9/11 War Crimes Tribunal

RESPONSE TO "The Vancouver Hearings: Subversion from Within"

9/11 Tribunal under attack for prosecuting 9/11 Accused beyond “the Usual Suspects”

9/11 Tribunal under attack for prosecuting 9/11 Accused beyond “the Usual Suspects”

By Alfred Lambremont Webre, JD, MEd; Judge, 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal

VANCOUVER, BC – Ask most seasoned 9/11 researchers to name the principal individuals involved at a responsible level of executive authority for the “inside job” of executing the false flag operation of September 11, 2001, and you will invariably get at least these four names: George W. Bush, U.S. President; Richard B. Cheney, U.S. Vice President; Donald H. Rumsfeld, U.S. Secretary of Defense on 9/11; and Benjamin Netanyahu, an agent of influence of a war crimes racketeering network within the State of Israel that carried out an act of war against the United States on 9/11. After all, Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld held constitutional authority on 9/11, and a Memorandum to the U.S. Congress, presented to the Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee in November 2006 demonstrated probable cause that Messrs. Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld had committed Treason against these United States under Article III of the U.S. Constitution for their actions in abetting the armed attack upon U.S. soil by advanced U.S. weapons on September 11, 2001.

Memo to U.S. Congress: prima facie evidence that Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld committed treason on 9/11

http://www.examiner.com/article/memo-to-u-s-congress-prima-facie-evidence-that-bush-cheney-and-rumsfeld-committed-treason-on-9-11

9/11 Vancouver Hearings named"The usual suspects"

So it was with some disappointment when, as Judge of the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal, I received and reviewed, together with my fellow Judge Constance Fogal, B.A, M.A, B.ED, LL.B, the sworn oral statements of nearly twenty Vancouver Hearings speakers and subsequent evidentiary submissions and affidavits of some of the speakers that at best named “the usual suspects” of Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld and at worst named the posse of FBI agents who picked up debris in front of the Pentagon following 9/11 so as to obfuscate the demolition explosions that really took place there.

The 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal would not render appropriate war crimes justice if it prosecuted only shills like Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld and the posse of FBI agents, sent to destroy public evidence by their administrative masters.

The mission of the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal is to identify, investigate, prosecute, try, convict and sentence key individuals of an international war crimes racketeering organization responsible for 9/11, and the global war of aggression and world-wide police state 9/11 was intended to bring about.

Affidavits of Leuren Moret and of Andrew D. Basiago

9/11 War Crimes Tribunal - Public Roles as Witnesses & Judges

9/11 War Crimes Tribunal - Public Roles as Witnesses & Judges

The Internet and email lists, etc has paradoxically both facilitated and made more difficult the role of a Tribunal of Conscience, witnesses and Judges. In a "brick and mortar" courtroom, it is easy to tell when a Tribunal is in session; when the Tribunal is adjourned. In the case of the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal, a Tribunal of Conscience, the issue of when the Tribunal is "in session" is more problematic to define. Judges of the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal only speak for the Tribunal in official Notices of Decision, Indictments or other documents that are posted on the Tribunal website at www.911warcrimestribunal.org

Witnesses of the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal - The Evidentiary Statements and Affidavits of the 9/11 witnesses are their official Tribunal-related statements. Privileged communications such as this email also are part of official Tribunal statements. Any other public or private statements by 9/11 Tribunal Judges and/or witnesses, whether on the media, in email lists, social media, emails, etc, are merely statements by individuals in their own private capacity exercising their right of freedom of speech, and do not reflect in any way on the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal, its evidence, Proceedings and Judgments. This rule is made to protect Judges and witnesses, for example, from outlandish claims and statements made by organizers and specific speakers of a June 15-17, 2012 9/11 Conference in Vancouver, BC.

Judges and witnesses who feel slandered or mistreated on an email list are perfectly free to wage in on that list and deconstruct the slander in their own rights as individuals if they so wish without in any way affecting the Tribunal. They are also free to ignore these slanders, and or to bring legal action as needed.

