tony Blair, former U.S. President George W. Bush and his cabinet members Cheney, Rumsfeld, Gonzales and their lawyers for war crimes and torture in Iraq.[3] The Tribunal had scheduled the trial of Israel’s war crimes in Palestine for August 20-24, 2013 and for November 20-25, 2013. I had participated in both trials of the Tribunal against Bush et al. and the first hearing on Israeli war crimes in Palestine. I was scheduled as a Judge on the Tribunal for the hearing on November 20-25, 2013.
Meme Warfare: How to overthrow the powers that be on a low budget
According to author “Meme Warfare” author Stephen DeVoy,[4]
- Meme - "A meme is a mental construct that copies itself from mind to mind. It reproduces by inducing its carrier to engage in behavior that causes the meme to copy to other minds. It is a mental construct conjoined with a set of instructions which compel its host to engage in activities that increase the probability of the entire instruction set being copied from a host’s mind into the minds of others."
- Memeplex - "A meme may have a higher chance of replication across a longer expanse of time if it aggregates with other memes. When aggregated, complementary memes enhance one another’s probability of replication. Thus, just as DNA found advantage in aggregating into complex aggregations of genes, some memes find advantage in aggregating into complexes of memes. This more complex form is called the memeplex."
- Meme Warfare "Meme warfare is the subversion or destruction of a memeplex by means of memetic engineering. Meme warriors design memes targeting existing memeplexes. Such memes are intended to infect an existing memeplex, hinder an existing memeplex, or form a part of a competing memeplex. In the later case, the goal may be to create a new memeplex intended to replace the old memeplex."
Meme Warfare against the Tribunal Judges & against Tribunal
The memeplex “Zionist”, falsely applied, was the weapon of choice in the Meme warfare designed to destabilize the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal.
On analysis of the evidence below, it appears that there are four primary individuals who were overtly involved in the initiative to engage in “Meme warfare” and destabilize the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal. These individuals appear to have consciously or unconsciously engaged in Meme warfare to a varying degree with the objective of destabilizing the Tribunal. It remains to be seen whether any of these individuals was covertly influenced to do so by outside intelligence agencies or groups, although some there is suggestive evidence of a coverup and a conspiracy to destabilize the Tribunal. The individuals are present or past members of the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Commission or present or past Prosecutors.[5]
The four individuals who, by the evidence, either consciously or unconsciously engaged in Meme warfare to destabilize the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal are (in alphabetical order):
- Former Prosecutor Francis Boyle, academic and former Judge on the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal and Prosecutor on the War Crimes Commission; Former Legal Counsel to the Palestinian Authority and Lt. Ehren Watada.
Website: http://www.law.illinois.edu/faculty/profile/francisboyle
- Former Prosecutor Matthias Chang, former political adviser to Tun Dr. Mahathir bin Mohamad when Dr. Mahathir was Prime Minister and former Prosecutor of the Legal Team of the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Commission. Self-professed high-ranking freemason inducted by a Grand Master freemason in the UK.
Website: http://futurefastforward.com/
- Commissioner Michel Chossudovsky, Canadian academic and journalist, Member of Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal. Voted against having Tribunal trial of Israeli war crimes in Palestine.
Website: http://www.globalresearch.ca
- Secretary-General Dr. Yaacob Merican, Secretary General of the Kuala Lumpur Foundation to Criminalize War
Website: http://www.criminalisewar.org
Secretary-General Yaacob Merican & the Kuala Lumpur Foundation to Criminalize War
The timeline of the Meme war against the Judges of the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal starts for me when the Foundation Secretary-General Dr. Yaacob Merican, began in May 2012, for some unknown reason, to lean on me for outreach to recruit Judges and Prosecutors for the Tribunal when that was really his job and function. Yaacob Merican invited me to a sumptuous luncheon at a spectacular Islamic art gallery and in front of a retinue of personnel from the Kuala Lumpur Foundation to Criminalize War, asked me to recruit “Caucasian” Judges for the Tribunal. Internally, I felt that his request was borderline political, but not unlawful. As I was a supporter of the non-profit peace efforts of Tun Mahathir, I complied with Secretary-General Yaacob Merican’s requests in good faith as part of my contributions to this charitable peace effort. I saw my helping the Foundation recruit non-Malaysian Judges and Prosecutors as in no way providing grounds for my recusal as a “biased” Judge under the law.
In the law, judicial bias has to do with a tangible interest that the Judge has in the outcome of litigation. In the case of the Tribunal’s trial of Israeli war crimes in Palestine 1948-present, I am neither Israeli nor Palestinian nor have any tangible interest in Palestine or Israel and therefore I am not biased according to the law. I am Director of Exopolitics Israel, Exopolitics Palestine, and Exopolitics Iran, and a war crimes correspondent for Press TV and have covered the Palestinian-Israeli conflict. These functions do not disqualify me as a Judge.
According to the law in most nations, “Laws or court rules provide for recusal of judges. Although the details vary, the following are nearly universal grounds for recusal.
