In this exclusive wide-ranging May 15, 2012 interview with Alfred Lambremont Webre, independent scientist Leuren Moret, MA, PhD (ABD), updates the viewing audiences on the status of the ongoing Fukushima radiation-depopulation rollout, stating that "Fukushima radiation has taken over our planet." Leuren Moret also exposes inaccuracies in a recent Fukushima "Estimate of the Situation" video by former Gen. Albert S. Stubblebine (U.S. Army, Ret.). Stubblebine has publicly denied his involvement in a secret 1968 - 73 DARPA time travel and teleportation program despite direct eye witness whistleblower testimony to the contrary by Washington State attorney Andrew D. Basiago. Leuren Moret also offers solutions on how humanity can adapt positively to the challenges of this Fukushima radiation false flag depopulation plan, instigated by an international war crimes racketeering organization led by the Dutch and British Monarchs and City of London bloodline families including the Rothschilds.
ExopoliticsTV interview with Peter Kling & Alfred Lambremont Webre
by Alfred Lambremont Webre
In an exclusive ExopoliticsTV interview with Alfred Lambremont Webre, hermeneutics expert Peter Kling stated that his scientific analysis of prophetic texts contained in the Old and New Testaments of the Bible indicate that U.S. President Barack Obama has a Biblical destiny, although the destiny may ultimately not be a favorable one for the world population.
Mr. Kling has developed an Exopolitical interpretation of "Armageddon" as it appears in the Bible.
Mr. Kling says, “Revelation 19:11 is when the real Alien attack and the "War of Armageddon" take place. Armageddon is not the destruction of the Earth, it is the destruction of the "Class 1 Planet" the New World Order and its supporters and the Rebel Aliens who helped establish it.” Mr. Kling says that Armageddon is when ethical extraterrestrial civilizations intercede on Earth to overthrow the New World Order that is supported by unethical ETs.
Book of Revelation 19:11 states: "And I saw the heaven opened; and behold, a white horse, and he that sat thereon called Faithful and True; and in righteous he doth judge and make war."
Hermeneutics and Bible prophesy
Hermeneutics is defined as “the study of interpretation theory, and can be either the art of interpretation, or the theory and practice of interpretation. Traditional hermeneutics—which includes Biblical hermeneutics—refers to the study of the interpretation of written texts, especially texts in the areas of literature, religion and law.”
Hermeneutics in regard to "Bible prophecy or biblical prophecy is the prediction of future events based on the action, function, or faculty of a prophet. Such passages are widely distributed throughout the Bible, but those most often cited are from Ezekiel, Daniel, Matthew 24, Matthew 25, and Revelation. Believers in biblical prophecy engage in exegesis and hermeneutics of scriptures which they believe contain descriptions of global politics, natural disasters, the future of the nation of Israel, the coming of a Messiah and a Messianic Kingdom, and the ultimate destiny of humankind."
Hermeneutics and Sir Isaac Newton
Peter Kling, referred to by some as "the Einstein of Biblical prophecy" considers himself a hermeneutics scholar from the hermeneutic school of Sir Isaac Newton
Scientist Sir Isaac Newton, a President of the Royal Society, is considered one of the foremost practitioners of Bible prophecy hermeneutics. "Newton was a strong believer in prophetic interpretation of the Bible and considered himself to be one of a select group of individuals who were specially chosen by God for the task of understanding Biblical scripture. Unlike a prophet in the classical sense of the word, Newton relied upon existing Scripture to prophesy for him, believing his interpretations would set the record straight in the face of what he considered to be, "so little understood". Though he would never write a cohesive body of work on Prophecy, Newton's beliefs would lead him to write several treatises on the subject, including an unpublished guide for prophetic interpretation entitled, Rules for interpreting the words & language in Scripture. In this manuscript he details the necessary requirements for what he considered to be the proper interpretation of the Bible. In his posthumously-published Observations upon the Prophecies of Daniel, and the Apocalypse of St. John, Newton expressed his belief that Bible prophecy would not be understood 'until the time of the end', and that even then 'none of the wicked shall understand'. Referring to that as a future time ('the last age, the age of opening these things, be now approaching'), Newton also anticipated 'the general preaching of the Gospel be approaching' and 'the Gospel must first be preached in all nations before the great tribulation, and end of the world'".
Watch exclusive ExopoliticsTV interview with Peter Kling
Readers can watch the exclusive ExopoliticsTV interview with Peter Kling embedded in the article above or at the following URL:
Wikipedia is considering dropping the profile of Exopolitics author and founder of Exopolitics, the science of relations among intelligent civilizations in the multi-verse, because Webre's Wikipedia entry lacks "notability".
PUBLIC NOTICE re: WIKIPEDIA
In a statement, Webre said, " You can see my online biography on Wikipedia, which is now considering deleting my entry for lack on "notability", at
"The original entry was not prepared by me. My view is that Wikipedia's action continues to be part of the CIA time travel controlled US Presidency's retaliation against me for having exposed Soetoro/Obama's participation in a 1980-83 secret CIA jumproom project.
Webre continued, "If you think I do meet the Wikipedia criteria of "notability", please feel free to intervene in the wikipedia discussion. You can go directly to this link and enter your reasons why my entry should NOT be deleted.
In the Wikipedia system, "notability" means impact. The following independent news articles demonstrate that my work has public, worldwide impact. However, Wikipedia is now directing commenters away from a designated page so that they cannot comment. This is cointelpro, open and shut."
"The following international news articles feature international lawyer and Judge Alfred Lambremont Webre and constitute independent sources of 'notability' or impact.
Alfred Lambremont Webre, JD, MEd is a futurist and author of Exopolitics: Politics, Government and Law in the Universe (available at www.UniverseBooks.com), a book that founded the field of Exopolitics – the science of relations among intelligent civilizations in the multi-verse. Exopolitics includes a case study of human contact with an advanced civilization on Mars.
Alfred’s forthcoming book, Dimensions: The Dimensional Ecology of the Multi-verse, integrates empirical data from intelligent extraterrestrial civilizations and intelligent civilizations of souls in the Inter-life and demonstrates a new hypothesis of a functioning ecology of intelligence in the dimensions in the multi-verse. Dimensions will be published in the 2013.
Alfred is a journalist, whose Exopolitics.com articles on multiversal research and cooperation are widely read in North America. Webre is the founder of www.exopolitics.com, a leading exopolitical news website, and the host of ExopoliticsTV, a public affairs channel on relations among intelligent civilizations in the multi-verse.
Alfred’s investigative journalism has been featured on TruTV, PressTV, and mainstream TV networks, and has exposed an international war crimes racketeering organization using exotic technologies such as the HAARP aerosol/chemtrails weapons system for tectonic and weather warfare, mind control and other ecocidal and depopulation programs. Please visit www.exopolitics.com.
Alfred is chairman of the Mars Anomaly Research Society (MARS) www.projectmars.net, which is spearheading the international effort to research, disclose, and educate the public about life on Mars. He has proposed a truth- amnesty process to facilitate the release of the advanced, extraterrestrial-derived new energy technologies that can be used to create a sustainable, peaceful space age society.
Alfred is a graduate of Yale University and Yale Law School in international law and was a Fulbright Scholar in international economic integration in Uruguay. He has taught economics at Yale University and constitutional law at the University of Texas. Alfred was general counsel to the New York City Environmental Protection Administration, a futurist at Stanford Research Institute (where he directed the proposed 1977 Carter White House extraterrestrial communication study), was a NGO delegate to the United Nations and the UNISPACE conference, and is a judge on the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal.
On Nov. 22, 2011, the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal found former US President George W. Bush and former UK Prime Minister Tony Blair guilty of crimes against peace - the most serious of war crimes - for starting an illegal and unjustified war in Iraq using fraud and duplicity. The war in resulted in over 1 million deaths of innocent civilians and the displacement of several millon more innocent civilians.
Alfred is currently developing ExoUniversity, an educational entity (www.exouniversity.org) whose goal is to provide web-based interactive continuing education, research, information, and policy regarding Exopolitics, PsiSciences and ExoSciences to individuals and institutions throughout the world.
Date: April 1, 2012 MEMO TO: David Wilcock, Drake, Benjamin Fulford, Alexander Romanov, Chodoin Daikaku RE: Plan for MASS ARRESTS 2012 FROM: Alfred Lambremont Webre, JD, MEd - Yellow belt (Aikido)
Gentlemen:
The purpose of this Memorandum is to support your/our/humanity's project for planetary "regime change" and to transform the international war crimes racketeering organization leadership hierarchy and structure of our planet into a sustainable, democratic, transparent, abundant, multi-dimensional galactic society.
Thank you deeply for re-framing the term "Mass Arrests" in my consciousness and in that of many families, citizens and activists around the world.
When I first heard David and Drake talking about "mass arrests" in their March 28. 2012 video/Panel, I thought of the "Mass Arrests" that many of us in the aware community have been confronting since the REX program in 1984 and before.
I deeply support David Wilcock's articulation of the planned mass arrests as an external shock that will trigger a dimensional shift into a prophecized "Golden Age" on Earth.
At the same time, I have my own comments and perspectives that I would like to place on the table for consideration and discussion in this Memorandum, which I am forwarding to David and Ben for distribution to their panels for their information.
BEN'S PANEL: Benjamin Fulford, Alexander Romanov & Chodoin Daikaku March 27, 2012) http://youtu.be/E1WUWfs3pdc
2. The Nov. 22, 2011 Bush & Blair verdicts
Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal, Nov. 2011
On Nov. 22, 2011, as a Judge on the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal, our Tribunal found George W. Bush and Tony Blair guilty of crimes against peace - the Nuremberg level war crime - in the war in Irag.
Some karmic justice occurred to the "Bush" clan. Nov. 22, 2011 was the 48th anniversary of the assassination of JFK on 11/22/63. George HW Bush was photographed in Dealey Plaza, Dallas, Texas on that date, standing by the Texas School Depository Building in his role as field coordinator of the CIA/Rothschild/City of London-ordered JFK assassination.
The following week in Nov. 2011 (while I was in South Africa), our Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Commission petitioned three neighbouring African governments to arrest George W. Bush as he visited these nations on a coincidental "humanitarian" visit. The three governments refused to arrest G.W. Bush. I do hope your combined forces will lawfully succeed where others have initiated efforts.
3. The Annunaki-Illuminati exploitative hierarchy is 280,000 years old in 2012
I and many are deeply grateful to have the word "Mass Arrests" reversed on the Perpetrator class. The Annunaki-Illuminati exploitative hierarchy is one term for the Perpetrator Class. Another, rooted in international law, is the "International War Crimes Racketeering Organization".
This hierarchy can be brought down and non-violent regime change accomplished by the power of law, as your plan clearly sets out, and as David Wilcock has especially articulated in his dialogue with Drake around the possibility of summary executions.
The specific "international war crimes racketeering organization" your operation is planning to eviscerate is the heir to the Annunaki-Illuminati exploitative hierarchy that intervened on Earth 280,000 years ago to start its gold exploitation of our planet and dumbing down of the 12-strand DNA homo sapiens, designed as a Light being guardian of the 3rd dimension to the 2-strand homo sapiens of today. As Alexander Romanov knows, the term "Illuminati" here does not refer to the Gnostic Illuminati he represents.
Univ. of Hawaii geneticist William Brown at Occupy Adam's Calendar, Nov. 28, 2011
Adam's Calendar, near Johannesburg, South Africa is the location of the initial Annunaki occupation 280,000 years ago.
On 11.11.11 the government of Deep Abzu (South Africa) closed Adam's Calendar, the Annunaki gold teleportation machine to the public.
On 11.28.11, international researchers including Michael Tellinger, Kerry Cassidy, William Brown, Laura Magdalene Eisenhower and Alfred Lambremont Webre entered Adam's Calendar to break the cycle of Annunaki occupation and reveal it to the world.
You can visually experience our Occupy Adam's Calendar in this short 2 min film:
Buckingham Palace: Prince William holding the cloven rear hoof of the Lamb
1. VIDEO: Deconstructing the CIA time-travel-captured U.S. Presidency: Bush Sr; Clinton: Bush Jr.; Obama - Alfred Lambremont Webre with host Roxy Lopez
"Wow, I needed to hear this and how it all ties in together. Now things are making sense, the pieces are fitting together perfectly and the puzzle has a picture. Alfred's truth and bravery is bigger than the universe and a benefit to us all. What he shares definitely takes balls +add your brain=open up your mind."
"Thanks for sharing, people needs to hear and understand whats going on! Love and Support from Denmark!"
4. Date: April 1, 2012 MEMO TO: David Wilcock, Drake, Benjamin Fulford, Alexander Romanov, Chodoin Daikaku RE: Plan for MASS ARRESTS 2012 FROM: Alfred Lambremont Webre, JD, MEd - Yellow belt (Aikido)
Gentlemen:
The purpose of this Memorandum is to support your/our/humanity's project for planetary "regime change" and to transform the international war crimes racketeering organization leadership hierarchy and structure of our planet into a sustainable, democratic, transparent, abundant, multi-dimensional galactic society.
"Wow, I needed to hear this and how it all ties in together. Now things are making sense, the pieces are fitting together perfectly and the puzzle has a picture. Alfred's truth and bravery is bigger than the universe and a benefit to us all. What he shares definitely takes balls +add your brain=open up your mind."
"Thanks for sharing, people needs to hear and understand whats going on! Love and Support from Denmark!"
ExopoliticsTV: Suzanne Hansen - Grey ETs & the human soul
ExopoliticsTV - Mary Rodwell, RN - Grey ETs and the human soul
by Alfred Lambremont Webre, JD, MEd
In an exclusive ExopoliticsTV interview with Alfred Lambremont Webre, Suzanne Hansen, Founding Director of UFOCUS NZ Research Network (New Zealand) publicly reveals the unique and compelling history of how she first met the soul of her son aboard a Grey ET spacecraft when she was only 8 years old and her son appeared as a “Ball of Light.”
In her interview, Ms. Hansen reveals that later in her life, after she was married and pregnant with her son, she was taken aboard a Grey ET spacecraft, where she met her son’s soul once more as “a Ball of Light.” On this occasion, her son’s Soul was inserted into her womb and her son’s body in a procedure by the Grey ETs, who also gave her deep information about the future positive social role her son would play on Earth. Throughout her life, Ms. Hansen states, her experiences with the Grey ETs were “transformational, purposeful, and positive.”
ExopoliticsTV interview with Suzanne Hansen: Grey ETs & the human soul:
Corroborated by alien abduction expert Mary Rodwell, RN
Suzanne Hansen’s account is corroborated by Mary Rodwell, RN, who led Ms. Hansen through hypnotic regression sessions designed to help her recover her memories of her life-long experiences around her son’s Soul aboard Grey ET spacecraft.
Ms. Rodwell is “a world leader in alien abduction counseling. Mary Rodwell was featured in an SBS documentary alongside her son – a self-confessed UFO skeptic. Mary, a former nurse and midwife and clinical hypnotherapist founded ACERN in 1997 and has since investigated over 1600 cases of ET encounters worldwide. ACERN helps alien abduction victims deal with their traumas with the support of qualified medical doctors, psychologists and therapists.
“In the documentary My Mum Talks to Aliens, aired nationally in Australia, Mary Rodwell and her son are followed on their journey of discovery as they travel the country in pursuit of solid evidence of an alien presence on Earth.
“’I believe these advanced intelligences have been visiting this planet since the dawn of time, and I believe they’re here to assist evolution to another level,’ Ms. Rodwell said.”
View alien abduction expert Mary Rodwell, RN’s ExopoliticsTV corroborating interview
Readers can view alien abduction expert Mary Rodwell, RN’s ExopoliticsTV interview corroborating Suzanne Hansen’s experiences with Soul interactions on board Grey ET craft by clicking on the URL below:
Suzanne Hansen’s credibility as a UFO expert and activist
Suzanne Hansen has been a powerful and effective force in bringing about UFO and extraterrestrial disclosure in New Zealand. She is credited with helping bring about the recent disclosure of secret UFO and extraterrestrial files by the Defence Force of New Zealand on Wednesday, December 22, 2010. The New Zealand Defense Force released over 2,000 pages of reports by civilians, military personnel, and pilots, detailing unexplained aerial sightings (UAS)
UFO group reports New Zealand defence chief resistance to, final release of classified UFO documents
As this reporter wrote, Suzanne Hansen of New Zealand’s UFO Research, Support and Resource Network has publicly released official correspondence with Lt Gen Jerry Mataparae, Chief of Defence Force NZ following the decision by New Zealand’s Ministry of Defence to release previously classified details of UFO and extraterrestrial-related files.
Lt Gen Jerry Mataparae’s official correspondence indicates that he initially resisted release of the classified UFO documents, stating “’It would require a substantial amount of collation, research and consultation to identify whether any of that information could be released,’ and that he was not in a position to deploy staff to undertake that task, given other work priorities.”
The Ministry of Defence decision to release New Zealand’s classified UFO and extraterrestrial files was reported January 29, 2010.
In December 2009, fourteen months later the beginning of intensive communications with Ms. Hansen’s UFO group, Lt. Gen. Mataparae as Chief of Defence stated in a letter to UFOCUS NZ, “I am pleased to be able to inform you that two NZDF officers have begun the task of assessing classified files held in relation to this topic with a view to declassification. I would expect that files which are transferred to Archives New Zealand would be subject to extensive embargo periods in terms of access by the general public.”
UFO document release follows MOD Dec. 9 letter to UFOCUS NZ
The Ministry of Defence classified UFO document release followed Lt. Gen. Mataparae’s Dec. 9, 2009 letter to Suzanne Hansen.
Ms. Hansen states, “A Chief of Defence Force office spokesperson advised, ‘The declassification of the UFO files is now a ‘work in progress’ in conjunction with Archives New Zealand. The files must be amended to meet new requirements of the Privacy Act.’ The Defence Force will notify UFOCUS NZ when this process is completed later this year, and the research network will be given the opportunity of access to the files.”
Ms. Hansen states “UFOCUS NZ's own archives contain credible and detailed UFO sighting reports from New Zealand pilots, air traffic controllers, and military personnel. In addition, the research network holds sighting reports from members of the public who experienced significant UFO sightings dating as far back as 1908. Some of these prominent cases were investigated by NZ Air Force personnel, and she is hopeful the MOD files may contain their reports."
In a later communication to this reporter, Mr. Hansen stated, "The Chief of Defence originally supported the idea of declassification, but needed to confer with other officials regarding constraints and embargos. Some files will still remain under embargo."
Suzanne Hansen’s statement
In preparation for this article, Ms. Hansen submitted the following statement to this reporter Alfred Lambremont Webre:
Hi Alfred
Thanks. I have written up the accompanying description a little better for you: -
(1) During this experience at age eight, I was initially taken to a large room in which I 'played' with children of mixed species, using mind games to facilitate telepathic communications between us. The interesting thing is that I could 'see' the objects being produced by our minds, with both my mind (thoughts) and my eyes. You will notice a strange small bed in this drawing with a baby on it and a Grey beside it. In another regression session, Mary Rodwell regressed me to when I was 6 months old, where I could see myself lying on this small bed. I have nick-named it the 'lullaby bed' and a description of how and why this bed is used with human babies, and the technology involved, features in another chapter of my book.
(2) I was invited to accompany a Grey to a room where I was to meet another 'child'. Here I am as an eight-year-old girl, during my first 'official' meeting with the ball of blue light, learning to relate to the soul of my future son through play. The Greys 'observed' from another area of the craft to see if we would be suited.
(3) At age 28, I was taken onboard craft for a 'merging' procedure, where the soul of my future son would enter my body, and that of my unborn child, for the first time. Two Grey-mixed-species entities comforted me, while a Grey began a procedure to lower my metabolism prior to the soul entering my body.
Regards,
Suzanne
Images depicting Suzanne Hansen’s experiences aboard Grey ET craft
Images by artist Suzanne Hansen's husband depicting her experiences aboard Grey ET craft can be accessed below.
Ms. Hansen writes:
Hi Alfred
I have attached three drawings of the 6 that accompany the two experiences I discussed - you can decide which you would like to use.
The first shows the large room in which I 'played' with children of mixed species, using mind games to facilitate telepathic communications between us. The interesting thing is that I could 'see' the objects being produced by our minds, with both my mind (thoughts) and my eyes. In another regression I did with Mary, I described being taught to project a hologram from my mind into the air in front of me. (A chapter of my book, called 'The Test', is devoted to this particular onboard experience.) You will notice a strange bed in this drawing, with a baby on it and a Grey beside it. I have nicknamed this the 'lullaby bed' and it also features in another chapter. Mary regressed me to 6 months old, where I could see myself lying on this bed, or piece of technology.
The second drawing shows me as an eight year old learning to relate to the soul of my future son, the blue ball of light, through play - chasing it around the room while the Greys 'observed' to see if we would be suited.