Per Curiam

Oct. 2, 2o12

9/11 War Crimes Tribunal witness Susan Lindauer talks to WeAreChange Connecticut

  

9/11 War Crimes Tribunal witness Susan Lindauer talks to WeAreChange Connecticut

"Whistleblower & activist Susan Lindauer talks to WeAreChange Connecticut on her background as a former CIA asset covering events that include 9/11, Libya, Iraq, & much more."

YOU TUBE:

http://youtu.be/YDNqy6BGLZE

9/11 WAR CRIMES TRIBUNAL

www.911warcrimestribunal.org

Facebook:

http://www.facebook.com/groups/911warcrimestribunal.org/

ARTICLE URL:

http://bit.ly/VKdwWj

Tentative truce apparently reached between 9/11 speakers and 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal

9/11 War Crimes Tribunal urges speakers to cease "misguided war of slander and division", form own Tribunal to prosecute 9/11 Accused: "there can never be too many Tribunals of Conscience"

VANCOUVER, BC -In an Oct. 3, 2012 letter to Speakers at a June 15-17, 2012 9/11 conference in Vancouver, BC, the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal urged that Speakers "as a community assemble your collective evidence and continue the work of the 9/11 Vancouver Hearings in a Tribunal of Conscience to investigate, prosecute, try and convict the 9/11 Accused named in your evidence."

With its Oct 3 letter, the Tribunal returned to the Speakers "all Presentations, documents including Evidentiary Submissions and Affidavits filed by 9/11 Vancouver Hearings speakers with this Tribunal, with the exception of 9/11 Tribunal witnesses who have opted to stay as witnessed with this Tribunal of Conscience. Such Presentations, documents and Evidentiary Submissions and Affidavits are no longer in the Witness Docket of this Tribunal and are not part of the Tribunal's evidence."

The organizers of the June 15-17, 2012 conference and 17 of its 19 speakers essentially staged a walk-out from the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal because Judges Fogal and Webre exercised judicial independence and introduced the affidavits of 9/11 witnesses Leuren Moret, MA, PhD ABD & Andrew D. Basiago, JD, MPhil (Cantab) into Tribunal evidence.

The four 9/11 witnesses with the 9/11 Tribunal presently include: Andrew D. Basiago, JD, MPhil (Cantab), Dean T. Hartwell, JD, Susan Lindauer, MA, and Leuren Moret, MA, PhD ABD.

The Tribunal states, "We urge you Speakers to cease your misguided war of slander and division against the proper actions of the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal, its Judges, and its Witnesses and move on to the constructive agenda that your Evidentiary Submissions and Affidavits demand.

"The statements of Alice Walker, a jury member in the ongoing 4th Russell Tribunal on Palestine, a sister Tribunal of Conscience,  this week on Democracy Now are set out below as an example to show that there can never be too many Tribunals of Conscience."

The Moret Affidavit: The U.K., French, and Canadian 9/11 connections

9/11 QUESTION about Kevin Barrett's Veterans Today article of the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal

Updates for Oct. 2, 2012 - 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal

1. Judge Fernando Imposimato & Prosecution of 9/11 Accused at the International Criminal Court (ICC) - The Tribunal is in active cooperation with Judge Imposimato for prosecution of 9/11 at the ICC, and had forwarded him our latest update on the Tribunal: "9/11 War Crimes Tribunal expected to issue Indictments of Accused in 9/11 events on January 22, 2013"
URL OF THIS ARTICLE:
http://bit.ly/S9QWBu

Judge Imposimato wrote back on Oct. 1 thanking the Tribunal for legal analysis and information in our article, and indicating that he was meeting at the ICC later this week in exploratory meetings for prosecution of 9/11 Accused by the ICC.

2. 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal Group on Facebook -  The Tribunal has started a group on Facebook in addition to its public website:
9/11 War Crimes Tribunal
JOIN & SUPPORT NOW ON FACEBOOK
http://www.facebook.com/groups/911warcrimestribunal.org/?bookmark_t=group
You are welcome to join this Group on Face book. This is a forum on social media for the posting of news and updates on the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal and related events, such as 9/11 witness Susan Lindauers Oct 2 public lecture in Harvard Square, Cambridge, MA.

