As you know there are different venues and formula for achieving a resolution of past injustices, and making way for the release of advanced, fuel-less non-polluting energy technologies now sequestered in the national security state, and public disclosure of secret human-ET liaison programmes that may be 6 decades old by now.
One of these venues is the War Crimes Tribunal; Another venue is the Truth-Amnesty-Disclosure Process. This is the start of a fruitful discussion.
Below is a video that illustrates some of the problems in another area - 9/11 - in attempting to get war crimes restorative justice through established institutions like the International Criminal Court, which are controlled by the permanent war economy and hence This is where Citizen's Tribunals come into play, convened under the authority of natural law, and which prosecute war crimes - genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes and aggressive war. A case can be made that the war by the US (and allies) against ethical Extraterrestrial civilizations would qualify as a war crime against humanity.
Although video is of a speech announcing the Citizen's 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal, many of the same principles would apply to a Citizen's Tribunal for Exopolitical War Crimes. I remain skeptical that the U.N . would be serve as a responsive venue for such an ET Tribunal at this time. We citizens have to form our own Institutions.
"International Citizens 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal"
Watch on GoogleVideo: http://tinyurl.com/39j7eq
Watch at 9/11 Tribunal Website:
9/11 War Crimes Tribunal: http://peaceinspace.blogs.com
NEW YORK, N.Y. - International Lawyer Alfred Lambremont Webre, JD, MEd, who is a Judge on the Kuala Lumpur International War Crimes Tribunal, will make a public call for an International Citizen's 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal. He will speak at Ready for Mainstream, a 9/11 Anniversary Conference (Sept.8-9, 2007) at Cooper Union, 7th St and 4th Avenue, New York.
According to Leuren Moret and Alfred Webre, 9/11 was a False Flag Operation to provide a pretext to engage in Genocidal & Ecocidal Depleted Uranium (DU) bombing of Central Asia (Afghanistan and Iraq) in order to secure vast oil and uranium reserves; to roll out a Terror-based National Security state-system world-wide; to implement the final stages of a world Depopulation policy; and to trigger a World War III conflagration.
Since 1945, under the Nuremberg Principles, causing aggressive war constitutes the most serious of War Crimes. The International Citizen's 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal would be convened under the jurisdiction of the Kuala Lumpur International War Crimes Tribunal, established in February 2007 as a permanent citizen's Tribunal by The Perdana Global Peace Organization, chaired by Tun Dr. Mahathir bin Mohamad, former Prime Minister of Malaysia, who is the first prominent world leader to take up the depleted uranium (DU) radiation issue as an instrumentality of the Depopulation policy.
As a matter of law, there is a sufficient quantum of evidence for the appointment of an independent prosecutor under Article III(3) of the U.S. Constitution to prosecute treason against President GW Bush; Vice President Richard B. Cheney; and the Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld for the armed attack upon the United States on September 11, 2001, in the guise of a False Flag Operation.
U.S. Congress fails to Act
The establishment of an International Citizen's 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal is justified, given that official institutions in the U.S. have failed to assign legal accountability for the False Flag Operation of 9/11. Representative John Conyers, Jr., Chairman of the U.S. House of Representatives Judiciary Committee and his senior staff personally reviewed the 9/11 Independent Prosecutor Act and Congressional Memorandum following the 2006 U.S. Mid-term Election and Senior Staff met twice with representatives of the 9/11 Independent Prosecutor Act. The Chairman refused to introduce the Act, despite support for the Act by his Senior Staff. The 9/11 Commission failed to take testimony under oath from Bush and Cheney, and reached fraudulent conclusions.
9/11 As A War Crime
The False Flag Operation of 9/11 was the pretext for, and an integral part of the planning and execution of the illegal War of Aggression in 2001 against Afghanistan and of War Crimes committed by the United States in Afghanistan, as found by the Final Judgment, International Criminal Tribunal for Afghanistan at Tokyo. The Court found the use of Depleted Uranium (DU) weapons in Afghanistan to constitute War Crimes, Genocide, Crimes Against Humanity, and Omnicide. The False Flag Operation of 9/11 is a legal component of these War Crimes, and the perpetrators of 9/11 are guilty Aggressive War, Genocide, Crimes Against Humanity, and War Crimes.
9/11 War Crimes Tribunal:
URL of this article:
U.N. Tribunal For Crimes Against Aliens?