- The judge is related to a party, attorney, or spouse of either party (usually) within three degrees of kinship.
- The judge is a party.
- The judge is a material witness unless pleading purporting to make the Judge a party is false (determined by presiding judge, but see Substitution (law)).
- The judge has previously acted in the case in question as an attorney for a party, or participated in some other capacity.
- The judge prepared any legal instrument (such as a contract or will) whose validity or construction is at issue.
- Appellate judge previously handled case as a trial judge.
- The judge has personal or financial interest in the outcome. This particular ground varies by jurisdiction. Some require recusal if there is any interest at all in the outcome, while others only require recusal if there is interest beyond a certain value.
- The judge determines he or she cannot act impartially.”[6]
Timeline of a Meme War
1. Feb. 11, 2013: I forwarded to Secretary-General Yaacob Merican my report on new Judges for the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal, and suggested that he “consult with Prof. Boyle both as to additional names for persons who can be KLWC Tribunal Judges as well as assisting the Amicus Curiae team.” Former Proseutor Boyle had formerly been a Judge of the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal before switching over to the Prosecution. Secretary-General Yaacob’s concern at that point seems to have been obtaining “Caucasian” Judges, who would presumably counter-balance the predominantly “Malaysian” Tribunal Judges. No mention was made of “Zionist”, “Pro-Israel”, or other similar Meme.
LETTER OF ALFRED L. WEBRE Feb. 11, 2013
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Alfred Lambremont Webre, JD MEd <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 12:34 PM
Subject: Re: KLFWC Tribunal on Palestine May 2013
To: Yaacob Merican <[email protected]>
Dear Dr. Yaacob - Hi! Thank you very much for the news about the forthcoming KLWC Tribunal on Palestine, tentatively scheduled for 5 to 10 May 2013. I have marked the dates on my calendar.
My apologies for not having written sooner. Here is my report.
I contacted the following persons qualified to be Judges on the KLWC Tribunal.
1. Judge Baltazar Garzon (Spain)
Bio:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baltasar_Garz%C3%B3n
2. Hon. Ramsay Clark (U.S.)
Bio:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ramsey_Clark
3. Gail Davidson (Canada)
Bio:
http://www.lrwc.org/gail-davidson-board-of-directors/
Gail Davidson was honored to be invited, and indicated she felt she was too busy to take on the responsibilities of being a Judge on the KLWC Tribunal.
Baltazar Garzon - I was unable to get a formal response from Judge Baltazar Garzon, who until recently was the subject of a political trial brought against him in Spain (See article).
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-16965790
You may want to evaluate whether you want to ask him to be on the KLWC Tribunal. This is the best address I could get for him
Fundación Internacional Baltasar Garzón
C/ Antonio Diaz-caÑabate, 10Madrid, 28007
011-34- 911 729 69
Ramsay Clark represented Saddam Hussein, as you know. I have not yet been able to get a formal acceptance from him. I suggest that the Commission contact Ramsay Clark directly with the invitation to be a KLWC Tribunal Judge.
OFFICE:
Ramsey Clark & Lawrence W Schilling
36 E 12th St 6th Fl
New York, NY 10003-4604
Phone/Fax: (212) 475-3232
Professor Boyle - My suggestion is that you may want to consult with Prof. Boyle both as to additional names for persons who can be KLWC Tribunal Judges as well as assisting the Amicus Curiae team.
Please let me know if you need any information, etc.
Best wishes, Alfred
=====
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 11:42 PM, Yaacob Merican <[email protected]> wrote:
Dear Alfred,
It has been quite some time since we last heard from you. I hope that you are in the best of health and that you are free, if things go according to plan, that is, to sit on the KLWC Tribunal on Palestine tentatively scheduled to be held from 5 to 10 May 2013.
I recollect that before your departure from K.L. after your last visit to Malaysia, you gave assurance that you would forward to me some names of persons (at least two) with international law qualifications (together with their résumés) for consideration of the Trustees of the KLFCW to empanel two more additional Caucasian judges on the KLWC Tribunal.
Time is getting closer to the scheduled Palestine Tribunal Hearing and I would appreciate it very much if I could have your nominations as soon as possible.
Would you also be able to propose a name or two international lawyers of Professor Boyle's calibre, to assist the Amicus Curiae team in the aforementioned Tribunal Hearing, please?
Warmest regards
Yaacob
Sec-Gen, KLFCW
2. June 6, 2013: The next major milestone occurs when Secretary-General Yaacob asks me if I know of “a pro-Israeli international lawyer with a caliber at par with the Prosecution's Francis Boyle.” [Former U.S. Representative] Cynthia McKinney is trying her level best to secure for the Amicus Curiae team the services of a pro-Israeli international lawyer with a caliber at par with the Prosecution's Francis Boyle. Time is if the essence. Would you know of anyone personally who would agree to act as such during the forthcoming hearing.”?
Intent of the request for a pro-Israeli international lawyer?