Despite what appear to be mis-guided (and slanderous) public articles and radio interviews by the organizers and specific speakers, there is a great deal of support on Facebook for the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal. Paradoxically, the irrationality of these articles that border on transparent Cointelpro attacks, have brought a great deal of public support to the Tribunal and our witnesses.

3. 9/11 Tribunal - Public Roles as Witnesses & Judges - The Internet and email lists, etc has paradoxically both facilitated and made more difficult the role of a Tribunal of Conscience, witnesses and Judges. In a "brick and mortar" courtroom, it is easy to tell when a Tribunal is in session; when the Tribunal is adjourned. In the case of the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal, a Tribunal of Conscience, the issue of when the Tribunal is "in session" is more problematic to define.

Judges of the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal only speak for the Tribunal in official Notices of Decision, Indictments or other documents that are posted on the Tribunal website at www.911warcrimestribunal.org

Witnesses of the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal - The Evidentiary Statements and Affidavits of the 9/11 witnesses are their official Tribunal-related statements.

Privileged communications such as this email also are part of official Tribunal statements.

Any other public or private statements by 9/11 Tribunal Judges and/or witnesses, whether on the media, in email lists, social media, emails, etc, are merely statements by individuals in their own private capacity exercising their right of freedom of speech, and do not reflect in any way on the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal, its evidence, Proceedings and Judgments.

This rule is made to protect Judges and witnesses, for example, from outlandish claims and statements made by organizers and specific speakers of a June 15-17, 2012 9/11 Conference in Vancouver, BC.

Judges and witnesses who feel slandered or mistreated on an email list are perfectly free to wage in on that list and deconstruct the slander in their own rights as individuals if they so wish without in any way affecting the Tribunal. They are also free to ignore these slanders, and or to bring legal action as needed.

4. Update on the Affidavit of 9/11 witness Leuren Moret, MA, PhD ABD - The Tribunal is now working closely to assist Leuren Moret in the timely completion of her submission and affidavit by Oct. 28, 2012, despite the intrusive use of Cointelpro frequency weapons to immobilize her laptop computer, and any new computer she would try to use for this task. The Tribunal has arranged for Ms. Moret to complete here submission by hand in a special notebook, and for transport of Ms. Moret's hand-written and affidavit to Vancouver, BC by the due date.

Thank you.

Oct. 2, 2012

www.911warcrimestribunal.org

ARTICLE URL:

 http://bit.ly/VqiSWB

9/11 conference speakers acknowledge Sept. 26, 2012 Notice of Decision by 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal severing ties with conference on grounds of interference with judicial independence and suppression of 9/11 evidence

VANCOUVER, BC -  The organizers and speakers of a June 15-17, 2012 9/11 conference in Vancouver, BC  have served final acknowledgement of the validity of the Notice of Decision of the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal dated September 26, 2012, officially separating the Tribunal from the 9/11 Vancouver Hearings on the grounds of unwarrented intereference with judicial independence of a Tribunal of Conscience.

Below, for the public record, are copies of the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal's response to the 9/11 Vancouver Hearing.

9/11 War Crimes Tribunal

9/11 War Crimes Tribunal Judges Alfred Lambremont Webre & Constance Fogal,  June 17, 2012

VANCOUVER, B.C. - The 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal is a citizen's tribunal of conscience that was duly constituted by the 9/11 Vancouver Hearings June 15-17, 2012 in Vancouver, B.C.

Alfred Lambremont Webre, one of the Judges on the Tribunal states, "As a duly constituted citizen's tribunal of conscience for the events of September 11, 2001, the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal has jurisdiction under natural law and justice; declarations of natural law, such as the U.N. Declaration of Human Rights; international humanitarian law such as the Geneva Conventions; and national laws such as national, state and provincial criminal statues prohibiting murder and conspiracy for any jurisdiction whose citizens died in the World Trace Center on 9/11.  The 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal was convened by a worldwide community of citizens who participated in the 911 Vancouver Hearings (June 15-17, 2012) in Vancouver, BC and via streaming internet from diverse locations around the world including the United States, India, and elsewhere."

During the 9/11 Vancouver Hearings, 19 expert witnesses gave sworn testimony as to names, titles, and implicating evidence for individuals, each of whom is alleged to have acted as part of a common plan as a leading co-conspirator in the events of 9/11 and for whom they are aware of prima facie evidence that is sufficient to raise a presumption of fact.

9/11 War Crimes Tribunal Indictment

Following the Hearings, these 19 sworn expert witnesses and additional expert and eye witnesses on 9/11 have been requested to file further written submissions and affidavits with the 9/11 Vancouver War Crimes Tribunal on or before July 15, 2012 as to individuals for whom there is prima facie evidence that they acted as part of a common plan in the events of 9/11. Each expert witness is being asked to provide a detailed summary of implicating evidence for each such individual named.

Two of the conference organizers of the Vancouver Hearings, James Fetzer and Kevin Barrett, organized a boycott of the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal following the Tribunal's accepting into evidence of the affidavits of 9/11 eyewitness Andrew D. Basiago, Esq. and Leuren Moret, MA, PhD ABD. Most of the conference speakers joined the boycott and withdrew their evidentiary submissions from the Tribunal.

The 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal plans to call additional expert and eyewitnesses and develop and issue an Information and Indictment of individuals alleged to have participated in a criminal, common plan and conspiracy to carry out the events of September 11, 2001.

 At some point, with sufficient 9/11 expert and eye-witnesses, the 9/11 Tribunal will issue an indictment. The Information and Indictment will be accompanied by an Evidentiary Report, setting out the evidence of probable cause for the indictments of the Accused.

Legal implications of the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal

Following the issuance of an Information and Indictment against specific named individuals who allegedly participated in a common plan and conspiracy in the events of 9/11, there are multiple legal venues in which the criminal charges in the Information and Indictment can be prosecuted and tried, and verdicts and judgments reached and enforced against the Accused.

A. International law - The alleged crimes of the Accused in the Information and Indictment may be found to violate the Geneva Conventions of 1949 and constitute war crimes, genocide and crimes against humanity. At the 9/11 Vancouver Hearings Judge Alfred Webre stated, "The 9/11 false flag operations may qualify as a crime against peace, war crime, genocide, and crime against humanity, inter alia, if it can be demonstrated that the true intent of the 9/11 perpetrators was to carry out 9/11 as a pretext for invading Afghanistan, which invasion and war has been found to be genocidal because of the use of depleted uranium weapons and other reasons.  So the legal chain of culpability is there, under the Nuremberg precedents of a crime against peace and starting an unjust war.  The Tokyo Tribunal for War Crimes in Afghanistan, in an opinion by Judge Niloufer Bhagwat, found that U.S. President George W. Bush and his administration had committed war crimes, genocide, and crimes against humanity through the horrific birth defects and other widespread genetic and health damage cause to Afghan civilians through the U.S. use of depleted uranium weapons."

The 9/11 Indictment can be taken by the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal to the national courts of any of the more than 100 nations, such as Germany and Spain, that are signatories to the Rome statue of the International Criminal Court (ICC) for prosecution and enforcement, as well as to the ICC itself. The chief prosecutor of the ICC, to the criticism of many throughout the world, has failed to act on over 400 complaints on war crimes in Iraq and in Afghanistan by US and UK forces, and has privately stated he will not take jurisdiction of 9/11.

Organization of American States - According to one source, "The 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal Indictment can also be submitted to the Organization of American States (OAS) which might be an even better choice since it has the only international criminal court the U.S. has signed onto and the other OAS member countries may not be so biased in favor the U.S.  One attorney took the U.S. government as a defendant there to get an opinion on the fact that the US used Depleted Uranium weapons on hospitals in Granada during the U.S. attack on Granada.  She won and the U.S. had to rebuild all the hospitals they destroyed in Granada.  She never would have achieved that victory in any other international courts."

B. U.S. Congress - The 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal Indictment can be taken by the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal to the U.S. Senate and to the U.S. House of Representatives Judiciary Committee for the appointment of a Special Prosecutor to prosecute the Accused Treason under Article III of the U.S. Constitution, which provides, "Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court. The Congress shall have Power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted." 

There is legal precedent for such an action.  In November 2007, a Memorandum was presented to senior Congressional staff and personally to Rep John Conyers, Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee setting out sufficient prima facie evidence of Article III(3) treason in connection with the events of 9/11 by George W. Bush, Richard B. Cheney, Donald H. Rumsfeld, and other Jane and John Does. Senior Congressional staff acknowledged the seriousness of the allegations in the Memorandum.  Rep. Conyers took the Memorandum home to Detroit, MI over the Thanksgiving 2007 holidays promising an answer as to whether he would move on the file after the Holidays.  To this date, no answer has been forthcoming from Rep. Conyers.

C. Canadian Parliament - There are various concurrent efforts to have the Parliament of Canada investigate the 9/11 events, as NORAD is a joint Canada/USA function and 26 Canadians were killed at the World Trade Center on 9/11. The 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal Indictment can be taken by the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal to members of Parliament and the Senate, including the Prime Minister and the Opposition Leaders in the Parliament of Canada to appoint a Public Inquiry to investigate and report on possible criminal violations by Canadian persons or U.S. persons, including U.S. government employees or contractors/agents, and other individuals flowing out of the 9/11 events.

D. Prosecution for murder - The 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal Indictment can be taken by the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal to any District attorney and/or U.S. Attorneys in the United States of America, and to any Public Prosecutors in other nations whose citizens were killed in the World Trade Center or the events of 9/11. The alleged Accused, Co-conspirators and persons acting in a common plan to cause, facilitate or support the events of September 11, 2001 can each be prosecuted for murder by a U.S. attorney, by a district attorney or by public prosecutors of a nation whose citizens were killed at the World Trade Center or in any aspect of the false flag operation on September 11, 2001.

E. 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal - The 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal can establish a formal Tribunal for a trial of the Accused under the 9/11 Vancouver Indictment. This trial would be heard by the 9/11 Tribunal Judges, with appointed prosecutors, counsel for the Accused and due process for the Accused.  A sister tribunal of conscience, the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal, has successfully tried George W. Bush, Tony Blair, Richard B. Cheney, Donald H. Rumsfeld, et al. for war crimes in Iraq.

9/11 War Crimes Tribunal

Judges on the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal include Constance (Connie) Fogal, B.A, B.Ed, M.A., LL.B, and Alfred Lambremont Webre, JD, MEd.  Connie Fogal is former leader of the Canadian Action Party, former Vancouver Parks Board Commissioner, former Director, Kitsilano and Vancouver Community Resource boards; lawyer with the Defence of Canadian Liberty Committee to oppose what Fogal sees as threats to Canadian constitutional sovereignty. Alfred Lambremont Webre is a Judge on the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal, submitted a Memorandum to the Chairman of the U.S. House of Representatives Judiciary Committee calling for the appointment of a special prosecutor to investigate 9/11 and was a co-architect of the Space Preservation Treaty.

The 9/11 Vancouver Hearings were organized by under Professor Jim Fetzer, PhD, McKnight Professor Emeritus at the University of Minnesota Duluth, the founder of Scholars for 9/11 Truth, who edited its first book, THE 9/11 CONSPIRACY (2007), organized its first conference, “The Science and Politics of 9/11″ (Madison) and produced its first DVD; and co-organizer Joshua Blakeney, Graduate student at the University of Lethbridge, 9/11 activist, Staff Writer at Veterans Today, and now the Canadian correspondent for PressTV, who was awarded the Queen Elizabeth II Graduate Scholarship to study “The Origins of the Global War on Terror”.

Information:

www.911vancouverhearings.com

 

Contact the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal
Email: [email protected]

URL OF THIS ARTICLE:

http://bit.ly/S9QWBu