Download EMAIL.CORRESPONDENCE.ALFRED.LAMBREMONT.WEBRE.JIM.FETZER
Download The Vancouver Hearings
Prof. James Fetzer
Dear Jim - As per
your request, below and attached (PDF) is the chronology of our email
correspondence, starting with my 17 February 2012 email to you and your
responses through March 9, 2012.
I urge you and your colleagues to review this
chronology objectively and re-frame your views away from a polemical
confrontation with a legitimate and independent 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal
that came into being under natural law when the Tribunal administered
an oath to each succeeding witness during the proceedings on June 15-17,
2012, as viewed by a world-wide community in the Denman theatre and on
live stream.
Cordially,
Alfred Lambremont Webre, JD, MEd
Attached:
The Vancouver Hearings by Alfred Lambremont Webre, JD,MEd (PDF)
March 9, 2012
--
Judge Alfred Lambremont Webre, JD, MEd
Judge Alfred Lambremont Webre, JD, MEd
9/11 War Crimes Tribunal
A Citizen's Tribunal of Conscience
Contact information:
9/11 War Crimes Tribunal
3339 West 41 Avenue
Vancouver, BC CANADA V6N 3E5
Tel: 604-733-8134
Email: [email protected]
Skype: peaceinspace
JIM FETZER REQUEST - OCT. 12, 2012
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: James Fetzer <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 4:55 AM
Subject: Your email of 23 February 2012 . . .
To: Alfred Lambremont Webre <[email protected]>
Alfred,
Would you be so kind as to forward a copy of the email of 23 February 2012
which you assert you sent to me? Checking my files, I cannot locate it and
I would like to review it to determine whether it supports your claims about it.
Thanks.
CORRESPONDENCE BY JUDGE ALFRED LAMBREMONT WEBRE, JD, MEd
1. LETTER OF FEB. 17, 2012 TO JIM FETZER; CC TO LEUREN MORET AND KRIS KNIGHT (9/11 MADISON, WISC)
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: EXOPOLITICS.COM <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 4:51 PM
Subject: Jim - The Vancouver Hearings (15-17 June 2012) - from Alfred Webre
To: "Prof. Jim Fetzer" <[email protected]>
Cc: Kris Knight <[email protected]>, Leuren Moret <[email protected]>
Jim
- Hi! A friend forwarded me the information for The Vancouver hearings
on 9/11 recently and I was able to review the planned event, schedule,
speakers, and topics at:
First of all, congratulations for organizing this event and keeping 9/11 truth open and alive.
Second, as you know, there are glaring omissions in
the planned topics and speakers that in my mind amount to (1) burying
public knowledge of the deep politics of 9/11 going back to 1971, and
the exotic technologies that were used by the perpetrators to this
event, and (2) keeping a sophisticated discussion of the legal and
constitutional issues on 9/11 out of public discussion.
My letter to you is designed to open a conversation
about rectifying both of these omissions. I am cling Kris Knight and
Leuren Moret because they were both present at the Madison 9/11
Conference and they are each familiar with my work on aspects (1) and 2)
above and can vouch for my work in their own way as part of the
necessary public dialogue. Leuren was also present at Conspiracy Con
2009 where Andrew D. Basiago, a 1971 9/11 eye witness, and I were both
speakers and has met Andy and can vouch for him as a person.
(1) 9/11 Exotic black budget technologies - These
are well documented in my articles below. In a word, we have a
whistleblower from DARPA quantum access projects who is an eyewitness to
DARPA/CIA possession of images of the controlled demolition of the twin
towers on September 11, 2011 in 1971. We have an eyewitness to Donald
H. Rumsfeld's personal knowledge of these images in 1971, as defence
liaison for this DARPA project to the 1971 Nixon Cabinet, of which he
was a member. Need I remind you that Donald H. Rumsfeld is, by prima
facie evidence, a prime suspect in the 9/11 false flag operation?
(Please see articles 5 & 6 below).
That eyewitness is a member of the bar of the state
of Washington and a 10-year colleague of mine and of impeccable
credentials, Andrew D. Basiago. We both spoke at the 2009 Conspiracy
Con, and have spoken at numerous US and international conferences and
media on these issues.
As long as you continue to gate-keep this evidence
and information about 9/11 by keeping at least a presentation of this
evidence from a public forum like The Vancouver Hearings, you are doing
the public a great disservice, IMHO.
Please see articles 1 - 4 below for documentation on these issues.
2.
Legal and constitutional issues re 9/11 - As you may remember, I was
able to present a Memorandum to the U.S. Congress to the then Chairman
of the House Judiciary Committee, Hon. John Conyers, Jr. in Nov, 2007
when the Democrats had won their majority back, setting out prima facie
evidence of Article III Treason by George W. Bush, RIchard B. Cheney,
and Donald H. Rumsfeld et al on 9/11, and requesting the appointment of a
special prosecutor to prosecute Article III treason. This documentation
is set out in articles 5 & 6 below. These issues should continue to
be raised at public forums, especially The Vancouver Hearings. Without
an informed briefing of the liability of the perpetrators of 9/11 under
US and international humanitarian law, very little effective public
action for recourse will develop over time.
REQUEST: As a long-time resident of
Vancouver, BC and a long time 9/11 activist and author, I formally
request a time slot in the public interest to make a presentation on the
above issues. I would only require, as other speakers, 40 minutes or
less. As I am resident in Vancouver, you would have no travel or
accommodations costs.
Please let me know if you need more information, or
would like to have a phone call about this. Kris and Leuren, please do
express our opinions here via return email if you so wish.
Thank you.
Alfred ;-)
Articles on 9/11 false flag operation by Alfred Lambremont Webre
1. Time Travel and Political Control
2. Secret DARPA time travel program may hold key to understanding the deep politics of 9/11
3. Four U.S. exotic black ops used in 9/11: Tesla time travel, antigravity UFO, directed energy weapons, mini-nukes
4. Scientist: Directed energy weapons turned World Trade Center into nanoparticles on 9/11
5. Memo to U.S. Congress: prima facie evidence that Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld committed treason on 9/11
6. U.S. attorney or district attorney can prosecute Bush, Cheney, and Rumsfeld for murder on 9/11
9/11 Truth & Reconciliation - Restorative Justice
--
Alfred Lambremont Webre, JD, MEd
Vancouver, B.C. V6N3E5 CANADA
Tel: 604-733-8134
Skype: peaceinspace
Email: [email protected]
EXOPOLITICS.COM: "Relations among intelligent civilizations in the multiverse"
==========
2. RESPONSE BY JIM FETZER MARCH 5 2012, CC JOSH BLAKENEY & KEVIN BARRETT
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: James Fetzer <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 7:30 AM
Subject: Re: Jim - The Vancouver Hearings (15-17 June 2012) - from Alfred Webre
To: "EXOPOLITICS.COM" <[email protected]>
Cc: Josh Blakeney <[email protected]>, Kevin Barrett <[email protected]>
Alfred,
Thank
you for your excellent email to us. We have been trying to sort out
the program, where we would appreciate your appraisal of how it now
stands. We have several ideas in the works, including inviting you to
offer a closing statement encompassing all of our presentations as the
final speaker on Sunday. Alternatively, we are considering the
possibility that you might work well as one of the judges for this
conference. This is tentative, of course, but we would welcome any
thoughts or comments in reply.
Warm regards,
Jim
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 6:51 PM, EXOPOLITICS.COM <[email protected]> wrote:
Jim - Hi! A friend forwarded me the information for The Vancouver
hearings on 9/11 recently and I was able to review the planned event,
schedule, speakers, and topics at:
First of all, congratulations for organizing this event and keeping 9/11 truth open and alive.
Second,
as you know, there are glaring omissions in the planned topics and
speakers that in my mind amount to (1) burying public knowledge of the
deep politics of 9/11 going back to 1971, and the exotic technologies
that were used by the perpetrators to this event, and (2) keeping a
sophisticated discussion of the legal and constitutional issues on 9/11
out of public discussion.
My letter to you is designed to open a conversation
about rectifying both of these omissions. I am cling Kris Knight and
Leuren Moret because they were both present at the Madison 9/11
Conference and they are each familiar with my work on aspects (1) and 2)
above and can vouch for my work in their own way as part of the
necessary public dialogue. Leuren was also present at Conspiracy Con
2009 where Andrew D. Basiago, a 1971 9/11 eye witness, and I were both
speakers and has met Andy and can vouch for him as a person.
(1) 9/11 Exotic black budget technologies - These
are well documented in my articles below. In a word, we have a
whistleblower from DARPA quantum access projects who is an eyewitness to
DARPA/CIA possession of images of the controlled demolition of the twin
towers on September 11, 2011 in 1971. We have an eyewitness to Donald
H. Rumsfeld's personal knowledge of these images in 1971, as defence
liaison for this DARPA project to the 1971 Nixon Cabinet, of which he
was a member. Need I remind you that Donald H. Rumsfeld is, by prima
facie evidence, a prime suspect in the 9/11 false flag operation?
(Please see articles 5 & 6 below).
That eyewitness is a member of the bar of the state
of Washington and a 10-year colleague of mine and of impeccable
credentials, Andrew D. Basiago. We both spoke at the 2009 Conspiracy
Con, and have spoken at numerous US and international conferences and
media on these issues.
As long as you continue to gate-keep this evidence
and information about 9/11 by keeping at least a presentation of this
evidence from a public forum like The Vancouver Hearings, you are doing
the public a great disservice, IMHO.
Please see articles 1 - 4 below for documentation on these issues.
2.
Legal and constitutional issues re 9/11 - As you may remember, I was
able to present a Memorandum to the U.S. Congress to the then Chairman
of the House Judiciary Committee, Hon. John Conyers, Jr. in Nov, 2007
when the Democrats had won their majority back, setting out prima facie
evidence of Article III Treason by George W. Bush, RIchard B. Cheney,
and Donald H. Rumsfeld et al on 9/11, and requesting the appointment of a
special prosecutor to prosecute Article III treason. This documentation
is set out in articles 5 & 6 below. These issues should continue to
be raised at public forums, especially The Vancouver Hearings. Without
an informed briefing of the liability of the perpetrators of 9/11 under
US and international humanitarian law, very little effective public
action for recourse will develop over time.
REQUEST: As a long-time resident of
Vancouver, BC and a long time 9/11 activist and author, I formally
request a time slot in the public interest to make a presentation on the
above issues. I would only require, as other speakers, 40 minutes or
less. As I am resident in Vancouver, you would have no travel or
accommodations costs.
Please let me know if you need more information, or
would like to have a phone call about this. Kris and Leuren, please do
express our opinions here via return email if you so wish.
Thank you.