This request by Secretary-General Yaacob Merican is a key issue in Meme warfare. To understand if his request for “Pro-Israeli defense counsel” is part of Meme warfare, one must know who issued the original request to obtain pro-Israel defense counsel and with what intent.
- Did the request of pro-Israeli defense counsel originate with Secretary-General Yaacob or from another individual or organization that transmitted it to Secretary-General Yaacob?
- Who was that outside individual or organization? What was their intent?
- Why did “Caucasian” suddenly become “Pro-Israeli”?
- Why was “time of the essence”?
- What was the intent of this request?
- If the intent of the original request was to set up a Meme warfare situation around the meme “Zionist” to destabilize the Judges, then Secretary-General Yaacob’s request constitutes Meme warfare.
Secretary-General Yaacob Merican’s request - It is this request for “the services of a pro-Israeli international lawyer with a caliber at par with the Prosecution's Francis Boyle” that sets up the Meme warfare against three Judges of the Tribunal. Judge Eric David and Judge Mike Hourigan, two of the Judges recommended by Former U.S. Rep. Cynthia McKinney were attacked as “Zionist”, and I was to be attacked as “Zionist” because I acceded to Secretary-General Yaacob Merican’s innocent-seeming request and searched (unsuccessfully) for pro-Israeli Judges.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Yaacob Merican <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 7:02 PM
Subject: Re: KLFWC Tribunal on Palestine May 2013
To: "Alfred Lambremont Webre, JD MEd" <[email protected]>
Dear Alfred,
Many thanks for your e-mail.
The KLWC Tribunal Hearing on Palestine is confirmed to take place as scheduled from Wednesday 21 to Saturday 24 August 2013 in Kuala Lumpur.
Please schedule your flight arrangements so that you would arrive in Kuala Lumpur at the latest by the morning of Tuesday 20 August 2013.
Cynthia McKinney is trying her level best to secure for the Amicus Curiae team the services of a pro-Israeli international lawyer with a caliber at par with the Prosecution's Francis Boyle. Time is if the essence. Would you know of anyone personally who would agree to act as such during the forthcoming hearing.
Warmest regards.
Yaacob
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 8:47 AM, Alfred Lambremont Webre, JD MEd <[email protected]> wrote:
Dear Dr. Yaacob - Hi! I was recently at the Kuala Lumpur Foundation to Criminalise War website and I happened to notice the following:
UPCOMING EVENTS
Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal–Hearing on Palestine
Date: 21 – 24 August, 2013 at 2nd Floor, No. 88, Jalan Perdana, Taman Tasik Perdana, Kuala Lumpur
Recently my attendance was requested at a public event scheduled for August 24, 2013. I told the host of that event I could tentatively not attend because there was a Kuala Lumpur Tribunal hearing scheduled for that date.
My schedule starts filling up about three months in advance.
Can you please advise me via return email if I should set aside the dates of 21-24 August 2013 to attend the above hearing as a Judge on the Tribunal?
Many thanks and best wishes, Alfred
To avoid a Pro-Palestinian “Kangaroo Court”?
I assumed, without asking Secretary-General Yaacob Merican, that the order for pro-Israeli defense counsel was a good faith requirement to avoid the trial seeming to be a “Kangaroo Court” in favor of the Palestinians, which had been a major criticism leveled at the Tribunal to date internationally.
Therefore, with the help of my co-director at Exopolitics Israel, I proceeded to contact Ambassador Alan Baker, former Israeli Ambassador to Canada who lives in Israel and is an international lawyer. His associate Prof. Robbie Sabel, Professor of International Law at Hebrew University in Jerusalem, declined to appear for Israel. I contacted my former classmate Prof. Bruce Ackerman of Yale Law School as well as my former teacher Prof. Guido Calabresi of Yale Law School. Both of these scholars recommended Prof. Alan Dershowitz of Harvard, who Former Prosecutor Francis Boyle had told me was the “default go-to person on Israel” in the United States. Prof. Dershowitz reply, citing Former Prosecutor Francis Boyle's libel of him and Harvard Law School as his principal reason for not wanting to help recommend someone to represent Israel.
Alan Dershowitz [email protected] via shaw.ca
Jun 7 to webre
“Thank you. I will think about it. Part of me doesn't want to add any legitimacy to Boyle who is an extreme supporter of terrorism and an extremist anti Israel agitator with no credibility. . . He has called me a war criminal and has accused harvard law school of complicity in war crimes. But I will respond to your inquiry.”
“Who appointed him to prosecute the case?”
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 7, 2013, at 4:42 PM, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Dear Prof. Dershowitz - Hi! My classmate Prof. Bruce Ackerman of Yale Law School suggested that I contact you with a specific question.
> I am a Judge on the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal. The Tribunal has a hearing scheduled for August 21-24, 2013 on alleged Israeli war crimes in its invasion of Gaza in January 2009.
> The Prosecutor is Prof. Francis Boyle of the Univ of Illinois who has tried cases before the International Criminal Court.
> I was asked to locate a pro-Israel lawyer of Prof. Boyle's stature who would like to serve as amicus curiae representing Israel.
