9/11 War Crimes Tribunal Judges Alfred Lambremont Webre & Constance Fogal, June 17, 2012
VANCOUVER, B.C. - The 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal is a
citizen's tribunal of conscience that was duly constituted by the 9/11
Vancouver Hearings June 15-17, 2012 in Vancouver, B.C.
Alfred
Lambremont Webre, one of the Judges on the Tribunal states, "As a duly
constituted citizen's tribunal of conscience for the events of
September 11, 2001, the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal has jurisdiction under
natural law and justice; declarations of natural law, such as the U.N.
Declaration of Human Rights; international humanitarian law such as the
Geneva Conventions; and national laws such as national, state and
provincial criminal statues prohibiting murder and conspiracy for any
jurisdiction whose citizens died in the World Trace Center on 9/11.
The 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal was convened by a worldwide community of
citizens who participated in the 911 Vancouver Hearings (June 15-17,
2012) in Vancouver, BC and via streaming internet from diverse
locations around the world including the United States, India, and
elsewhere."
During the 9/11 Vancouver Hearings, 19 expert
witnesses gave sworn testimony as to names, titles, and implicating
evidence for individuals, each of whom is alleged to have acted as part
of a common plan as a leading co-conspirator in the events of 9/11 and
for whom they are aware of prima facie evidence that is sufficient to raise a presumption of fact.
9/11 War Crimes Tribunal Indictment
Following
the Hearings, these 19 sworn expert witnesses and additional expert
and eye witnesses on 9/11 have been requested to file further written
submissions and affidavits with the 9/11 Vancouver War Crimes Tribunal
on or before July 15, 2012 as to individuals for whom there is prima facie
evidence that they acted as part of a common plan in the events of
9/11. Each expert witness is being asked to provide a detailed summary
of implicating evidence for each such individual named.
Two of the conference organizers of the Vancouver Hearings, James
Fetzer and Kevin Barrett, organized a boycott of the 9/11 War Crimes
Tribunal following the Tribunal's accepting into evidence of the
affidavits of 9/11 eyewitness Andrew D. Basiago, Esq. and Leuren Moret,
MA, PhD ABD. Most of the conference speakers joined the boycott and
withdrew their evidentiary submissions from the Tribunal.
The
9/11 War Crimes Tribunal plans to call additional expert and
eyewitnesses and develop and issue an Information and Indictment of
individuals alleged to have participated in a criminal, common plan and
conspiracy to carry out the events of September 11, 2001.
At some point, with sufficient 9/11 expert and
eye-witnesses, the 9/11 Tribunal will issue an indictment. The
Information and Indictment will be accompanied by an Evidentiary
Report, setting out the evidence of probable cause for the indictments
of the Accused.
Legal implications of the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal
Following
the issuance of an Information and Indictment against specific named
individuals who allegedly participated in a common plan and conspiracy
in the events of 9/11, there are multiple legal venues in which the
criminal charges in the Information and Indictment can be prosecuted and
tried, and verdicts and judgments reached and enforced against the
Accused.
A. International law - The alleged
crimes of the Accused in the Information and Indictment may be found to
violate the Geneva Conventions of 1949 and constitute war crimes,
genocide and crimes against humanity. At the 9/11 Vancouver Hearings
Judge Alfred Webre stated, "The 9/11 false flag operations may qualify
as a crime against peace, war crime, genocide, and crime against
humanity, inter alia, if it can be demonstrated that the true
intent of the 9/11 perpetrators was to carry out 9/11 as a pretext for
invading Afghanistan, which invasion and war has been found to be
genocidal because of the use of depleted uranium weapons and other
reasons. So the legal chain of culpability is there, under the
Nuremberg precedents of a crime against peace and starting an unjust
war. The Tokyo Tribunal for War Crimes in Afghanistan, in an opinion
by Judge Niloufer Bhagwat, found that U.S. President George W. Bush and
his administration had committed war crimes, genocide, and crimes
against humanity through the horrific birth defects and other
widespread genetic and health damage cause to Afghan civilians through
the U.S. use of depleted uranium weapons."
The 9/11 Indictment
can be taken by the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal to the national courts of
any of the more than 100 nations, such as Germany and Spain, that are
signatories to the Rome statue of the International Criminal Court
(ICC) for prosecution and enforcement, as well as to the ICC itself.
The chief prosecutor of the ICC, to the criticism of many throughout
the world, has failed to act on over 400 complaints on war crimes in
Iraq and in Afghanistan by US and UK forces, and has privately stated
he will not take jurisdiction of 9/11.
Organization of American States - According to one source, "The 9/11
War Crimes Tribunal Indictment can also be submitted to the Organization
of American States (OAS) which might be an even better choice since it
has the only international criminal court the U.S. has signed onto and
the other OAS member countries may not be so biased in favor the U.S.
One attorney took the U.S. government as a defendant there to get an
opinion on the fact that the US used Depleted Uranium weapons on
hospitals in Granada during the U.S. attack on Granada. She won and the
U.S. had to rebuild all the hospitals they destroyed in Granada. She
never would have achieved that victory in any other international
courts."
B. U.S. Congress - The 9/11 War Crimes
Tribunal Indictment can be taken by the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal to the
U.S. Senate and to the U.S. House of Representatives Judiciary
Committee for the appointment of a Special Prosecutor to prosecute the
Accused Treason under Article III of the U.S. Constitution, which
provides, "Treason against the United States, shall consist only in
levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them
Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the
Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in
open Court. The Congress shall have Power to declare the Punishment of
Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or
Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted."
There
is legal precedent for such an action. In November 2007, a Memorandum
was presented to senior Congressional staff and personally to Rep John
Conyers, Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee setting out
sufficient
prima facie evidence of Article III(3) treason in
connection with the events of 9/11 by George W. Bush, Richard B.
Cheney, Donald H. Rumsfeld, and other Jane and John Does. Senior
Congressional staff acknowledged the seriousness of the allegations in
the Memorandum. Rep. Conyers took the Memorandum home to Detroit, MI
over the Thanksgiving 2007 holidays promising an answer as to whether he
would move on the file after the Holidays. To this date, no answer has
been forthcoming from Rep. Conyers.
C. Canadian Parliament
- There are various concurrent efforts to have the Parliament of Canada
investigate the 9/11 events, as NORAD is a joint Canada/USA function
and 26 Canadians were killed at the World Trade Center on 9/11. The 9/11
War Crimes Tribunal Indictment can be taken by the 9/11 War Crimes
Tribunal to members of Parliament and the Senate, including the Prime
Minister and the Opposition Leaders in the Parliament of Canada to
appoint a Public Inquiry to investigate and report on possible criminal
violations by Canadian persons or U.S. persons, including U.S.
government employees or contractors/agents, and other individuals
flowing out of the 9/11 events.
D. Prosecution for murder
- The 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal Indictment can be taken by the 9/11 War
Crimes Tribunal to any District attorney and/or U.S. Attorneys in the
United States of America, and to any Public Prosecutors in other
nations whose citizens were killed in the World Trade Center or the
events of 9/11. The alleged Accused, Co-conspirators and persons acting
in a common plan to cause, facilitate or support the events of
September 11, 2001 can each be prosecuted for murder by a U.S.
attorney, by a district attorney or by public prosecutors of a nation
whose citizens were killed at the World Trade Center or in any aspect
of the false flag operation on September 11, 2001.
E. 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal
- The 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal can establish a formal Tribunal for a
trial of the Accused under the 9/11 Vancouver Indictment. This trial
would be heard by the 9/11 Tribunal Judges, with appointed prosecutors,
counsel for the Accused and due process for the Accused. A sister
tribunal of conscience, the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal, has
successfully tried George W. Bush, Tony Blair, Richard B. Cheney, Donald
H. Rumsfeld, et al. for war crimes in Iraq.
9/11 War Crimes TribunalJudges
on the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal include Constance (Connie) Fogal, B.A,
B.Ed, M.A., LL.B, and Alfred Lambremont Webre, JD, MEd. Connie Fogal
is former leader of the Canadian Action Party, former Vancouver Parks
Board Commissioner, former Director, Kitsilano and Vancouver Community
Resource boards; lawyer with the Defence of Canadian Liberty Committee
to oppose what Fogal sees as threats to Canadian constitutional
sovereignty. Alfred Lambremont Webre is a Judge on the Kuala Lumpur War
Crimes Tribunal, submitted a Memorandum to the Chairman of the U.S.
House of Representatives Judiciary Committee calling for the appointment
of a special prosecutor to investigate 9/11 and was a co-architect of
the Space Preservation Treaty.
The 9/11 Vancouver Hearings were
organized by under Professor Jim Fetzer, PhD, McKnight Professor
Emeritus at the University of Minnesota Duluth, the founder of Scholars
for 9/11 Truth, who edited its first book, THE 9/11 CONSPIRACY (2007),
organized its first conference, “The Science and Politics of 9/11″
(Madison) and produced its first DVD; and co-organizer Joshua Blakeney,
Graduate student at the University of Lethbridge, 9/11 activist, Staff
Writer at Veterans Today, and now the Canadian correspondent for
PressTV, who was awarded the Queen Elizabeth II Graduate Scholarship to
study “The Origins of the Global War on Terror”.
Information:
www.911vancouverhearings.com
Contact the 9/11
War Crimes Tribunal
Email: [email protected]
URL OF THIS
ARTICLE:
http://bit.ly/S9QWBu