VANCOUVER, BC - EbolaGate is actually a Vaccine-inducement/Bioweapons False Flag attack strategy, with many sophisticated alternative scenarios, some of which may or may not materialize as in all false flags. The basic premise is to start an Ebola "outbreak", followed by an inducement campaign to take vaccones that themseves are genetic bioweapons, in West African countries where local immune systems and health profiles are compromised, there are unsanitary conditions, little public health care, and martial law quarantines for mass infection can easily be imposed (as when towns of 50,000 persons are now being quarantined rather than the infected persons in the towns). Instead of being treated with known Vitamin C and immune system treatments, local populations are given ineffective treatments, or worse, treatments that are themselves bioweapons. The scenario here, led by WHO, is to covertly maximize infection rates and vector propagation, shred local health care and public order (nurses are now on strike in one country). This scenario is aimed at (1) creating a base for an African Bioweapons genocide, long sought because of the mineral, oil and gas wealth of Africa [Think of the US Rangers infecting of South Africa with the AIDS virus embedded in the small pox vaccine in the mid 1990s] (2) Providing the jumping-off point for mutation of the EbolaGate viruses and their traveling via air travel, sea travel, land, to Europe, India, Asia, and North and South America. In North America there awaits a sophisticated Ebola Gate False Flag machine led by WHO-CDC [Nazi-CIA] and Martial law regulations signed by George Bush I & II, Clinton, and Obama that can mandate FEMA incarceration and mass vaccinations with EbolaGate vaccines that maim or kill as part of the depopulation plan.
To see the estimated death toll, under current infection rates of Ebola gate by June 2016 of Infected persons: 4,707,573,324 [4.7 Billion] Dead persons: 2,877,739,573 [2.8 billion] please go to:
This generation of vaccines is not the vaccine people imagine in which a bit of antigen from some disease is injected into the person to stimulate antibodies.
Skipping over whether that ever worked or not, people might want to know the current vaccines are DNA vaccines.
They shoot patented genetically modified stuff into people, intended for "uptake" by the person's DNA. Skipping over whether once someone has patented material in them the corporations might claim ownership of organs or blood. This is just what Monsanto does of crops in which their patented DNA shows up in farmers' plants, even if by accident of wind and pollen, or caused to be there by Monsanto itself.
Whether a corporation which owns the patent on what is being injected into people's children might make claims on that child's body or not, people might want to stop and consider what the genetically modified stuff consists of in the first place.
They might especially want to do that since the genetically engineered material is specifically meant to alter their DNA, their body's blue print. (Would you let someone come in and alter the blue print of the house you are building without permission, and without seeing what's in their plans?)
So, what's in these DNA (GMO) vaccines?
There is SV 40 there, for a starter. It causes cancer. But it's just a starter.
Another consideration is the choice of promoter. The SV40 promoter was conventionally used until research showed that vectors driven by the Rous Sarcoma Virus (RSV) promoter had much higher expression rates. More recently, expression rates have been further increased by the use of the cytomegalovirus (CMV) immediate early promoter. Inclusion of the Mason-Pfizer monkey virus (MPV)-CTE with/without rev increased envelope expression. Furthermore the CTE+rev construct was significantly more immunogenic than CTE-alone vector.  Additional modifications to improve expression rates have included the insertion of enhancer sequences, synthetic introns, adenovirus tripartite leader (TPL) sequences and modifications to the polyadenylation and transcriptional termination sequences. An example of DNA vaccine plasmid is pVAC, it uses SV40 promoter.
SV 40 was in the polio vaccines in the 1950s. It was banned in vaccines in 1961 because it causes tumors. But they are still using it though it led to an epidemic of soft tissue cancers.
SV40 was the 40th virus found in rhesus monkey kidney cells when these cells were used to make the polio vaccine. This virus contaminated both the Inactivated Polio Vaccine (IPV) created by Dr. Jonas Salk and the Oral or "Live" Polio Vaccine (OPV) created by Dr. Albert Sabin.
Children being fed sugar cubes with the oral polio vaccine. Circa 1961.
In 1961, SV40 was discovered by Dr. Bernice Eddy of the National Institute of Health, Division of Biologics when she took the material used to grow polio vaccines and injected it into hamsters. Tumors grew in the hamsters. Her discovery was subsequently validated by Drs. Maurice Hilliman and Benjamin Sweet of Merck.
Upon the discovery that SV40 was an animal carcinogen that had found its way into the polio vaccines, a new federal law was passed in 1961 that required that no vaccines contain this virus. However, this law did not require that SV40 contaminated vaccines be thrown away or that the contaminated seed material (used to make all polio vaccines for the next four decades) be discarded. As a result, known SV40 contaminated vaccines were injected into children up until 1963. In addition, it has been alleged that there have been SV40-contaminated batches of oral polio vaccine administered to some children until the end of the 1990's.
Rhesus Macaque (Macaca mulatta)
Poor monkey. He didn't make the polio vaccines.
And he didn't get those cancer causing polio vaccines containing SV 40 mandated, either.
How have the vaccine corporations been able to go forward with selling those vaccines? How can the CDC urge parents to let their children be injected with vaccines unapproved in the US for use in humans?
But shocking as it is that the DNA vaccines (most of what's on the market) have not been approved to be given to people, when one looks at what is included in these new DNA (GMO) vaccines, it's hard not to think "Good God, are they out of their minds?"
So what else in these DNA (GMO) vaccines?
The Rous Sarcoma virus (RSV) is also there, being used as a promoter. It's quite a nasty cancer-causing virus, .just like SV 40, but maybe more so. (Is a sarcoma - a connective tissue cancer - harder to treat that a soft tissue one?).
In 1911, Peyton Rous discovered that cancer could be induced in healthy chickens by injecting them with a cell-free extract of the tumor of a sick chicken.
He ground up samples of the tumor and passed the material through a filter with pores so fine that not even bacteria could get through. However, the tumor filtrate was able to induce cancer when injected into chickens.
This was the first demonstration of an oncogenic virus — that is, a virus capable of causing cancer. The tumor was a sarcoma, a tumor of connective tissue. The virus was named the Rous sarcoma virus (RSV).
The Rous sarcoma virus is a retrovirus (as is HIV, the virus that causes AIDS).
As soon as RSV infects a cell, its reverse transcriptase synthesizes DNA copies of its genome. These enter the nucleus of the cell and insert themselves randomly throughout the DNA of the host's chromosomes.
Normal gene transcription within the nucleus now produces an RSV messenger RNA (mRNA) that reenters the cytoplasm. Some copies of this mRNA are then translated by the normal machinery (e.g., ribosomes) of the host cell into protein products. Other copies of the RNA become incorporated into new virus particles.
