COOPRADIO.ORG: HAARP & its role in the False Flag Operation of September 11, 2001 with Independent Scientist Leuren Moret
When: Dec. 15, 2008 @ Noon - 1 PM Pacific Time
Where: Vancouver COOP RADIO CFRO 102.7 FM www.coopradio.org
What: COOPRADIO.ORG: HAARP & its role in the False Flag Operation of September 11, 2001 with Independent Scientist Leuren Moret
Part VII in the HAARP Series.
LISTEN TO AUDIO ARCHIVE NOW (MP3):
HAARP & its role in the False Flag Operation of September 11, 2001
THIS INTERVIEW ADDRESSES THE “ENERGY BUDGET” AS THE CONSTRAINTS AND METHOD FOR ANALYSIS OF THE SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL EVIDENCE FOR THE USE OF HAARP AND BEAM WEAPONS AT THE WORLD TRADE CENTER SITE ON 9/11
IN TERMS OF THE SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE FOR HAARP/BEAM WEAPONS USED AT THE WTC, THE ENERGY BUDGET IS THE MOST CRITICAL FACTOR TO USE AS AN APPROACH FOR SOLVING THE MYSTERY OF THE WTC DESTRUCTION. THE ENERGY REQUIRED TO TAKE DOWN THE BUILDINGS, AND TO CREATE THE VERY SMALL SIZE OF THE PARTICLES OF THE DUST, MUST BE ACCOUNTED FOR. CHEMICAL EXPLOSIVES DO NOT PROVIDE THE ENERGY NEEDED TO PRODUCE THE LARGE VOLUME OF VERY SMALL NANOSIZED PARTICLES PRODUCED FROM THE COLLAPSE OF THE WTC BUILDINGS. YOU CAN’T GET MORE ENERGY OUT OF IT THAN YOU PUT INTO IT.
- Seismic Record: the energy budget recorded in the seismic record on the day of 9/11 and the collapse of the buildings did not reflect the mass of building materials involved in the collapse, nor the nearly freefall of the collapsing buildings. The seismic record demonstrates an event on the scale of a quarry blast. WHERE WAS THE THUD?
- Kinetic Energy: two robust buildings with very robust steel beam reinforcement would release a sizeable amount of kinetic energy from the buildings falling – that would be all of the energy that went into the construction of the buildings. The release of that amount of kinetic energy is not reflected in the physical evidence on the seismic record. Into what physical process did that kinetic energy go?
- Molecular Dissociation: the collapse of the buildings produced the highest mass per volume of very fine particles (nanoparticles) ever measured in an air sample in the United States. It takes a tremendous amount of energy to dissociate or break the molecular bonds of steel, concrete and other building materials that were “powdered” into very fine particles during the collapse of the buildings. The largest mass per volume of METALS ever measured in an air sample in the US were reported by Dr. Thomas Cahill who did air monitoring for 5 months. Metal is used in buildings because it is very strong – and would require large amounts of energy to reduce it to nanoparticles. Chemical explosives do not release enough energy to produce that volume of very fine particles. A much more energetic process was involved such as laser or beam energy which releases focused and concentrated energy as complex waveforms necessary to cause molecular dissociation.
- Physical Evidence of Buildings Collapsing: in videos of the collapses on 9/11 the WTC buildings erupted into emulsion like a drinking fountain, and the rubble did not hit the ground. Even on tape huge pieces of aluminum building siding vaporized as they were freefalling, and never hit the ground.
o Controlled Demolition: this was not a controlled demolition
♣ Detritus Pile: should be 1/3 the height of the building
The 100+ story buildings were about 1 story high when the collapse of the buildings ended. A fireman on one of the news videos said the antenna that had been on the of B. 1 was on the top of a pile of rubble about one story high. The rubble pile should have been 35 stories if it was a conventional controlled demolition.
♣ Rubble Never Hit the Ground – this defies gravity, where did the rubble go?
♣ Footprints - Geometrically Round Holes: contiguous round holes 24’ in diameter were in the footprints of the WTC buildings 1 and 2, and a 60’ deep geometrically round hole was in the middle of Liberty Street near the WTC. This is evidence of beam weapons. There was NO debris inside the footprints of the two WTC buildings… only bare dirt with circles in the dirt.
♣ Livermore Nuclear Weapons Lab Beam Weapon Demo: in 1955 the microwave oven was invented and was a concept for a beam weapon.