The third drawing shows the two entities (mixtures of Grey and another species) comforting me as a Grey begins a calming procedure to lower my metabolism prior to the soul of my son entering my body, and that of the unborn child.
I am very grateful to my husband, who is an artist, for doing draft drawings for my book. I sit with him for hours in order to get them as close as I can recall to the real thing.
Please let me know if you have any questions Alfred.
Kind regards
Suzanne
IMAGE A - Suzanne Hansen as child playing on Grey ET UFO
Credits: Suzanne Hansen
IMAGE B: Suzanne Hansen playing with the blue Ball of Light soul of her son on a Grey ET UFO Credit: Suzanne Hansen
IMAGE C: Grey ETs calming Suzanne Hansen during soul enmeshment aboard Grey ET craft Credit: Suzanne Hansen
Suzanne Hansen’s account of Soul interactions on board Grey ET craft
In her ExopoliticsTV interview, Suzanne Hansen starts by stating that at the age of 8 years she was taken by Grey extraterrestrials on board a Grey spacecraft and told that she would be meeting someone who would be “very important” to her in her life.
Did you know that the U.S. government has had secret time travel technology for 40 years?
Discover the secrets of Tesla-based teleportation technology
Imagine a world where you and your family will teleport from the Vancouver teleport to the London UK teleport in several seconds for a vacation
Now is the time to join a growing movement to disclose teleportation for public transport worldwide
Experience a new reality on EARTH DAY 2012 (April 22) by learning about a sustainable, positive future for Earth, eliminating fossil-fuel burning airplanes, trains, trucks, buses, and automobiles and the land-consuming infrastructure they require.
Join us for a paradigm-shifting ExoUniversity.org Forum at the Roundhouse in Vancouver, B.C. on Sunday April 22, 2012 from 1:00 pm to 6:00 pm for "An Introduction to Time Travel with an emphasis on Teleportation" with former U.S. chrononaut Andrew D. Basiago and Exopolitics founder Alfred Lambremont Webre
BUY TICKETS FOR EARTH DAY APRIL 22, One Billion Acts of Green, "An Introduction to Time Travel with an emphasis on Teleportation" Click here to buy tickets: http://www.exouniversity.eventbrite.ca/
When: EARTH DAY April 22, 2012 from 1:00 pm to 6:00 pm PDT Where: Roundhouse, 181 Roundhouse Mews, Vancouver, B.C. What:"An Introduction to Time Travel with an emphasis on Teleportation" - An EARTH DAY 2012 Act of Green Who: Former U.S. chrononaut Andrew D. Basiago and Exopolitics founder Alfred Lambremont Webre
2012 UPDATE: Focus on the Sun - Shifting the Frame of Consciousness of Humanity on the Venus Transit (June 6) and the Winter Solstice (Dec 21) of 2012 by Dr. Carl John Calleman
EXCERPTS:
1. "My own view is however that we have no reason to expect that any shift in consciousness will take place automatically on a global scale just because there is a special date. If there is a shift in consciousness to be generated, we will have to rise up to the task ourselves. I also think we should keep in mind that a shift in consciousness by definition is not something that is generated out of the already existing frame of consciousness. Thus, a shift cannot be about having more of what we already have like “raising our consciousness” and even less so “raising the vibrations of mother earth.” A shift in consciousness is a shift and not just more of the same or a temporary fluctuation."
2. Especially for the December 21, 2012 date some people are however saying that “there will be a shift in consciousness” or “there will be an ascension”, statements that are made without any foundation whatsoever except for the dreams of those pronouncing them. Thus, by themselves both the Venus Transit and the Winter Solstice are like Y2K dates without any inherent energetic meaning and I think it is just as superstitious to associate them with some automatic birth of a new world as the end of the world, which is the big media favorite…A “galactic alignment” has been happening every year for the past 40 years or so and will not create any shift in consciousness this year either. To think that a shift will happen automatically is just millenarianism in a new guise. The Maya clearly did not create their calendar to pinpoint a date in our own time and I think on this point all professional Mayanists agree. If so, they would have created a calendar that was a countdown to this time and they did not."
3. "Even if nothing will happen automatically it may however still be very possible to use these events to intentionally produce a shift in consciousness. It will then be up to us exactly what to do with it and this is a matter that should be seriously discussed. Maybe in fact the era of nations that the Maya had built their calendar on is now due to come to an end. Almost all forms of separation that exist in the world today in fact depends on our subordination to nationhood, much more so than I think people realize, because it is basically the nations that have instituted the oppression of women as well…If it is to have lasting consequences I believe we will have to lift ourselves to a new and higher frame of consciousness, a solar rather than a national."
4."The Venus Transit on June 6, is an excellent occasion to focus on the sun and bring about such a shift and so may (in the northern hemisphere) be three dark days beginning on December 21 with the same purpose. If this would be successful it could provide a real shift at least in a minority of humanity, who would start to operate on an entirely new basis, earthbound and yet not tied up in its power structures. (Note that also those that oppose their governments, presidents or kings still recognize them as the centers of their lives and are still stuck in the same framework.)"
5. "A big part of the reason that we do not have peace on earth is of course that we accept different nations as centers and organize our lives around these. If many decide to make the sun the center of the organization of their lives then there would be a completely new basis for life on earth. What I propose is that the shift in consciousness on the Venus Transit and the Winter Solstice of 2012 we should bring is to shift the center of our world from being the nation to being the sun. This can be done by establishing a connection of our third eye, which is our own center, with the sun and would truly be a shift in consciousness. This is not more of the same and it is not something that can be done piecemeal. It has to be done through a shift where we lift ourselves to a new level to become children of the sun. If we are telling ourselves: The sun is the center of my life we will know ourselves if we have reached this level or not. It will all be up to ourselves." FULL ARTICLE: http://www.calleman.com/content/articles/Focus_on_the_Sun.htm
Author Alfred Lambremont Webre, JD, MEd is founder and Faculty member at www.Exouniversity.org, offering continuing education in Exopolitics, PsiSciences, and ExoSciences.
EXOPOLITICS is a book that, in its 2000 edition, founded Exopolitics, the science of relations among intelligent civilizations in the multiverse.
EXOPOLITICS is a book that was time traveled using advanced Tesla-based quantum access technology by the U.S. Defense Advanced Projects Agency (DARPA) from the year 2005 (or later) to the year 1971 (or earlier). The futuristic innovative policy recommendations that Alfred would write in EXOPOLITICS in 2000 about relations with extraterritorial civilizations, and in 2005 about the intelligent civilization on Mars made Alfred a “person of interest” to the CIA in 1971. Because of the book EXOPOLITICS, Alfred has been subjected to intense political surveillance, harassment and torture by CIA and other alphabet agencies since 1971 to present. CIA has chosen to keep its relations with the Martian civilization, including U.S. President Barack H. Obama's visits to Mars 1980-83 as part of a secret CIA Mars jump room program, a U.S. national security secret, instead of public knowledge as mandated by the National Aeronautics and Space Act of 1958.
EXOPOLITICS is the evolution of Alfred Lambremont Webre's groundbreaking work as a futurist at the Stanford Research Institute, where in 1977 he directed a proposed extraterrestrial communication study project for the Carter White House. Exopolitics may turn the dominant view of our Universe upside down. It reveals that we live on an isolated planet in the midst of a populated, evolving, and highly organized inter-planetary, inter-galactic, and multi-dimensional Universe society. It explores why Earth seems to have been quarantined for eons from a more evolved Universe society. Exopolitics suggests specific steps to end our isolation, by reaching out to the technologically and spiritually advanced civilizations that are engaging our world at this unique, challenging time in human history.
2000 - 2010 The first decade of Exopolitics
In 2011, the Australian publication Veritas Magazine asked Alfred to review the first decade of Exopolitics, 2000 - 2010. We include excerpts from that interview here.
"Rik Clay walks us through his staggering research that indicates that there is a Trinity Event of the Ages looming for the 2012 Summer Olympics in London.
"The only video of its kind that presents Rik Clay's work in this way."
Prince William as the continuation of the Jesus Christ bloodline (Anti-christ). Queen Elizabeth Windsor's Diamond Jubilee in 2012.
Rik Clay was assassinated in June 2008, shortly after the release of this program on Red Ice radio.
Here is the full 2 hour audio interview with Rik Clay on Red Ice radio.
VANCOUVER, B.C. - ExoUniversity.org, a Vancouver-based initiative offering continuing education in Exopolitics, PsiSciences, and ExoSciences, is launching its 2012 forum lecture series April 22nd at the Roundhouse, covering subjects now intentionally excluded from university curricula, though taught in sequestered projects of the national security state and defense contractors.
2012 ExoUniversity Forums, launching April 22, 2012
In the April 22nd event, ExoUniversity faculty member Andrew D. Basiago, a former U.S. chrononaut with DARPA's Project Pegasus, will discuss the people, places, technologies, and experiences associated with time travel with an emphasis on teleportation at the time of its emergence in the US defense-technical community of the early 1970’s.
ExoUniversity faculty member Alfred Lambremont Webre, lawyer, cosmologist, and futurist, was the founder of Exopolitics and is one of the leading political commentators on the implications of the Time-Space Age. Alfred is author of Exopolitics: Politics, Government, and Law in the Universe (Universe Books, 2005), a book that was time traveled by DARPA from 2005 (or later) to 1971 (or earlier), making Alfred a “person of interest” to the CIA.
In this first of eight forums, attendees can:
● Learn the true history of time travel, the real Philadelphia Experiment;
● See how teleportation will revolutionize transport in the 21st century;
● Become part of the movement to achieve public teleportation globally.
ExoUniversity.org faculty for its forums in 2012 Forums include Laura Magdalene Eisenhower, great-granddaughter of U.S. President Dwight D. Eisenhower, and former U.S. chrononaut William B. Stillings.
“Quantum access technologies, like teleportation, are the future of transportation,” says ExoUniversity.org founder and Exopolitics author Alfred Lambremont Webre, JD, MEd. “Knowledge about these technologies is now a closely guarded secret of the national security state. The only way an individual wishing to pursue a career or entrepreneurship in Exosciences, PsiSciences, or Exopolitics can do so is to join an intelligence agency as a spy or a classified project as an employee of a defense contractor. Many find such options morally repugnant. ExoUniversity.org opens this knowledge to the public.
“I approached one of the colleges in the B.C. University system with a curriculum for Exopolitics,” Webre continues. “Officials did not say the Exopolitics curriculum was invalid. They stated that as an institution and faculty their minds were too closed to incorporate Exopolitics into their curriculum for at least 10 years. Ten years is too long for us to wait. The future is now. With the help of colleagues, we have founded ExoUniversity.org to offer continuing education in ExoSciences, PsiSciences and Exopolitics today and not tomorrow.”
Exosciences includes such disciplines as energy medicine and quantum access sciences resulting in technologies such as time travel, chronovision, and teleportation, and other sciences now effectively kept out of the scientific mainstream educational canon. PsiSciences includes parapsychology, a discipline that seeks to investigate the existence and causes of psychic abilities, near-death experiences, and life between lives using the scientific method. Exopolitics is the science of relations among intelligent civilizations in the multi-verse.
ExoUniversity.org is a division of ExoKnowledge Society, a B.C. non-profit Society.
DOOR PRIZES: Four autographed copies of Exopolitics: Politics, Government, and Law in the Universe (UniverseBooks 2005) by Alfred Lambremont Webre, JD, MEd will be given out as door prizes at each ExoUniversity Forum.
Tickets:
$30.00 per Forum Lecture in advance; $40 at the door
“An introduction to time travel with an emphasis on teleportation” with Andrew D. Basiago & Alfred Lambremont Webre”
Andrew D. Basiago, lawyer, writer, and statesman, was one of America’s early time-space explorers and is an emerging figure in the Truth Movement.
Andy has a fascinating life story to tell. Forty years ago, as a child, he was involved in different forms of time travel during the early years of time-space exploration by the US government. This classified research and development program, under DARPA, was code-named “Project Pegasus.”
Project Pegasus sent Andy backward in time via chronovisor to view historical events (including the time of the dinosaurs) and forward in time via teleporter to retrieve data about future events (to the year 2045).
Andy will discuss the people, places, technologies, and experiences associated with time travel at the time of its emergence in the US defense-technical community in the early 1970’s and describe how “quantum access” has enabled the CIA to capture the US presidency.
Alfred Lambremont Webre, lawyer, cosmologist, and futurist, was the founder of Exopolitics and is one of the leading political commentators on the implications of the Time-Space Age.
Alfred is author of Exopolitics: Politics, Government, and Law in the Universe (Universe Books, 2005), a book that was time traveled by DARPA from 2005 (or later) to 1971 (or earlier), making Alfred a “person of interest” to the CIA.
In this lecture:
● Learn the true history of time travel, the real Philadelphia Experiment;
● See how teleportation will revolutionize transport in the 21st century;
● Become part of the movement to achieve public teleportation globally.
Andy and Alfred are two of our most fearless contemporary truth tellers.
This event promises to be a very interesting day of paradigm-shifting information. You don’t want to miss this unprecedented talk. It will change the way that you view the Universe. We look forward to seeing you there!
2. Sunday May 27, 2012 – 3:30pm – 7pm
“An introduction to life on Mars” with Andrew D. Basiago & Alfred Lambremont Webre
March 1, 2012 - "President Barack Obama's long-form birth certificate released by the White House on April 27, 2011, is suspected to be a computer-generated forgery, not a scan of an original 1961 paper document as represented by the White House when the long-form birth certificate was made public," Arizona's Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio said at a press conference today in Phoenix.
This is the major preliminary finding of a six-month ongoing Sheriff's Cold Case Posse law enforcement investigation into the authenticity of Obama's birth certificate and his eligibility to be president.
Having developed probable cause to believe the long-form birth certificate was most likely a computer-generated forgery, investigators began examining other evidence of President Obama's life history.
Investigators additionally have developed credible evidence suggesting:
• President Obama's Selective Service card was most likely a forgery, revealed by an examination of the postal date stamp on the document;
• Records of Immigration and Naturalization Service cards filled out by airplane passengers arriving on international flights originating outside the United States in the month of August 1961, examined at the National Archives in Washington, D.C., are missing records for the week of President Obama's birth, including the dates Aug. 1, 1961 through Aug. 7, 1961.
Beginning in October 2011, the Sheriff's Cold Case Posse, consisting of former law enforcement officers and lawyers with law enforcement experience, examined dozens of witnesses and hundreds of documents, as well as taking numerous sworn statements from witnesses around the world.
In August 2011, 250 members of the Surprise, Arizona, Tea Party, residents of Maricopa County, presented a signed petition asking Sheriff Arpaio to undertake the investigation.
The Tea Party members petitioned under the premise that if a forged birth certificate was utilized to obtain a position for Barack Obama on the 2012 Arizona presidential ballot, their rights as Maricopa County voters could be compromised.
The Cold Case investigators further determined that the Hawaii Department of Health has engaged in what Sheriff's investigators believe is a systematic effort to hide from public inspection whatever original 1961 birth records the Hawaii Department of Health may have in their possession.
"Officers of the Hawaii Department of Health and various elected Hawaiian public officials may have intentionally obscured 1961 birth records and procedures, to avoid having to release to public inspection and to the examination of court-authorized forensic examiners any original Obama 1961 birth records the Hawaii Department of Health may or may not have," said Mike Zullo, the lead investigator in Sheriff Arpaio's Cold Case Posse.
The Cold Case investigators have not yet determined who, when, or precisely how the long-form computer-generated birth certificate released on April 27 may have been forged, but investigators say the evidence contained in the computer-generated PDF file released by the White House as well as important deficiencies in the Hawaii process of certifying the long-form birth certificate establish probable cause that a forgery has been committed.
The Cold Case Posse investigators advised Sheriff Arpaio that the forgers most likely committed two crimes: first, in fraudulently creating a forgery that the White House characterized, knowingly or unknowingly, as an officially produced governmental birth record; and second, in fraudulently presenting to the residents of Maricopa County and to the American public at large a forgery the White House represented as "proof positive" of President Obama's authentic 1961 Hawaii long-form birth certificate.
"A continuing investigation is needed to identify the identity of the person or persons involved in creating the alleged birth certificate forgery, and to determine who, if anyone, in the White House or the state of Hawaii may have authorized the forgery," Arpaio said.
Among the evidence released at the press conference were five videos the Cold Case Posse produced to demonstrate why the Obama long-form birth certificate is suspected to be a computer-generated forgery.
The videos consisted of step-by-step computer demonstrations using a control document.
The videos were designed to display the testing used by the investigators to examine various claims made by supporters of the April 27 document.
The videos illustrate point-by-point the investigators' conclusion that the features and anomalies observed on the Obama long-form birth certificate were inconsistent with features produced when a paper document is scanned, even if the scan of the paper document had been enhanced by Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and optimized.
Additionally, the videos demonstrated that the Hawaii Department of Health Registrar's name stamp and the Registrar's date stamp were computer-generated images imported into an electronic document, as opposed to actual rubber stamp imprints inked by hand or machine onto a paper document.
"That we were able to cast reasonable suspicions on the authenticity of the Registrar stamps was especially disturbing, since these stamp imprints are designed to provide government authentication to the document itself," Zullo said, stressing that if the Registrar stamps are forgeries, the document itself is likely a forgery.
The investigators also chronicled a series of inconsistent and misleading representations that various Hawaii government officials have made over the past five years regarding what, if any, original birth records are held by the Hawaii Department of Health.
"As I said at the beginning of the investigation," Arpaio said, "the president can put all this to rest quite easily. All he has to do is demand the Hawaii Department of Health release to the American public and to a panel of certified court-authorized forensic examiners all original 1961 paper, microfilm, and computer birth records the Hawaii Department of Health has in its possession."
Arpaio further stressed the Hawaii Department of Health needs to provide, as part of the full disclosure, evidence regarding the chain of custody of all Obama birth records, including paper, microfilm, and electronic records, in order to eliminate the possibility that a forger or forgers may have tampered with the birth records.
Arpaio went on to say the President should also authorize Kapiolani Hospital, the birth hospital listed on the Obama long-form birth certificate, to release any and all hospital patient records for Stanley Ann Dunham Obama, his mother, and for the newly born Barack Obama, in order to provide additional corroboration for the original 1961 birth records held in the Hawaii Department of Health vault.
"Absent the authentic Hawaii Department of Health 1961 birth records for Barack Obama, there is no other credible proof supporting the idea or belief that President Barack Obama was born in Hawaii, as he and the White House have consistently asserted," Zullo said.
"In fact, absent the authentication of Hawaii Department of Health 1961 birth records for Barack Obama, there is no other proof he was born anywhere within the United States."
Arpaio concluded the press conference by suggesting a congressional investigation might be warranted and asked that any other law enforcement agency with information referencing this investigation be forwarded to his office.
"Nicobar Islands, South East Bay of Bengal. "Extensive Reptilian ‘pencil’ shaped undersea base destroyed Prior notification of next strategic Reptilian undersea base to be taken out and destroyed."
"On February 3, 2012 late in the evening, after having received a telepathic communication from the Commander of the primary Andromeda Council biosphere - I provided to Alfred Webre of Exopolitics, via e-mail, an advanced notice report of two (2) strategic Reptilian undersea bases that remained to be taken out & destroyed.
"My report of that evening stated that the first of the two (2) remaining undersea bases would be located in the Indian Ocean/Bay of Bengal area with the finding of an extensive, massive undersea base located & beginning on the top portion of “pencil” shaped, north/south oriented undersea land ridge, a very unnatural-looking undersea land ridge.
"The beginning of this base is marked by the white “box” with the cross hairs in the middle. It runs the full length of the ‘pencil’ – north to south."
CAVEAT LECTOR: The views expressed in this article are not necessarily the views of Exopolitics.com. Readers are encouraged to exercise independent research and judgment. In the view of Exopolitics.com, the "Andromeda Council" may be in fact an assumed name by an inter dimensional entity or entities and not a true galactic governance council.
AP: Bush receiving History Making Texan award on March 2, 2010
by Alfred Lambremont Webre, JD, MEd
This article is the fourth of a multi-part series on secret technologies, their application to the events of September 11, 2001, and the consequent implications for our society.
Former U.S. President George W. Bush, Vice President Richard B. Cheney, and Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld can each be prosecuted for murder by a U.S. attorney, by a district attorney or by a non-U.S. state prosecutor whose citizens were killed at the World Trade Center or in any aspect of the false flag operation on September 11, 2001. The prima facie evidence for prosecuting Mr. Bush, Mr. Cheney and Mr. Rumsfeld for murder is contained in a Memorandum to the U.S. Congress, Parts IV – VII of which published in the Examiner.com article below.
In 2008, former Los Angeles assistant District Attorney and author Vincent Bugliosi presented the legal framework for the prosecution of former George W. Bush for murder in having intentionally misled the U.S. Congress in taking the U.S. to war in Iraq. This reporter, Alfred Lambremont Webre, has successfully presented the legal framework for the prosecution of Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld for murder for having knowingly engaged in command and control operations in the false flag operation of 9/11 that intentionally led to the deaths of approximately 2830 innocent civilians and emergency responders at or around the World Trade Center.