> This is the website of the Tribunal.
> http://criminalisewar.org/the-foundation/judges-commissioners/
> I would very much appreciate your letting me know if can you kindly suggest of any names of qualified lawyers who may be interested and contact info via return email.
> Best wishes,
> Alfred Webre
>
> Alfred Lambremont Webre, JD, MEd
> Vancouver, B.C. V6N3E5 CANADA
> Tel/Fax: 604-733-8134
> Skype: peaceinspace
> Email: [email protected]
>
Meme warfare distortions and falsehoods
With that outreach my effort to recruit pro-Israeli defense counsel ended. Please notice that I did not ask Prof. Dershowitz to participate in the trial, merely to suggest the names of Pro-Israeli counsel who might be interested in representing Israel. I asked Prof. Dershowitz, “I would very much appreciate your letting me know if can you kindly suggest of any names of qualified lawyers who may be interested and contact info via return email.”
In the heat of Meme warfare against me, both Former Prosecutor Francis Boyle and Former Prosecutor Matthias Chang would falsely state that I was a Zionist by falsely alleging that I had “asked Dershowitz to represent Israel.” That is an exaggeration and distortion of the facts that is standard in Meme warfare, and demonstrative of how the minds and persona of Former Prosecutor Francis Boyle and Former Prosecutor Matthias Chang had become thoroughly infected with the “Zionist” Meme in this attack and how they sought by Meme warfare to attach the Meme to me in people’s minds.
Through Judge Eric David, one of the two Judges that Cynthia McKinney had recommended to Secretary-General Yaacob Merican, I later learned that Cynthia McKinney had contacted Prof. Alan Dershowitz who had declined to participate. Clearly both former U.S. Rep Cynthia McKinney and I were both set up to search for “pro-Israel” defense counsel as part of Meme warfare against the Judges of the Tribunal.
3. August 20, 2013 – Orchid Room, Hotel Majestic, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Conversation with Former Prosecutor Francis Boyle – I am seated next to Prosecutor Francis Boyle at a luncheon prior to the trial of Israeli war crimes in Palestine 1948- present, which was to start the next day. I casually mention to Former Prosecutor Francis Boyle that I am very proud that the Kuala Lumpur Foundation to Criminalize War had reached out to pro-Israeli Counsel to balance the trial and tell him that I had contacted counsel in Israel, Professors at Yale and Harvard Law School who had recommended Alan Dershowitz, but that Prof. Dershowitz had chosen not to recommend anyone. Former Prosecutor Francis Boyle launched into a lengthy, detailed dissertation on the feud between himself and specific professors at Yale Law School and Harvard Law School including Prof. Dershowitz. At no time during the luncheon did Former Prosecutor Francis Boyle raise any objection to my having searched for pro-Israeli defense counsel on behalf of Israel or of having contacted Prof. Dershowitz.
August 20, 2013 - Meme Warfare against Tribunal Judges The evening before the trial, Commissioner Michel Chossudovsky, a controlling member of the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Commission, and Former Prosecutor Boyle began to secretly conspiring to engage in Meme warfare and seek the recusal of three Judges on false Meme warfare grounds of “Zionism” or New World Order affiliations. We now know this because Cynthia McKinney leaked the emails in which Chossudovsky stated he wished to purge three of the Tribunal Judges (See emails below).
(1) Judge Eric David, a Judge that Cynthia McKinney had nominated, on grounds that he was a Mossad agent, without providing any evidence thereof;
(2) Judge Mike Hourigan because he had been at one time been associated with the UN Tribunal on Ruanda; and
(3) Chief Judge of the Tribunal because he had been associated with the UN Tribunal on Yugoslavia.
Chossudovsky and Boyle Meme warfare against Tribunal Judges
Readers can download the full email exchange (PDF) leaked by former U.S. Rep. Cynthia McKinney showing clear Meme warfare against Judges Eric David and Michael Hourigan in the day before the trial on Israeli war crimes in Palestine at the following:
Download CHOSSUDOVSKYemail scan
CLICK TO DOWNLOAD PDF: http://bit.ly/HLIwme
4. August 21 – 22,
2013 - Meme warfare against Judges at hearing
Former Prosecutor Francis Boyle and Commissioner Michel Chossudovsky waged continual Meme warfare against Judge Eric David during the two-day hearing, demanding his recusal on the grounds of being a Mossad agent without offering any evidence thereof other than repetition of the Memeplex “Zionist”. Vowing to shut the Tribunal down, Former Prosecutor Francis Boyle staged a sit-in of the Palestinian witnesses in the courtroom, playing on their minds with Meme warfare as well.
The irony is that on August 20, 2013, the Judges of the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal had held an initial chambers discussion of the case, structured around a Defense motion to dismiss the charges against the State of Israel. On the basis of the discussion, Judge Eric David drafted a brilliant opinion in favor of the Palestinians, denying Israeli’s motion for dismissal of the State of Israel as a defendant. Because of the Meme warfare of Chossudovsky and Boyle, the Judges never got to consider this motion publicly as a Tribunal.
Moreover, the internal discussion of the Judges on August 20, 2013 showed that (1) the Tribunal would have voted unanimously to find that Israel’s war crimes in Palestine constituted crimes against humanity, and (2) the Tribunal would have voted 6-1 to find that Israel’s war crimes in Palestine constituted genocide, the one dissenting vote being Judge Eric David, who beleived the acts amounted to crimes against humanity, not genocide (consistent with his public positions).
Facts and actual judicial impartiality does not matter to Meme warfare, however. What matters is the destabilization of targeted Judges the Tribunal.
Final Judgement of the Tribunal
The Meme warfare of Former Prosecutor Francis Boyle is documented in the Final Judgment of the Tribunal, which readers can download and read (PDF).
Download KLWCT-Judgment-22-August-2013
DOWNLOAD PDF BY CLICKING HERE: http://bit.ly/1fuDndL
After the conclusion of the trial, Former Prosecutor Francis Boyle resigns as Prosecutor.
5. November 1, 2013 – The next event for me in the timeline of the destabilization of the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal is my receipt on Nov. 1, 2013 of a letter from Former Prosecutor Matthias Chang demanding my recusal as a Judge, again using "Zionist" Meme warfare against me. The timing of Former Prosecutor Matthias Chang’s letter is remarkable as it is sent 20 days prior to the next scheduled hearing of the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal, as if a convenient legal maneuver to set up "Zionist" Meme warfare for my recusal on the Nov. 20-25, 2013 trial of Israel’s war crimes in Palestine.
Former Prosecutor Matthias Chang’s letter is also includes a telltale Meme warfare fundamental error – the same error that Former Prosecutor Francis Boyle stated - that I had attempted to recruit Alan Dershowitz to represent Israel. In fact, I only asked Prof. Dershowitz if he could suggest postntial counsel for Israel.
The only person I had told that I approached Prof. Alan Dershowitz to suggest names of possible defense counsel for Israel was Former Prosecutor Francis Boyle, in the luncheon at the Hotel Majestic.
1. Therefore was it former Prosecutor Francis Boyle who contacted former prosecutor Matthias Chang with erroneous information about me to continuing Meme warfare against me as a Judge of the Tribunal?
2. Was this how former Prosecutor Matthias Chang who then took up the Meme warfare against me on this false premise?
3. Or did former Prosecutor Francis Boyle tell someone else in his network, such as Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Commissioner Michel Chossudovsky who then contacted Former Prosecutor Matthias Chang to continue Meme warfare?
Meme Warfare Mind Map
A Meme warfare mind map of the destabilization of the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal will be most enlightening and illustrative for all tribunals of conscience worldwide to illustrate for informed citizenry how Meme warfare is used to destabilize tribbunals of conscience and NGOs.
Former Prosecutor Matthias Chang states, “It has come to my knowledge that you attempted to get the services of Derzhowitz (sic) to represent Israel in the hearing which was postponed and now to be reconvened in November.”
After this initial falsehood, Former Prosecutor Matthias Chang’s subsequent emails degenerate into a Meme warfare rant. Readers are welcome to access them by downloading the following PDF. What is clear is that Former Prosecutor Francis Boyle and Former Prosecutor Matthias Chang are conspiratorially engaged in Meme warfare to destabilize me as a Judge as well as the Tribunal.
Download MATTHIAS.CHANG.LETTERS
DOWNLOAD PDF BY CLICKING HERE: http://bit.ly/18k3i2I
6. November 4, 2013 – The next milestone in the timeline of "Zionist" Meme warfare to destabilize targated Judges is a letter from the Chief Judge of the Tribunal stating that since I had now “openly taken the position of being an “Applicant/Complainant” before the Tribunal for a restraining order” against Commissioner Chossudovsky, Former Prosecutor Chang and others, "it has now become highly improper for you to be part of the panel of Judges at the Hearing."
The fact is that I had not served a formal motion on the court. I only emailed a notice of intent to file. Here the Tribunal Chief Judge, with no due process, was apparently guided by Secretary-General Yaacob Merican, who generally presents the Chief Judge with administrative matters, into joining in the reality distortions of "Zionist" Meme warfare against the targeted Judges.
Readers can view the Chief Judge’s letter (PDF), which appears to be more continuation of "Zionist" Meme warfare against me as a Judge of the Tribunal below.
DOWNLOAD PDF BY CLICKING ON THE FOLLOWING: http://bit.ly/HQrcvT
TEXT OF NOTICE OF INTENT
"I hereby serve notice of intent to apply to the Tribunal for a restraining order against Michael Chossudovsky, Mathias Chang, and all present and former members of the KLWCC and prosecution team, former KLWC Tribunal judges from directly or directly applying for or lobbying for the recusal of KLWC Tribunal Judges, based on a clear abuse of the recusal privilege in this case."