.... each end of the RNA molecule has a set of repeated sequences of nucleotides ("R" and "P") that perform at least two important functions:
they enable the DNA copies of RSV to insert into the host's DNA and
they act as enhancers, causing the host nucleus to transcribe the RSV genes at a rapid rate.
After looking at what RSV does to DNA, to say these DNA vaccines affect DNA seems a sizable understatement. RSV gets into a person's DNA where it then gets the person's cell nuclei to reproduce RSV (a sarcoma - a cancer) and rapidly.
What else is in these DNA (GMO) vaccines - vaccines which have never been approved for human use in the US?
The DNA vaccines also use cytomegalovirus as a promoter. And cytomegalovirus is associated with small heads (and many other severe problems) in babies (see below)r.
The CDC refers to "congenital" cytomegalovirus as CMV that is "present at birth." But DNA vaccines include CMV and logically they might pass this virus to pregnant women and then fetuses could become infected with it. So for a baby to be born with a CMV infection doesn't mean the CMV is "congenital." It could be vaccine-induced. But it's handy to refer to CMV as "congenital" CMV as that immediately distracts from the DNA vaccines (that are not approved for human use) containing it. It also slips past the fact that these vaccines (and they would be DNA vaccines) are being incessantly pushed on pregnant women. So, when a baby is born with a CMV infection, rather than asking what caused the CMV infection and perhaps see this DNA vaccine connection, a baby with the infection is simply considered to have a very unfortunate congenital condition.
Most (90 of every 100) infants who are infected with cytomegalovirus (CMV) at birth (congenital CMV infection) appear healthy at birth. Health problems or disabilities due to congenital CMV infection may appear 2 or more years after birth, or they may never appear—80 of every 100 infants with congenital CMV infection never develop symptoms or disabilities.
Signs and Symptoms
Signs of CMV infection that may be present at birth
Small size at birth
Small head size
Permanent health problems or disabilities due to congenital CMV infection
Small head size
Lack of coordination
Death (in rare cases)
Children with congenital CMV infection are more likely to have permanent disabilities if they had symptoms of CMV infection at birth. However, some children with congenital CMV infection who appear healthy at birth can develop hearing or vision loss over time due to congenital CMV infection. For this reason, if you know your baby was born with CMV infection, it is important to have his or her hearing and vision tested regularly.
Prevention - pregnant women should very wary of babies and children.
These DNA vaccines don't stop at SV 40 or RSV or CMV but also use the Mason-Pfizer monkey virus (MPV), having apparently not learned (or learned?) that simian viruses have been a disaster in vaccines (causing cancers and retroviruses like AIDS). The DNA vaccines with this patented (to Pfizer) monkey virus are then actually coupled with CMV for even more effect - the same viral infection that can break down the mind, vision, hearing, lungs, liver and other organs of babies and children over time and even kill them.
And that's leaving off all the "[a]dditional modifications to improve expression rates .... enhancer sequences, synthetic introns, adenovirus tripartite leader (TPL) sequences and modifications to the polyadenylation and transcriptional termination sequences." It's way more than unclear what all this is, but "synthetic" introns are synthetic rather than real biology, that are meant to affect or become part of one's DNA.
For most people, it looks for all the world like those making DNA vaccines have been injecting people with them before getting them approved for use by humans, and are using one monkey and cancer virus after another and magnifying their impact by adding in a viral infection that wrecks babies.
If two wrongs don't make a right, can multiple cancer viruses and a viral infection that destroys children, make health?
Aren't cancer viruses and viruses that cause babies to be born with small heads (or to die) a bit weird (dare one say unlikely?) as a method to prevent common and usually minor childhood diseases ?
And wouldn't it make much more sense to just use vitamin C which is an absolute viricide and easily kills all the childhood disease viruses? Why get fancy or cancer-y?
How does vitamin C kill viruses? First, you take 3 cancer viruses and a synthetic rabbit's foot .... just kidding.
The mechanism of action of high dose vitamin C is known and understood. In normal healthy tissues it acts as an antioxidant. In other tissues, it generates hydrogen peroxide, the chemical that platinum blondes use to bleach their hair. This happens in sick and inflamed tissues, for example in a malignant tumour. The process is typically a form of Fenton reaction, generating free radicals. The oxidation and free radicals arising from the hydrogen peroxide kill bacteria and inactivate viruses. In other words, vitamin C acts as a targeted bleach and antiseptic. http://orthomolecular.org/resources/omns/v10n13.shtml
Just on the face of it, it seems a common sense thing to skip any technology that has never been proven as safe for humans. And why not stick with something unequivocally safe and which cures all viruses, rather than accept just "promises" to prevent them (while we can see again and again, from all the childhood disease outbreaks in vaccinated kids, that the promises are just promises).
And, just on the face of it, it seems such a greatly sane thing to ALWAYS bypass shooting any, to say nothing of multiple, cancers and other viruses into pregnant women, babies, children and adults. Actually, it seems reasonable to bypass shooting those things into anything living.
But some seem to very much like mixing together and experimenting with strange things and injecting it into people.Here is a list of some of their known experiments.
Most people just want to be well and enjoy life. They have accepted vaccines or have brought their children get them in order, they h0ped, to avoid the of risk their getting very sick and dying. But with the new DNA vaccines including Simian Virus 40, Rous Sarcoma Virus, Mason-Pfizer monkey virus (MPV), and cytomegalovirus, and even mixed together, vaccines as a safety net to protect people from minor childhood disease and short-lived flu, appear on closer inspection, to be taking on a rather large risk of getting some of the worst diseases there are out there, or potentially even new combinations of them.
This vaccine situation starts to feel rather like what we've learned about food or shampoos. When they include an endless list of things we can't say or know nothing about, they just haven't seemed to add up to anything good down the line.
If people are so concerned about viruses, why bother with the risk of cancer virus-loaded vaccines, when Vitamin C effectively kills all viruses? Vitamin C doesn't pose any risk of causing cancer or of slowly deconstructing children's physiology over time. Vitamin C's side effects aren't more diseases, but improved health in countless ways. http://www.doctoryourself.com/klennerbio.html
Given supplemental ascorbate (vitamin C), not merely from birth but also all throughout gestation, Klenner’s uniformly healthy, trouble-free infants were known by the staff as the “Vitamin C Babies.” (12)
In a 1978 letter to Klenner, Irwin Stone writes that he thinks that “giving levels of ascorbate for long periods of time at the daily levels you recommend. . . is equivalent to creating a new human subspecies, ‘Homo sapiens ascorbicus’ . . . with unusual resistance to disease and stress and with a prolonged life span.”
This article shows vitamin C is safe and highly effective.