In Memo to U.S. Congress: prima facie evidence that Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld committed treason on 9/11, Examiner.com reported how a Memorandum to the U.S. Congress presented to then incoming Chairman of the U.S. House of Representatives Judiciary Committee, Rep. John Conyers, Jr. (D-Mich), following the November 2006 mid-term elections sets out prima facie evidence for the appointment of an independent prosecutor to prosecute then U.S. President George W. Bush, Vice President Richard B. Cheney, and Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld and numerous Jane and John Does for treason under Article III (3) of the U.S. Constitution for acts committed on September 11, 2001.
One source states, “In common law jurisdictions, prima facie denotes evidence which – unless rebutted – would be sufficient to prove a particular proposition or fact. For example, in a trial under Criminal law the prosecution has the burden of presenting prima facie evidence of each element of the crime charged against the defendant.” The source continues: “Murder, as defined in common law countries, is the unlawful killing of another human being with intent (or malice aforethought), and generally this state of mind distinguishes murder from other forms of unlawful homicide (such as manslaughter). As the loss of a human being inflicts enormous grief upon the individuals close to the victim, as well as the fact that the commission of a murder deprives the victim of their existence, most societies both present and in antiquity have considered it a most serious crime worthy of the harshest of punishment. A person convicted of murder is typically given a life sentence or even the death penalty for such an act. A person who commits murder is called a murderer.”
The Memorandum to the U.S. Congress is still on the desk of Rep. John Conyers, Jr. awaiting further action by the U.S. Judiciary Committee. However, as this Examiner.com article demonstrates, prima facie evidence exists for a U.S. attorney, a district attorney or a non-U.S. state prosecutor whose citizens were killed at the World Trade Center or in any aspect of the false flag operation on September 11, 2001 to prosecute Mr. Bush, Mr. Cheney, Mr. Rumsfeld for murder.
The false flag operation of 9/11 is not an academic issue. NATO heads of state, from U.S. President Barack H. Obama to Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper routinely still employ "9/11" as the political and symbolic pretext for a war in Afghanistan, and for the expansion of police state measures domestically and in the world’s travel, banking and financial matrix. In a 2006 paper entitled, “False Flag Operations, 9/11, and the Exopolitical Perspective”, Dr. Michael E. Salla writes: “According to an August 2006 Scripps Howard/Ohio University national survey, 36% of Americans believe 9-11 was an ‘inside job’ with government agencies complicit in what occurred. A Zogby poll in May 2006 found that 42% of Americans believed that official explanations and the 9-11 Commission were covering up the truth.”
Memorandum to the U.S. Congress – parts IV – VII
The following are Parts IV – VII of the Memorandum, together with relevant evidentiary attachments.
For reasons of space, the excerpts from the Memorandum to the U.S. Congress in this Examiner.com article do not contain the footnotes and full references in the original Memorandum. Examiner.com readers are encouraged to download a copy of the original Memorandum to the U.S. Congress (PDF) here or here.
IV. Why Did the President and His Secret Service Agents Remain at the School?
“President George W. Bush reportedly believed, upon hearing that a plane had struck one of the Twin Towers, that it was an accident. It was not terribly strange, therefore, that he decided to go ahead with the photo-op at the school in Sarasota. Word of the second strike, however, should have indicated to him and his Secret Service agents---assuming the truth of official story, according to which these strikes were unexpected---that the country was undergoing an unprecedented terrorist attack. And yet the Secret Service allowed him to remain at the school for another half hour.
“This behavior was very strange. The president’s location had been highly publicized. If the attacks were indeed unexpected, the Secret Service would have had no idea how many planes had been hijacked, and they would have had to assume that the president himself might be one of the targets: What could be more satisfying to foreign terrorists attacking high-value targets in the United States than to kill the president? For all the Secret Service would have known, a hijacked airliner might have been bearing down on the school at that very minute, ready to crash into it, killing the president and everyone else there---including the Secret Service agents themselves. It is, in any case, standard procedure for the Secret Service to rush the president to a safe location whenever there is any sign that he may be in danger. And yet these agents, besides allowing the president to remain in the classroom another 10 minutes, permitted him to speak on television, thereby announcing to the world that he was still at the school.
“Would not this behavior be explainable only if Bush and the head of the Secret Service detail knew that the planned attacks did not include an attack on the president? And how could this have been known for certain unless the attacks were being carried out by people within our own government? The 9/11 Commission, far from asking these questions, was content to report that ‘[t]he Secret Service told us they . . . did not think it imperative for [the president] to run out the door.’ A serious inquiry into this matter, therefore, remains to be made.”
AP: Cheney at National Press Club, June 1, 09
V. Why Did the 9/11 Commission Lie about Vice President Cheney?
“One sign of the complicity of Vice President Cheney is the fact that the 9/11 Commission evidently felt a need to lie about the time of two of his activities: his entry into the Presidential Emergency Operations Center (PEOC) under the White House and his giving the order to shoot down any unauthorized airplanes.
“It had been widely reported that Cheney had gone down to the PEOC shortly after the second strike on the WTC, hence about 9:15. The most compelling witness was Secretary of Transportation Norman Mineta, who testified to the 9/11 Commission that when he arrived at the PEOC at 9:20, Cheney was already there and fully in charge. “The 9/11 Commission Report, however, claimed that Cheney did not enter the PEOC until ‘shortly before 10:00, perhaps at 9:58.’ Mineta’s testimony, given in an open hearing, was simply omitted from the Commission’s final report. Why would the Commission go to such lengths to conceal the true time of Cheney’s entry into the PEOC?
“One possible reason would involve the content of Mineta’s testimony. He said: ‘During the time that the airplane was coming in to the Pentagon, there was a young man who would come in and say to the Vice President, ‘The plane is 50 miles out.’ ‘The plane is 30 miles out.’ And when it got down to ‘the plane is 10 miles out,’ the young man also said to the Vice President, ‘Do the orders still stand?’ And the Vice President . . . said, ‘Of course the orders still stand. Have you heard anything to the contrary?’
“Mineta said that this conversation---evidently meaning the final exchange---occurred at about 9:25 or 9:26.
“This testimony creates a problem for the official story. Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld’s spokesman, in explaining why the Pentagon was not evacuated before it was struck, claimed that ‘[t]he Pentagon was simply not aware that this aircraft was coming our way.’ The 9/11 Commission claimed that there was no warning about an unidentified aircraft heading towards Washington until 9:36 and hence only ‘one or two minutes’ before the Pentagon was struck at 9:38. Mineta’s account, however, says that Cheney knew about an approaching aircraft more than 10 minutes earlier. There would have been over 12 minutes for the Pentagon to be evacuated.
“Mineta’s account also seems to suggest that Cheney had issued stand-down orders. Mineta himself did not make this allegation, saying instead that he assumed that ‘the orders’ were to have the plane shot down. But besides the fact that that interpretation does not fit what actually happened--the aircraft was not shot down---it would make the story unintelligible: The question whether the orders still stood would not make sense unless they were orders to do something unexpected---not to shoot the aircraft down. By omitting Mineta’s testimony and stating that Cheney did not enter the PEOC until almost 10:00, the 9/11 Commission implied that Cheney could not have given a stand-down order to allow an aircraft to strike the Pentagon.
“The lie about Cheney’s entry into the PEOC was also important to the controversy over whether the US military shot down Flight 93. The 9/11 Commission, simply ignoring a vast amount of evidence that the military did so, supported the official claim that it did not. The Commission provided this support by claiming that Cheney, having not arrived at the PEOC until almost 10:00, did not issue the shoot-down order until after 10:10---which would have been seven or more minutes after Flight 93 had crashed (at 10:03). But in addition to the evidence that Cheney had been in the PEOC since about 9:15, we also have evidence---including statements from Richard Clarke and Colonel Robert Marr, the head of NORAD’s northeast sector (NEADS) ---that Cheney’s shoot-down order was issued well before 10:00.
“The 9/11 Commission’s obvious lies about Cheney’s activities give reason to suspect that it, under the leadership of Philip Zelikow, was trying to conceal Cheney’s responsibility for the Pentagon strike and the downing of Flight 93.”
VI. Did Members of the Bush-Cheney Administration Have Reasons to Desire the Attacks of 9/11?
“Besides having the means and opportunity to orchestrate the events of 9/11 and their subsequent cover-up, high officials in the Bush-Cheney administration would also have had motives.
“Afghanistan: Zbigniew Brzezinski’s 1997 book, The Grand Chessboard, had said that establishing military bases in Central Asia would be crucial for maintaining ‘American primacy,’ partly because of the huge oil reserves around the Caspian Sea. But American democracy, he added, ‘is inimical to imperial mobilization.’ Brzezinski, explaining that the public had ‘supported America’s engagement in World War II largely because of the shock effect of the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor,’ suggested that Americans today would support the needed military operations in Central Asia only ‘in the circumstance of a truly massive and widely perceived direct external threat.’
"Support for these operations was generated by 9/11 plus the claim by the Bush-Cheney administration that the attacks had been planned in Afghanistan by Osama bin Laden—-a claim for which it refused to provide any proof.
“A more specific motivation was provided by the ‘pipeline war.’ The Bush-Cheney administration supported--as had the Clinton-Gore administration until 1999--UNOCAL’s plan to build an oil-and-gas pipeline through Afghanistan, but the Taliban, being unable to provide sufficient security, had become regarded as an obstacle. In a meeting in Berlin in July 2001, representatives of the Bush-Cheney administration, trying to get the Taliban to share power with other factions, reportedly gave them an ultimatum: ‘Either you accept our offer of a carpet of gold, or we bury you under a carpet of bombs.’ When the Taliban refused, the Americans reportedly said that ‘military action against Afghanistan would go ahead . . . before the snows started falling in Afghanistan, by the middle of October at the latest.’
“Given the fact that the attacks on New York and Washington occurred on September 11, the U.S. military had time to get logistically ready to begin the attack on Afghanistan on October 7.
“Iraq: Some key members of the Bush-Cheney administration---including Paul Wolfowitz, Lewis ‘Scooter’ Libby, Donald Rumsfeld, and Dick Cheney himself---had in the late 1990s been active members of an organization, the Project for the New American Century (PNAC), that advocated attacking Iraq to remove Saddam Hussein, establish a strong military presence, and control the oil. PNAC’s Rebuilding America’s Defenses, released late in 2000, reiterated the idea of a permanent military presence in the Gulf region, saying that the ‘unresolved conflict with Iraq provides the immediate justification’ but ‘the need for a substantial American force presence in the Gulf transcends the issue of the regime of Saddam Hussein.’
“Immediately upon taking office, the Bush administration---two former members have revealed--- was intent on attacking Iraq. Then in 2003, after its war in Afghanistan, the administration used 9/11 as a pretext for attacking Iraq, partly by suggesting that Saddam was involved in the attacks, partly by playing on the American people’s sense, created by 9/11, of being vulnerable to a major attack from abroad.
“Increased Military Spending: A second possible motive was provided by PNAC’s more general goal of further increasing America’s military superiority to be able to achieve global domination. This goal had already been asserted in the draft of the ‘Defense Planning Guidance’ written in 1992 by Wolfowitz and Libby under the guidance of Cheney, who was completing his tenure as secretary of defense. (In an essay that was entered into the Congressional Record, this draft was portrayed as an early version of Cheney’s ‘Plan . . . to rule the world.’)
“In 2000, Wolfowitz and Libby were listed as participants in the project to produce PNAC’s Rebuilding America’s Defenses, in which this goal showed up again. This document also contained an idea perhaps derived from Brzezinski’s book: After saying that the desired Pax Americana ‘must have a secure foundation on unquestioned U.S. military preeminence’ and that such preeminence will require a technological transformation of the US military, it adds that this process of transformation will ‘likely be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event--like a new Pearl Harbor.’
“When 9/11 came, it was immediately treated as ‘the Pearl Harbor of the 21st century,’ as President Bush reportedly called it that very night. It was also characterized as, in Bush’s words, ‘a great opportunity,’ with Rumsfeld adding that 9/11 created ‘the kind of opportunities that World War II offered, to refashion the world.’ This idea then showed up in The National Security Strategy of the United States of America, issued by the Bush administration in September 2002, which brazenly said: ‘The events of September 11, 2001 opened vast, new opportunities.’
“A central dimension of the desired technological transformation of the military is the weaponization of space, euphemistically called ‘Missile Defense.’ In January of 2001, the Commission to Assess U.S. National Security Space Management and Organization, which was chaired by Rumsfeld, published its report. Speaking of the need for massive funding for the U.S. Space Command, the Rumsfeld Commission asked whether such funding would occur only after a ‘Space Pearl Harbor.’
“On the evening of 9/11, Rumsfeld held a press conference. In attendance was Senator Carl Levin, the chair of the Senate Armed Services Committee, who was asked this question: ‘Senator Levin, you and other Democrats in Congress have voiced fear that you simply don’t have enough money for the large increase in defense that the Pentagon is seeking, especially for missile defense. . . . Does this sort of thing convince you that an emergency exists in this country to increase defense spending. . . ?’ Congress immediately appropriated an additional $40 billion for the Pentagon and much more later, with few questions asked.
Wiki: Rumsfeld, U.S. Secretary of Defense on September 11, 2001
VII. Summation: The 9/11 Attacks as Acts of Treason
“The facts recited above constitute prima facie evidence that the named individuals---U.S. President George W. Bush, U.S. Vice President Richard B. Cheney, U.S. Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld---and other John and Jane Does are independently and jointly guilty of Treason against these United States under Article III (3) of the U.S. Constitution, because:
“I. The attacks of 9/11, as portrayed in the official account, could not have succeeded if standard operating procedures between the FAA and NORAD had been followed. The Pentagon, under the leadership of Donald Rumsfeld, has provided three mutually inconsistent accounts of NORAD’s response, which means that at least two of them are false. Moreover, the third account, articulated by the 9/11 Commission, is contradicted by a wide range of facts, including evidence that the FAA had notified NORAD in a timely fashion. There must have been stand-down orders, and these could have come only from the highest levels of the Pentagon and the White House.
“II. Overwhelming evidence exists that the collapses of the Twin Towers and Building 7 were instances of controlled demolition. But al-Qaeda operatives could not have obtained the needed access to the buildings to plant the explosives and would not have ensured that the buildings come straight down. The controlled demolition, therefore, had to be the work of insiders. That President Bush was one of those insiders is suggested by the fact that his brother and cousin were principals in the company in charge of WTC security. Complicity at the highest levels of the federal government is also indicated by the removal of evidence (the collapsed steel), which is normally a federal offense. Finally, if the airplane strikes could have occurred only with the consent of the president and the secretary of defense (as suggested in the previous point), the coordination of these strikes with the demolition of the buildings implies their involvement in the latter as well.
“III. Overwhelming evidence also exists for the conclusion that the attack on the Pentagon was an inside job. That the official story could not be true is evident from many facts: Hani Hanjour’s incompetence; the choice of the west wing as the target; the impossibility of a commercial airliner’s coming back to Washington undetected and hitting the Pentagon unless permitted; and the lack of physical evidence consistent with an attack by a Boeing 757. That the strike was an inside job is implied by the falsity of the official story, the evidence that the strike was made by a military aircraft, the removal of evidence, and the government’s refusal to release videos of the strike. This operation could hardly have been planned without the involvement of Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld.
“IV. Complicity at the highest levels of the federal government is also indicated by President Bush’s remaining at the school after it was evident---given the truth of the official account---that the United States was experiencing a surprise attack. This behavior makes sense only if Bush and his lead Secret Service agent knew that there would be no attack on the school.
“V. The complicity of Vice President Cheney in the attack on the Pentagon and the downing of Flight 93 is implied by the testimony of Secretary Mineta in conjunction with the false claims of the 9/11 Commission, under the guidance of administration insider Philip Zelikow, as to when Cheney went to the PEOC and when he issued the shoot-down authorization.
“VI. The conclusion from the evidence that members of the Bush administration orchestrated the attacks of 9/11 is reinforced by the fact that they had some huge projects---prosecuting wars in Afghanistan and Iraq and obtaining funding to accelerate the technological transformation of the military---that would likely be possible only in the event of “a new Pearl Harbor.”
“On the basis of this and other evidence, the conclusion that the Bush-Cheney administration was complicit in the 9/11 attacks has been reached by many Americans, including intellectuals and former military officers. It is time for an independent official investigation into this evidence."
CAVEAT LECTOR: This memorandum is based upon the best public research resources presently available. It is presented not as a full treatment of the subject but as merely a brief summary pointing to the existence of sufficient prima facie evidence to warrant the appointment of an independent prosecutor.
ATTACHMENTS
My Observation of LAX Security Events on 9/11 By an Upper Management LAX Official
“I was employed in upper management at LAX involved with security in the APO (Air Port Operations---where the planes are, not the passengers). I will not otherwise identify myself in this statement, since I, for both personal and professional reasons, need to remain anonymous. But I will give as much detail as possible about security-related events in the APO that I overheard on September 11, 2001, and will also suggest ways in which my account could be corroborated.
“’Security’ in the APO involves the CHP, LAWA PD, LAPD, and the FBI, herein referred to as ‘Security’ (but the CHP was not in proximity to me during the period my account covers).
My Account
“As on other days, there was ‘chatter’ on LAX Security walkie-talkies, so what Security was saying could easily be heard. On some of the walkie-talkies I could overhear both sides of the conversations, on others only one. I do not know who was at the other end of the walkie-talkies, but I can only assume that it was LAX dispatch or command.
“While there, I observed and heard the following:
“At first, LAX Security was very upset because at that time it seemed to Security that none of the Air Traffic Controllers (ATCs) tracking the hijacked airliners had notified NORAD as required. Security was well aware that LAX was a target and Emergency SOP were already in progress in that there was discussion of evacuating the airport.
“More chatter revealed that the ATCs had notified NORAD, but that NORAD had not responded because it had been ‘ordered to stand down.’ This report made Security even more upset, so they tried to find out who had issued that order. A short time later the word came down that the order had come ‘from the highest level of the White House.’ This seemed inappropriate, so Security made attempts for more details and clarification, which was not resolved in my presence.
“3 planes were grounded and swapped out in Atlanta, Georgia, simply because they did not pass the routine pre-flight inspection checklist. Those planes were found to be fully loaded with automatic weapons. LAX Security surmised that could only have been accomplished by Maintenance, the Caterers, but, in their view, most likely by ‘House Keeping.’
“LAX Security believed that the terrorists did not board the planes through the passenger terminals, but rather by similar means, i.e. via House Keeping. Other airports were mentioned, but I was unable to get it all down. Therefore, I don’t have an accurate accounting for the status and location of the other planes.
“Another piece of information that I overheard was that the Pentagon had been hit by a rocket.
“There was also a radio station identifying itself as LAX Radio, from which the following was heard:
“There were 11 planes and 11 targets. But at the time only 10 of the targets were mentioned: the WTC; the Pentagon; the White House; the Capitol; Camp David; the Sears Tower; the Space Needle; the Trans America Bldg.; LAX; and Air Force One—‘if it could be found.’
“Two fighter jets had been scrambled and had successfully shot down a hijacked airliner over Pennsylvania. The point of deployment of the fighter jets was also mentioned, but I can’t remember the name of the military base.
"Points of origin mentioned included Newark, Atlanta, and other locations, but it was confusing to me in that I couldn’t determine if they were with respect to hijacked planes or fighter jets being scrambled. Unfortunately the names of these airports were not all familiar to me or it would have been easier for me to account for them.
“As I was leaving there was an order to evacuate the airport.
“In 2001 and 2002 I tried to notify the media of the events at LAX, but they made it clear they were not interested.
Possible Corroboration
“I can think of four ways in which my account of what I heard could be corroborated:
“1st LAWA PD, LAPD, and FBI records will reveal the names of the security officers on duty in the APO during the time of the attacks.
“2nd I believe the head of LAX Security in the APO at that time was Captain Gray. He should be able to confirm the fact that my account reflects what happened that morning.
“3rd The audio recordings of radio transmissions at LAX would reveal the comments of all the Security officers and LAX dispatch/command.
“4th The audio recording of the LAX Radio broadcast would reveal what was broadcast on 911.
“Note: Items 3 and 4 would reveal if I have inadvertently confused information attained from LAX Security with information received from LAX Radio. (For example, I believe I heard the comment about a rocket hitting the Pentagon during the walkie-talkie conversations, but it is possible that I heard it later on the radio.)”
End of Memorandum to the U.S. Congress
Recent evidence that has emerged pointing to the high-level involvement of operatives of Israel and the Israeli intelligence service, Mossad, in the false flag events of 9/11 does not alter the liability of Mr. Bush, Mr. Cheney and Mr. Rumsfeld for prosecution for treason and for murder.