In the summer of 1990, I observed a demonstration of the Livermore Shiva laser facility in the middle of the night. A 16’ diameter amber colored beam was shot straight up into the sky from the lab and all air traffic was diverted for a 5 mile radius during the demonstration. When I asked a grad student working at the laser facility what they were trying to do, he said “Make a star”. I knew that could not be true because lasers are used to molecularly dissociate materials by releasing tremendous amounts of energy as very advanced and complex waveforms. Livermore had long been involved in development of HAARP since 1978 in secret collaboration with the Soviet Union, AND advanced beam weapons.
o Dust: in videos of the collapse larger particles fell and cascaded
down from the buildings under the forces of gravity, but before they hit the ground they vaporized and suddenly went up into the atmosphere like an antigravity demonstration. Nanoparticles are so tiny that they are not
subject to the forces of gravity, so molecular dissociation
occurred on the larger particles as they were freefalling,
reducing them into nano-particles (0.1 microns in diamater and smaller) which suddenly obeyed other physical laws – quantum mechanics. More evidence of HAARP/beam weapon technology applied during collapse.
o Satellite photos: showed dust going into upper atmosphere –
which had to be nanoparticles and may have been enhanced
by other technology because most very fine particles/dust would stay in the Troposphere and be rained out in 2 months as we know from depleted uranium particulate releases from battlefield already.
o 1400 Toasted Cars: located blocks from the WTC buildings,
with door handles missing, engine blocks missing, blistering on some parts of the car finish, strange rust patterns on the bodies of the cars.
o Paper Around Cars Not Burned: whatever “vaporized” the
engine blocks and the door handles on 1400 cars did not ignite fragile and flammable paper lying all over the ground around the cars. If engine blocks and door handles selectively vaporized, why didn’t body of car vaporize?
o Pile of Cars Spontaneously Combusted: in a news video, the
entire pile of cars started burning spontaneously at the same time with no visible cause, it was not a fire that started in one car and spread to others.
o Rust Occurred Immediately: on cars and trucks, and in FEMA
photos there was heavy rust on STEEL beams – steel does not rust, and it is a slow oxidation process that results in rusting of iron. This rusting happened immediately.
o Basements Of WTC Buildings Undamaged: stuffed
mannequins in the basement with clothing on were carried out of the basement undamaged. If a 100+-story building collapsed into its basement and left a 35-story rubble pile, there would be nothing left in the basement. Even streetcars underground at the WTC were pulled out after the collapse and had no damage.
o Prof. Cahill Air Monitoring Samples: the hardest and most
durable materials vaporized (steel, concrete etc), and the most fragile materials (paper) cascading out of windows and all over the ground for blocks were undamaged
o Truckloads of Potting Soil: right after the WTC disaster, the
ground was “fuming”, and sequential FEMA aerial photos show 130 dumptrucks FULL of soil (filled almost to the top of the dumptruck space) covered with tarps so that the dirt in the trucks was not visible to onlookers on the street, coming INTO the WTC area, dumping the soil and going out for more. This happened even before the rescues or cleanup started and it continued for some time. The piles of soil were left for a week and got higher each day in sequential photos. The soil “fuming” lasted until March 2002 (8 months).
o Where Were All the WTC Bodies?: Emergency Room MDs Dr.
Tony Daher and Dr. Lincoln Cleaver were interviewed on TV on 9/11 about the casualties. They said there weren’t any after about noon on 9/11, no more casualties came to the ER. Firemen saw NO BODIES but talked about the antenna on top of building 1 that was at ground level on top of about one story of rubble.
o Boots Disintegrated: on emergency responders after 2 hours.
They had to get new boots every 2 hours – molecular dissociation. It was not from burning, their skin would have been damaged.
o NO FIRES IN BUILDINGS: William Rodriguez, Senior
Janitor at WTC said there were no fires in the buildings. He
conducted rescue efforts, saved injured workers and had
keys to every lock in both buildings.
o No Ground Fuming During Rain: For 99 days the “burning”
(fuming) continued at the WTC site, but when it rained there was no fuming. If it had been fires burning, the rain would have caused steam from heating rainwater.
o USGS: Iron versus Steel: the USGS analyzed the mineral form
of the rust on steel beams and iron objects at the WTC. They did not address the “steel does not rust” issue, but dodged it by referring to the rusted steel beams in the rubble pile as “iron beams” and gave mineral analyses of IRON minerals produced by oxidation.
o Official Sample Data Not Reliable: spectral absorption images
at the WTC indicated average particle size was about 1 micron, which is subjected to gravity and would have fallen with the collapsed buildings. USGS did not collect many dust samples and collecting samples by other different agencies did not agree with each other. No samples were taken at the toasted cars.
o Beam Weapon Evidence: was present at the top of the WTC
buildings as ‘lathering up’ started before buildings started
coming down. ‘Lathering up’ in videos preceded the collapse of all buildings, even Building 7 which supposedly Larry Silverstein when he said “Pull it” to firefighters meant controlled demolition. Color alteration and modification in news videos compared to other photos/videos at tops of buildings indicates “doctoring” of images.