All the new vaccines are DNA (or GMO) vaccines. They are not the older vaccines people imagine in which a bit of antigen is injected into a child and they have a reaction that (allegedly) protects them from that antigen in the future. No, these are third generation vaccines that while using the same name of the other vaccines (measles, mumps, etc.) are based on an entirely new technology that has never been approved for human beings.
As of last year, Wikipedia had an article on DNA vaccines, boasting of them. Now, the vaccines touted as breakthroughs in science (HPV and Hepatitis B) are not mentioned and Wikipedia writes as though no DNA vaccine were in use in the US. The reality is those two vaccines and many other DNA vaccines, are being used in the US, and are crippling or killing babies, children and teens.
Why does Wikipedia deny the current commercial use of DNA vaccines in the US? Because this is the current vaccine type in use across almost all vaccines now - though there has been NO APPROVAL FOR HUMAN USE.
And because these vaccines have already proven to be an extreme danger to human life.
No DNA vaccines have been approved for human use in the United States.
But Wikipedia goes further. The next sentence, after admitting these vaccines have never been approved for human use, explain why the CDC says children must get repeated courses of the vaccines, and especially explain the measles and whooping cough outbreaks in vaccinated populations.
Thus far, few experimental trials have evoked a response strong enough to protect against disease,
and the usefulness of the technique, while tantalizing, remains to be conclusively proven in humans.
"As for the CDC, there has been a monumental and complete breakdown of the entire regulatory system around vaccines. It is gone.
The pharmaceutical industry and CDC, using means that threatened education, jobs, food, social acceptance, and the family itself, have sold DNA (GMO) vaccines never approved for human use in the US.
And now they have gotten them mandated.
But the situation is worse than this because now the WHO - run by the Rockefellers who had half interest in IG Farben which ran the concentration camps in Nazi Germany and who are genocidal and desire an extreme reduction in world population - wants Zika vaccines for the world for a virus unproven to do anything.
"The U.S. lead prosecutor in the Nuremberg War Criminal Tribunal against the IG Farben [the combined pharmaceutical/chemical giant that the Rockefellers had half interest in] anticipated this development when he said,
"These IG Farben criminals, not the lunatic Nazi fanatics, are the main war criminals. If the guilt of these criminals is not brought to light and if they are not punished, they will represent a much greater threat to the future peace of the world than Hitler if he were still alive."
The WHO is where the IG Farben companies went after WWII. The Rockefellers run it. The WHO, pretending to be helping, has continued the Nazi intent to get rid of inferior or unwanted people. If they were interested in helping save lives, why did they not stop the polio vaccines in Pakistan that were killing 1000s of children, but instead called for saturation vaccination? Why did the UNICEF vaccines teams going into Pakistan include CIA? Why did the WHO threaten to remove visas from Pakistan if they didn't continue with the lethal vaccines?
GAVI’s partners include certain countries, the Bill and Melinda Gates Children’s Vaccine Programme, International Federation of Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association, Rockefeller Foundation, United Nations Children’s Fund, World Health Organisation and the World Bank, the report says.
The WHO vaccine against Zika will be a DNA (GMO) vaccine, too, and also be unapproved for human use, as well as untested as to its real impact (or intent). Will it be against Zika?
Right now, it's known that the CDC is involved with the Zika virus and with no oversight by anyone. This article is one that everyone should read carefully because it makes clear that vaccines and mosquitoes are in the hands of dangerous people involved with bioweapons.
39 million people are said to have died from AIDS. In the U.S., AIDS is today the 7th leading cause of death of people age 25-44, down from 1994 and 1995 when it was the leading cause of death. http://aids.about.com/od/dataandstatistics/qt/aids_deaths.htm
Now the WHO after killing 39 million people with a vaccine, wants billions for a new also unknown, untested vaccine. They want to fight the Zika virus. But the Zika virus which used to be harmless, was handled by the CDC and now includes a death gene.
So, if we want to be safe, perhaps it is not viruses we need to be safe from but our own naivete, our own inability to connect obvious dots and take seriously what we see.
Those with a Nazi and bioweapons background who want to get rid of most of the world's population, are offering untested vaccines to "save" people.
"Interested to learn the truth about how the Kenyan Catholic Doctors Association became suspicious and what they discovered, I decided to contact obstetrician and gynaecologist Dr. Wahome Ngare.
"I asked him whether or not he had any final comments that he would like to portray to the public.
Dr. Ngare replied:
"1. The reputation of WHO has been called to question many times in the past but there is always inconclusive evidence and a great deal of media sensitization of information that they get away Scot free. The Catholic Church in Kenya has offered the world irrefutable evidence in this case of the Kenyan tetanus eradication campaign demonstrating clearly the forceful but secretive sterilization of a community.
How much more damage and proof will the world demand before action is taken?
2. This is not an African problem; this is not a racial problem. It is a problem of good versus evil. Passivity allows evil to thrive and ever flourish. It is time individuals who stand for what is good understood that the only way to defeat evil is to confront it head on and took action in their area of direct influence e.g. at home, the work place and their local communities.
3. This chance must not be squandered. The Catholic Church in Kenya has done its part and will continue to be vigilant. However, we appeal to the people and private organizations of good will from all across the world to come together and supported the Catholic Church in Kenya to fight the excesses of this organization."
Hillary Clinton depends on money from foundations that have run mass sterilization campaigns using vaccines, donors who are paralyzing and killing large numbers of children with vaccines. It makes Mrs. Clinton's tweet about vaccines chilling:
"The science is clear: The earth is round, the sky is blue, and #vaccineswork. Let's protect all our kids. #GrandmothersKnowBest"
Perhaps the tweet should be:
The history is clear. The earth is round, the sky is blue (except for chemtrails) and WHO vaccines have murdered millions. Let's all protect our children and end the WHO.
How much more damage and proof
will the world demand before action is taken?
This is not an African problem; this is not a racial problem.
First part - knowing some things Second part - staying hydrated Third part - viruses and poisons Fourth part - gases
A pinch of knowing
One enema kit
A little nebulizer
Some sodium ascorbate - the gentler vitamin C
Now, Granny always thinks if you're going to deal with crazy folk and bioweapons, it's good to know what's what and have a remedy ready. You can rummage through your pantry and cabinets and pull out a few things that should do the trick. If you're missing something, go down to your local health food store or go on that computer thing and order it.
Do it soon. These buzzards think they've mixed up some really nasty things and are all hot to try them out. Get yourself ready to surprise them with good health.
The First Part of Granny's home remedy - what's what or a pinch of knowledge
Then there was that swine flu pandemic hullabaloo about nothing. It's just shameful what they'll do to sell their vaccines. That ebola thing they blamed on fruit bats in Africa. How's that, again? CDC has got the patent on it. Do African fruit bats work in the labs in Atlanta, now?
And now Zika, Zika, Zika. These people lie so much, they must confuse themselves. They made those wicked GMOs and spray just tons of that horrible poison on it and hurt every living thing, including babies' brains. And now they want to say a virus did it Yes, just like little Thomas said his friend Christopher was the one that took the cookies out of the jar - Thomas, what with the crumbs all over his chubby little face.
We have eyes the Lord gave us to see and that Zika thing, my word, that is a falsehood. After it was Monsanto's spray that made those babies so deformed, now they want to spray everyone to kill their own weird mosquitoes? Who made that mosquito spray? Let's just guess. And is Monsanto making the chemicals they are spraying on everyone from those airplanes, claiming it's clouds? Well if it is, those airplanes are shitting clouds. Scuse my language, but really. What else you going to call all that nasty poo coming out of the behinds of those planes?
Wasn't it Monsanto that sprayed the Vietnamese and messed up their babies?
Oh, yes, let's spray some more to save us from all that spraying before. That makes about as much sense as giving someone who's dying from aspirin overdose, aspirin to save them.
Zika is so they can spray the tarnation out of you. And then they'll turn around and say "Oh my, it ain't enough, so we need to stick poisons directly into you with this here syringe." And here come the shots that you won't know what's in them but it don't take a brain in your head to know it ain't for your health because if they cared about that they wouldn't be making those GMOs that give rats big ole tumors or be spraying you like a bug.
No, those shots are more of the same and then some, likely chips and I don't mean potato ones, but the kind they can control after it's in you and hurt you with it or put thoughts in your head or worse, if you know what I mean.
These are sick folks that have spent too much time down in some awfully dank basements coming up with stuff that would make roaches faint.
I wouldn't say they are just plain evil. I would say they are multi-tasking evil.
Okay, now we've put in a pinch of knowledge for this remedy but we need one more piece before we can get this home remedy going so you'll know hospitals which might be plumb out of the basics people need.
Now if you're good at math because you haven't had that common crap stuff Bill Gates is pushing on innocent kids, you should be able to put 2 and 2 together. They are making viruses and if people get real sick, a lot will need fluids, and they been working to get rid of the fluid bags hospitals use. You could say they've been doing preparedness backwards, un-doing preparedness. They have been going the boy scouts one better - Be unprepared! Well, that adds up to .... hell, you add it up.
Now, we can get started. They got bioweapons and they wanted to make sure we have squat. Well, they can take their ole bioweapons and spray them on their own selves because we are going to mix up a batch of bio-remedy right here.
The Second Part of Granny's home remedy - making sure everyone is always well-hydrated.
After the knowledge comes the getting down to business.
The government has made sure hospitals are not going to be able to help you if you get terribly sick and dehydrated, from vomiting or fever or whatever, but the truth is you don't want to go to a hospital anyway because it takes time to drive there and time sign in and wait and you're heaving or passed out or who knows what all, and then even if they can find a bag of fluids in some back closet for you, those bags are slow. So, it ain't worth bothering with.
And besides what the government wants is all that chaos, everybody sick and crowding the hospitals and begging for help they ain't got, and people dropping down everywhere. Great for "news at 6" kind of thing with big stories like "23 states reporting shortages of fluid bags and shutting their doors." Great for scare-you-big-time.
Does anyone know what an enema kit is? Or what you do with this tube and tip? Well, you might be making a face about now because you do know the tip goes in your pretty little backside, and maybe you are thinking "Ewww" but God didn't put your bottom hole there for no reason, children. it's there to save you from bioweapons.
You can get portable enema kits. If you don't have something and you need one quick, use what you got. A plastic bottle with a jerry-rigged tube and something to insert that's safe.
Anyway, you got your own enema bag or bottle and you just fill it up with water and a little bit of salt and sugar because you need those electric lights [some call them electrolytes] they give to the blood. Plain water won't do it.
Here's what they say to put in for a 6 year old, so just do more for big person:
0.75 liters of room temperature water
5 tablespoons of real sugar
1 tablespoon of real sea salt
Now, I have no idea how much a liter is but you can find that out on your own. I am guessing real sugar means organic and real sea salt means none of that lousy table salt that Dr. Caldwell says is 1/3 salt, 1/3 sand and 1/3 glass. Get sea salt. Best to get these things in advance and have them on hand because if you're puking or your family is hollering for help, it makes it easier if you're part way ready to help.
Now, while some of you might be squeamish about using an enema, just remember it is much faster than a drip and nobody has to be on death's door to get one, whereas a hospital emergency room ain't going to give you a damn thing unless you are on death's door and wiping your feet on the welcome mat. But doing this at home means if anyone is feeling poorly, you don't have to wait til it gets worse.
Now here's what they say about giving it.
"Mix in enema kit until all is dissolved. Administer the enema. Have the patient hold the enema some 10 minutes. You can have the patient lie in different positions to let the enema go round and round the intestines. Distract the patient with television, movie, stories, games or anything so he can hold it. Then let him blow out in the toilet."
The kids might even go along easier because they might like that last part and look forward to the big blow out. In any case, you'll know whoever gets the enema will be hydrated in just 10 minutes. Because all along your mighty colon, the blood vessels are right there ready to pull in the water the body needs. That's why it's good to all to know how the body works and that our bottom holes are a blessing.
Ten minutes, no car ride, no hospital, and you've made fools of the FDA. That's a treat.
The Third Part of Granny's home remedy - making a monkey out of those nasty viruses and toxins
Bioweapons can be viruses or toxins. So it makes sense to use something that kills the first and can take the sting out of the second. And you probably got it at home already. It's plain old sodium ascorbate - buffered vitamin C in powdered form.
And guess what - you can put it in an enema and get it into your blood faster than the government can find another country to bomb.
Only this pie will kill ALL viruses and even take the kick out of ALL poisons.
How it Works
The mechanism of action of high dose vitamin C is known and understood. In normal healthy tissues it acts as an antioxidant. In other tissues, it generates hydrogen peroxide, the chemical that platinum blondes use to bleach their hair. This happens in sick and inflamed tissues, for example in a malignant tumour. The process is typically a form of Fenton reaction, generating free radicals. The oxidation and free radicals arising from the hydrogen peroxide kill bacteria and inactivate viruses. In other words, vitamin C acts as a targeted bleach and antiseptic.
Vitamin C is unique, because it has low toxicity and can be taken safely in massive amounts. Other antioxidants and supplements will not have a similar effect. Do not be confused and think that Echinacea, for example, will help. Yes, there may be supplements and herbs that provide a little immune system support, but this is Ebola we are talking about - get real!
Note, vitamin C is not some magical antitoxin ....Vitamin C nearly always acts by transferring electrons, as an oxidant or antioxidant.