_____________________ COPYRIGHT: Permission to use extracts & copyright notice
Copyright Alfred Lambremont Webre JD, MEd, All right reserved
Permission is granted to include extracts of this article on websites and email lists provided a link is included to the original article.
This article is copyrighted and should not be added in its entirety on other websites or email lists without author's written permission. For permission please contact: exopolitics@exopolitics.com. Thank you.
AP: Bush receives History Making Texans award, March 2, 2010
by Alfred Lambremont Webre, JD, MEd
This article is the third of a multi-part series on secret technologies, their application to the events of September 11, 2001, and the consequent implications for our society.
A Memorandum to the U.S. Congress presented to then incoming Chairman of the U.S. House of Representatives Judiciary Committee, Rep. John Conyers, Jr. (D-Mich), following the November 2006 mid-term elections sets out prima facie evidence for the appointment of an independent prosecutor to prosecute then U.S. President George W. Bush, Vice President Richard B. Cheney, and Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld and numerous Jane and John Does for treason under Article III (3) of the U.S. Constitution for acts committed on September 11, 2001.
Article III (3) of the U.S. Constitution provides: "Sect. 3. Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying war against them, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort. No person shall be convicted of treason unless on the testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act, or on open confession in open court."
United States v. Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, et al. is the upcoming trial of five alleged Al-Qaeda members for “masterminding” the September 11, 2001 attacks. Regardless of whether U.S. President Barack H. Obama chooses to have these defendants tried in a U.S. Military Commission or in a U.S. Federal court, the Memorandum to the U.S. Congress contains prima facie evidence that the sitting U.S. President, Vice President, and Secretary of Defense committed actionable Article III (3) treason on 9/11. Consequently, one can characterize the forthcoming trial in United States v. Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, et al. as a political show trial, no different in effect – the wrongful execution of the defendants and the attempted hoodwinking of the U.S. and world population – from other political show trials in recent history.
There is a substantial segment of U.S. and world public opinion that believes that 9/11 was a false flag operation. In a 2006 paper entitled, “False Flag Operations, 9/11, and the Exopolitical Perspective”, Dr. Michael E. Salla writes: “According to an August 2006 Scripps Howard/Ohio University national survey, 36% of Americans believe 9-11 was an ‘inside job’ with government agencies complicit in what occurred. A Zogby poll in May 2006 found that 42% of Americans believed that official explanations and the 9-11 Commission were covering up the truth.”
This article contains the first of two installments setting out the compelling prima facie case of why an independent prosecutor should be appointed to investigate actionable treason on 9/11.
The law of treason and constitutional accountability
The Memorandum to the U.S. Congress addresses the issue of the law of treason and constitutional accountability for the events of September 11, 2001. The Memorandum is designed to set out the prima facie evidence which supports the appointment by the U.S. Congress (or other entity) of an independent or special prosecutor to “prosecute Treason against these United States of America by U.S. President George W. Bush, U.S. Vice President Richard B. Cheney, U.S. Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld, and other John and Jane Does for planning and carrying out the acts of treason, as defined in Article III (3) of the U.S. Constitution, by conspiring to carry out, carrying out, and/or causing to be carried out an armed attack upon these United States on September 11, 2001, as part of a strategic deception operation.”
For reasons of space, the excerpts from the Memorandum to the U.S. Congress in this article do not contain the footnotes and full references in the original Memorandum. Readers are encouraged to download a copy of the original Memorandum to the U.S. Congress (PDF) here or here.
Memorandum to the U.S. Congress – parts I – III
The following are Parts I – III of the Memorandum. Please note that the Memorandum contains this caveat:
CAVEAT LECTOR: This memorandum is based upon the best public research resources presently available. It is presented not as a full treatment of the subject but as merely a brief summary pointing to the existence of sufficient prima facie evidence to warrant the appointment of an independent prosecutor.
AP: Cheney at National Press Club, June 1, 2009
MEMORANDUM
The September 11, 2001 Attacks as Acts of Treason under Article III (3) of the U.S. Constitution
“The United States Constitution, in Article 3, Section 3, says that it is treason for a citizen of the USA to engage in “levying war” against the United States. If U.S. citizens consciously participated in planning the attacks of 9/11 on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, this participation would clearly be treasonous. There is considerable prima facie evidence that named members of the U.S. Executive Branch---U.S. President George W. Bush, U.S. Vice President Richard B. Cheney, and U.S. Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld---participated in this planning.
“This prima facie evidence sustains a constitutional, Joint Resolution of the U.S. Congress to appoint an Independent Prosecutor under the authority of Article III (3) of the U.S. Constitution to prosecute Treason against these United States of America by U.S. President George W. Bush, U.S. Vice President Richard B. Cheney, U.S. Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld, and other John and Jane Does for planning and carrying out the acts of treason, as defined in Article III (3) of the U.S. Constitution, by conspiring to carry out, carrying out, and/or causing to be carried out an armed attack upon these United States on September 11, 2001, as part of a strategic deception operation.
“An investigation of these acts of prima facie Treason was not carried out by the 9/11 Commission. This Commission, directed by an insider, Philip Zelikow, who was directly connected to the named U.S. President George W. Bush of the U.S. Executive Branch, took as its starting point the Bush-Cheney administration’s claim that the attacks were planned and carried out entirely by members of al-Qaeda. The Commission examined only facts and allegations that were consistent with this theory.
“All evidence pointing to complicity by the named individuals---U.S. President George W. Bush, U.S. Vice President Richard B. Cheney, U.S. Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld---along with other John and Jane Does, was ignored or, in a few cases, distorted. The U.S. Congress in its constitutional jurisdiction needs to authorize the appointment of an independent prosecutor to conduct a genuine investigation of this prima facie evidence of Treason under Article III (3) of the U.S. Constitution, which is summarized below in terms of six questions.”
AP: Cheney at National Press Club, June 1, 2009
I. How Could Hijacked Airliners Have Struck the WTC and the Pentagon?
“If the standard operating procedure of the FAA and the US military had been carried out on the morning of 9/11, AA Flight 11 and UA Flight 175 would have been intercepted before they reached Manhattan, and Flight 77 would have been intercepted long before it could have reached the Pentagon. (Such interceptions are routine, being carried out about 100 times a year.) As to why these interceptions did not occur, the public has never been given a plausible explanation. Indeed, we have received three mutually inconsistent stories.
“In the first few days, military officials said that no fighter jets were sent up by NORAD until after the strike on the Pentagon at 9:38, even though signs that Flight 11 had been hijacked were observed at 8:15. That would mean that although interceptions usually occur within 15 minutes, in this case over 80 minutes had elapsed before any fighters were even airborne. This story suggested that a “stand-down” order had been issued.
“Within a few days, a second story was put out, according to which NORAD had sent up fighters but, because FAA notification had unaccountably come very late, the fighters did not arrive soon enough to prevent the attacks. Critics showed, however, that even if the FAA’s notifications had come as late as NORAD claimed, there would have been time for interceptions to occur. This second story did not, therefore, remove the suspicion that a stand-down order had been given.
“The 9/11 Commission Report gives a third account, according to which, contrary to NORAD’s timeline of September 18, 2001, the FAA did not notify NORAD about Flights 175 and 77 until after they had struck their targets. This third story, besides contradicting the second story and also considerable evidence that the FAA had notified the military in a timely manner, contains many inherent implausibilities. It does not, accordingly, remove grounds for suspicion that a stand-down order had been issued---a suspicion for which there is ear-witness testimony.”
II. Why Did the Twin Towers and Building 7 of the WTC Collapse?
“The administration of U.S. President George W. Bush and Vice President Richard B. Cheney has also failed to provide a credible explanation of the total collapses of the World Trade Center buildings. According to the official explanation, the Twin Towers collapsed because of the impact of the airplanes and the heat from the ensuing fires. But this explanation faces several formidable problems.
“First, Building 7 also collapsed, and in about the same way. This similarity implies that all three buildings collapsed because of the same causes. But building 7 was not hit by a plane, so its collapse must be explained by fire alone. That would lead to the conclusion that all three buildings collapsed from fire alone.
“Second, however, the fires in these three buildings were not very big, very hot, or very long-lasting, compared with fires in some steel-frame high-rises that did not induce collapses. In 1991, for example, a fire in Philadelphia burned for 18 hours, and in 2004, a fire in Caracas burned for 17 hours. But neither of these fires resulted in even a partial collapse, let alone a total collapse. By contrast, the World Trade Center’s north and south towers burned only 102 and 56 minutes, respectively, before they collapsed. Building 7, moreover, had fires on only a few floors, according to some witnesses and all the photographic evidence.
“Third, total collapses of steel-frame high-rise buildings have never, either before or after 9/11, been brought about by fire alone, or fire combined with structural damage from airplanes. All such collapses have been caused by explosives in the procedure known as ‘controlled demolition.’
“Fourth, the collapses of these three WTC buildings all manifested many standard features of controlled demolition, such as: sudden onset (whereas steel, if weakened by fire, would gradually begin to sag); straight-down collapse (as opposed to falling over); collapse at virtually free-fall speed (indicating that the lower floors were offering little if any resistance); total collapse (indicating that the massive steel columns in the core of each building had been sliced into many pieces---which is what explosives do in controlled demolitions); the production of molten steel; and the occurrence of multiple explosions, as reported by dozens of people---including journalists, police officers, WTC employees, emergency medical workers, and firefighters. The official theory cannot explain one, let alone all, of these features---at least, as physicist Steven Jones has pointed out, without violating several basic laws of physics. But the theory of controlled demolition easily explains them all.
“Fifth, although the question of whether explosives were used could have been answered by examining the buildings’ steel columns, virtually all of the steel was immediately sold to scrap dealers, trucked away, and sent to Asia to be melted down. Moreover, although it is usually a federal crime to remove anything from a crime scene, in this case the removal was overseen by government officials.
“Sixth, al-Qaeda terrorists could not have obtained access to the buildings for the enormous number of hours it would have taken to plant the explosives. But the question of how agents of the Bush-Cheney administration could have gotten such access can be answered by pointing out that Marvin Bush and Wirt Walker III---the president’s brother and cousin, respectively---were principals of the company in charge of security for the WTC. It is also doubtful that al-Qaeda terrorists would have had the courtesy to ensure that the buildings would come straight down, rather than falling over onto other buildings.”
Wiki: Rumsfeld, U.S. Secretary of Defense on September 11, 2001
III. Could the Official Account of the Pentagon Possibly Be True?
“According to the official account, the Pentagon was struck by AA Flight 77, under the control of al-Qaeda hijacker Hani Hanjour. This account is challenged by many facts.
“First, Flight 77 allegedly, after making a U-turn in the mid-west, flew back to Washington undetected for 40 minutes, even though it was then known that hijacked airliners were being used as weapons and even though the US military has the best radar systems in the world, one of which, it brags, “does not miss anything occurring in North American airspace.”
“Second, the aircraft, in order to hit the west wing, reportedly executed a 270-degree downward spiral, which according to some experts would have been impossible for a Boeing 757. Hanjour, moreover, was known as “a terrible pilot,” who could not even fly a small airplane.
“Third, how could a pilot as poor as Hanjour have found his way back to Washington without guidance from the ground?
“Fourth, the Pentagon is surely the best defended building on the planet. It is not only within the P-56-A restricted air space that extends 17 miles in all directions from the Washington Monument, but also within P-56-B, the three-mile ultra-restricted zone above the White House, the Capitol, and the Pentagon. It is only a few miles from Andrews Air Force Base, which, assigned to protect these restricted zones, has at least three squadrons with fighter jets on alert at all times. (The claim by The 9/11 Commission Report that no fighters were on alert the morning of 9/11 is wholly implausible. ) Also, the Pentagon is surely protected by batteries of surface-to-air missiles, which are programmed to destroy any aircraft without a US military transponder entering the Pentagon’s airspace. (So even if Flight 77 had entered the Pentagon’s airspace, it could have escaped being shot down only if officials in the Pentagon had deactivated its anti-aircraft defenses.)
“Fifth, terrorists brilliant enough to get through the US military’s defense system would not have struck the west wing, for many reasons: It had been reinforced, so the damage was less severe than a strike anywhere else would have been; it was still being renovated, so relatively few people were there; the secretary of defense and all the top brass, whom terrorists would presumably have wanted to kill, were in the east wing; and hitting the west wing required a difficult maneuver, whereas crashing into the roof would have been easier and deadlier.
“Sixth, there is considerable evidence that the aircraft that struck the Pentagon was not even a Boeing 757. For one thing, unlike the strikes on the Twin Towers, the strike on the Pentagon did not create a detectable seismic signal. Also, the kind of damage and debris that would have been produced by the impact of a Boeing 757 was not produced by the strike on the Pentagon, according to both photographs and eyewitnesses. Karen Kwiatkowski, who was then an Air Force Lieutenant Colonel employed at the Pentagon, writes of ‘a strange lack of visible debris on the Pentagon lawn, where I stood only moments after the impact. . . . I saw . . . no airplane metal or cargo debris.’
“Photographs show that the façade of the west wing remained standing for 30 minutes after the strike and that, during this time, the hole in this façade was only about 16 to 18 feet in diameter. A Boeing 757 has a wingspan of about 125 feet, and a steel engine is mounted on each wing. And yet there was, as Former Air Force Colonel George Nelson has pointed out, no visible damage on either side of this hole. Former pilot Ralph Omholt, discussing both debris and damage on the basis of the photographic evidence, writes: ‘there is no doubt that a plane did not hit the Pentagon. There is no hole big enough to swallow a 757. . . . There is no viable evidence of burning jet fuel. . . . The pre-collapse Pentagon section showed no ‘forward-moving’ damage. . . . There was no tail, no wings; no damage consistent with a B-757 ‘crash.’”
“Additional evidence that no large airliner hit the west wing is provided by the fact that the fourth-floor office of Isabelle Slifer, which was directly above the strike zone (between the first and second floors), was not damaged by the initial impact.
"There is considerable evidence, moreover, that the aircraft that struck the Pentagon was instead a US military missile. This evidence consists partly of testimony. Lon Rains, editor of Space News, said: ‘I was convinced it was a missile. It came in so fast it sounded nothing like an airplane.” The upper management official at LAX, quoted earlier as saying that he overheard members of LAX Security receiving word of a stand-down order, says that they later received word that “the Pentagon had been hit by a rocket.’ Professor David Edwards of Salisbury University reports that on the morning of 9/11, a young couple burst into his subway car at L’Enfante Station and started shouting: ‘We were standing at the Pentagon Station, waiting for the train to come, and we saw a missile fly into the Pentagon! We saw it, we saw it!’ Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, in an apparent slip of the tongue, referred in an interview to ‘the missile [used] to damage this building.’
“The missile hypothesis is also supported by physical evidence. Dr. Janette Sherman of Alexandria reports that shortly after the strike her Geiger counter showed the radiation level, about 12 miles downwind from the Pentagon, to be 8-10 times higher than normal. Two days later, Bill Bellinger, the EPA radiation expert for the region, said that the rubble at the crash site was radioactive, adding that he believed the source to be depleted uranium. These findings are what one would expect, says a former scientist at the Livermore Nuclear Weapons Laboratory---if the Pentagon had been struck by a military missile with a depleted uranium warhead.
“On the basis of all this evidence, retired Army Major Doug Rokke has said: ‘When you look at the whole thing, especially the crash site void of airplane parts [and] the size of the hole left in the building . . . , it looks like the work of a missile.’
“A seventh reason to be dubious about the official story is that evidence was destroyed. Shortly after the strike, government agents picked up debris from the Pentagon in front of the impact site, put it in a large container, and carried it off. Shortly thereafter the entire lawn was covered with dirt and gravel, with the result that any remaining forensic evidence was covered up. FBI agents also immediately confiscated the videos from security cameras on two nearby buildings. Although the Department of Justice, responding to a request under the Freedom of Information Act, has acknowledged the FBI’s possession of at least one of these videos, the Department of Justice has refused to release it.
"These seven problems, besides challenging the official account, collectively indicate that the strike on the Pentagon was orchestrated by forces within our own government---an act that would clearly constitute treason.”
Parts IV – VII of the Memorandum to the U.S. Congress
Parts IV – VII of the Memorandum to the U.S. Congress will be covered in a succeeding article. For reasons of space, the excerpts from the Memorandum to the U.S. Congress in this article do not contain the footnotes and full references in the original Memorandum. Readers are encouraged to download a copy of the original Memorandum to the U.S. Congress (PDF) here or here.
_____________________ COPYRIGHT: Permission to use extracts & copyright notice
Copyright Alfred Lambremont Webre JD, MEd, All right reserved
Permission is granted to include extracts of this article on websites and email lists provided a link is included to the original article.
This article is copyrighted and should not be added in its entirety on other websites or email lists without author's written permission. For permission please contact: exopolitics@exopolitics.com. Thank you.
Wiki commons: WTC building exhibiting molecular dissociation during controlled demolition on 9/11
By Alfred Lambremont Webre, JD, MEd
This is the second of a multi-part series on secret technologies, their application to the events of September 11, 2001, and the consequent implications for our society.
In his article “False Flag Operations, 9-11 and the Exopolitical Perspective” Dr. Michael E. Salla states, “The fourth exopolitical factor [of false flag operations] concerns the use of weather modification technologies that former Secretary of State William Cohen confirmed as existing in 1997.” The “weather modification technologies” Dr. Salla is referring to include directed energy weapons which, by the evidence, have been used in scalar, weather warfare and seismic false flag operations such as December 26, 2004 (Boxing Day) Indonesian Tsunami, the China earthquake of May 12, 2008, the Haiti earthquake of January 12, 2010, and the Chile earthquake of February 27, 2010.
Dr. Judy Wood, a former assistant professor at Clemson University, has developed compelling evidence that a directed energy weapon turned the physical matter of the World Trade Center towers into nanoparticles through the process of molecular dissociation. Dr. Wood demonstrates clear evidence that cannot be accounted for by the official 9/11 Commission explanation or alternative theory of military planes, cruise missiles, or other projectiles hitting the World Trade Center buildings, or a controlled demolition caused solely by "advanced explosive nano-thermitic composite material found in the World Trade Center dust," or solely by 4th generation mini-nukes.
In a February 22, 2010 Washington Times article, Richard Gage, a San Francisco architect and founder of the nonprofit Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, states, "’Government officials will be notified that 'Misprision of Treason,' U.S. Code 18 (Sec. 2382), is a serious federal offense, which requires those with evidence of treason to act,’ Mr. Gage says. ‘The implications are enormous and may have profound impact on the forthcoming Khalid Shaikh Mohammed trial.’”
The trial of Khalid Shaikh Mohammed may soon begin (subject to reported political negotiations with Republicans), as U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder testified before a U.S. House appropriations subcommittee on March 16, 2010 that “a decision will be made in a matter of weeks on where to try the alleged mastermind of the Sept. 11 attacks,” indicating that the Obama administration has a pre-determined position on the evidence that the events of September 11, 2001 were a false flag operation.
United States v. Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, et al. "is the upcoming trial of five alleged Al-Qaeda members for aiding the September 11, 2001 attacks. Charges were announced by Brigadier General Thomas W. Hartmann on February 11, 2008 at a press conference at the Pentagon. The men charged are Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, Mohammed al Qahtani, Ramzi Binalshibh, Ammar al-Baluchi, and Mustafa al-Hawsawi. In an 88-page complaint, the group was charged with attacking civilians, attacking civilian objects, intentionally causing serious bodily injury, murder in violation of the law of war, destruction of property in violation of the law of war, hijacking or hazarding a vessel or aircraft, terrorism, and providing material support for terrorism. If convicted, the five will face the death penalty."
Regardless of whether U.S. President Barack H. Obama chooses to have these defendants tried in a U.S. Military Commission or in a U.S. Federal court, the evidence amassed by such researchers as Dr. Judy Wood and Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth satisfies the burden of proof that the events of September 11, 2001 were, beyond a reasonable doubt, a false flag operation. Consequently, one can characterize the forthcoming trial in United States v. Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, et al as a political show trial, no different in effect – the wrongful execution of the defendants and the attempted hoodwinking of the U.S. and world population – from other political show trials in recent history.
This article in the continuing 9/11 series examines the evidence for the use of secret advanced directed energy weapons in the molecular dissociation of the World Trade Center buildings into nanoparticles on September 11, 2001. The article discusses the implications of this evidence, in light of Andrew D. Basiago’s eyewitness evidence that a secret DARPA time travel program, whose defense liaison was then Nixon Cabinet Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld, was in physical possession images of the World Trade Center 9/11 events in 1971, 30 years before the actual events occurred on September 11, 2001. Mr. Rumsfeld, of course, was U.S. Secretary of Defense on 9/11.
The World Trade Center and directed energy weapons on 9/11
Dr. Judy Wood has developed multiple lines of evidence that demonstrate beyond a reasonable doubt that the molecular dissociation of the physical matter of the World Trade Center towers into nanoparticles on September 11, 2001 was the product of a directed energy weapon. Readers are urged to review this evidence here.
9/11 and the laws of evidence
Application of the law of witness and documentary evidence may be a methodology leading to breakthroughs in evaluating a new generation of data now emerging regarding use of secret advanced technologies, such as quantum access time travel and teleportation, and secret directed energy weapons on 9/11.
The basic standard in evaluating witness and documentary evidence in the common law is the standard of “reasonableness.” This standard can be stated as “what would a reasonable person conclude?” When a jury in a court of common law is determining a question of fact, as to whether secret advanced technologies, such as quantum access time travel and teleportation, and secret directed energy weapons on 9/11, the members of the jury resort to the standard of reasonableness in weighing direct and expert witnesses, and documentary evidence.
Evidence and the burden of proof - The principle of reasonableness
Witness evidence - One source summarizes the principles of the law of witness evidence as follows: "In systems of proof based on the English common law tradition, almost all evidence must be sponsored by a witness, who has sworn or solemnly affirmed to tell the truth. The bulk of the law of evidence regulates the types of evidence that may be sought from witnesses and the manner in which the interrogation of witnesses is conducted during direct examination and cross-examination of witnesses. Other types of evidentiary rules specify the standards of persuasion (e.g., proof beyond a reasonable doubt) that a trier of fact such as a jury must apply when it assesses evidence."
Documentary evidence - Documentary, including photographic evidence can be treated, according to one source, as follows: "Evidence of an indirect nature which implies the existence of the main fact in question but does not in itself prove it. That is, the existence of the main fact is deduced from the indirect or circumstantial evidence by a process of probable reasoning. The introduction of a defendant's fingerprints or DNA sample are examples of circumstantial evidence. The fact that a defendant had a motive to commit a crime is circumstantial evidence. It is possible to argue that all evidence is ultimately circumstantial, on the premises that no experience whatsoever can directly prove a fact. Recall, however, that courts of law deal with what is reasonable, not with ontology."
“The principal questions of ontology are ‘What can be said to exist?’ and ‘Into what categories, if any, can we sort existing things?’”
Witness and documentary evidence that advanced, directed energy weapons were used on the WTC on 9/11
Evidentiary sample: directed energy weapons & WTC buildings
One researcher draws on Dr. Wood’s work and sets out a sample of documentary and witness evidence sufficient to conclude that an advanced directed energy weapon was used on the World Trade Center (WTC) buildings on 9/11.
9/11 documentary evidence of use of directed energy weapons at WTC
1. Seismic Record: “The energy budget recorded in the seismic record on the day of 9/11 and the collapse of the WTC buildings did not reflect the mass of building materials involved in the collapse, nor the nearly freefall of the collapsing buildings. The seismic record demonstrates an event on the scale of a quarry blast. Where was the thud [that would have accompanied a WTC building collapse]?”
2. Kinetic Energy: “Two robust WTC buildings with very robust steel beam reinforcement would release a sizeable amount of kinetic energy from the buildings falling – that would be all of the energy that went into the construction of the WTC buildings. The release of that amount of kinetic energy is not reflected in the physical evidence on the seismic record. Into what physical process did that kinetic energy go?”
3. Molecular Dissociation: “The collapse of the WTC buildings produced the highest mass per volume of very fine particles (nanoparticles) ever measured in an air sample in the United States. It takes a tremendous amount of energy to dissociate or break the molecular bonds of steel, concrete and other building materials that were “powdered” into very fine particles during the collapse of the buildings. The largest mass per volume of metals ever measured in an air sample in the US were reported by Dr. Thomas Cahill who did air monitoring for 5 months. Metal is used in buildings because it is very strong – and would require large amounts of energy to reduce it to nanoparticles. Chemical explosives do not release enough energy to produce that volume of very fine particles. A much more energetic process was involved such as laser or beam energy which releases focused and concentrated energy as complex waveforms necessary to cause molecular dissociation.”
4. Physical Evidence of Buildings Collapsing: “In videos of the collapses on 9/11 the WTC buildings erupted into emulsion like a drinking fountain, and the rubble did not hit the ground. Even on tape huge pieces of aluminum building siding vaporized as they were freefalling, and never hit the ground.”
5. Controlled Demolition: “The [collapse of the WTC buildings] was not a 'controlled demolition' for the following reasons:
WTC Detritus Pile - “Should have been 1/3 the height of the WTC buildings. The 100+ story WTC buildings were about 1 story high when the collapse of the buildings ended. A fireman on one of the news videos said the antenna that had been on the top of WTC Building 1 was on the top of a pile of rubble about one story high. The rubble pile should have been 35 stories if it was a conventional controlled demolition.”
WTC Rubble Never Hit the Ground – “This defies gravity, where did the rubble go?”
Footprints – “Geometrically Round Holes: contiguous round holes 24’ in diameter were in the footprints of the WTC buildings 1 and 2, and a 60’ deep geometrically round hole was in the middle of Liberty Street near the WTC. This is evidence of beam weapons. There was no debris inside the footprints of the two WTC buildings, only bare dirt with circles in the dirt.”
Dust - “In videos of the collapse larger particles fell and cascaded down from the buildings under the forces of gravity, but before they hit the ground they vaporized and suddenly went up into the atmosphere like an antigravity demonstration. Nanoparticles are so tiny that they are not subject to the forces of gravity, so molecular dissociation occurred on the larger particles as they were freefalling, reducing them into nano-particles (0.1 microns in diameter and smaller) that suddenly obeyed other physical laws of quantum mechanics. More evidence of [directed energy weapon or] HAARP/beam weapon technology applied during collapse.”
9/11 Satellite photos - “[9/11 satellite photographs showed] dust going into upper atmosphere –which had to be nanoparticles and may have been enhanced by other technology because most very fine particles/dust would stay in the Troposphere and be rained out in 2 months as we know from depleted uranium particulate releases from battlefield already.”
1400 Toasted Cars - “Located blocks from the WTC buildings, with door handles missing, engine blocks missing, blistering on some parts of the car finish, strange rust patterns on the bodies of the cars.”
Paper Around Cars Not Burned - "Whatever ‘vaporized’ the engine blocks and the door handles on 1400 cars did not ignite fragile and flammable paper lying all over the ground around the cars. If engine blocks and door handles selectively vaporized, why didn’t body of car vaporize?”
Pile of Cars Spontaneously Combusted - “In a news video, the entire pile of cars started burning spontaneously at the same time with no visible cause, it was not a fire that started in one car and spread to others.”
Rust Occurred Immediately - “On cars and trucks, and in FEMA photos there was heavy rust on steel beams – steel does not rust, and it is a slow oxidation process that results in rusting of iron. This rusting happened immediately.”
Basements Of WTC Buildings Undamaged - “Stuffed mannequins in the basement of WTC with clothing on were carried out of the basement undamaged. If a 100+-story WTC building collapsed into its basement and left a 35-story rubble pile, there would be nothing left in the basement. Even streetcars underground at the WTC were pulled out after the collapse and had no damage.”
Prof. Cahill Air Monitoring Samples - “The hardest and most durable materials vaporized (steel, concrete etc), and the most fragile materials (paper) cascading out of WTC windows and all over the ground for blocks were undamaged.”
Truckloads of Potting Soil - “Right after the WTC disaster, the ground was “fuming”, and sequential FEMA aerial photos show 130 dump trucks full of soil (filled almost to the top of the dump truck space) covered with tarps so that the dirt in the trucks was not visible to onlookers on the street, coming into the WTC area, dumping the soil and going out for more. This happened even before the rescues or cleanup started and it continued for some time. The piles of soil were left for a week and got higher each day in sequential photos. The soil ‘fuming’ lasted until March 2002 (8 months).”
Boots Disintegrated – “Boots on emergency responders disintegrated after 2 hours. They had to get new boots every 2 hours – an effect of molecular dissociation. It was not from burning, their skin would have been damaged.”
No Ground Fuming During Rain - “For 99 days the “burning” (fuming) continued at the WTC site, but when it rained there was no fuming. If it had been fires burning, the rain would have caused steam from heating rainwater.”
USGS: Iron versus Steel - “The USGS analyzed the mineral form of the rust on steel beams and iron objects at the WTC. They did not address the ‘steel does not rust’ issue, but dodged it by referring to the rusted steel beams in the rubble pile as ‘iron beams’ and gave mineral analyses of iron minerals produced by oxidation.”
Official Sample Data Not Reliable – “Spectral absorption images at the WTC indicated average particle size was about 1 micron, which is subjected to gravity and would have fallen with the collapsed buildings. USGS did not collect many dust samples and collecting samples by other different agencies did not agree with each other. No samples were taken at the toasted cars.”
Directed Energy Weapon Evidence - “Evidence of use of a directed energy weapon was present at the top of the WTC buildings as ‘lathering up’ started before buildings started coming down. ‘Lathering up’ in videos preceded the collapse of all buildings, even Building 7 which supposedly Larry Silverstein when he said, 'Pull it' to firefighters meant controlled demolition. Color alteration and modification in news videos compared to other photos/videos at tops of buildings indicates “doctoring” of images. When the Seattle Dome was destroyed with controlled demolition, the dust created by the destruction did not get any higher than the top of the building. The WTC dust got into the upper atmosphere almost immediately – which indicates very tiny atmospheric dust sized particles (0.1 micron and smaller), in fact smaller than atmospheric dust that stays mainly in the Troposphere.
“Lathering Up” Incriminating - “WTC Building 7 ‘lathered up’ even before WTC Building 2 went down. WTC Building 7 not damaged at all by WTC Building 2 going down – right next to each other.”
Freon tanks - “Very odd, large tanks were removed from WTC building and OSHA made bogus statement about what and why they were removed. Was freon used in WTC takedown? A NYC cop whom the researcher met with Cindy Sheehan said he was injured in WTC Building 7 and removed on a gurney, but his eyes were covered so he could not see anything as they left the building. He reported he was able to see dead bodies lying all over the floor as he was being carried out – before building 7 had collapsed. Was this due to Freon asphyxiation put through ventilation system like in a recent Russian submarine disaster?
9/11 witness evidence of use of directed energy weapons at WTC
Where Were All the WTC Bodies? - “Emergency Room physicians Dr. Tony Daher and Dr. Lincoln Cleaver were interviewed on TV on 9/11 about the casualties. They said there weren’t any casualties after about noon on 9/11. No more casualties came to the Emergency Room. Firemen saw no bodies but talked about the antenna on top of building 1 that was at ground level on top of about one story of rubble.”
No Fires In Buildings – “William Rodriguez, Senior Janitor at WTC said there were no fires in the buildings. He conducted rescue efforts, saved injured workers and had keys to every lock in both buildings.”
Livermore Nuclear Weapons Lab Beam Weapon Demonstration - In 1955 the microwave oven was invented and was a concept for a beam weapon. In the summer of 1990, the researcher observed a demonstration of the Livermore Shiva laser facility in the middle of the night. A 16’ diameter amber colored beam was shot straight up into the sky from the lab and all air traffic was diverted for a 5 mile radius during the demonstration. When the researcher asked a grad student working at the laser facility what they were trying to do, he said, “Make a star”. The researcher knew that could not be true because lasers are used to molecularly dissociate materials by releasing tremendous amounts of energy as very advanced and complex waveforms. Livermore had long been involved in development of HAARP [a directed energy weapon] since 1978 in secret collaboration with the Soviet Union, and advanced beam weapons.
Minneapolis Bridge Collapse (August 1, 2007) – The researcher states, “Similarities to WTC disaster, every bridge segment [in the August 1, 2007 Minneapolis bridge collapse] failed at exactly the same time instead of domino effect after first collapse. This defies the laws of engineering. It should have been one place failed and sequential domino-like failures followed for a normal engineering collapse.”
What are the implications of the evidentiary conclusion that an advanced directed energy weapon was used in 9/11?
1. Documentary and witness evidence – The documentary and witness evidence presented by Dr. Judy Wood and other researchers is sufficient to conclude, by the laws of evidence, that it is more probable than not that an advanced directed energy weapon was used on the World Trade Center buildings on September 11, 2001. Likewise, there appears to be documentary and witness evidence that the following technologies may also have been part of the false flag attack on the World Trade Center buildings: (1) "advanced explosive nano-thermitic composite material found in the World Trade Center dust," or (2) perhaps even 4th generation mini-nukes. It is plausible that these latter two technologies were employed to mask the use of advanced directed energy weapons in the molecular dissociation of the physical matter of the World Trade Center towers, to sow doubt in any official 9/11 investigation and in the 9/11 truth movement, and thus to preserve the secrecy of directed energy technology application.
2. False flag operation – The use of an advanced directed energy weapon in 9/11 demonstrates beyond a reasonable doubt that 9/11 was a false flag operation. If an advanced directed energy weapon had been used by an overt foreign enemy of the United States upon U.S. soil (the World Trade Center), the U.S. military would have used every possible means to retaliate against any foreign enemy that used such an advanced directed energy weapon.
3. Public Notice – There is ample notice on the public record of Dr. Judy Wood’s evidence regarding the use of directed energy weapons at the World Trade Center buildings on 9/11. Starting in March 16, 2007, Dr. Judy Wood has pursued requests for correction with the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) regarding evidence for directed energy weapons. Dr. Wood filed a Qui Tam action filed at the United States District Court for the Southern District Of New York. A writ of certiorari was filed in this matter in the Supreme Court of the United States on October 14, 2009 and was recently dismissed by the U.S. Supreme Court.
4. Deemed official notice - The U.S. Department of Justice or a prosecutor before a U.S. Military Commission that is prosecuting the defendants in United States v. Khalid Sheikh Mohammed et al. can be reasonably deemed to have notice of the evidence that directed energy weapons were used against the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001. This evidence is contained in Dr. Wood’s proceedings at National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), and her Qui Tam action U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, and the U.S. Supreme Court. Dr. Judy Wood’s evidence is of public importance in the question of a trial of the alleged “masterminds” of 9/11 in which capital punishment may result.
5. Political show trial – Regardless of ultimate judicial venue (U.S. Federal court or U.S. Military Commission), if the trial of the defendants in United States v. Khalid Sheikh Mohammed et al. proceeds without the Department of Justice prosecutors, the U.S. Attorney, the U.S. President, the U.S. Federal Court or Military Commission, or the defense attorneys having weighed the evidence of directed energy weapons having been used in the World Trade Center, then a major miscarriage of justice will have taken place. It can be reasonably concluded that the trial in the matter of United States v. Khalid Sheikh Mohammed et al. is a political show trial and continued psychological operation, as was the original false flag operation of September 11, 2001.
The term show trial “is a pejorative description of a type of highly public trial. The term was first recorded in the 1930s. There is a strong connotation that the judicial authorities have already determined the guilt of the defendant and that the actual trial has as its only goal to present the accusation and the verdict to the public as an impressive example and as a warning. Show trials tend to be retributive rather than correctional justice. Such trials can exhibit scant regard for the principles of jurisprudence and even for the letter of the law. Defendants have little real opportunity to justify themselves: they have often signed statements under duress and/or suffered torture prior to appearing in the court-room.”
6. Use of secret quantum access time travel technologies – The eyewitness evidence of Cambridge-educated environmentalist and lawyer Andrew D. Basiago that a secret DARPA time travel program had physical possession as early as 1971 of images of the events of at the World Trade Center buildings on 9/11, 30 years in advance of the event must now be evaluated with the evidence of Dr. Judy Wood and other researchers that directed energy weapons were used at the World Trade Center buildings on 9/11. Both of secret time travel and teleportation technologies and directed energy weapons are among the most secret and the most advanced technologies in the arsenal of DARPA and the U.S. Department of Defense. The fact that a 9/11 connection has been established for both secret time travel and teleportation technologies and directed energy weapons around one individual of Cabinet rank in both 1971 and 2001 is of high evidentiary importance. By the evidence, that individual is Donald H. Rumsfeld, defense liaison to DARPA’s secret time travel program and a member of U.S. President Richard M. Nixon’s cabinet in 1971, and 30 years later, U.S. Secretary of Defense on September 11, 2001 with line authority over advanced directed energy weapons of the U.S. government.
7. Treason or misprision of treason – The next article in this multi-part series on secret technologies and 9/11 will explore the reasonable prima facieevidence for the criminal indictment and trial for treason (Article III (3) of the U.S. Constitution) or misprision of treason (U.S. Code 18, Sec. 2382), of then sitting U.S. president George W. Bush, vice president Richard B. Cheney, U.S. secretary of defense Donald H. Rumsfeld, and numerous Jane and John Does.
_____________________ COPYRIGHT: Permission to use extracts & copyright notice
Copyright Alfred Lambremont Webre JD, MEd, All right reserved
Permission is granted to include extracts of this article on websites and email lists provided a link is included to the original article.
This article is copyrighted and should not be added in its entirety on other websites or email lists without author's written permission. For permission please contact: exopolitics@exopolitics.com. Thank you.
This article is part of an ongoing series on U.S. black budget exotic technologies, their use in the 9/11 false flag psyops, and the consequent impact on humanity’s social and exopolitical future.
New computer analysis by UK researcher Richard D. Hall has revealed that an anti-gravity remote controlled UFO drone may have been used to hit World Trade Center tower 2 on September 11, 2001. Mr. Hall made this analysis public in two videos set out in the Examiner.com article below.
Mr. Hall’s analysis of a possible an anti-gravity remote controlled UFO drone used to hit the World Trade Center on 9/11 is the subject of an exclusive ExopoliticsTV interview by Alfred Lambremont Webre with UFO, reverse speech and video analysis expert Jon Kelly (Vancouver UFO Examiner), available for viewing by Examiner.com in the article below.
According to Mr. Hall’s analysis, a remote-controlled anti-gravity UFO, clearly visible in video footage, was intentionally guided into World Trade Center tower 2 on 9/11. News and other video footage showing images of a jetliner hitting WTC tower 2 is due, according to Mr. Hall’s analysis, to after the fact editing. Another remote-controlled antigravity UFO, according to Mr. Hall was most probably guided into World Trade Center Tower 1.
Project Camelot whistleblower Aaron McCollum has also revealed in that U.S. secret antigravity craft that he traveled in possessed a stealth camouflage capability to appear and sound like a commercial jetliner, such as a Boeing 747.
Jon Kelly’s analysis of the 9/11 antigravity UFO, which identifies the September 11, 2001 false flag operation as “a showcase for exotic military technologies including black project UFO's” is set out in the ExopoliticsTV interview video below.
A total of four advanced exotic technologies exclusively in the possession of U.S. black budget military intelligence have now been inked to use in the 9/11 false flag psychological operation by an executive command and control network that reaches to the highest levels of U.S. government, military-intelligence, and world political and financial elites.
Examiner.com reporter Alfred Lambremont Webre has identified these four U.S. black budget exotic technologies as key to identifying, planning and/or carrying out the 9/11 false flag psyops:
(3) Directed Energy weapon (possibly although not necessarily HAARP) for controlled demolition of World Trade Center towers by molecular dissociation (Researchers Dr. Judy Wood and another independent scientist)
(4) 4th Generation mini-nuke for controlled demolition of World Trade Center towers (Independent scientist).
The principal barriers to use of this prima facie eyewitness, whistleblower and documentary evidence in criminal prosecution of the perpetrators of the false flag operation of September 11, 2001 are (1) A U.S. government truth embargo around these black budget technologies; (2) An active campaign by agencies such as the National Security Agency (NSA) to disrupt the 9/11 truth movement, and any prosecution of the true high level perpetrators of the 9/11 false flag operation, such as former U.S. President George W. Bush, Vice President Richard B. Cheney, and Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld; and (3) a denial paradigm within the 9/11 truth movement, the mainstream media, the international justice system, and a significant constituency of the public that these exotic technologies exist and may have been used by high-ranking officials and individuals in the commission of the 9/11 false flag operation.
The false flag operation of September 11, 2001 provided a legislative, political and media pretext for the launching of a worldwide war on terror by the U.S. and ‘allies,’ and a domestic police state worldwide.
9/11 remote-controlled antigravity UFO
ExopoliticsTV interview
Examiner.com readers can view UFO and video analysis expert Jon Kelly’s exclusive interview on ExopoliticsTV with Alfred Lambremont Webre, in a 2-part video starting below:
In his ExopoliticsTV interview, Jon Kelly states, “9-11 as a showcase for exotic military technologies including black project UFO's. Why use a UFO to deliver an explosives payload? The UFO is destroyed in the delivery process. Is that a sign of advanced technologies, when your delivery vehicle is destroyed on the first delivery? Why use a UFO, then cover it up with video editing only to have it uncovered nine years later? Why not a missile or a bomb?”
Mr. Kelly continues, “By destroying the delivery vehicle in the process of delivering an explosives payload to the WTC towers, one can reduce the opportunity for witnesses to make sense out of the attacks. According to Richard Hall's presentation, covering up the real events with video manipulation was important to the controllers behind the scenes of 9-11.”
ExopoliticsTV Interview - Part 2
Part 2 of UFO and video analysis expert Jon Kelly’s exclusive interview on ExopoliticsTV with Alfred Lambremont Webre starts below:
Mr. Kelly states, “The strategic model is not unlike a VBIED or a truck bomb, where a truck filled with explosives drives to the target then detonates.”
Mr. Kelly concludes, “In Richard Hall's version of events, a VBIED in the form of an exploding UFO strikes the WTC. Mr. Hall clearly demonstrates that the raw video of this event was edited using masks and layers to produce a fictional visual account of the events of 9-11 for distribution as news by the major media. The raw video, sourced from a VHS recording is not a high resolution recording. However, it does convincingly display a metallic, reflective saucer-shaped vehicle in a steady, controlled descent into the WTC tower.”
In the ExopoliticsTV interview, Jon Kelly states, “Mr. Hall’s hypothesis also resolves long-standing questions regarding the pod-shaped object protruding from the bottom of the jet airliner as it crashes into the tower. Mr. Hall describes the pod as the remnants of the UFO saucer mixed with the overlayed jet airliner video image. The overlay did not subtract the saucer from the frame, but combined it visually with the airliner.”
Mr. Kelly concludes, “If this very expensive technology was deployed for this purpose, it represents extreme hubris and arrogance on the part of the deployers. Why did they need to do that? To show off to themselves? To show off to someone else? As an ultimate act of perversion? They perverted the flow of tax dollars from the average citizens to develop secret technologies which they then used to secretly seize control of society and launch illegal wars.”
9/11: Showcase for exotic military-intelligence technologies
9/11 as a multi-dimensional false flag psyops appears to have been designed as a showcase for the leading edge of U.S. black budget military-intelligence technologies.
Quantum access Tesla-based time travel
The first among these exotic technologies was quantum access Tesla-based time travel technology, developed in DARPA’s Project Pegasus (1968-72) under the policy oversight of then Nixon cabinet member Donald H. Rumsfeld. Mr. Rumsfeld was later to play a pivotal operational role in the 9/11 false flag as U.S. Secretary of Defense on September 11, 2001.
A key whistle blower, Andrew D. Basiago, , has emerged with evidence that secret U.S. time travel technologies were used as early as 1971 to acquire first-hand documentary knowledge about September 11, 2001 – fully three decades before the horrific events of that fateful day.
Mr. Basiago, a child participant in DARPA’s time travel program, Project Pegasus, has publicly stated how in 1971 he viewed moving images of the attack on the Twin Towers on September 11, 2001 that had been obtained from the future and brought back to the early 1970’s.
DARPA is the chief research and development arm of the US military, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency. DARPA created the precursor to the Internet, “Arpanet,” and has a penchant for trumpeting its advances, such as putting surveillance cameras on the backs of bumblebees and other exotic achievements in military science.
Mr. Basiago claims that DARPA’s secret technical accomplishments go far beyond what it has publicly acknowledged and that by 1970 DARPA had achieved teleportation-based time travel as well as advanced electro-optical means of discerning past and future events via different technologies that provide quantum access.
Mr. Basiago has described how while serving in Project Pegasus, he viewed moving images of 9/11 at the secured U.S. defense-technical facility where they were processed after being retrieved from the future, the Aerojet Corporation facility that once stood at the corner of Bullock Avenue and Leroy Place in Socorro, New Mexico.
According to Mr. Basiago’s whistleblower testimony, Donald H. Rumsfeld, the sitting U.S. Secretary of Defense on September 11, 2001, was the defense attaché to Project Pegasus during the early 1970’s, when Mr. Rumsfeld was officially serving as a counselor to President Nixon and member of his Board of Wage and Price Stabilization.
In all likelihood, Mr. Rumsfeld, as the defense attaché to Project Pegasus, would have known about and possibly had control over the data about 9/11 derived via “quantum access” and brought back to the early 1970’s for analysis by the DARPA research and development program under his administrative authority.
Mr. Basiago’s eyewitness account that Secretary Rumsfeld and others knew about 9/11 decades in advance because data about it was gathered via DARPA’s secret time travel program unlocks several of the more enigmatic facts in the 9/11 literature and may be the key to society’s unraveling of the ultimate accountability for the false flag operation that took place on September 11, 2001.
Andrew D. Basiago: What I know is that in the early 1970's, Project Pegasus had moving images of one of the planes hitting one of the Twin Towers on 9/11; that 9/11 was known and spoken of by project principals; and that the defense attaché to Project Pegasus was Donald Rumsfeld, the individual who was serving as Defense Secretary during 9/11. The evidence from Project Pegasus shows that the US government knew about the 9/11 attacks many years in advance, not necessarily that it "took part" in those attacks.
Q: If Project Pegasus knew about 9/11 before it would happen, why wasn't 9/11 prevented from occurring?
Andrew D. Basiago: That's a good question. What I know is that it was the consensus of the US officials administering Project Pegasus that information about future events should be used to engage in contingency planning for future events but not to "play God" and change the future by preventing or altering future events. A paradox exists such that acting to change future events based on prior knowledge of them results in diminished accurate knowledge of future events. So, there is an institutional reluctance to change future events based upon prior knowledge of them because of the impact of doing so on the quality of the intelligence database concerning future events.
Q: How much information about the future has Project Pegasus learned about?
Andrew D. Basiago: My experiences in Project Pegasus indicate that by 1970, the US government was using chronovision to capture remotely and record on film a vast amount of footage of past and future events. When we visited the project location at Flemington, NJ -- where I was shown remote images of the signing of the US Constitution in 1787 and saw George Washington and Benjamin Franklin as they appeared in life -- we could see that the technicians there were filming reams and reams of scenes of past events on 16 mm film stock and storing it in film canisters. Presumably, this process is done digitally today.
Q: Is Project Pegasus still active?
Andrew D. Basiago: I do not know whether Project Pegasus is still active, but the intelligence infrastructure that evolved from it is in all likelihood very active at this time. Project Pegasus was a small, highly secret research and development program launched in the late 1960's. However, the technologies that it developed gave the US government the keys to past and future events. My guess is that the quantum access capabilities that Project Pegasus provided the US government are now headquartered at some form of national intelligence center that provides the President, the intelligence community and the military information about future events.
Q: Was just the military involved or was the government also involved?
Andrew D. Basiago: Project Pegasus combined individuals employed by the US military (Navy, DARPA), the US intelligence community (CIA) and civilian defense contractors (e.g., Parsons). It was a research and development program of the US Department of Defense (DoD).
Q: How could a father actually put his son through all of these violent and possibly fatal transportation experiments?
Andrew D. Basiago: It is my position that my father and I were proud to serve our country during its hour of maximum danger and were also privileged to be involved in America's early activities in time-space exploration. My father did not involve me in Project Pegasus. Rather, we were approached by the US government and told we had to be involved for reasons that remain a mystery. In all likelihood, we were identified by project personnel from the future, who knew from the perspective of their time that we had been involved in the program, and hence we were brought into the program to create the future program that had knowledge of our past involvement.
Q: Why was not an adult the one transported so that the information brought back might be more precise?
Andrew D. Basiago: Children were involved for five main reasons. First, we were experimental test subjects into the physical and mental effects of teleportation on children. Second, we were necessary participants because the holograms produced by the chronovisors would collapse if adults were involved and so small, cooperative, intelligent human beings were needed as the time travelers in the chronovisor probes, and therefore a decision was made to involve gifted and talented American school children. Third, we were regarded as better participant-observers of the past and future events accessed in the program because children are tabula rasa -- blank slates whose perceptions are not skewed by the selection bias produced by their previous experiences. Fourth, we were trainees who were expected to become America's first generation of "chrononauts" in a fully fledged time-space program when we grew up. Fifth and lastly, the Department of Defense found that when adults were involved in time travel, the psychologically destabilizing effects of moving between alternate time lines was causing some adult time travelers to become insane, so it was hoped that by training time travelers from childhood a competent cadre of US time travelers could be formed.
Q: How could a child possibly be put through all of this and also remember everything he saw or even understand what he saw or heard?
Andrew D. Basiago: I am a gifted individual with exceptional powers of observation and memory. These gifts were identified when I was being trained in Project Pegasus. In one test, I recited back random numbers provided to me verbally to 84 places. I was identified as the future whistle blower about Project Pegasus even while I was still serving on the project. I have spent over 10 years investigating my experiences and proving them to an historical certainty. I am an individual who did remember what I saw and heard, so it is not valid to say that I couldn't have done so because a child couldn't or shouldn't have been able to. That involves the fallacy of using the general to refute the specific. I not only remembered much of what I saw and heard, but I later wrote it down and went back and investigated it and proved my memories. Consequently, I am now able to provide an insider's account of the US government's time-space program at the time of its emergence in the late 1960's and early 1970's.
Andrew D. Basiago's Comments on ExopoliticsTV 9/11 Antigravity UFO
On August 13, 2010, Mr. Basiago wrote to the producers and guest of ExopoliticsTV,
Alfred, Jon,
In re: Exopolitics TV
The complexities of what I have described in regard to Project Pegasus are being distorted just as I feared they would be in the 9/11 context, which is why I avoided talking about the 9/11 connection to Project Pegasus for so many years.
Let me explain:
The images of 9/11 that I saw at the Aerojet Corporation facility in Socorro, NM were from the microfilmed summaries of future events that we were traveling to the future (2045) via stargate to retrieve and bring back.
The lab at Aerojet was not a chronovisor array; it was a microfilm-processing lab.
What my father and I were being shown was footage from the future that had survived the journey backward in time intact enough to be developed at Aerojet and provide a video window into what would happen on the fated day in the future known as 9/11.
The images were NOT real time images retrieved in 1971 from 2001, which presumably would have shown the saucer.
So, I want to make it clear that my account of seeing planes in those images and Hall's account of a saucer around which a hologram of a plane was wrapped or later inserted are NOT inconsistent.
We were seeing the conventional, post-9/11 images that showed a plane, with the additional element that the images had been ferried back from a repository in the future.
We were not peering into the actual event, for which Halls' data now suggests we would have seen a flying saucer rather than the second plane.
We were seeing images from the future of the conventional, 9/11 cover story featuring the planes.
To my knowledge, there wasn't a chronovisor array in Socorro.
What I saw and later investigated was that an Aerojet facility falsely described as Gibbons Hall, a student union of New Mexico Tech, was being used by Aerojet and the physics faculty of New Mexico Tech to retrieve portions of the microfilm that had not be erased when it was jumped back in time via stargate to the present.
This microfilm contained summaries of future events being prepared by project historians in the future.
Thus, the images of the planes hitting the towers did not result from Looking Glass technology but rather historical archives that were accessed to produce the briefing materials contained on the microfilm that were being sent back from the future to our present to brief the Nixon Administration on the history of the future.
I just wanted to clear this up because your broadcast on Exopolitics TV seemed to imply that Hall's footage refutes my claims about the 9/11 footage and it does NOT have this evidentiary impact.
Andy
Scientist: Directed energy weapons turned World Trade Center into nanoparticles on 9/11
One researcher draws on Dr. Wood’s work and sets out a sample of documentary and witness evidence sufficient to conclude that an advanced directed energy weapon was used on the World Trade Center (WTC) buildings on 9/11.
9/11 documentary evidence of use of directed energy weapons at WTC
1. Seismic Record: “The energy budget recorded in the seismic record on the day of 9/11 and the collapse of the WTC buildings did not reflect the mass of building materials involved in the collapse, nor the nearly freefall of the collapsing buildings. The seismic record demonstrates an event on the scale of a quarry blast. Where was the thud [that would have accompanied a WTC building collapse]?”
2. Kinetic Energy: “Two robust WTC buildings with very robust steel beam reinforcement would release a sizeable amount of kinetic energy from the buildings falling – that would be all of the energy that went into the construction of the WTC buildings. The release of that amount of kinetic energy is not reflected in the physical evidence on the seismic record. Into what physical process did that kinetic energy go?”
3. Molecular Dissociation: “The collapse of the WTC buildings produced the highest mass per volume of very fine particles (nanoparticles) ever measured in an air sample in the United States. It takes a tremendous amount of energy to dissociate or break the molecular bonds of steel, concrete and other building materials that were “powdered” into very fine particles during the collapse of the buildings. The largest mass per volume of metals ever measured in an air sample in the US were reported by Dr. Thomas Cahill who did air monitoring for 5 months. Metal is used in buildings because it is very strong – and would require large amounts of energy to reduce it to nanoparticles. Chemical explosives do not release enough energy to produce that volume of very fine particles. A much more energetic process was involved such as laser or beam energy which releases focused and concentrated energy as complex waveforms necessary to cause molecular dissociation.”
4. Physical Evidence of Buildings Collapsing: “In videos of the collapses on 9/11 the WTC buildings erupted into emulsion like a drinking fountain, and the rubble did not hit the ground. Even on tape huge pieces of aluminum building siding vaporized as they were freefalling, and never hit the ground.”
5. Controlled Demolition: “The [collapse of the WTC buildings] was not a 'controlled demolition' for the following reasons:
WTC Detritus Pile - “Should have been 1/3 the height of the WTC buildings. The 100+ story WTC buildings were about 1 story high when the collapse of the buildings ended. A fireman on one of the news videos said the antenna that had been on the top of WTC Building 1 was on the top of a pile of rubble about one story high. The rubble pile should have been 35 stories if it was a conventional controlled demolition.”
WTC Rubble Never Hit the Ground – “This defies gravity, where did the rubble go?”
Footprints – “Geometrically Round Holes: contiguous round holes 24’ in diameter were in the footprints of the WTC buildings 1 and 2, and a 60’ deep geometrically round hole was in the middle of Liberty Street near the WTC. This is evidence of beam weapons. There was no debris inside the footprints of the two WTC buildings, only bare dirt with circles in the dirt.”
Dust - “In videos of the collapse larger particles fell and cascaded down from the buildings under the forces of gravity, but before they hit the ground they vaporized and suddenly went up into the atmosphere like an antigravity demonstration. Nanoparticles are so tiny that they are not subject to the forces of gravity, so molecular dissociation occurred on the larger particles as they were freefalling, reducing them into nano-particles (0.1 microns in diameter and smaller) that suddenly obeyed other physical laws of quantum mechanics. More evidence of [directed energy weapon or] HAARP/beam weapon technology applied during collapse.”
9/11 Satellite photos - “[9/11 satellite photographs showed] dust going into upper atmosphere –which had to be nanoparticles and may have been enhanced by other technology because most very fine particles/dust would stay in the Troposphere and be rained out in 2 months as we know from depleted uranium particulate releases from battlefield already.”
1400 Toasted Cars - “Located blocks from the WTC buildings, with door handles missing, engine blocks missing, blistering on some parts of the car finish, strange rust patterns on the bodies of the cars.”
Paper Around Cars Not Burned - "Whatever ‘vaporized’ the engine blocks and the door handles on 1400 cars did not ignite fragile and flammable paper lying all over the ground around the cars. If engine blocks and door handles selectively vaporized, why didn’t body of car vaporize?”
Pile of Cars Spontaneously Combusted - “In a news video, the entire pile of cars started burning spontaneously at the same time with no visible cause, it was not a fire that started in one car and spread to others.”
Rust Occurred Immediately - “On cars and trucks, and in FEMA photos there was heavy rust on steel beams – steel does not rust, and it is a slow oxidation process that results in rusting of iron. This rusting happened immediately.”
Basements Of WTC Buildings Undamaged - “Stuffed mannequins in the basement of WTC with clothing on were carried out of the basement undamaged. If a 100+-story WTC building collapsed into its basement and left a 35-story rubble pile, there would be nothing left in the basement. Even streetcars underground at the WTC were pulled out after the collapse and had no damage.”
Prof. Cahill Air Monitoring Samples - “The hardest and most durable materials vaporized (steel, concrete etc), and the most fragile materials (paper) cascading out of WTC windows and all over the ground for blocks were undamaged.”
Truckloads of Potting Soil - “Right after the WTC disaster, the ground was “fuming”, and sequential FEMA aerial photos show 130 dump trucks full of soil (filled almost to the top of the dump truck space) covered with tarps so that the dirt in the trucks was not visible to onlookers on the street, coming into the WTC area, dumping the soil and going out for more. This happened even before the rescues or cleanup started and it continued for some time. The piles of soil were left for a week and got higher each day in sequential photos. The soil ‘fuming’ lasted until March 2002 (8 months).”
Boots Disintegrated – “Boots on emergency responders disintegrated after 2 hours. They had to get new boots every 2 hours – an effect of molecular dissociation. It was not from burning, their skin would have been damaged.”
No Ground Fuming During Rain - “For 99 days the “burning” (fuming) continued at the WTC site, but when it rained there was no fuming. If it had been fires burning, the rain would have caused steam from heating rainwater.”
USGS: Iron versus Steel - “The USGS analyzed the mineral form of the rust on steel beams and iron objects at the WTC. They did not address the ‘steel does not rust’ issue, but dodged it by referring to the rusted steel beams in the rubble pile as ‘iron beams’ and gave mineral analyses of iron minerals produced by oxidation.”
Official Sample Data Not Reliable – “Spectral absorption images at the WTC indicated average particle size was about 1 micron, which is subjected to gravity and would have fallen with the collapsed buildings. USGS did not collect many dust samples and collecting samples by other different agencies did not agree with each other. No samples were taken at the toasted cars.”
Directed Energy Weapon Evidence - “Evidence of use of a directed energy weapon was present at the top of the WTC buildings as ‘lathering up’ started before buildings started coming down. ‘Lathering up’ in videos preceded the collapse of all buildings, even Building 7 which supposedly Larry Silverstein when he said, 'Pull it' to firefighters meant controlled demolition. Color alteration and modification in news videos compared to other photos/videos at tops of buildings indicates “doctoring” of images. When the Seattle Dome was destroyed with controlled demolition, the dust created by the destruction did not get any higher than the top of the building. The WTC dust got into the upper atmosphere almost immediately – which indicates very tiny atmospheric dust sized particles (0.1 micron and smaller), in fact smaller than atmospheric dust that stays mainly in the Troposphere.
“Lathering Up” Incriminating - “WTC Building 7 ‘lathered up’ even before WTC Building 2 went down. WTC Building 7 not damaged at all by WTC Building 2 going down – right next to each other.”
Freon tanks - “Very odd, large tanks were removed from WTC building and OSHA made bogus statement about what and why they were removed. Was freon used in WTC takedown? A NYC cop whom the researcher met with Cindy Sheehan said he was injured in WTC Building 7 and removed on a gurney, but his eyes were covered so he could not see anything as they left the building. He reported he was able to see dead bodies lying all over the floor as he was being carried out – before building 7 had collapsed. Was this due to Freon asphyxiation put through ventilation system like in a recent Russian submarine disaster?
This prima facie evidence of the use of U.S. exotic black budget technologies in 9/11 can bring the perpetrators of 9/11 to justice
The prima facie eyewitness, whistleblower and documentary evidence now available that these four exotic black budget technologies in the sole possession of the U.S. military-intelligence sector is sufficient to bring the perpetrators of the false flag operation of September 11, 2001 to justice under the following provision of the U.S. constitution, and related criminal laws for non-U.S. citizens who were perpetrators of the false flag operation of 9/11.
Article III (3) of the U.S. Constitution provides: "Sect. 3. Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying war against them, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort. No person shall be convicted of treason unless on the testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act, or on open confession in open court."
_____________________ COPYRIGHT: Permission to use extracts & copyright notice
Copyright Alfred Lambremont Webre JD, MEd, All right reserved
Permission is granted to include extracts of this article on websites and email lists provided a link is included to the original article.
This article is copyrighted and should not be added in its entirety on other websites or email lists without author's written permission. For permission please contact: exopolitics@exopolitics.com. Thank you.
Wiki-commons: Image of WTC in molecular dissociation on 9/11
by Alfred Lambremont Webre, JD, MEd
This is the first of a multi-part series on quantum access technologies, their application to the events of September 11, 2001, and the consequent implications for our society.
In a 2006 paper entitled, “False Flag Operations, 9/11, and the Exopolitical Perspective”, Dr. Michael E. Salla identifies five exopolitical factors behind false flag operations, including the false flag operation of September 11, 2001. Although Dr. Salla identifies exotic scalar weapons as the “fourth exopolitical factor” in false flag operations, his 2006 article does not disclose how exopolitically-related factors specifically may have played out in the case of 9/11.
Since then, a key whistle blower, Andrew D. Basiago, has emerged with evidence that secret U.S. time travel technologies were used as early as 1971 to acquire first-hand documentary knowledge about September 11, 2001 – fully three decades before the horrific events of that fateful day.
Mr. Basiago, a child participant in DARPA’s time travel program, Project Pegasus, has publicly stated how in 1971 he viewed moving images of the attack on the Twin Towers on September 11, 2001 that had been obtained from the future and brought back to the early 1970’s.
DARPA is the chief research and development arm of the US military, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency. DARPA created the precursor to the Internet, “Arpanet,” and has a penchant for trumpeting its advances, such as putting surveillance cameras on the backs of bumblebees and other exotic achievements in military science.
Mr. Basiago claims that DARPA’s secret technical accomplishments go far beyond what it has publicly acknowledged and that by 1970 DARPA had achieved teleportation-based time travel as well as advanced electro-optical means of discerning past and future events via different technologies that provide quantum access.
Mr. Basiago has described how while serving in Project Pegasus, he viewed moving images of 9/11 at the secured U.S. defense-technical facility where they were processed after being retrieved from the future, the Aerojet Corporation facility that once stood at the corner of Bullock Avenue and Leroy Place in Socorro, New Mexico.
According to Mr. Basiago’s whistleblower testimony, Donald H. Rumsfeld, the sitting U.S. Secretary of Defense on September 11, 2001, was the defense attaché to Project Pegasus during the early 1970’s, when Mr. Rumsfeld was officially serving as a counselor to President Nixon and member of his Board of Wage and Price Stabilization.
In all likelihood, Mr. Rumsfeld, as the defense attaché to Project Pegasus, would have known about and possibly had control over the data about 9/11 derived via “quantum access” and brought back to the early 1970’s for analysis by the DARPA research and development program under his administrative authority.
Mr. Basiago’s eyewitness account that Secretary Rumsfeld and others knew about 9/11 decades in advance because data about it was gathered via DARPA’s secret time travel program unlocks several of the more enigmatic facts in the 9/11 literature and may be the key to society’s unraveling of the ultimate accountability for the false flag operation that took place on September 11, 2001.
Examiner.com will explore Mr. Basiago’s whistleblower eyewitness evidence regarding how secret U.S. government time travel technologies relate to 9/11 in future installments of this series.
Corroborative evidence of Andrew D. Basiago’s secret U.S. government time travel
Fig. 1-ProjectPegasus.net: Photo of Andrew D. Basiago on Nov. 19, 1863 at Gettysburg Address
This article introduces readers to quantum access evidence in the form of a time travel artifact that resulted from Andrew D. Basiago’s childhood participation in DARPA’s secret time travel program in the early 1970’s. The ALTA reports and Web Bot technology have identified Mr. Basiago, an emerging figure in the disclosure movement, as a “planetary whistleblower” based on the global significance of his revelations. Exploring this time travel artifact will help establish a frame of reference for readers to better evaluate evidence gathered by quantum access technology and time travel participants like Mr. Basiago.
Corroborative documentary evidence of the veracity of Mr. Basiago’s time travel expeditions on behalf of the U.S. government exists. This documentary evidence consists of a photograph of Mr. Basiago taken at the scene of U.S. President Abraham Lincoln’s Gettysburg Address on November 19, 1863 after he was teleported to that location in the time-space continuum via DARPA time travel technology.
Andrew D. Basiago at Gettysburg, PA on November 19, 1863 (Gettysburg Address)
Figure 1 is the photograph of Andrew D. Basiago as a Project Pegasus time travel participant taken at the site of U.S. President Abraham Lincoln’s Gettysburg Address on November 19, 1863, to which Mr. Basiago had been teleported back in time by DARPA.
Mr. Basiago has publicly answered questions about this corroborating photographic evidence of his time travel experiences in the secret U.S. government program in which time travel was achieved.
Q: Is this [Figure 1] the photo of you on November 19, 1863?
Andrew D. Basiago: Yes. I am the boy standing in the foreground of the image at center-left, looking to his right. My shoes were lost in the transit through the quantum plenum that took me from the plasma confinement chamber at the time lab in East Hanover, NJ in 1972 to Gettysburg, PA on the day that Abraham Lincoln gave his famous address there in 1863. When I walked into downtown Gettysburg, where the shops were, after walking into town along the north-south arterial that led into Gettysburg, a cobbler by the name of John Lawrence Burns accosted me and took me inside a millinery shop and furnished me with a pair of men's street shoes and a Union winter parka that he took from a stack of military clothing in a storeroom at the back of the shop. In this image, one can see how over-sized the shoes were. I can confirm that this image was taken right after President Lincoln arrived on the dais, because when I walked over to this location and stood in this manner to detract attention from my shoes, I had been standing over by the dais, and Lincoln had not yet arrived, and I only stood in this position for several minutes before the quantum field effect produced by the plasma confinement chamber ended and I found myself back in the time lab in New Jersey.
Q: This is incredible, Andrew! I did not know there were pictures. Was this a picture (Figure 1) discovered that just happened to have you in it, or was this picture taken by those with you and you brought it back?
Andrew D. Basiago: To my knowledge, this was the only photograph that was taken in a past or future time when I was time traveling for DARPA's Project Pegasus. I think another breakthrough will come in the form of accounts from residents of Santa Fe [New Mexico] about children suddenly appearing at the state capitol complex there in the early 1970's. Our arrivals were sometimes witnessed. Several of my own arrivals were witnessed. I have spoken with area residents who knew that individuals were teleporting into Santa Fe in the early 1970's. Some of that knowledge resulted from the arrival of teleportees, including myself, being seen by others; other knowledge resulted from the fact that employees of LANL [Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM] were bringing stories about the teleportation that was going on home from work and sharing them with their children around the dinner table in Los Alamos and White Rock.
Q: What were you looking at [in the photograph in Figure 1]?
Andrew D. Basiago: Nothing, intentionally. I was wearing a hodgepodge of clothes: the Union bugle boy uniform that I had been issued back in East Hanover, NJ in 1972; the Union winter parka that Burns had outfitted me in when I walked into town shivering in the brisk autumn air; the huge men's shoes that he gave me when I walked into town barefoot. When I walked over to the dais, several women were gossiping about me (presumably, because I was apparently a bugle boy separated from his regiment or a carpetbagger). I was questioned by two Union officers about where my regiment was bivouacked. I also had a strange encounter with my father, who was dressed as a Pennsylvania farmer and standing in front of the dais, in which he intentionally ignored me. He later said that encountering me there at Gettysburg was how he found out I was going to be in the program. But he was startled to see me and not expecting me to be there, [he] acted like he didn't know who I was. After I was questioned by the two Union officers, I was concerned that I should make myself inconspicuous. We had been trained to avoid being conspicuous, being questioned, being arrested, being detained, and so on, because these things might create complications that would prevent us from getting back to the present. So, self-conscious about the huge shoes that I was wearing and trying to avoid being further noticed, I walked about 100 paces from the dais and stood with my back to the dais looking in the opposite direction from where I knew Lincoln would be arriving. I hoped that by affecting an air of non-chalance in this manner, I would avoid further scrutiny by those present. It didn't work! I ended up becoming the first time traveler from the future to be photographed!
Andrew D. Basiago answers questions about Project Pegasus and 9/11
Q: Why would the US take part in 9/11?
Andrew D. Basiago: What I know is that in the early 1970's, Project Pegasus had moving images of one of the planes hitting one of the Twin Towers on 9/11; that 9/11 was known and spoken of by project principals; and that the defense attache to Project Pegasus was Donald Rumsfeld, the individual who was serving as Defense Secretary during 9/11. The evidence from Project Pegasus shows that the US government knew about the 9/11 attacks many years in advance, not necessarily that it "took part" in those attacks.
Q: If Project Pegasus knew about 9/11 before it would happen, why wasn't 9/11 prevented from occurring?
Andrew D. Basiago: That's a good question. What I know is that it was the consensus of the US officials administering Project Pegasus that information about future events should be used to engage in contingency planning for future events but not to "play God" and change the future by preventing or altering future events. A paradox exists such that acting to change future events based on prior knowledge of them results in diminished accurate knowledge of future events. So, there is an institutional reluctance to change future events based upon prior knowledge of them because of the impact of doing so on the quality of the intelligence database concerning future events.
Q: How much information about the future has Project Pegasus learned about?
Andrew D. Basiago: My experiences in Project Pegasus indicate that by 1970, the US government was using chronovision to capture remotely and record on film a vast amount of footage of past and future events. When we visited the project location at Flemington, NJ -- where I was shown remote images of the signing of the US Constitution in 1787 and saw George Washington and Benjamin Franklin as they appeared in life -- we could see that the technicians there were filming reams and reams of scenes of past events on 16 mm film stock and storing it in film canisters. Presumably, this process is done digitally today.
Q: Is Project Pegasus still active?
Andrew D. Basiago: I do not know whether Project Pegasus is still active, but the intelligence infrastructure that evolved from it is in all likelihood very active at this time. Project Pegasus was a small, highly secret research and development program launched in the late 1960's. However, the technologies that it developed gave the US government the keys to past and future events. My guess is that the quantum access capabilities that Project Pegasus provided the US government are now headquartered at some form of national intelligence center that provides the President, the intelligence community and the military information about future events.
Q: Was just the military involved or was the government also involved?
Andrew D. Basiago: Project Pegasus combined individuals employed by the US military (Navy, DARPA), the US intelligence community (CIA) and civilian defense contractors (e.g., Parsons). It was a research and development program of the US Department of Defense (DoD).
Q: How could a father actually put his son through all of these violent and possibly fatal transportation experiments?
Andrew D. Basiago: It is my position that my father and I were proud to serve our country during its hour of maximum danger and were also privileged to be involved in America's early activities in time-space exploration. My father did not involve me in Project Pegasus. Rather, we were approached by the US government and told we had to be involved for reasons that remain a mystery. In all likelihood, we were identified by project personnel from the future, who knew from the perspective of their time that we had been involved in the program, and hence we were brought into the program to create the future program that had knowledge of our past involvement.
Q: Why was not an adult the one transported so that the information brought back might be more precise?
Andrew D. Basiago: Children were involved for five main reasons. First, we were experimental test subjects into the physical and mental effects of teleportation on children. Second, we were necessary participants because the holograms produced by the chronovisors would collapse if adults were involved and so small, cooperative, intelligent human beings were needed as the time travelers in the chronovisor probes, and therefore a decision was made to involve gifted and talented American school children. Third, we were regarded as better participant-observers of the past and future events accessed in the program because children are tabula rasa -- blank slates whose perceptions are not skewed by the selection bias produced by their previous experiences. Fourth, we were trainees who were expected to become America's first generation of "chrononauts" in a fully fledged time-space program when we grew up. Fifth and lastly, the Department of Defense found that when adults were involved in time travel, the psychologically destabilizing effects of moving between alternate time lines was causing some adult time travelers to become insane, so it was hoped that by training time travelers from childhood a competent cadre of US time travelers could be formed.
Q: How could a child possibly be put through all of this and also remember everything he saw or even understand what he saw or heard?
Andrew D. Basiago: I am a gifted individual with exceptional powers of observation and memory. These gifts were identified when I was being trained in Project Pegasus. In one test, I recited back random numbers provided to me verbally to 84 places. I was identified as the future whistle blower about Project Pegasus even while I was still serving on the project. I have spent over 10 years investigating my experiences and proving them to an historical certainty. I am an individual who did remember what I saw and heard, so it is not valid to say that I couldn't have done so because a child couldn't or shouldn't have been able to. That involves the fallacy of using the general to refute the specific. I not only remembered much of what I saw and heard, but I later wrote it down and went back and investigated it and proved my memories. Consequently, I am now able to provide an insider's account of the US government's time-space program at the time of its emergence in the late 1960's and early 1970's.
This multi-part series on quantum access technologies, their application to the events of September 11, 2001, and the consequent implications for our society will be continued in Part II.
_____________________ COPYRIGHT: Permission to use extracts & copyright notice
Copyright Alfred Lambremont Webre JD, MEd, All right reserved
Permission is granted to include extracts of this article on websites and email lists provided a link is included to the original article.
This article is copyrighted and should not be added in its entirety on other websites or email lists without author's written permission. For permission please contact: exopolitics@exopolitics.com. Thank you.
2. YOU TUBE: "Unraveling the Soetoro-Obama Deception" Alfred Lambremont Webre with host. Robert Stanley.
The final judgment in the GA case against Obama's ballot eligibility is a fraud because it rules Obama's April 27, 2011 Birth Certificate is genuine, and not the obvious forgery it it.
Andrew D. Basiago, lawyer, writer, and statesman, was one of America’s early time-space explorers and is an emerging figure in the Truth Movement.
Alfred Lambremont Webre, lawyer, cosmologist, and futurist, was the founder of Exopolitics and is one of the leading commentators of the Time-Space Age.
On February 25, 2012, Andy and Alfred will appear together at the Awakening Center in Rainier, Washington to unravel the Obama/Mars connection.
In this seven-hour presentation, they will explore the deep politics of President Barack Obama's background, including his involvement in the CIA’s Mars visitation program of the 1980’s, which Andy contends Obama served in with him, William B. Stillings, Regina E. Dugan, and others.
Recently, Andy appeared with William B. Stillings and Laura M. Eisenhower on talk radio’s Coast to Coast AM and described the US government’s 30-year cover-up of its “jump room” technology, as reported by Alfred while he was the Seattle Exopolitics Examiner.
The White House responded by publishing an unofficial “official” denial on the pages of Wired.com and the Examiner, in a blatant act of censorship, retaliated by dropping Alfred as an examiner.
The truth marches on, however, and Andy and Alfred continue their efforts as two of our most fearless contemporary truth tellers.
You don’t want to miss this unprecedented talk. Reserve your seat at this exciting truth event now, while tickets are still available
WHEN: SATURDAY, FEB 25, 2012 9 AM - 5 PM WHERE: AWAKENING CENTER, RAINIER, WA. WHO: ANDREW D. BASIAGO & ALFRED LAMBREMONT WEBRE WHAT:"THE OBAMA/MARS CONNECTION" WHY: TRUTH
1. PUBLIC EVENT - The Awakening Center – Rainier, WA – 2/25/2012 – "Unraveling the Obama/Mars Connection" with Andrew D. Basiago and Alfred Lambremont Webre
There is empirical evidence supporting the hypothesis that the events of September 11, 2001 (“9/11”), which involved attacks upon the World Trade Center in New York City, and the Pentagon in Washington, D.C., may in fact have been a hyperdimensional “false flag operation”. The hypothesis that 9/11 may be a hyperdimensional false flag operation is advanced in HIGH STRANGENESS: Hyperdimensions and the Process of Alien Abduction, a book by France-based author Laura Knight-Jadczyk. The term “hyperdimensional” means “of or pertaining to a system having more dimensions than naturally found in our universe.” “False flag operations” are defined as “covert operations conducted by governments, corporations, or other organizations, which are designed to deceive the public in such a way that the operations appear as though they are being carried out by other entities. The name is derived from the military concept of flying false colors; that is, flying the flag of a country other than one's own. False flag operations are not limited to war and counter-insurgency operations, and have been used in peace-time; for example, during Italy's strategy of tension.”
The model of 9/11 which a “critical channeling” research source sets out in Knight-Jadczyk’s book holds that the events of September 11, 2001 were in fact a “hyperdimensional false flag operation”, created with converging planning and involvement of a 3rd density “consortium” of corrupt human military and elites and 4th density hostile reptilian (hyperdimensional) Extraterrestrials. The purpose of this series of investigative articles is to examine the evidence supporting this hypothesis about 9/11.
According to the hyperdimensional model, 3rd density refers to the space-time dimension of reality that we humans conventionally inhabit. In the 4th density, time is no longer the regulating dimension it is in our 3rd density, and 4th density beings can travel backward and forwards in time, thus facilitating intervention in 3rd density human public affairs.
This series of articles will investigate 9/11 as a possible hyperdimensional false flag event, including the empirical evidence for (1) 9/11 as a false flag operation by a “consortium” of corrupt human military and elites; (2) the use of exotic weapons in the 9/11 false flag operation; (3) the possibility use of hyperdimensional weapons in the false flag event of 9/11; (4) the evidence for joint operations and agreements between a “consortium” of corrupt human military and elites and hyperdimensional predatory reptilian 4 D Extraterrestrials; (5) how the war crimes network behind the 9/11 false flag event can be brought to justice; (6) how to diminish the destabilizing influence of 4D predatory reptilian Extraterrestrials in human public affairs.
Because of space limitations, this article is limited to evidence for (1) 9/11 as a false flag operation by a “consortium” of corrupt human military and elites. Other components of this investigative series will be covered in future articles.
9/11 as a hyperdimensional false flag operation
Laura Knight-Jadczyk’s hypothesis is that a predatory reptilian Extraterrestrial group is targeting our 3rd density human civilization with de-stabilizing events such at the false flag operation of September 11, 2001 in order to ultimately replace our present human civilization with a hybrid reptilian race.
Included in the de-stabilizing targeting operations by predatory reptilian hyperdimensional ETs, is a program of alien abductions sponsored by the 4th density reptilians, and carried out the by 3rd density Gray alien surrogates and black operations of within the military-intelligence world. By one scientific study, up to 6.3 million Americans, or 2% of the U.S. population has been abducted under this hyperdimensional reptilian ET program.
The 9/11 “hyperdimensional false flag operation” model is consistent with empirical evidence gathered at the crime scenes of the 9/11 attacks. (1) There is compelling evidence that the September 11, 2001 attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon were a false flag operation conducted by a corrupt military and elite international war crimes racketeering network (“consortium”) using advanced exotic weapons, for the purpose of launching an international war of aggression (War on Terror) and imposing a domestic police state (martial law) worldwide. (2) There is also preliminary evidence of a hyperdimensional involvement in the 9/11 attacks.
If the 9/11 hyperdimensional false flag operation is in any degree factual or true, such a conclusion would have far-reaching implications in any deep analysis of the forces shaping important current world public events, such as the 9/11-inspired War on Terror (2001 – present), and 9/11 inspired domestic police state measures such as the PATRIOT Act in the United States and similar martial law legislation elsewhere.
The 9/11 hyperdimensional model, involving the interaction and coordination of a 3rd density powerful human “consortium” and hostile 4th density Extraterrestrials with whom this consortium has working agreements, also would explain why the mysteries of 9/11 have not been successfully explained to date, either by (co-opted) official investigations, or a community of 9/11 researchers, working world-wide since September 11, 2001, to solve the crimes of 9/11 within a conventional 3D science paradigm.
This article presents a convergence of science-based evidence about a possible 9/11 hyperdimensional false flag operation not presented elsewhere. The article seeks to investigate new pathways significant step in moving toward a solution of the 9/11 crimes which until now have seemed unsolvable by official bodies, parliamentary initiatives, and a wide, planetary 9/11 research community.
The leaders of the G-20 Nations and most of the other 192 United Member nations and organizations continue publicly to support programs of international wars of aggression and domestic homeland security (police state) measures worldwide by publicly referring to “the terrorist attacks on 9/11” as a pretext.
The evidence in this article serves as a threshold foundation to show that the only “9/11 terrorists” are a consortium of corrupt human military and elites, plausibly acting in concert with hyperdimensional reptilian Extraterrestrials of hostile intent toward humankind. This hostile hyperdimensional 4D reptilian ET intent – in concert with a corrupt human consortium - may be what originally created the false flag operations of 9/11 and continues to be used as a pretext by Earth's 192 national governments and numerous international institutions to create a planet enmeshed in seemingly endless war, crime, disease and povert
9/11 as a false flag operation by a “consortium” of corrupt human military and elites
The issue of establishing operational and legal culpability for the events of September 11, 2001 has deeply divided public opinion in the U.S. and in other societies. One scholarly organization states, “in July of 2006, a Scripps Howard and Ohio University poll concluded that, ‘Thirty-six percent of respondents overall said it is ‘very likely’ or ‘somewhat likely’ that certain federal officials either participated in the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon or took no action to stop them’, and ‘sixteen percent said it's ‘very likely’ or ‘somewhat likely’ that the collapse of the twin towers in New York was aided by explosives secretly planted in the two buildings.’"
Polls of United States and Canadian audiences about 9/11 culpability are somewhat divergent. A poll of New York citizens (targets of the 9/11 attacks) shows a relatively high opinion of a conscious conspiracy by “U.S. Leaders”. “In August of 2004, a Zogby International poll indicated that 49.3% New York City residents and 41% of New York citizens ‘overall’ say US Leaders ‘knew in advance that attacks were planned on or around September 11, 2001, and that they consciously failed to act.’ The poll, released on August 30, 2004, also found that 66% called for a new probe.”
Canadian poll audiences, by contrast tend to be more conservative than the New York 9/11 target audience: “In September of 2006, an Ipsos-Reid poll found that 22 percent of Canadians believe ‘the attacks on the United States on September 11, 2001, had nothing to do with Osama Bin Laden and were actually a plot by influential Americans.’"