Alfred ;-)
Articles on 9/11 false flag operation by Alfred Lambremont Webre
1. Time Travel and Political Control
2. Secret DARPA time travel program may hold key to understanding the deep politics of 9/11
3. Four U.S. exotic black ops used in 9/11: Tesla time travel, antigravity UFO, directed energy weapons, mini-nukes
4. Scientist: Directed energy weapons turned World Trade Center into nanoparticles on 9/11
5. Memo to U.S. Congress: prima facie evidence that Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld committed treason on 9/11
6. U.S. attorney or district attorney can prosecute Bush, Cheney, and Rumsfeld for murder on 9/11
9/11 Truth & Reconciliation - Restorative Justice
--
Alfred Lambremont Webre, JD, MEd
Vancouver, B.C. V6N3E5 CANADA
Tel: 604-733-8134
Skype: peaceinspace
Email: [email protected]
EXOPOLITICS.COM: "Relations among intelligent civilizations in the multiverse"
3. LETTER OF ALFRED LAMBREMONT WEBRE MARCH 9. 2012 TO JIM FETZER CC TO JOSH BLAKENEY AND KEVIN BARRETT:
NOTE: Word.doc The Vancouver Hearings by Alfred Lambremont Webre is attached
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Alfred Lambremont Webre, JD MEd <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 12:30 PM
Subject: Re: Jim - The Vancouver Hearings (15-17 June 2012) - from Alfred Webre
To: James Fetzer <[email protected]>
Cc: Josh Blakeney <[email protected]>, Kevin Barrett <[email protected]>
Jim, Kevin and Josh - Hi! It was very good to speak
with you regarding the Vancouver Hearings, June 15-17, 2012. I have had
the opportunity to review the revised format and the extraordinary
caliber of international speakers/researchers and topics for the
Hearings.
Thank you for your invitation to serve as a Judge at
the Vancouver Hearings. I would be honored to do so, or if you decide on
another format, to deliver a summation of proceedings.
As we discussed, I am including my evaluation for The Vancouver Hearings (below and attached Word.doc).
Please let me know if you need any information, etc.
Best wishes, Alfred
The Vancouver Hearings, June 15-17, 2012
Here
are some preliminary concepts and suggestions to implement a judicial
format in The Vancouver Hearings that would permit the Hearing’s
findings to be submitted to competent legal authorities at the
international level, and at the national level in the United States, for
investigation, prosecution and enforcement.
Judicial Panel
As you suggested,
you are considering a judicial format for the Hearings with a panel of
three Judges sitting at the Hearings who would evaluate the
presentations and evidence proffered by the speakers (who are appearing
as “expert witnesses” under the law), and render a judgment in a 90
minute conclusion to the proceedings.
Each Judge would deliver a 30 minute reasoned opinion
from the Bench, followed by a written Judgment and Opinion that would be
posted along with the proceedings (papers; videotape or proceedings;
possible legal transcript).
You may want to appoint an amicus curiae (Counsel,
friend of the Court), whose function would be to introduce each speaker
as an expert witness to the Court and frame the legal relevance of the
evidence/presentation the witness is about to give.
The amicus curiae would interface with the Master of Ceremonies, the speakers (“Expert witnesses”), and the panel of Judges.
9/11 as a war crime
I would deeply favor such a format for a number of reasons.
(1) International humanitarian law – The 9/11 false
flag operation, in my opinion, constitutes the war crimes of Aggressive
War, Genocide, and Crimes against Humanity under the Nuremberg Decision,
the Geneva Conventions, and the Rome Statute of the International
Criminal Court. The planners and perpetrators of the 9/11 false flag
operation intended to use this false flag operation to commence a war of
aggression against Afghanistan, and arguably Iraq. The resulting wars
in Afghanistan and Iraq, through use of depleted uranium (DU) weapons
have resulted in deliberate acts by the U.S. government, including those
involved in the 9/11 false flag operation, that constitute genocide and
crimes against humanity.
(2) Enforcement - The Judgment and proceedings of the
Vancouver Hearings can be brought to (1) any of the nation-state
signatories of the Rome Statute for prosecution for war crimes by their
national courts (e.g. Spain); (2) A district attorney or other
prosecutor in the U.S. for prosecution of the perpetrators for murder.
At the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal, we found
George W. Bush and Tony Blair guilty of aggressive war for war crimes in
Iraq, and have set the above procedures into motion. Please see:
Bush, Blair found guilty of war crimes in Malaysia tribunal/ Judgment of the Court (PDF)
Format of The Vancouver Hearings
The
present format of The Vancouver Hearings (below) would accommodate
itself easily to a Judicial Format without significant change.
Suggestions for Format
1. Staging – The Panel
of Judges can be seated at a table with microphones, Stage Left (on the
Judges left as the Judges face the audience), at a 45 degree angle to
the edge of the stage. The Speaker’s (“Expert witnesses”) podium can be
place Stage Right at a 45 degree angle to the edge of the stage. Stage
center would be a table with the Master of Ceremonies and the amicus
curiae.
2. Swearing in – Judges and expert witnesses (Speakers)
would be sworn in by a local Vancouver, BC Judge or Notary Public at
the opening of the proceedings. This gives rise to the perjury penalty
for intentional false witness.
3. Speaker’s presentations – You may want to allow 10
mins at the end of each speaker’s presentation for brief questions by
Judges.
4. Discussion & debate – Amicus curiae would moderate these and Judges may ask questions.
5. Judgment and Opinion – There is a suggested new section in the format (below).
Sunday June 17, 2012
Noon – 1:30 pm Lunch on the Town
1:30 – 3:00 pm Judgment and Opinions by Panel of Judges.
Master of Ceremonies ends Proceedings
6.
Recording/Media – As discussed, you may wish to (1) video-tape
proceedings for the record; (2) have a legal transcript; (3) live stream
the proceedings on the Internet through some provider like www.livestream.com;
(4) Have a press/media agent to get the story of The Vancouver Hearings
into the Mainstream Media in Canada, the USA, and the world.
Additional Speakers (Expert witnesses)
You may want to consider adding:
1.
Independent scientist Leuren Moret who is an expert on the depleted
uranium (DU) aspects of 9/11, an expert on the directed energy weapons
aspects of 9/11, and a co-author with me of the 2007 Memorandum to the
U.S. Congress re the 9/11 Independent Prosecutor Act.
2. Former DARPA Project Pegasus participant
(1968-71) and Washington State attorney Andrew D. Basiago who has direct
eyewitness testimony regarding Donald H. Rumsfeld's possession in 1971,
30 years in advance of 9/11, of photographic images of the 9/11 event
at the World Trade Center, acquired through exotic DARPA quantum access
technology.
THE VANCOUVER HEARINGS
The Denman Theatre, 15-17 June 2012
Organizers: James H. Fetzer, Ph.D., and Joshua Blakeney
PROGRAM: 5 PM—Doors Open. 6-10 PM—Speakers, Discussion, and Debate
Friday, 15 June 2012:
Master of Ceremonies: Jack Etkin
6:00-7:00 PM: Orientation and Keynote Address: Splitting the Sky
7:00-9:00 PM: Session 1: How were the Twin Towers destroyed?
*Charles Boldwyn, “Conventional Explosives and Nanothermite?” (40 minutes)
*Kurt Miller, “Mini-Nukes or Directed Energy Weaponry?” (40 minutes)
*Dwain Deets, “Alternative Theories about the Twin Towers” (40 minutes)
9:00-10:00 PM: Discussion and Debate
Saturday, 16 June 2012:
9:00-11:00 AM: Session 2: Video Fakery and Planes/No Planes
*Morgan Reynolds, “Some Problems with the Plane Stories” (40 minutes)
*Mike Sparks, “What did and didn’t happen at the Pentagon” (40 minutes)
*Jim Fetzer, “Fakery and Fraud in the ‘official account’ of 9/11” (40 minutes)
11:00-Noon: Discussion and Debate
Noon-1:30 PM: Lunch on the town
1:30-4:30 PM: Session 3: The Hijackers, the Phone Calls, and the Passengers
*Elias Davidsson, “There is no proof hijackers were on those planes” (40 minutes)
A.K. Dewdney, “The phone calls from the planes were faked” (40 minutes)
*Dean Hartwell, “If there were no planes, were there passengers?” (40 minutes)
4:30-5:30: Discussion and Debate
5:30-7:00: Dinner on the town
7:00-9:00 PM: Session 4: Who was responsible for 9/11 and why?