People can understand that C can kill viruses but it's harder to understand what it does to poisons or toxins. Okay, say you drink a poison. If you get enough C into the blood before the poison can get to the organs and destroy them, C will change the number of the poison's electrons so by the time it gets to the organs, it's not really a poison anymore. It's plumb flat. No kick. Just "stuff."
Now, ebola didn't turn out to be that deadly or spread that good (wonder if those at the CDC who made it got fired?) so they (the same cussed biotech Rockefeller fellers) went and added rabies to ebola .... after they had messed with rabies and made it worse and also airborne.
"There are other dangers inherent in genetically modified vaccines that make rabies baits pretty dangerous stuff. Splicing rabies onto other viruses can carry many risks that we are just recently becoming aware of. In Arizona and other parts of the US, rabies is starting to jump species. For the first time, we are seeing rabies jump from bats to foxes to skunks with no bite required. .... Maybe somebody should figure that out before they go splicing that virus together with other viruses, creating one angry mutant virus.
"Dr. Terje Traavik PhD (Centre of Biosafety), has written extensively about how genetically engineered viruses are creating new hybrid viruses through recombination. He cautions that the characteristics of some of these new hybrid viruses are similar to both of the parent viruses but also include traits from neither. Dr. Traavik specifically expresses concern about the stability of genetically engineered viruses. He notes that cases of rabies infected humans could be due to a return to virulence of the genetically engineered rabies virus with the pox viruses. [Emphasis added.]
"In addition to the danger of jumping species and return to virulence, there is another frightening way for these new viruses to spread: aerosolization. It used to be that we could feel pretty safe about rabies because the chances that our dogs would trade saliva with another animal were pretty slim. Nowadays, thanks to recombinant vaccines, there is no bite required. The Center for Disease Control acknowledges that rabies can be spread via aerosolization so you or your dog need only be in close proximity to a rabies infected animal to be in danger.
"Despite these gaps of knowledge and frightening possibilities, the US alone continues to drop tens of millions of genetically modified, rabies/pox spliced vaccines into your backyard. What does this mean for you and your dog? It means the days of rabies being a simple but deadly virus with a simple mode of transmission are long gone. In their wake are questions of just easily how can these new mutant rabies strains be spread, can they just jump from one species to another and potentially jump to humans like West Nile Disease, and can the animals eating those baits actually get rabies? As we ponder these questions, the baits continue to drop by the thousands and new genetically modified vaccines are being developed at a maddening rate."
The Fourth Part of Granny's home remedy - for fast acting poison gases.
Now, the only thing left to deal with is those gases that could kill someone fast (like sarin) when they are got out and go into closed in places like subways. And there wouldn't likely be time to take off your pants for an enema, and that might scare the ticket agents anyway.
So, what can you do?
Why, just get the vitamin C into the lungs where the poison is going, so it can grab that poison by its throat, mess with its electrons, and neutralize the sucker.
How do you get it into the lungs? you might be asking. Think, children. Don't let your college education mess with your imagination cuz this is an easy one. Spray the C in, too.
Carry a little ole battery-powered nebulizer with water and sodium ascorbate mixed together in it, and take some puffs if you feel bad. The lungs, just like the colon, got all those capillaries right there - so whatever goes in there is a direct shoot into the blood It's why the gases work so fast. So, get the C in to gas the gas). Is it a good way to get C into the blood safely? Makes sense, says a vitamin C researcher.
And, of course if people are falling down around you, give them puffs, too. (If you can't get a battery powered nebulizer, bring a small plug-in one and look for a socket. Are there other ways to breathe in C? Maybe. Just be sure you use the soft kind - the sodium ascorbate.
This method is a great boon for getting C into babies and little kids fast, and for anyone who is passed out.
Here's an example of a portable nebulizer but there's others. Worse comes to worse, use a small spray bottle or a cleaned out perfume atomizer filled with water and C. What matters is to get the C fast to where the gas is.
That's the remedy.
Take a deep breath. You go get a few things and you're ready.
Don't let these cusses scare you.
Zika? Bosh. High dose C through a pregnancy means healthy babies/
The Rockefeller cusses are who've kept you and the world from knowing. Same ones running the World UN-Healthy Organization and saying all that guff about Zika. Back in the early 50s, they stopped Klenner from letting the world know vitamin C kills viruses. Instead, they went into making disease scares and vaccines big time and became theTrueAngelofDeath.
Enzo Paoletti and Dennis Panicali at the New York State department of Health, devised a Strategy to produce recombinant DNA vaccines by using genetic engineering techniques. They were able to transform ordinary smallpox vaccine into vaccines that may be able to prevent other diseases.
What Paoletti and his colleague, Virologist Dennis Panicali, set out to do was to alter the DNA of cowpox virus by inserting a gene from another virus (namely herpes, hepatitis B or influenza). These efforts resulted, amongst others in the development of a commercialHepatitis B vaccine which is now widely used. HPV vaccine is another notable recombinant DNA vaccine.
"What Paoletti and his colleague, Virologist Dennis Panicali, set out to do was to alter the DNA of cowpox virus by inserting a gene from another virus (namely herpes, hepatitis B or influenza).
"These efforts resulted, amongst others in the development of a commercial Hepatitis B vaccine which is now widely used. HPV vaccine is another notable recombinant DNA vaccine."
(The article then includes photos of recipients of these two DNA (GMO) vaccines.)
Now, under Paolettt's name in Wikipedia, it says only:
Enzo Paoletti is an Italian scientist who devised a strategy to produce DNA vaccines. Working with his colleague Dennis Panicali at the New York State department of Health and using genetic engineering techniques, the researchers were able to transform ordinary smallpox vaccine into vaccines that may be able to prevent other diseases.
Paoletti and his colleague, Dennis Panicali, a virologist, altered the DNA of vaccinia virus by inserting a gene from another virus (namely herpes, hepatitis B or influenza). The efforts resulted in multipleveterinary vaccinesand the development ofthe first DNA vaccine for humans, a single-doseJapanese encephalitis vaccinecalled IMOJEVreleased in 2010.As of June 2015, no other DNA vaccines are available for use in humans.
Wikipedia does not mention the DNA vaccines Paoletti was responsible for helping develop - the Hepatitis B vaccine or the HPV - and denies there are any DNA vaccines in use in the US.
NIH, posting an article by the Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biologic Research. says otherwise.
"No DNA vaccines have been approved for human use in the United States.
"Thus far, few experimental trials have evoked a response strong enough to protect against disease, and the usefulness of the technique, while tantalizing, remains to be conclusively proven in humans.As of June 2015 only one human DNA vaccine has been approved for human use,the single-dose Japanese encephalitis vaccine called IMOJEV,released in 2010."