When the Seattle Dome was destroyed with controlled demolition, the dust created by the destruction did not get any higher than the top of the building. The WTC dust got into the upper atmosphere almost immediately – which indicates VERY TINY atmospheric dust sized particles (0.1 micron and smaller), in fact smaller than atmospheric dust which stays mainly in the Troposphere.
o “Lathering Up” Incriminating: Building 7 “lathered up” even
before B. 2 went down. B7 not damaged at all by B. 2 going down – right next to each other.
o Freon tanks very odd, large tanks removed from WTC
building and OSHA made bogus statement about what and why they were removed. Was freon used in takedown? A NYC cop I met with Cindy Sheehan said he was injured in B. 7 and removed on a gurney, but his eyes were covered so he could not see anything as they left the building. He reported he was able to see dead bodies lying all over the floor as he was being carried out – BEFORE building 7 had collapsed. Was this due to Freon asphyxiation put through ventilation system like in recent Russian submarine disaster?
o Minneapolis Bridge Collapse: similarities to WTC disaster,
every bridge segment failed at exactly the same time instead of domino effect after first collapse. This defies the laws of engineering. It should have been one place failed and sequential domino-like failures followed for a normal engineering collapse.
911 Blog Forum Comment: We stand at the beginning of a new age. Our government has in its hands a method of disrupting the molecular basis for matter [HAARP/beam weapons], and its first impulse was to weaponize it. Is this so hard to understand? Like splitting atoms to create destruction was it hard to understand in 1945? [HAARP - the new and improved model]
Of course this new “invention” came when the United States ruled supreme. A weapon system of vast new power comes in time and we don’t have an enemy worthy of it, so naturally we use it on ourselves, ‘Wag the Dog’.
NOTE: The copyright on this radio program is held by Vancouver Coop Radio CFRO 102.7 FM, which is a non-profit organization. http://www.coopradio.org
The views expressed on the radio program are entirely those of the guest, independent scientist Leuren Moret. Email: firstname.lastname@example.org
Other Coop Radio guests who have conducted similar interviews in this area include Dr. Judy Wood and John Hutchinson. See: http://www.drjudywood.com
COOPRADIO.ORG: Dr. Judy Wood & Canadian Inventor/Scientist John Hutchison on 9/11 & The Hutchison Effect
Listeners should contact Leuren Moret, Dr. Judy Wood and John Hutchinson directly with regard to any questions as to content, conclusions and overlap.
COOPRADIO: HAARP Series of Radio Programs with Independent Scientist Leuren Moret
HAARP as a Space-Based Weapon of Mass Destruction
Part I: Monday June 2, 2008 @ Noon-1 PM PDT
WHERE: Vancouver Coop Radio CFRO 102.7 FM
LISTEN LIVE: http://www.coopradio.org
Host: Alfred Lambremont Webre, JD, MEd
LISTEN TO PART I : Leuren Moret: HAARP - as a space-based weapon of
mass destruction - and Environmental War, SYNOPSIS of talk and listen:
LISTEN TO MP3 OF PART I:
PART II: Monday June 23, 2008 @ Noon-1 PM PDT
Leuren Moret: HAARP and Environmental War, SYNOPSIS AND REFS.
LISTEN to MP3 Part II:
Part III: Monday July 14, 2008 @ Noon - 1 PM PDT
Leuren Moret: HAARP & Weather Modification/Weather Warfare
SYNOPSIS AND REFERENCES:
LISTEN to MP3 Part III:
Part IV: August 4, 2008 @ Noon - 1 PM PDT
Leuren Moret: HAARP and Weather Modification (CONTINUED)
SYNOPSIS AND REFERENCES:
LISTEN to MP3 Part IV:
Part V: Monday Sept 15, 2008
Leuren Moret: HAARP: Arctic Ice Cap Melt Down, Controlled Ecocide, and Depopulation
SYNOPSIS AND REFERENCES:
LISTEN to MP3 Part V:
Part VI: Nov. 3, 2008 @ Noon - 1 PM Pacific Time
Leuren Moret: HAARP & Mind Control in the 2008 Canada & USA Elections
SYNOPSIS AND REFERENCES:
LISTEN to MP3 Part VI:
Part VII: December 15, 2008 (but mp3 is posted below)
Leuren Moret: HAARP & its role in the False Flag Operation of September 11, 2001
SYNOPSIS AND REFERENCES:
LISTEN to MP3 Part VII:
Part ? : July 23, 2007
Leuren Moret: HAARP and Mind Control
(Link to be posted soon with Synopsis, Transcript and references)
LISTEN to MP3 Part ?: