VANCOUVER, BC – This is Part II (and Part I if you missed it) of Three-Part Symposium exposing a sentient, invading, off-planet, predatory, pathogenic AI Artificial Intelligence and offering Soul and Love-based solutions for restoring an increasingly robotized human society.
The history of “The Agenda of Transhumanism” is a plague that we can trace back to our ancient past that is now showing itself in the current era with the proliferation of high-tech devices, the use of robotics in warfare, back-engineered systems from alien technologies, HAARP, Microwave proliferation, Scalar energy, geo-engineering, vaccination campaigns, toxic food, GMO, legislation and world governmental bodies that use statues and regulations propagated as laws to further enslave Humankind. In other words, in a stealth like manner, hidden in plain sight, we are hosting an entity that is soulless and inorganic in its predatory nature.
In Parts II and III Jeffrey Sewell leads the discussion with the introduction of Metabiology, the science of As above, so below in the Metamystical relationship of Humankind with their place in the Cosmos. A very large subject matter that brings into our collective consciousnesses just how we are in every sense of the meaning co-creators.
Christine and Claudia bring to the symposium their empirical data as planetary healers and Earth Empaths along with a soul-driven impulse for truth – the Truth that as we are able to embrace it sets us Free. It is the return of the Divine Sovereign, an aspect of our deepest subconscious mind that when touched stirs a longing and Knowing that is the cure and the directional compass for the healing crisis moments in our quadrant of the Universe.
The beauty of presenting a field of information from multiple view points is not only that it provides the listener with a more comprehensive study, it also allows for the surprise of new revelations and insights to emerge in the moment.
We start our series with Part I, which brings in Alfred Webre’s overview of forty years within the world of Exopolitics, the shock he felt when waking up to the reality of the sentient AI Artificial Intelligence black goo’s presence and his dedication to helping Humankind wake up and discover solutions.
VANCOUVER, BC – Part I of Three-Part Symposium Exposing Sentient, Off-planet Predatory, Pathogenic AI Artificial Intelligence and offering Soul and Love-based solutions for restoring an increasingly robotized human society.
WATCH PART I OF EXPOSING EXTRATERRESTRIAL AI ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SYMPOSIUM
MODEL STATUTE concerning weapons systems operating on new physics principles used by AI Artificial Intelligence to entrain humans and/or to torture or inflict other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment including electronic weapons, electromagnetic weapons, magnetic weapons, directed energy weapons, geophysical weapons, wave-energy weapons, frequency weapons, genetic weapons, scalar weapons, psychotronic weapons, chemtrail aerosol weapons, implant weapons, nanotechnology weapons, high frequency active aural high altitude ultra low frequency weapons, information technology weapons.
MODEL STATUTE FOR THE EUROPEAN UNION
Council Regulation (EC) No _________________ of _________, 201_
Council Regulation (EC) No _________________ of _________, 201_ concerning weapons systems operating on new physics principles used by AI Artificial Intelligence to entrain humans and/or to torture or inflict other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment including but not limited to electronic weapons, electromagnetic weapons, magnetic weapons, directed energy weapons, geophysical weapons, wave-energy weapons, frequency weapons, genetic weapons, scalar weapons, psychotronic weapons, chemtrail aerosol weapons, implant weapons, nanotechnology weapons, high frequency active aural high altitude ultra low frequency weapons, information technology weapons.
Official Journal _______________________________________
Council Regulation (EC) ________________________________
of ______________ 201_
concerning weapons systems operating on new physics principles used to torture or inflict other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment including but not limited to electronic weapons, electromagnetic weapons, magnetic weapons, directed energy weapons, geophysical weapons, wave-energy weapons, frequency weapons, genetic weapons, scalar weapons, psychotronic weapons, chemtrail aerosol weapons, implant weapons, nanotechnology weapons, high frequency active aural high altitude ultra low frequency weapons, information technology weapons.
(hereinafter collectively referred to as “new physics torture weapons”).
THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 133 thereof,
Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,
(1) Pursuant to Article 6 of the Treaty on European Union, respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms constitutes one of the principles common to the Member States. In view of this, the Community resolved in 1995 to make respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms an essential element of its relations with third countries.
(2) Article 5 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and Article 3 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms all lay down an unconditional, comprehensive prohibition on torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment. Other provisions, in particular the United Nations Declaration Against Torture and the 1984 United Nations Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment, place an obligation on States to prevent torture.
(3) Article 2(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union states that no one shall be condemned to the death penalty or executed. On 29 June 1998, the Council approved “Guidelines on EU policy towards third countries on the death penalty” and resolved that the European Union would work towards the universal abolition of the death penalty.
(4) Article 4 of the said Charter states that no one shall be subjected to torture or to inhuman or degrading treatment. On 9 April 2001, the Council approved “Guidelines to the EU policy toward third countries, on torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment “. These guidelines refer to both the adoption of the EU Code of Conduct on Arms Exports in 1998 and the ongoing work to introduce EU-wide controls on the exports of paramilitary equipment as examples of measures to work effectively towards the prevention of torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment within the Common Foreign and Security Policy. These guidelines also provide for third countries to be urged to prevent the use and production of, and trade in, equipment that is designed to inflict torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment and prevent the abuse of any other equipment to these ends.
(5) It is therefore appropriate to lay down Community rules on use and on trade with third countries in new physics torture weapons. These rules are instrumental in promoting respect for human life and for fundamental human rights and thus serve the purpose of protecting public morals. Such rules should ensure that Community economic operators do not derive any benefits from trade that either promotes or otherwise facilitates the implementation of policies on torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment, which are not compatible with the relevant EU Guidelines, the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and international conventions and treaties.
(6) For the purpose of this Regulation, it is considered appropriate to apply the definitions of torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment laid down in the 1984 United Nations Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment and in Resolution 3452 (XXX) of the General Assembly of the United Nations. These definitions should be interpreted taking into account the case law on the interpretation of the corresponding terms in the European Convention on Human Rights and in relevant texts adopted by the EU or its Member States.
(7) The Guidelines to the EU Policy toward third countries on torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment provide, inter alia, that the Heads of Mission in third countries will include in their periodic reports an analysis of the occurrence of torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment in the State of their accreditation, and the measures taken to combat it. It is appropriate for the competent authorities to take these and similar reports made by relevant international and civil society organisations into account when deciding on requests for authorisations. Such reports should also describe any new physics torture weapons used in third countries for the purpose of torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment.
(8) In order to contribute to the prevention of torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment, it is considered necessary to prohibit the supply to third countries of technical assistance related to goods which have no practical use other than for the purpose of torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment by new physics torture weapons.
(9) The aforementioned Guidelines state that, in order to meet the objective of taking effective measures against torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment, measures should be taken to prevent the use, production and trade of new physics torture weapons, including parts and equipment thereof, which are designed to inflict torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment. It is up to the Member States to impose and enforce the necessary restrictions on the use and production of such equipment.
(10) In order to take into account new data and technological developments, the lists of new physics torture weapons and parts and equipment thereof covered by this Regulation should be kept under review and provision should be made for a specific procedure to amend these lists.
(11) The Commission and the Member States should inform each other of the measures taken under this Regulation and of other relevant information at their disposal in connection with this Regulation.
(12) Member States should lay down rules on penalties applicable to infringements of the provisions of this Regulation and ensure that they are implemented. Those penalties should be effective, proportionate and dissuasive.
(13) This Regulation respects the fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised in particular by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union,
HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:
Subject matter, scope and definitions
Subject matter and scope
1. This Regulation lays down Community rules governing new physics torture weapons.
For the purposes of this Regulation:
(a) “new physics torture weapons” means weapons or weapons systems operating on new physics principles used to torture or inflict other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment including but not limited to electronic weapons, electromagnetic weapons, magnetic weapons, directed energy weapons, geophysical weapons, wave-energy weapons, frequency weapons, genetic weapons, scalar weapons, psychotronic weapons, chemtrail aerosol weapons, implant weapons, nanotechnology weapons, high frequency active aural high altitude ultra low frequency weapons, information technology weapons.
(b) “torture” means the use of new physics torture weapons to commit any act by which severe pain or suffering, whether physical or mental, is intentionally inflicted on a person for such purposes including but not limited to intentional psychological programming, experimentation, voice to skull communication, artificial telepathy, remote influencing, remote inducement of physical or mental illness, mood management, mind control of persons or populations, remote virtual sexual assault, remote virtual rape, forced reproductive sterilization by means of chemtrails aerosol weapons, forced reproductive sterilization by means of vaccinations, (“RHIC- EDOM”) radio hypnotic intracerebral control and electronic dissolution of memory, remote transmission of images or films to brain, remote reading and controlling of thoughts, subliminal thought control, tinnitus, remote introduction of implants into body via vaccination, remote introduction of implants into body via chemtrails aerosol weapon, remote introduction of implants into body via food, water or potable liquid, remote introduction of implants into body via nanobot, remote scarring of body, remote introduction of inorganic particles into body, telephone terror including remotely induced epilepsy, muscle pains and cramps in neck and legs, headaches, severe toothaches, sudden falling off of healthy teeth while talking on the phone, remotely induced backaches, vibrations in various parts of the body, itching, ear tumors, brain tumors, respiratory diseases, asthma, immediate diarrhea and vomiting, remote deformation of victim’s body parts and organs including deformed bloated abdomen, deformed neck, lumps and channels on the head, shoulders widened, blown up arms and legs, deformed genitals and other deformations, remote inducement of extreme weight gain or abnormal weight loss endangering the victim’s health, remote inducement of blindness, cataracts or eye cancer, remote control of gangstalking or gangstalkers, gangstalking, commission of the following crimes in conjunction with the use of new physics torture weapons: harassment, breaking and entering of private property, ransacking of private property.
(c) “assassination” means the intentional use of new physics torture weapons to cause the death of a person by means including but not limited to heart attack; strangulation; suffocation; fast-acting cancer; diabetes; myocardial infarction; hemorrhage in brain; thrombosis in lungs; infectious disease.
Weapons systems operating on new physics principles used to torture or inflict other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment
1. Any use of a new energy torture weapon to torture or inflict other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment on any individual in the European Union or on any European Union citizen shall be prohibited, irrespective of the geographical location of such weapon, inside or outside of the European Union.
1. Any export of a new energy torture weapon shall be prohibited, irrespective of the origin of such weapon.
2. The supply of technical assistance related to a new energy torture weapon, whether for consideration or not, from the customs territory of the Community, to any person, entity or body in a third country shall be prohibited.
1. Any import of a new energy torture weapon shall be prohibited, irrespective of the origin of such weapon.
2. The acceptance by a person, entity or body in the customs territory of the Community of technical assistance related to a new energy torture weapon, supplied from a third country, whether for consideration or not, by any person, entity or body shall be prohibited.
1. High frequency active aural high altitude ultra low frequency weapon – The manufacture, deployment, or operation of any new physics torture weapon known as a high frequency active aural high altitude ultra low frequency weapon that uses high frequency (HF) electromagnetic or scalar wave transmission to excite the ionosphere or any other part of the Earth’s atmosphere over the territory of the Community in order to torture or inflict other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment on any individual, weather modification in the European Union or on any European Union citizen, irrespective of the geographical location of the ground component of such weapon, inside or outside of the Community shall be absolutely prohibited. The combination of those weapons from different locations is also forbidden.
2. Chemtrail aerosol weapon – The manufacture, deployment, operation, or dispersal of any new physics torture weapon known as a chemtrail aerosol weapon in or over any part of the Earth’s atmosphere over the territory of the Community in order to torture or inflict other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment on any individual in the European Union or on any European Union citizen shall be absolutely prohibited.
General and final provisions
In any case where an individual, organisation or Member State charged with violation of this Regulation shall plead national security or other reasons for secrecy as a legal defense to its actions, that individual, organisation or Member State shall be required to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that its actions were in fact directly related to national security or other reasons for secrecy and not to an intention or negligence to torture or inflict other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment.
Penalties and Compensation for Victims –
1. Member States shall lay down rules on penalties applicable to infringements of this Regulation imposing a minimum criminal penalty of twenty (20) years without possibility of parole to a maximum of life in prison without possibility of parole plus a fine of 1,000,000 Euros for each individual infringement and shall take all measures necessary to ensure that they are implemented. The penalties provided for must be effective, proportionate and dissuasive.
2. Compensation for Victims – Member States shall lay down rules on compensation to victims of any infringement of this Regulation which shall include:
(a) the costs of any surgery and physical or psychological therapy to fully restore the physical and mental health of the victim;
(b) financial compensation to the victim’s family for pain and suffering endured as a result of any infringement of this Regulation;
(c) financial compensation to the victim for loss of income and loss of property due to any infringement of this Regulation.
Member States shall take all measures necessary to ensure that such rules are implemented. The compensation provided for must be effective, proportionate and fair to the victim and the victim’s family. Wherever possible, the individual or organisation committing the infringement shall be held financially responsible for paying compensation, except that the victims and their families shall be entitled to compensation hereunder regardless of the ability of the individual or organisation committing the infringement to pay.
3. Member States shall notify the Commission of those rules by _____________201_ and shall notify it without delay of any subsequent amendment affecting them.
1. This Regulation shall apply to the customs territory of the Community.
Entry into force
This Regulation shall enter into force on ____________ 201_.
This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at _____________________, ______________ 201_
For the Council
“There are three basic types of EU legislation:
regulations, directives and decisions. “A regulation is similar to a national law
with the difference that it is applicable in all EU countries.”
European Commission ec.europa.eu
“The European Commission differs from the other institutions in that it alone has legislative initiative in the EU. Only the Commission can make formal proposals for legislation: they cannot originate in the legislative branches. However, the Council and Parliament may request the Commission to draft legislation, though the Commission does have the power to refuse to do so. Under the Lisbon Treaty, EU citizens are also able to request the Commission to legislate in an area via a petition carrying one million signatures, but this is not binding.”
This Model Statute can be adapted of adoption and implementation in any international and national jurisdiction.
VANCOUVER, BC - Targeted Inventor Rainetta Jones recounts her story as the true Inventor of the (1) Apple iPod (which revived a sagging Apple’s fortunes at the time it was released and then incorporated into Apple’s profit mainstay iPhone) and the true Inventor of the (2) Kindle, which Amazon has used to increasingly monopolize the eBook market.
With this Panel, the late Steve Jobs of Apple and Jeff Bezos of Amazon, former and current CEOs of companies using inventions stolen unlawfully from Rainetta Jones, join the ranks of another Intellectual Property theft racketeering syndicate operating within major corporate law firms and media giants, including BBC, ITV, Virgin Media, Channel 4, Scottish TV, as well as major networks in 146 nations around the world showing programs that were stolen by the syndicate from Concept Innovator Seven including the blockbuster and profit center “Dancing with Stars” on ABC-TV in the USA and CTV in Canada.
This a series of interviews on SevenGate, the landmark exposé by UK creator Seven through her self-represented lawsuit against a world-wide high-level law, media, and government psyop syndicate to target creators, steal lucrative media properties, and fund domestic state terror with the surplus revenues.
Part 1 - SevenGate Lawsuit exposes syndicate stealing prime TV & funding 7/7 false flags
My excellent adventure with reported AI Cloning Centre visitor Donald Marshall
By Alfred Lambremont Webre
VANCOUVER, BC - After much ado about not being able to contact me (even though I had asked reported AI cloning center visitor Donald Marshall for a specific meeting time several weeks ago), Donald Marshall and I set 5 PM PDT [9 PM Atlantic Time in Halifax] on Saturday September 5, 2015 to meet on Skype.
DONALD:I just wanted to talk on skype. I didn't know it'd be a recorded interview. I'm not sure which time zone I'm in.
I have much to tell you.
8 hours ago
ALFRED: Donald Hi! That's fine. My Skype is peaceinspace. Today is a good day for Skype I am in Vancouver How about 5 pm Vancouver time? Alfred
I'm in Halifax. What time is that for me?
ALFRED: I do not know. I am on Pacific time - Halifax is Atlantic time and weird you can google it wink emoticon
6 hours ago
Donald - 5 pm PST is 9 PM today Halifax time.
Vancouver (Canada - British Columbia) Saturday, September 5, 2015 at 5:00:00 PM PDT UTC-7 hours Halifax (Canada - Nova Scotia) Saturday, September 5, 2015 at 9:00:00 PM ADT
ALFRED: Perfect - Talk with you at 9 pm your time. This will not be recorded. Off the record private conversation. Thank you for keeping me updated!
DONALD: This is your lucky day
26 minutes ago
ALFRED: Donald - Hi! It is now 9:10 PM Halifax time. Do you plan to Skype me? We were going to speak at 9 and I do not have your skype. Mine is peaceinspace.
END OF SKYPE
Well, the appointed time for Donald Marshall to call me at 5 pm PDT on Saturday September 5, 2015 came and went and no skype call despite all of his flaying about that he wished to speak with me.
Here are the reasons why [barring some explainable event] I think Donald Marshall did not call me to talk off the record, and why he certainly avoided an interview.
Halifax, NS, where Donald Marshall resides, is the military mind control capital of Canada.
Inorganic Intelligence avoids exposure. Therefore Donald Marshall broke his agreement and did not call me at 5 pm PST today to brief me, as the AI Inorganic Intelligence to which he is entrained calculated that it would be unacceptably exposed in the call, and Donald would have to admit to himself that his experiences are AI-driven and created, astral, and technological holographic astral projections at best IMHO.
My experience in that Donald Marshall is heavily AI Inorganic Intelligence-entrained, whether directly by an off-planet plasma Inorganic Intelligence I call “Iggy”, or by one of the AI Artificial Intelligences that reportedly the Dracos [also Iggy-entrained] have gifted the Matrix controllers to run holographic mind control programs, one of which is the “cloning program” that Donald Marshall reports on in his videos.
REPORT on my own holographic experience around “Donald Marshall” that took place August 9, 2015 during a beachfront Party at Vancouver Harbour.
The most remarkable “Truman Show Moment” relating to Donald Marshall occurred to me on August 9, 2015 at a beachfront party at Point Grey, Vancouver Harbour [See photo above].
Donald Marshall had just contacted me via Facebook asking to meet so that he could brief me on his “Cloning Center” experiences, and a number of colleagues and friends were excitedly calling me to share the importance of Donald Marshall’s reports of his experiences at the “Cloning Centers” and what it could add to our knowledge of how invading AI Inorganic Intelligence [“Iggy”] was now operating to entrain and overtake humanity.
I was looking forward meeting with Donald Marshall and learning more and if he was willing perhaps even interviewing him and adding more to the public store of knowledge about AI Inorganic Intelligence and Donald’s specific story.
At dusk as the sun set I sat about 20 feet from the water on a log on the beach enjoying the natural beauty, watching others who wandered by on the beach in front of me with their dogs.
Suddenly to the right of me a very different figure appeared, clearer and more defined than the passers by, looking like a Senior Production Assistant from the set of the motion picture “Truman Show”. The figure was male, about 45 years old, nerdy, dressed sharply in black socks and runners, black shorts, and a black short-sleeved shirt. He was about 30 feet away from me, and stopped, looking straight at me. He looked more like a clone than a human, with that “manufactured” look.
The figure stopped and slowly turned around to reveal in large white lettering the following lettering written on the back on his shirt: “MARSHALL”. After pausing with his back towards me, he walked slowly away from me down the beach toward the direction from which he had first appeared.
My interpretation of my “Marshall” experience
On reflection and after consultation with researchers and colleagues and after examination of video testimony by Donald Marshall of his “Cloning Center” experiences, I have interpreted my “Marshall” experience as a specific intentional technological intrusion into my timeline and my perceptual reality by some intelligence wanting to teaching and brief me as an investigator and reporter as to “Donald Marshall” Cloning Center experiences and phenomena.
What I learned from this experience is as follows:
Perceptual Holographic Insertions – At the beach I experienced a technology whereby some intelligence [whether one’s unconscious; interdimensional living intelligence or inorganic intelligence] used remote neural influencing technology to insert a parallel individual and/or realities along side my normal waking reality.