Contradicting Wikipedia, NIH's posted article cites the HEP B aa a classic DNA vaccine currently in use and the HPV as another DNA vaccine being used in the US.
If we are to believe a medical journal over Wikipedia ...
The pharmaceutical industry aided by the CDC has been selling vaccines never approved for human use in the US. To sell those unapproved vaccines, the pharmaceutical industry and CDC have arranged for schools and day care centers to refuse access to children, for health care workers to lose jobs, for college student to be refused places on campus, for poor families, single mothers, and the homeless to be refused food services and support, and beyond imagining, for families to even lose their children - for refusing, whether for themselves or on behalf of their children, vaccines never approved for human use.
The CDC and media promotion of fear and targeting of people concerned about problems with the vaccines, made it almost impossible for them to warn close friends and even family members. Heavily funded by Bill Gates and the pharmaceutical industry, Hillary Clinton's utterly contemptuous comment was typical of the shut down of all questions:
"The science is clear: The earth is round, the sky is blue, and #vaccineswork. Let's protect all our kids. #GrandmothersKnowBest"
Why? Because it is one of the criteria Bush listed that leads to a coup under NSPD 51, with a pandemic emergency the only one among them that leads to an invasion of UN troops and take over by the WHO (Rockefellers and Gates).
Stuff like the methane leak are not just meant to hurt everyone but are part of a script meant to ring the "environmental disaster" bell as one of Bush's 5 things that justify a president suspending the Constitution and taking over:
1. "environmental disaster"
2. collapse of the economy
3. civil unrest
4. attack on the country (I think that is one or infrastructure breakdown like the grid)
5. and the trigger for an invasion - pandemic emergency
It's why the plan has to be out there. It's context for everything occurring.
The reason the maniacs can freak people out is because people have no context to see what's going on and it feels like it's coming from everywhere, independently. Context changes that. It makes sense.
There is a planned coup. It's on paper.
Context bursts the bubble.
Here is what looks like some context for what's going on (or is it the script?):
This context dispels some of the chaos and confusion which lowers the sense of terror. And people involved in any of those areas listed might be able to see how they are being used and think what they might do to foil things.
Another context put forward is for Armegeddon but that isn't written down and signed by a president or linked to other things on paper, too.
If anyone sees yet another context, they should put it out there.
Those running the world, through their control of media, have been playing magic tricks with the world, shell games where people are encouraged to look here and not at what is really going on.
Zika is clear example. Don't see that GMOs and glysophate, funded by the Rockefellers and Bill Gates, both genocidal, and delivered by Monsanto, are to be perfectly blunt, the destruction of humanity.
No, the horrific birth defects come from a virus!
Never mind that scientists in South American such as Andres Carrasco have attempted for years to expose the connection between those exact same malformations to GMOs and glysophate, for years, and were met by warnings, beatings by biotech-funded mobs, and death threats.
The Rockefellers, Gates and Monsanto have fallen back on a magic trick - look here, not there. It's a virus not the vast amount of poisons we have poured into the whole food supply and the entire ecosystem. A new virus gives us fear, it gives us who are anti-baby to begin with, alerts not to a whole country not to get pregnant, it gives us Planned Parent moving into South America for abortions driven by terror we created, it gives us possible "rescuing" vaccines which will almost certainly be sterilizing just as the tetanus and polio vaccines we're giving right now in Nigeria and Kenya are, just as we did in the 1990s in Nicaragua, Mexico and the Philippines. Hillary Clinton: Women Around The World Are Awaiting Your Condemnation of Clinton Foundation Donors For Sterilizing 2-3 Million Kenyan Women http://exopolitics.blogs.com/ebolagate/2015/03/hillary-clinton-women-around-the-world-are-awaiting-your-condemnation-of-clinton-foundation-donors-f.html
People have a choice to see what GMOs are doing and it's far from only babies who are being wrecked.
Or they can fall into the Rockefellers and Gates fear trap and fall for a virus. That traps lets them decimate humanity as they do much wish to do and have been planning for ages. The Rockefellers had half interest in IG Farben (a giant pharmaceutical and chemical industry) which ran the concentration camps under the Nazis, and experimented on prisoners, including experimenting to create vaccines as a means to surreptitiously sterilize women. They have them now. And IG Farben is who fund the WHO, controlled by Rockefellers and Gates.
It's not CO2 causing it but the multinational corporations. Through one horrific industry after another and through suppression (even murderous) of whistleblowers and of inventors and doctors who could have freed humanity from oil and from diseases long ago, the corporations have stolen from mankind its own cures for he world and plunged the world into increasing hell for their own profit and power.
To hide their crimes against humanity behind COs is the Zika mosquito again.
And it comes with more of their life-crushing solutions - an international carbon tax that can be applied against anyone, any country, and destroy them; Agenda 21 to move human beings off the land so industry can have total run of it; the NWO - an on-going form of global martial law with mass surveillance and pervasive control through chipping, and large scale depopulation.
What is happening in Brazil shows how far they - the Rockefellers and Gates - have gotten using food as a weapon against life. What they - the Rockefellers and Gates - are doing with vaccines shows how far they've twisted even the idea of healing, now turning it into death.
Their answer to their GMO nightmare is a virus leading to vaccines that will be covert sterilization (and chipping).
Their answer to their own destruction of the world is a global carbon tax which sets them up for global plunder which can be directed against everyone but especially against all those protecting the earth - small farmers, indigenous peoples.
It's obvious what must happen in Brazil. The virus must be exposed as a hoax and GMOs must be ended there and worldwide.
As for the carbon tax, it must also be exposed. It is an immense club in the hands of corporations which created it. And like Zika, a carbon tax is these deadly tricksters' means of distracting from all the things that must actually be done to save this planet from the very ones who proposed the carbon tax.
Instead of a carbon tax, the world must:
1. end extractive and explosive industries altogether - oil, coal, fracking, gas, nuclear, etc. NOT allowing them to trade away the harm they are doing,
2. tax only the 1%,
3. release the existing free energy technologies as soon as possible with industry required to use it and it being given for free to people around the world,
4. protect and benefit small businesses and small farmers and all people, by removing taxes and all regulations preventing them from using green energy and from creating even more beneficial technologies,
5. recognize that the current food safety laws are a threat to the environment and apply them only to the giant food industry, freeing small farmers and food producers and people to produce again,
6. end agri-business - a petroleum-based, poisonous, industry that is extractive of the earth and of animals, and is pumping out methane into the environment from the abnormal feeding and mass imprisonment of billions of animals - and return the land to small farmers and people interested in farming. Ruminants and Methane: Not the Fault of the Animals
7. end all genetic engineering of plants, animals, insects, and humans,
8. end pharma's manufacture of petroleum-based products and use of genetically engineered organisms,
9. end the use of plastics and all other petroleum-based products,
10. end the production of all poisons, the use of chemtrails, the fluoridation of water (or its contamination by any other substance).