Very truly yours,
Alfred Lambremont Webre, JD, MEd
Member, District of Columbia Bar
JUDGE, KUALA LUMPUR WAR CRIMES TRIBUNAL
Nov. 1, 2013
VANCOUVER, BC, CANADA
FULL LETTER OF ALFRED LAMBREMONT WEBRE
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2013 10:00:54 -0700
Subject: Denial of request for recusal and application for restraining order
From: [email protected]
CC: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Dear Dr. Yaacob - Hi! I have received this mischievous email from Matthias Chang requesting my recusal because I carried out your request as Chairman of the KLWC Commission to make inquiries of defense counsel for the matter of Palestine, as I had done previously in my searches for additional Judges for the War Crimes Tribunal, in which I contacted Ramsey Clark and Baltazar Garzon.
When you contacted me to search for defense council for Israel, I did not see any conflict in my capacity as a Judge of a citizen's tribunal of conscience, and I as usual did my best to fulfill your request as Chairman of the KLWC Commission.
As you and defense counsel Jason Kay know, I contacted Ambassador Alan Baker, former Israeli Ambassador to Canada who lives in Israel and is an international lawyer. His associate Prof. Robbie Sabel, Professor of International Law at Hebrew University in Jerusalem, declined to appear for Israel. I contacted my former classmate Prof. Bruce Ackerman of Yale Law School as well as Prof. Guido Calabresi of Yale Law School. Both of these scholars recommended Prof. Alan Dershowitz of Harvard. My sister, Jane M.N. Webre, Esq. had defeated Prof. Dershowitz in an appeal case and had told me about his methods, so I contacted Prof. Dershowitz.
Prof. Dershowitz reply
Here is Prof. Dershowitz reply, citing Francis Boyle's libel of him and Harvard Law School as his principal reason for not appearing for Israel.
Alan Dershowitz [email protected] via shaw.ca
Jun 7
to webre
Thank you. I will think about it. Part of me doesn't want to add any legitimacy to Boyle who is an extreme supporter of terrorism and an extremist anti Israel agitator with no credibility. . . He has called me a war criminal and has accused harvard law school of complicity in war crimes. But I will respond to your inquiry.
Who appointed him to prosecute the case?
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 7, 2013, at 4:42 PM, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Info: Dear Prof. Dershowitz - Hi! My classmate Prof. Bruce Ackerman of Yale Law School suggested that I contact you with a specific question.
> I am a Judge on the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal. The Tribunal has a hearing scheduled for August 21-24, 2013 on alleged Israeli war crimes in its invasion of Gaza in January 2009.
> The Prosecutor is Prof. Francis Boyle of the Univ of Illinois who has tried cases before the International Criminal Court.
> I was asked to locate a pro-Israel lawyer of Prof. Boyle's stature who would like to serve as amicus curiae representing Israel.
> This is the website of the Tribunal.
> http://criminalisewar.org/the-foundation/judges-commissioners/
> I would very much appreciate your letting me know if can you kindly suggest of any names of qualified lawyers who may be interested and contact info via return email.
> Best wishes,
> Alfred Webre
> Alfred Lambremont Webre, JD, MEd
> Vancouver, B.C. V6N3E5 CANADA
> Tel/Fax: 604-733-8134
> Skype: peaceinspace
> Email: [email protected]
> IMPORTANT - DISCLAIMER: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you receive this communication in error, please notify us immediately by telephone at 604-733-8134 and/or email and delete the original message. Thank you.
>
> Name: Judge Alfred Lambremont Webre
>
> email: [email protected]
>
I do not consider my actions to be grounds for recusal, far from it. I consider Mr. Chang's letter to be that of a mischievous interloper, in continuation of the considerable mischief perpetrated on the Tribunal at our last sitting in this matter by the former prosecutor, Francis Boyle. Indeed, Mr. Boyle's reputation for libel and unfounded slander preceded him at Harvard at Prof. Dershowitz states above. I consider Mr. Chang's letter to be a continuation of lobbying outside the court room by parties in the KLWC Commission (such as Michel Chossudovsky, who lobbied extensively for the recusal of 3 Judges including the Chief Judge at our last sitting) or formerly part of the KLWC Commission (such as Mr. Chang) to attempt to deter this Tribunal in its difficult case in the matter of Palestine.
Legal Authority
As legal authority, I cite the Judgment of the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal of 22 August 2013, Case No. 3- CHG-2013, Case No. 4- CHG - 2013, KLWCC vs. Amos Yaron and State of Israel, www.criminalisewar.org
I point to the statement of the Tribunal of "Deep concern and regret that there has been a serious breach of decorum and improper conduct on the part of Mr. Boyle, co-counsel for the Prosecution."
Application for restraining order against present and former members of the KLWCC, prosecution, and persons associated with the Perdana Peace Foundation and Criminalizewar
I hereby serve notice of intent to apply to the Tribunal for a restraining order against Michael Chossudovsky, Mathias Chang, and all present and former members of the KLWCC and prosecution team, former KLWC Tribunal judges from directly or directly applying for or lobbying for the recusal of KLWC Tribunal Judges, based on a clear abuse of the recusal privilege in this case.