In this case, my normal waking reality was watching the passersby on the beach. In parallel, an individual markedly different from the surrounding reality was inserted into my normal waking reality with a dream-like message for me, relating to “Clones, the Truman Show, and Donald Marshall.” In the end, however, that individual felt holographic and artificially generated and not anchored a reality with a living Core.
Hypothesis: My working hypothesis is that the “Cloning Centers” that Donald Marshall reports visiting may well be in the nature of these technological remote neural inserts into the normal waking reality. These “Cloning Centers”, their inhabitants, and their activities are consequently technological holographic constructs without a Living Core.
Donald Marshall’s inner challenge is to perceive and report and publicly expose his experiences of what are most plausibly remote neural holographic inserts into his perceptual field (and NOT real), and thus to disempower the invading plasma Inorganic Intelligence creating these experiences.
By his actions today of NO SHOW, Donald Marshall shows me he is not ready yet to expose the AI Inorganic Intelligence creating his neural holographic experiences. That will take a tremendous act of inner courage and Love.
And so I am giving Donald Marshall the space and Love to come forward and expose the AI Inorganic Intelligence, expel it from his inner reality, and begin important healing.
We can all support Donald to the extent he takes a human Loving first step forward in this work IMHO.
September 5, 2015
PS - Oh, and in case you wondered about “Donny’s” current attitude, here is Donald Marshall’s parting shot at me at 7 pm PST, two hours late after his missed appointment, acting out the AI-entrained part of the troll in my Facebook group:
“Donald Marshall: Don't really want to talk to you dude, you sound like a pompous windbag.”
AI Inorganic Artificial Intelligence - Articles by Alfred Lambremont Webre
Today Feb. 8, 2016 is International Day against Mind Control [Anniversary of assassination of Dr. Rauni Kilde] Legislate & Enforce ban on AI Artificial Intelligence/directed energy technologies to entrain or torture humans – How Dr. Rauni Kilde’s work can stop the Invading AI Artificial Intelligence Transhumanist Agenda
Legislate & Enforce ban on AI Artificial Intelligence /directed energy technologies to entrain or torture humans – How Dr. Rauni Kilde’s work can stop the Invading AI Artificial Intelligence Transhumanist Agenda
These works comprise The Omniverse Trilogy, A Portal for a New Paradigm into Our Common Reality Since 2000.
Alfred is a graduate of Georgetown Preparatory School in Classics, Yale University in Industrial Administration Honors and Yale Law School in international law and was a Fulbright Scholar in international economic integration in Uruguay. He has taught economics at Yale University and the Bill of Rights at the University of Texas. Alfred was general counsel to the New York City Environmental Protection Administration, a futurist at Stanford Research Institute (where he directed the proposed 1977 Carter White House extraterrestrial communication study), and was a NGO delegate to the United Nations and the UNISPACE conference. He was also a an Administrator of the Brownsville Community Health Center in the Lower Rio Grande Valley of Texas as well as a Judge on the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal.
Alfred has been active in public broadcasting in the United States (WBAI-FM) and Canada (Vancouver Coop Radio); public interest counter intelligence (Assassination Information Bureau); deconstruction of the Transhumanist Agenda; the peaceful uses of outer space (Institute for Cooperation in Space); Life on Mars (Mars Anomaly Research Society); multidimensional online education (Omniversity in development); and alternative news (NewsInsideOut.com; Exopolitics.com).
VANCOUVER, BC – In Part I of a two-Part NewsInsideOut.com Panel with Alfred Lambremont Webre, ET contactees Tolec and Ray Kosulandich detail their personal ET contactee histories and evidence for their ET contacts and in the case of Ray Kosulandich, multigenerational ET contacts going back to his grandfather. In the Panel both Tolec and Ray K distinguish their respective ET contacts as genuine and not tainted by AI (Artificial Intelligence) mind control memes such as arise in MILAB and other U.S. government programs.
The recent Blue Avian AI mind control meme is discussed, and both Tolec and Ray distinguish their ET contacts from this reported AI phenomenon.
Long-term transformation to mid-4D crystalline-based reality