11. end the smart grid which exposes humans, plants, animals, and insects to biologically destructive effects, and all technologies of human surveillance and control, including chips,
12. end the military-industrial complex and shift funding and personnel into a world clean up of land and water, into rebuilding infrastructure, into building free housing and installing free energy for humanity, into resettling migrants at home, into building mass transit including aeronautics all based on free energy.
Townsend Letter of this month describes a critical shortage of IV bags. “One of the great ironies is that while health authorities have called for curtailment of manufacturing by the compounding pharmacies, pharmaceutical companies have not been able to meet the drug and medical supply requirements of hospitals and clinics. http://www.townsendletter.com/June2014/ltrpub0614.html
What the letter does not mention is that this situation may have begun to occur after the FDA’s banning the mass production of IV vitamin C (the pre-prepared bags)
What had happened just previous to this peculiar banning of an item critical in burn units and on the battle field as well?
There was a 60 minute story in New Zealand shortly before in which IV vitamin C “miraculously” cured swine flu in a man the hospital there was pushing to take off of life support, saying there was no way he could survive. Not only that, even as IV vitamin C was obviously curing the man, two hospitals he was in each tried to reduce or deny access to it Video: Vitamin C Cures New Zealander’s Swine Flu Just As Life Support Was to be Terminated. http://www.3news.co.nz/Living-Proof-Vitamin-C—Miracle-Cure/tabid/309/articleID/171328/Default.aspx
Legally the US government may not have been in a position to ban vitamin C outright, so, instead, the FDA just threw a ringer into access to the delivery of the treatment – bags of IV-C
What’s more, as the Townsend Letter also reports, since 2010 (after swine flu was proved easily curable by IV vitamin C in New Zealand and the FDA banned the mass production of the treatment), the pharmaceutical industry stopped producing injectable vitamins and minerals.
It was compounding pharmacies which took over producing them.
This seizing of authority under the aegis of public safety is very similar to the FDA’s Monsanto-driven food safety law http://yupfarming.blogspot.com/2009/12/monsantos-baby-s-510.html. It came into existence in a similar way as well – a publicized contamination issue, with draconian bills then instantly offered following media scare stories, though the laws on the book were more than adequate to deal with any problems. But laws available were specific and within the rule of law, not the broad and vague language which the new bills offered that allowed for coming down on innocents. The food safety law is in place now and so far not been used to stop contamination coming from large industrial operations or closed them down for so much as an hour, but it has been the occasion for multiple swat team raids on organic farmers and coops, seizing safe food, closing down businesses, taking people away in handcuffs, and producing media stories giving the impression of a life and death food safety threat. The food has almost always been proven perfectly safe, as lawyers argued. So, subsequently, the FDA gave itself authority to seize even UN-contamined food. And as for fixing the problem, the FDA usually does not provide the farmers or companies a means to rectify any situation (“If one does x, y, z the facility can begin operating again”) but destroys their valuable organic inventory and shuts them down.
With compounding pharmacies, the FDA appears to doing a replay of how “food safety” was elevated to national issue, focusing not on the contamination of food with GMOs, drugs, hormones, chemicals, colorings, preservatives, etc. by the food industry but only on acute food borne illness. With over 100,000 people a year dying routinely from the drugs produced by the pharmaceutical industry, the compounding pharmacies do not even bear mentioning, other than they, too, like organic growers or raw milk dairies, are meeting very specific consumer requests.
“The Senate’s action is in response to a deadly outbreak of fungal meningitis caused by contaminated medicine distributed by the New England Compounding Center (NECC), a large and now defunct Massachusetts-based pharmacy.
“The culprit behind the outbreak was a high-dose injectable steroid used to treat inflammation and pain associated with conditions like herniated discs and certain types of arthritis. Most compounding pharmacies do not produce this type of medication. In fact, it is alleged that, in this instance, NECC was repacking and selling the existing medication — a crime in itself — and was not actually engaged in the practice of compounding.
“Incidentally, the FDA and local authorities were aware of dubious practices at NECC as early as 2006.
“The reason doctors turned to the NECC’s more expensive product instead of cheaper generic versions is that there was a national shortage of these drugs, due to increased FDA inspections of drug factories. While the inspections turned up few actual health threats, they caused a disruption in the supply chain and many healthcare providers had no choice but to use more expensive (and in the case of NECC, less reputable) alternatives.
What has been done to disrupt the ability of doctors to treat disease via intravenous administration of vitamins and/or minerals has taken place in a very sub rosa manner.
There was no news that vitamin C cures polio; no news that vitamin C cured swine flu; no news that the FDA banned the mass production of IV vitamin C after it was proven to curedswine flu; no news that drug companies stopped producing injectable vitamin like vitamin C at about the same time as the FDA ban; no news that both the task of preparing the bags of IV vitamin C formula, and the task of creating injectable vitamin C and the other minerals in the formula had to be taken over by compounding pharmacies; and no news that the FDA had taken control of compounding pharmacies and was starting to go after them.
The only news was national news of contamination at the New England Compounding Center (NECC) but that was actually old news and used to push for a law allowing the FDA power over all compounding pharmacies. There was no investigation into the FDA’s actions against other compounding pharmacies or the impact the law would have on small compounding pharmacies which were doing nothing wrong. Nor was there any story linking the FDA’s unexplained ban on the mass production of IV vitamin C solutions or its coming soon after IV vitamin C got international attention for curing swine flu in New Zealand, and especially there was no news on whether the FDA’s actions is limiting access to a cure for swine flu were intentionally destructive of public health in the midst of what the CDC was claiming was a terrible epidemic of potentially fatal flu.
Instead, without anyone noticing, and by many indirect means of banning production of the bags or shutting down those doing the production of the bags and the injectable vitamins and minerals, access to IV solutions for innumerable treatments for diseases, have been forced into critical shortage.
And while the CDC keeps reporting antibiotics are failing and the extreme medical crisis that that represents, it does not report that vitamin C is a powerful antibiotic, just as it continues to this day to not report vitamin C as a total cure for polio.