Very truly yours,
Alfred Lambremont Webre, JD, MEd
Member, District of Columbia Bar
JUDGE, KUALA LUMPUR WAR CRIMES TRIBUNAL
Nov. 1, 2013
VANCOUVER, BC, CANADA
LETTER FROM FORMER KLWCC PROSECUTOR CHANG
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: matthias chang <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 6:18 AM
Subject: Kuala Lumpur war Crimes Tribunal
To: Alfred Webre <[email protected]>, Alfred Webre <[email protected]>, Alfred Webre <[email protected]>
Dear Alfred,
Its been a long time since I met you and or heard from you.
So this email may surprise you.
Correct me if I am wrong.
It has come to my knowledge that you attempted to get the services of Derzhowitz to reprsent Issrael in the hearing which was postponed and now to be reconvened in November.
Obviously, I agree absolutely that Israel is entitled to the best Defence Counsel. I believe that charges were sent to Israel etc by the Prosecution and told that they can appoint the counsel of their choice failing which a defence counsel would be assigned in their absence as was the case with the trial against Bush and Blair. This is so stated in gthe Charter of the Tribunal.
This is obviously a correct procedure that obtains even in the court of law of all jurisdiction.
However, I find it most troubling that you as a Judge of the tribunal took the trouble to recruit Derzhowitz as defence counsel. If it is true, it is a gross dereliction of duty and your perceived impartiality as a Judge of the tribunal. No Judge of any tribunal or court should be involved in the selection and appointment of any counsel whether for the defence or the prosecution. It is not and cannot be the duty of a Judge of any tribunal.
It is unheard of. If in happens in the Court of Law in CANADA OR ANY OTHER JURISDICTION, the judge is in contempt of his own court. Such a Judge may even be censured and or removed by the Chief Justice of the country. I am sure you are more than aware this amounts to a gross misconduct.
It is unheard of and I am truly shock that you would do this and still remain as a Judge on the tribunal. You should immediately disqualify yourself as you have by your action brought disrepute to the entire proceedings.
This is a disgrace and it is unacceptable. And you are a lawyer!
If you disagree with my views as stated above, please cite me any case authorities or legal principle that a presiding judge can involved himself / herself in the selection and appointment of a counsel whether for the prosecution or the defence.
I suggest to you as a friend and a fellow lawyer that you decline to sit as a Judge of the War Crimes Tribunal and not attend the proceedings by informing the Registrar of the Tribunal or the Chairman of the tribunal soonest possible.
Your action has caused grave embarrassment to Tun Mahathir Mohamad. He cannot obviously be involved in such matters as the Tribunal, Commission are all independent. But this independence and impartiality has now been compromised and brought into disrepute.
Please DO THE RIGHT thing and resigned as a Judge of the tribunal.
I look forward to your reply asap.
Sincerely,
Matthias Chang
Meme Warfare: Denial of due process
In the end I was denied any due process by the Chief Judge of the Tribunal that had now been thoroughly destabilized by "Zionist" Meme warfare undertaken against targeted Judges by Secretary-General Merican, Former Prosecutor Chang, Commissioner Chossudovsky, and Former Prosecutor Boyle.
I had in fact made no formal motion before the court and was simply replying to the email of one of the principals in the "Zionist" Meme warfare conspiracy against the Judges of the Tribunal, namely Former Prosecutor Matthias Chang.
My not appearing as a Judge at the trial of the Israel war crimes against Palestine (Nov. 20-25, 2013), however, is a convenient coverup to those who set me up with the task of searching for “Pro-Israel” defense counsel and thus set up the trigger for "Zionist" Meme warfare designed to destabilize three Judges and the Tribunal. One wonders why the Chief Judge was pushed precipitously to rule on a legal motion that did not exist and never was made by me? Usually these matters were brought by Secretary-General Yaacob Merican to the Chief Judge. If this is the case, then it is clear the intent of this improper proceeding was yet another coverup of the original source of the "Zionist" Meme warfare.
By the evidence, it appears that I was railroaded in an improper judicial proceeding when no motion had been made. I was politically “pushed under the bus”, not afforded due process, as an attempted maneuver in "Zionist" Meme warfare to destabilize me as a Judge of the Tribunal.
Nov. 8 & 9, 2013 & Meme Warfare Aftermath:
Former Prosecutors Francis Boyle and Matthias Chang continue their Meme warfare – Former Prosecutor Francis Boyle continues to circulate Meme warfare emails with attacking “Zionist” warfare against Alfred Lambremont Webre and Tun Dr. Mahathir bin Mohamad, stating “What did Mahathir know and when did he know it?”
In an expected spasm of destabilizing Meme warfare, Former Prosecutor Matthias Chang openly begins Meme warfare against Former Prosecutor Francis Boyle, calling Former Prosecutor Boyle a “Zionist”.