*Kevin Barrett, “ (40 minutes)
*Joshua Blakeney, “ (40 minutes)
James Petras, “ (40 minutes)
9:00-10:00 PM: Discussion and Debate
Sunday 17 June 2012
9:00-11:00 AM: Session 5: The Media and the Intelligence Agencies
*Anthony Hall, “ (40 minutes)
Barrie Zwicker, “ (40 minutes)
Webster Tarpley, “ (40 minutes)
11:00-Noon: Discussion and Debate
* Speakers are confirmed.
Noon – 1:30 pm Lunch on the Town
1:30 – 3:00 pm Judgment and Opinions by Panel of Judges.
Master of Ceremonies ends Proceedings
Alfred Lambremont Webre, JD, MEd
March 9, 2012
Tel: 604-733-8134
Email: [email protected]
=====
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 7:30 AM, James Fetzer <[email protected]> wrote:
Alfred,
Thank
you for your excellent email to us. We have been trying to sort out
the program, where we would appreciate your appraisal of how it now
stands. We have several ideas in the works, including inviting you to
offer a closing statement encompassing all of our presentations as the
final speaker on Sunday. Alternatively, we are considering the
possibility that you might work well as one of the judges for this
conference. This is tentative, of course, but we would welcome any
thoughts or comments in reply.
Warm regards,
Jim
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 6:51 PM, EXOPOLITICS.COM <[email protected]> wrote:
Jim - Hi! A friend forwarded me the information for The Vancouver
hearings on 9/11 recently and I was able to review the planned event,
schedule, speakers, and topics at:
First of all, congratulations for organizing this event and keeping 9/11 truth open and alive.
Second,
as you know, there are glaring omissions in the planned topics and
speakers that in my mind amount to (1) burying public knowledge of the
deep politics of 9/11 going back to 1971, and the exotic technologies
that were used by the perpetrators to this event, and (2) keeping a
sophisticated discussion of the legal and constitutional issues on 9/11
out of public discussion.
My letter to you is designed to open a conversation
about rectifying both of these omissions. I am cling Kris Knight and
Leuren Moret because they were both present at the Madison 9/11
Conference and they are each familiar with my work on aspects (1) and 2)
above and can vouch for my work in their own way as part of the
necessary public dialogue. Leuren was also present at Conspiracy Con
2009 where Andrew D. Basiago, a 1971 9/11 eye witness, and I were both
speakers and has met Andy and can vouch for him as a person.
(1) 9/11 Exotic black budget technologies - These
are well documented in my articles below. In a word, we have a
whistleblower from DARPA quantum access projects who is an eyewitness to
DARPA/CIA possession of images of the controlled demolition of the twin
towers on September 11, 2011 in 1971. We have an eyewitness to Donald
H. Rumsfeld's personal knowledge of these images in 1971, as defence
liaison for this DARPA project to the 1971 Nixon Cabinet, of which he
was a member. Need I remind you that Donald H. Rumsfeld is, by prima
facie evidence, a prime suspect in the 9/11 false flag operation?
(Please see articles 5 & 6 below).
That eyewitness is a member of the bar of the state
of Washington and a 10-year colleague of mine and of impeccable
credentials, Andrew D. Basiago. We both spoke at the 2009 Conspiracy
Con, and have spoken at numerous US and international conferences and
media on these issues.
As long as you continue to gate-keep this evidence
and information about 9/11 by keeping at least a presentation of this
evidence from a public forum like The Vancouver Hearings, you are doing
the public a great disservice, IMHO.
Please see articles 1 - 4 below for documentation on these issues.
2.
Legal and constitutional issues re 9/11 - As you may remember, I was
able to present a Memorandum to the U.S. Congress to the then Chairman
of the House Judiciary Committee, Hon. John Conyers, Jr. in Nov, 2007
when the Democrats had won their majority back, setting out prima facie
evidence of Article III Treason by George W. Bush, RIchard B. Cheney,
and Donald H. Rumsfeld et al on 9/11, and requesting the appointment of a
special prosecutor to prosecute Article III treason. This documentation
is set out in articles 5 & 6 below. These issues should continue to
be raised at public forums, especially The Vancouver Hearings. Without
an informed briefing of the liability of the perpetrators of 9/11 under
US and international humanitarian law, very little effective public
action for recourse will develop over time.
REQUEST: As a long-time resident of
Vancouver, BC and a long time 9/11 activist and author, I formally
request a time slot in the public interest to make a presentation on the
above issues. I would only require, as other speakers, 40 minutes or
less. As I am resident in Vancouver, you would have no travel or
accommodations costs.
Please let me know if you need more information, or
would like to have a phone call about this. Kris and Leuren, please do
express our opinions here via return email if you so wish.
Thank you.
Alfred ;-)
Articles on 9/11 false flag operation by Alfred Lambremont Webre
1. Time Travel and Political Control
2. Secret DARPA time travel program may hold key to understanding the deep politics of 9/11
3. Four U.S. exotic black ops used in 9/11: Tesla time travel, antigravity UFO, directed energy weapons, mini-nukes
4. Scientist: Directed energy weapons turned World Trade Center into nanoparticles on 9/11
5. Memo to U.S. Congress: prima facie evidence that Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld committed treason on 9/11
6. U.S. attorney or district attorney can prosecute Bush, Cheney, and Rumsfeld for murder on 9/11
9/11 Truth & Reconciliation - Restorative Justice
--
Alfred Lambremont Webre, JD, MEd
Vancouver, B.C. V6N3E5 CANADA
Tel: 604-733-8134
Skype: peaceinspace
Email: [email protected]
EXOPOLITICS.COM: "Relations among intelligent civilizations in the multiverse"
4. RESPONSE OF JIM FETZER OF MARCH 9, 2012; CC KEVIN BARRETT AND JOSH BLAKENEY
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: James Fetzer <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 1:30 PM
Subject: Re: Jim - The Vancouver Hearings (15-17 June 2012) - from Alfred Webre
To: "Alfred Lambremont Webre, JD MEd" <[email protected]>
Cc: Josh Blakeney <[email protected]>, Kevin Barrett <[email protected]>
Alfred,
These are excellent
suggestions. Kevin, Josh, and I will discuss them and get back with
further thoughts. In the meanwhile, I have updated the program and web
site for The Vancouver Hearings at http://www.911vancouverhearings.com. Warm regards,
Jim
END OF SAMPLE OF LETTERS
Judge Alfred Lambremont Webre, JD, MEd
9/11 War Crimes Tribunal
A Citizen's Tribunal of Conscience
Contact information:
9/11 War Crimes Tribunal
3339 West 41 Avenue
Vancouver, BC CANADA V6N 3E5
Tel: 604-733-8134
Email: [email protected]
Skype: peaceinspace
IMPORTANT
- 9/11 TRIBUNAL CONFIDENTIALITY: This message is intended for the use
of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain
information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure
under applicable national and international laws. If the reader of this
message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent
responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you
are hereby notified that any dissemination or copying of this
communication is strictly prohibited. If you receive this communication
in error, please notify us immediately by telephone at 1-604-733-8134 and/or email and delete the original message. Thank you.
Those who want to review the history of our association with Alfred Lambremont Webre may want to review "The Vancouver Hearings: Subversion from within", http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/10/09/the-vancouver-hearings-subversion-from-within/
Posted by: James H. Fetzer | 10/12/2012 at 12:27 PM
Those who want to read Judge Webre's response to the Veteran's Today article can do so at:
RESPONSE TO "The Vancouver Hearings: Subversion from Within" - 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal
http://bit.ly/VXUL1U
Posted by: Alfred Lambremont Webre | 10/12/2012 at 12:54 PM