We must turn to the law of criminal culpability around the events of 9/11 – and not to public opinion polls - to find a universal standard around which the concept that the events of September 11, 2001 were a false flag operation undertaken by an organized group. The constitutional standards as to what constitutes treason towards the United States, and what constitutes criminal conspiracy or racketeering can provide the objective standard under the laws of evidence. If prima facie evidence of treasonous action and/or criminal conspiracy planning and executing the events of 9/11 can be established, then established constitutional and criminal law provide the basis or proceeding against the perpetrators of 9/11. Prima facie evidence – evidence of criminal culpability which on its face warrants investigation or criminal charges – is the basis by which constitutional societies achieve an objective standard to determine whether or not a “consortium” of corrupt human military and elites planned and caused 9/11 to occur as a false flag operation for specific reasons and outcomes.
The objective legal and evidentiary standards of the 9/11 Treason Independent Prosecutor Act
The Congressional Memorandum accompanying the 9/11 Independent Prosecutor Act sets out prima facie evidence that a “consortium” of corrupt human military and elites planned and carried out the false flag operation on September 11, 2001. Both the 9/11 Independent Prosecutor Act and the Congressional Memorandum were presented for review and action to senior staff of the Judiciary Committee of the U.S. House of Representatives in November 2006, shortly after the defeat of the Neo-conservative Republicans in the U.S. mid-term elections on November 7, 2006. Senior staff of the Judiciary Committee indicated they would be meeting with and presenting the Congressional Memorandum accompanying the 9/11 Independent Prosecutor Act to the incoming chairman of the U.S. House Judiciary, Rep. John Conyers, Jr. (D-MI) during the 2006 Thanksgiving Break in at the congressman’s headquarters in Detroit, MI. Despite reported statements by senior staff that there was sufficient prima facie evidence in the Congressional Memorandum to proceed with appointment of a public prosecutor to investigate and prosecute apparent treason and war crimes by a “consortium” of corrupt military and elites, no statement was ever issued by the chairman of the U.S. House Judiciary committee, and the draft bill (9/11 Independent Prosecutor Act) still awaits his official action.
9/11 Truth & Reconciliation
Documents of the 9/11 Truth & Reconciliation can be read at:
It sets out the prima facie evidence that a consortium of corrupt human military and elites planned and coordinated false flag operation on September 11, 2001, which constitutes treason under Article III of the U.S. constitution.
The executive summary of the Act and congressional memorandum, as presented to the chairman of the U.S. House Judiciary Committee, Rep. John Conyers, Jr. is as follows:
Executive Summary - The September 11 Treason Independent Prosecutor Act
Question: What Is the September 11 Treason Independent Prosecutor Act?
Answer: The Act is a Public Act of the United States Congress, and a Joint Resolution of the U.S. Senate and U.S. House of Representatives in the U.S. Congress. Any U.S. Senator and any U.S. Representative at no cost can introduce it simply by handing the Act to the Clerk according to official rules.
Question: What is the purpose of the September 11 Treason Independent Prosecutor Act?
Answer: The act would appoint an independent prosecutor under the authority of Article III (3) of the U.S. Constitution to prosecute treason against these United States of America by then U.S. President George W. Bush, U.S. Vice President Richard B. Cheney, U.S. Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld and other John and Jane Does for planning and carrying out the acts of treason, as defined in Article III (3) of the U.S. Constitution, by conspiring to carry out, carrying out, and/or causing to be carried out an armed attack upon these United States on September 11, 2001, as part of a False Flag Operation. Article III of the U.S. Constitution provides that, "Sect. 3. Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying war against them, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort...."
On September 11, 1998, the U.S. House of Representatives Judiciary Committee released a report by Independent Prosecutor, Kenneth Starr, which eventually led to an Article of Impeachment against President William Jefferson Clinton under Article II of the U.S. Constitution.
Question: What are the main grounds for concluding that there is prima facie evidence that the named individuals – then U.S. President George W. Bush, U.S. Vice President Richard B. Cheney, U.S. Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld - abused the power of their office and committed Article III Treason on September 11, 2001?
Answer: This is what the congressional memorandum accompanying The September 11, 2001 Treason Independent Prosecutor Act states:
VII. Summation: The 9/11 Attacks as Acts of Treason
The facts recited above constitute prima facie evidence that the named individuals---then U.S. President George W. Bush, U.S. Vice President Richard B. Cheney, U.S. Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld---and other John and Jane Does are independently and jointly guilty of Treason against these United States under Article III (3) of the U.S. Constitution, because:
I. The attacks of 9/11, as portrayed in the official account, could not have succeeded if standard operating procedures between the FAA and NORAD had been followed. The Pentagon, then under the leadership of Donald Rumsfeld, has provided three mutually inconsistent accounts of NORAD’s response, which means that at least two of them are false. Moreover, a wide range of facts, including evidence that the FAA had notified NORAD in a timely fashion, contradicts the third account, articulated by the 9/11 Commission. There must have been stand-down orders, and these could have come only from the highest levels of the Pentagon and the White House.
II. Overwhelming evidence exists that the collapses of the Twin Towers and Building 7 were instances of controlled demolition. But al-Qaeda operatives could not have obtained the needed access to the buildings to plant the explosives and would not have ensured that the buildings come straight down. The controlled demolition, therefore, had to be the work of insiders. That President Bush was one of those insiders is suggested by the fact that his brother and cousin were principals in the company in charge of WTC security. Complicity at the highest levels of the federal government is also indicated by the removal of evidence (the collapsed steel), which is normally a federal offense. Finally, if the airplane strikes could have occurred only with the consent of the president and the secretary of defense (as suggested in the previous point), the coordination of these strikes with the demolition of the buildings implies their involvement in the latter as well.
III. Overwhelming evidence also exists for the conclusion that the attack on the Pentagon was an inside job. That the official story could not be true is evident from many facts: Hani Hanjour’s incompetence; the choice of the west wing as the target; the impossibility of a commercial airliner’s coming back to Washington undetected and hitting the Pentagon unless permitted; and the lack of physical evidence consistent with an attack by a Boeing 757. That the strike was an inside job is implied by the falsity of the official story, the evidence that the strike was made by a military aircraft, the removal of evidence, and the government’s refusal to release videos of the strike. This operation could hardly have been planned without the involvement of then Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld.
IV. Complicity at the highest levels of the federal government is also indicated by then President Bush’s remaining at the school after it was evident---given the truth of the official account---that the United States was experiencing a surprise attack. This behavior makes sense only if Bush and his lead Secret Service agent knew that there would be no attack on the school.
V. The complicity of then Vice President Cheney in the attack on the Pentagon and the downing of Flight 93 is implied by the testimony of Secretary Mineta in conjunction with the false claims of the 9/11 Commission, under the guidance of administration insider Philip Zelikow, as to when Cheney went to the PEOC and when he issued the shoot-down authorization.
VI. The conclusion from the evidence that members of the then Bush administration orchestrated the attacks of 9/11 is reinforced by the fact that they had some huge projects---prosecuting wars in Afghanistan and Iraq and obtaining funding to accelerate the technological transformation of the military---that would likely be possible only in the event of “a new Pearl Harbor.”
Caveat lector: This memorandum is based upon the best public research resources presently available. It is presented not as a full treatment of the subject but as merely a brief summary pointing to the existence of sufficient prima facie evidence to warrant the appointment of an independent prosecutor.
Question: Where can I find more information about the September 11, 2001 Treason Independent Prosecutor Act?
Answer: You can find more information at the Internet information website for the 9/11 Treason Independent Prosecutor Act at:
This prima facie evidence that a “consortium” of corrupt human military and elites caused the attacks of September 11, 2001 as a false flag operation is the first component of a number of component this series of articles establishes in assembling an avenue of solution to the mystery of 9/11. Let us now proceed to the second component – exotic weapons as well as intentional misdirection or psyops used in the false flag operation of September 11, 2001.
The use of exotic weapons in the 9/11 false flag operation
To be continued in Part II of this investigative series on 9/11 as a hyperdimensional false flag operation.
_____________________ COPYRIGHT: Permission to use extracts & copyright notice
Copyright Alfred Lambremont Webre JD, MEd, All right reserved
Permission is granted to include extracts of this article on websites and email lists provided a link is included to the original article.
This article is copyrighted and should not be added in its entirety on other websites or email lists without author's written permission. For permission please contact: exopolitics@exopolitics.com. Thank you.
Mars visitors Basiago and Stillings confirm Barack Obama traveled to Mars
By Alfred Lambremont Webre, JD, MEd
Two former participants in the CIA’s Mars visitation program of the early 1980’s have confirmed that U.S. President Barack H. Obama was enrolled in their Mars training class in 1980 and was among the young Americans from the program who they later encountered on the Martian surface after reaching Mars via “jump room.”
Andrew D. Basiago, 50, a lawyer in Washington State who served in DARPA’s time travel program Project Pegasus in the 1970’s, and fellow chrononaut William B. Stillings, 44, who was tapped by the Mars program for his technical genius, have publicly confirmed that Obama was enrolled in their Mars training class in 1980 and that each later encountered Obama during visits to rudimentary U.S. facilities on Mars that took place from 1981 to 1983.
Their astonishing revelations provide a new dimension to the controversy surrounding President Obama’s background and pose the possibility that it is an elaborate ruse to conceal Obama’s participation as a young man in the U.S. secret space program.
Mars training class held for future Mars visitors
According to Mr. Basiago and Mr. Stillings, in Summer 1980 they attended a three-week factual seminar about Mars to prepare them for trips that were then later taken to Mars via teleportation. The course was taught by remote viewing pioneer Major Ed Dames, who was then serving as a scientific and technical intelligence officer for the U.S. Army. It was held at The College of the Siskiyous, a small college near Mt. Shasta in California.
They state that ten teenagers were enrolled in the Mars training program. In addition to Basiago and Stillings, two of the eight other teenagers in Major Dames’ class that they can identify today were Barack Obama, who was then using the name “Barry Soetoro,” and Regina Dugan, who Mr. Obama appointed the 19th director and first female director of the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) in 2009.
As many as seven parents of the ten students, all with ties to the CIA, audited the class. They included Raymond F. Basiago, an engineer for The Ralph M. Parsons Company who was the chief technical liaison between Parsons and the CIA on Tesla-based teleportation; Thomas Stillings, an operations analyst for the Lockheed Corporation who had served with the Office of Naval Intelligence; and Mr. Obama’s mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, who carried out assignments for the CIA in Kenya and Indonesia.
From 1981 to 1983, the young attendees then went on to teleport to Mars via a “jump room” located in a building occupied by Hughes Aircraft at 999 N. Sepulveda Boulevard in El Segundo, California, adjacent to the Los Angeles International Airport (LAX).
Obama identified as having visited Mars at least twice
Mr. Basiago and Mr. Stillings have each issued public statements confirming that they both attended Mars training with Mr. Obama and later encountered him on Mars during separate visits.
On August 21, 2011, Mr. Basiago stated: "Something highly significant has happened, and that is that two individuals from the same Mars training class in 1980 (Basiago and Stillings) have met and are comparing experiences and are able to corroborate not only that they were on the surface of Mars together but that before reaching Mars via jump room they were trained with a group of teenagers that included the current President of the United States (Obama) and director of DARPA (Dugan)."
Mr. Stillings’ statement, released at the same time, read: "I can confirm that Andrew D. Basiago and Barack Obama (then using the name "Barry Soetoro") were in my Mars training course in Summer 1980 and that during the time period 1981 to 1983, I encountered Andy, Courtney M. Hunt of the CIA, and other Americans on the surface of Mars after reaching Mars via the "jump room" in El Segundo, California.”
In a statement made Sept 20, 2011, Mr. Basiago confirmed Mr. Obama’s co-participation in the 1980 Mars training class, stating: “Barry Soetoro, a student at Occidental College, was in my Mars training class under Major Ed Dames at The College of the Siskiyous in Weed, California in 1980. That fact has been corroborated by one of my other classmates, Brett Stillings. Two years later, when he was taller, thinner, more mature, a better listener, using the name ‘Barack Obama,’ and attending a different college, Columbia University, we crossed paths again in Los Angeles and I didn't recognize him as the person that I had been trained with in the Mars program and encountered on the surface of Mars. In fact, doing so would have been virtually impossible in any case, because measures had been taken to block our later memories of Mars shortly after we completed our training in 1980.”
Mr. Basiago states that during one of his trips to Mars via “jump room” that took place from 1981 to 1983, he was sitting on a wall beneath an arching roof that covered one of the “jump room” facilities as he watched Mr. Obama walk back to the jump room from across the Martian terrain. When Mr. Obama walked past him and Mr. Basiago acknowledged him, Mr. Obama stated, with some sense of fatalism: “Now we’re here!”
Mr. Stillings states that during one of his visits to Mars, he walked out of the “jump room” facility and encountered Mr. Obama standing beside the facility by himself staring vacantly into a ravine located adjacent to the facility.
Mr. Basiago thinks that it is virtually certain that Ms. Dugan also went to Mars, because he once encountered her at the building in El Segundo where the “jump room” to Mars was located as he was entering the building to jump to Mars and she was exiting it. “I know you!” she said, greeting him as she passed him in the lobby of the building.
"Robert: I listened to tonight's show and all my mind keeps saying is Wow. I did know quite a bit about the Soetero/Obama situation, but some of it was new...but very complicated. The last 40 minutes or so was what really blew me away...I thought I was pretty up on stuff but what you two were talking about I knew nothing about. I have got to listen to the last part again so I can get my head around it. I don't have long-distance on my phone so I can't call in. The person who called in I really liked the way he was talking and truthfully I don't have anyone around me that talks like you, him, Alfred, nor Alex. I have to admit that I have been thinking that men were way behind the eight ball about this stuff, boy was I wrong. Makes me wish I was where I could talk with different people about all these subjects... all I got is the internet. and nowadays it is hard to find out what really is truth. I finally found your articles to read so I will do that also. A person thinks they got a pretty good handle on info and then they just get knocked on their butt when they listen to the different radio shows that are out there now. I have been researching for 12 years on the internet and it is like I know nothing compared to what I am hearing on the radio show I have been listening to the past few months. I will have to see if the library has your books and Alfred's. THANKS great great show !!!
PUBLIC EVENT-Rescheduled to Feb. 18, 2012: "The Obama/Mars Connection" with Andrew D. Basiago and Alfred Lambremont Webre@The Awakening Center, Rainier, WA 9AM - 5 PM.
Andrew D. Basiago, lawyer, writer, and statesman, was one of America’s early time-space explorers and is an emerging figure in the Truth Movement.
Alfred Lambremont Webre, lawyer, cosmologist, and futurist, was the founder of Exopolitics and is one of the leading commentators of the Time-Space Age.
On February 25, 2012, Andy and Alfred will appear together at the Awakening Center in Rainier, Washington to unravel the Obama/Mars connection.
In this seven-hour presentation, they will explore the deep politics of President Barack Obama's background, including his involvement in the CIA’s Mars visitation program of the 1980’s, which Andy contends Obama served in with him, William B. Stillings, Regina E. Dugan, and others.
Recently, Andy appeared with William B. Stillings and Laura M. Eisenhower on talk radio’s Coast to Coast AM and described the US government’s 30-year cover-up of its “jump room” technology, as reported by Alfred while he was the Seattle Exopolitics Examiner.
The White House responded by publishing an unofficial “official” denial on the pages of Wired.com and the Examiner, in a blatant act of censorship, retaliated by dropping Alfred as an examiner.
The truth marches on, however, and Andy and Alfred continue their efforts as two of our most fearless contemporary truth tellers.
You don’t want to miss this unprecedented talk. Reserve your seat at this exciting truth event now, while tickets are still available
WHEN: SATURDAY, FEB 25, 2012 9 AM - 5 PM WHERE: AWAKENING CENTER, RANIER, WA. WHO: ANDREW D. BASIAGO & ALFRED LAMBREMONT WEBRE WHAT:"THE OBAMA/MARS CONNECTION" WHY: TRUTH
1. PUBLIC EVENT - The Awakening Center – Rainier, WA – 2/25/2012 – "Unraveling the Obama/Mars Connection" with Andrew D. Basiago and Alfred Lambremont Webre
From Tacoma or Seattle, Washington: Take I-5 South Take exit 116 for Mounts Rd toward Old Nisqually Turn left at Mounts Rd SW/Nisqually Rd SW Continue onto Nisquallly Rd/Old Pacific Hwy SE Turn left at Reservation Rd SE Turn left at WA-510 E/St Clair Cutoff Rd Turn right at WA-507 S/1st St S Turn right at Minnesota St N Continue onto Rainier Rd SE Turn left at 138th Ave SE/Page Rd SE Left to 10905 138th Ave SE Rainier, WA 98576
From Portland, Oregon: Take I-5 North Take exit 88A toward Tenino Merge onto Old Hwy 99 SE/Tenino Grand Mound Rd SW Slight left at S Wichman St Turn right at N Wichman St SE Continue onto W Sussex Ave Continue onto WA-507 N/Park Ave E Turn left at Military Rd SE Slight right at 138th Ave SE/Page Rd SE Left to 10905 138th Ave SE, Rainier, WA 98576
From Olympia/Lacey, WA: Take College St. out of Lacey until it turns into Rainier Rd. Take Rainier Rd. all the way into Rainier Turn right on 138th Ave. SE Go approximately 1000 ft. down 138th Ave. SE to 10905 Awakening Center WA Turn left at 10905 138th Ave. SE
My 1970s meeting with DARPA's Project Pegasus secret time travel program
By Alfred Lambremont Webre, JD, MEd
In 1971-72, while I was General Counsel and Assistant Administrator of the New York City Environmental Protection Administration (now called a "Department") under Mayor John V. Lindsay, I was invited to speak to a group calling themselves the "Delaware Valley Industrial Engineering Association."
At the time, I was often in the New York city newspapers, especially the New York Post, whose then environmental reporter Steve Lawrence, reported widely on the my activities enforcing the New York City air pollution, water pollution, noise pollution and solid waste laws and regulations with the half-dozen activist environmental lawyers in my office. Invitations for me to speak publicly on environmental issues were frequent, and when I was invited to speak by this organization, I accepted.
"Delaware Valley Industrial Engineering Association."
On the day of my talk, a representative of the organization came my office on the 23rd floor of the New York City Municipal Building and together we set off in his car. He was a middle-aged bureaucrat-type; very different from the community-based environmental groups I often spoke to.
On the trip to the venue of the talk, we exchanged pleasantries. The representative was, however, mostly silent and unlike the environmental activist group representatives I was used to dealing with.
The car trip grew much longer than expected. I queried my host where we were going and he would simply smile and say something like "We will get there soon."
According to one source, the Delaware Valley is "The Delaware Valley is a term used to refer to the metropolitan area centered on the city of Philadelphia in the United States....The Delaware Valley is composed of several counties in southeastern Pennsylvania and southern New Jersey...The majority of the region's populace resides in Pennsylvania and New Jersey."
Delaware Valley and DARPA Project Pegasus
Andrew D. Basiago, a Washington-state attorney and childhood participant in DARPA Project Pegasus (1968-72), has stated that many of the East-coast U.S. functions of DARPA's Project Pegasus were centered in New Jersey in the 1971-72-time period.
We finally arrived several hours later at a nondescript office building and entered a hall on one of the upper floors of the office building. There was a lectern at the front of the hall, where I would speak.
There were about 50 or so people in the audience of the hall, all expecting me. The people in the audience were not at all like the community-based environmental activist audiences I usually spoke to in New York City at that time. The people in this audience were all male, dressed uniformly in shirts with ties or suits.
Smirks on the faces of the bureaucrats
As I approached the podium and was being introduced, I scanned the audience. I would make out a noticeable smirk on the faces of a number of the audience members. This was unusual, as environmental audiences at the time did not smirk, were not dressed in bland office garb, and were not uniformly male bureaucratic types.
As I spoke, I felt that I was being observed and measured for performance in a way that was unspoken and did not relate at all to the content of my talk, which was the urban environmental agenda of the early 1970s.
At the end of the talk I was asked a few perfunctory questions and then soundly applauded, which surprised me. I was given a mug with the words "Delaware Valley Industrial Engineering Association" on it. I kept the mug in my NYC EPA office as a memento.
If I were to summarize how I would characterize the experience at the time, I would say "cognitive dissonance." The audience and the true purpose in inviting me to speak did not add up and in my judgment had nothing to do with my role as a crusading environmental lawyer.
In researching this article, I was not able to locate a "Delaware Valley Industrial Engineering Association," and I doubt that such an organization ever existed except as a cover for a DARPA covert time travel surveillance event of Alfred Lambremont Webre.
Project Pegasus and Alfred Lambremont Webre
Andrew D. Basiago has revealed that the reason Project Pegasus was able to identify Jimmy Carter, who was the then Governor of George, in 1971, as a future U.S. President, is that the Project Pegasus was in possession of a copy of Exopolitics: Politics, Government and Law in the Universe by Alfred Lambremont Webre—a book that this reporter would not write until 1999 and would not be published as a library book until 2005, but which bears a quote on its front pages of a statement made by President Jimmy Carter.