Continuing Report on the Four Perpetrators of Meme Warfare
1. Former Prosecutor Francis Boyle - Continues to circulate Meme warfare attacks on the targeted Judges and on the Tribunal, and now has added Kuala Lumpur Foundation Secretary General Dr. Yaacob Merican and Kuala Lumpur Foundation Chairman Tun Dr. Mahathir bin Mohamad to his targets of “Zionist” Meme warfare, stating “What did Mahathir know and when did he know it?” in email broadcasts on the Internet.
2. Former Prosecutor Matthias Chang - Has begun “Zionist” Meme warfare against Former Prosecutor Francis Boyle, openly calling Former Prosecutor Francis Boyle a “Zionist” in a Nov. 9, 2013 email broadcast:
|
from: |
matthias chang <[email protected]> via bounce.secureserver.net |
|
to: |
"Boyle, US" <[email protected]>, |
Dear All,
I think no one should lose any sleep over the rabid rants of Francis Boyle.
His latest email shows and exposes what he really is - an outright Zionist agent of the most vicious kind trying to scuttle the tribunal proceedings from taking place by making all kind of accusations against his former colleagues all of whom had made tremendous sacrifices for the cause of justice.
3. Commissioner Michel Chossudovsky - Is playing sly political flip flop on the Tribunal. Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Commissioner Chossudovsky (the only Jew on the Commission) first published a vicious “Zionist” Meme warfare attack on the Tribunal right after the August 21-22, 2013, and since then deleted that article from the www.globalresearch.ca website. Was that deletion part of Commissioner’s coverup of his part in engaging in “Zionist” Meme warfare against the Tribunal designed to destabilize the Tribunal?[7]
Then, on Nov. 1, 2013 (the same date as Former Prosecutor Chang’s Meme warfare letter attacking Judge Alfred Webre), Commissioner Chossudovsky praised the Tribunal's past judgments against George W. Bush et al. as war criminals while lamenting that Lawyers Against the War were unsuccessful in blocking Dick Cheney’s Oct. 31, 2013 visit to Toronto. In 2010 Cheney cancelled a trip to Toronto because of war crimes allegations by Lawyers Against the War.[8]
4. Secretary-General Dr. Yaacob Merican – After expediting an improper in camera decision by the Tribunal Chief Judge on a motion that Judge Webre never made, Secretary-General Dr. Yaacob Merican has gone into stealth coverup mode, refusing to answer questions put to him by Former Prosecutor Chang as to why he started the “Zionist” Meme warfare attack to destabilize three targeted Judges of the Tribunal.
CONCLUSION
It seems a reasonable conclusion from the evidence at hand that clear from the evidence that these four individuals: Former Prosecutor Francis Boyle, Former Prosecutor Matthias Chang, Commissioner Michel Chossudovsky, and Secretary-General Dr. Yaacob Merican all acted to create a dynamic of “Zionist” Meme warfare that was unrelated to any real facts and whose purpose and mission was to destabilize the Tribunal and three Judges thereof, Judge Eric David, Judge Michael Hourigan, and Judge Alfred Lambremont Webre.
Who will investigate the four Perpetrators of “Zionist” Meme warfare?
Who will step in to investigate the roles of Former Prosecutor Francis Boyle, Former Prosecutor Matthias Chang, Commissioner Michel Chossudovsky, and Secretary-General Dr. Yaacob Merican and seek accountability for their roles in the “Zionist” Meme warfare that destabilized targeted Judges and the Tribunal.
What if one or more of these officials has acted on behalf of an intelligence agency in a Cointelpro role, as some now have come to suspect?
As a Judge on a Tribunal that, by clear prima facie evidence, has been destabilized by “Zionist” Meme warfare being directed against the Tribunal and its Judges, I feel it my duty to uphold my Oath of Office by letting the wider public community that supports the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal know of the facts of this “Zionist” Meme warfare.
Thank you,
Vancouver, BC
Nov. 10, 2013
This is part II of a series of articles on the covert control methods of the Illuminati used in conjunction with other New World Order operations to target specific Truth movement organizations and workers. The article connects dots, and the reader, as always, is free to perceive those dots as connected or not connected. Readers can access Part I in “Jon Stewart carries out Satanic Illuminati hit on Daily Show?: October 23, 2013” http://bit.ly/18XgqhG
[1] Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal, http://bit.ly/17hrnaf
[2] For a documentation of the ethnic cleansing of Palestine by Israel starting in 1948, please see Paper, Ilan (2007-09-07). The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine (Kindle Locations 41-42). Oneworld Publications (academic). Kindle Edition.
[3] Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal hearings, http://bit.ly/1eycJmw
[4] Stephen DeVoy, “Meme Warfare” http://bit.ly/1iUFNlT
[5] Please see Organization Chart, Kuala Lumpur Foundation to Criminalize War, http://bit.ly/17ULTkM
[6] Judicial disqualification, http://bit.ly/HNU6wo
[8] Prof. Michel Chossudovsky, "According to Dick Cheney “Canada is Too Dangerous”. He Fears Arrest but has not Cancelled his Trip to Toronto", November 1, 2013, http://bit.ly/1iXq1GR
How and why the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal was destabilized
by Alfred Lambremont Webre, JD, MEd
Comments