“Klenner described this seminal experience in a 1953 paper “The Use of Vitamin C as an Antibiotic”:
“Our interest with vitamin C against the virus organism began ten years ago in a modest rural home. Here a patient who was receiving symptomatic treatment for virus pneumonia had suddenly developed cynosis [sic: cyanosis]. He refused hospitalization for supportive oxygen therapy. X-Ray had not been considered because of its dubious value and because the nearest department equipped to give such treatment was 69 miles distant. Two grams of vitamin C was given intramuscularly with the hope that the anaerobic condition existing in the tissues would be relieved by the catalytic action of vitamin C acting as a gas transport aiding cellular respiration. This was an old idea; the important factor being that it worked. Within 30 minutes after giving the drug (which was carried in my medical bag for the treatment of diarrhea in children) the characteristic breathing and slate-like color had cleared. Returning six hours later, at eight in the evening, the patient was found sitting over the edge of his bed enjoying a late dinner. Strangely enough his fever was three degrees less than it was at 2 p.m. that same afternoon. This sudden change in the condition of the patient led us to suspect that vitamin C was playing a role of far greater significance than that of a simple respiratory catalyst. A second injection of one gram of vitamin C was administered, by the same route, on this visit and then subsequently at six hour intervals for the next three days. This patient was clinically well after 36 hours of chemotherapy. From this casual observation we have been able to assemble sufficient clinical evidence to prove unequivocally that vitamin C is the antibiotic of choice in the handling of all types of virus diseases. Furthermore it is a major adjuvant in the treatment of all other infectious diseases.”
“Again this paper is quoted at length to allow readers to judge for themselves whether or not the author made this up or deluded himself in some way. From 1943 through 1947 Dr. Klenner reported successful treatment of 41 more cases of viral pneumonia using massive doses of vitamin C. From these cases he learned what dosage and route of administration — intravenously, intramuscularly, or orally — was best for each patient. Dr. Klenner gave these details in a February 1948 paper published in the Journal of Southern Medicine and Surgery entitled “Virus Pneumonia and Its Treatment with Vitamin C”. This article was the first of Dr. Klenner’s twenty-eight (through 1974) scientific publications.” http://seanet.com/~alexs/ascorbate/199x/landwehr-r-j_orthomol_med-1991-v6-n2-p99.htm
Vitamin C is a total viricide. That means that it doesn’t need – as is true for vaccines – to be matched to viral strains. Mutating strains don’t matter, either. Vitamin C kills ALL viruses. And that would include even lab-invented viruses. With vitamin C, there is no reason to fear “the flu,” or West Nile, or Swine Flu, or any other virus the CDC is announcing or may announce as uncurable, deadly and terrifying.
The public has been kept from knowing there is no reason to fear viruses, at the same time as the FDA has worked to keep what does cure viruses and does provide a strong antibiotic, and what is needed to treat various diseases naturally (with vitamins and minerals), unavailable. IV bags are now in critically short supply and injectable forms of vitamin C and other vitamins are only available through compounding pharmacies, while those pharmacies are now in the grip of the FDA.
But the situation is worse than this, for it isn’t just access to IV vitamin C that is being shut down or to numerous therapies which use vitamins and minerals to restore the body, but HYDRATION ITSELF IS THREATENED.
This can’t be stressed enough.
Without hospitals able to rehydrate, it’s hard to imagine how many people could die from simple curable conditions, including even common but severe bouts of diarrhea or vomiting. Panic could be easily created by portraying the deaths as coming from some dreadful virus rather than from the reality – the absence of a simple but necessary product – IV bags that deliver adequate fluids.
Currently, too, “flu” numbers are not based on flu and but are padded with pneumonia numbers and colds even, as the CDC puts out figures that create the image of a dangerous medical situation that is non-existent, but the fear is used to sell vaccines. The CDC already created the impression of an emergency in 2009 with swine flu, when, for example, the 99% of the numbers it cited for swine flu in California were no swine flu or flu at all.http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2004/10/30/flu-deaths.aspx#!
And the Bush administration with the help of the CDC wrote pandemic emergency laws that are linked to martial law.
“Dehydration can result in serious symptoms in an otherwise healthy person, causing profound fatigue, postural hypotension, renal failure, delirium, and ultimately death. (“To Hydrate or Not to Hydrate: How Should It Be?”, Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 18, Issue 5, March, 2000: 1156-1158.)”
“For a more diverse view from another country, Robin L. Fainsinger, M.D., Director, Palliative Care Program, Division of Palliative Medicine, Department of Oncology, University of Alberta, writes in “When to Treat Dehydration in the Terminally Ill Patient?”:
“Our palliative care group has argued that the viewpoint that dehydration in dying patients is never a cause of symptom distress, overlooks the fact that: – 1) dehydration is well recognized in nonterminal patients to cause confusion and restlessness, problems often reported in terminally ill patients; 2) reduced intravascular volume and glomerular filtration rate caused by dehydration is accepted as a cause for prerenal failure, with opioid metabolite accumulation in the presence of renal failure causing confusion, myoclonus and seizures, having been well documented (1, 2, 3).”
Hydration is a very simple thing to provide, IF ONE HAS THE BASIC IV SOLUTIONS. Picture hospitals without those hanging bags of fluid and the FDA’s active anti-health contribution to what is in fact an extremely dangerous situation becomes clear.
The editor of the Townsend Letter reports that:
“By mid-February 2014, Baxter and Hospira were rationing shipments of IV bags only to hospitals. While the original shortage was for 1000 ml bags of normal saline, the shortage extended to all IV solutions, including 0.9% saline, 0.45% saline, 5% dextrose, and Lactate Ringer’s solutions. As of April 2014, it was impossible to purchase any form of IV solution. Hospitals and clinics are improvising by treating dehydration using one IV bag of solution for 72 hours instead of the typical 24-hour drip. In addition, patients are being switched from IV hydration to oral hydration. Critical situations treated in the OR and ICU are also cutting back on IV hydration. It is clear that hospitals are trying to make do by limiting their IV solutions, but at what point will they run out and face tragedy?”
The public and those sincerely committed to healthcare need to know what the FDA has been doing to ban the production of essential IV solutions and to shut down compounding pharmacies that provide crucially important injectable vitamins and minerals and the CDC has been lying about flus (including 1918) and silent both about available virus cures and about one strong antibiotic.
People need to know that the FDA is threatening people’s lives by removing access to innumerable treatments that rely on vitamins and minerals (not drugs). And they need to stop the FDA because it is now threatening the foundation of medical care itself by its systematic removal of one of the most basic forms of support for any patients in crises – fluids.
"One of the first medical doctors to report problems from glyphosate spraying of GM soy was Dr Darío Gianfelici, from Cerrito, Entre Ríos, Argentina. ....
Gianfelici said : “Our town experienced drastic changes before and after soy. I’ve seen people die from cancer at age 30. I have witnessed pregnancy problems and a significant increase in fertility problems. I have seen an increase in respiratory diseases, as has never been seen before.
“GM soy has been a death sentence for humans and for the environment. No money can compensate for the damage that has been caused – the contamination, the deaths, the cases of cancer and malformations.” [Any mention of birth defects are emphasized.]
Scientists corroborate birth defects & threatened by organised mob
Reports of birth defects in glyphosate-sprayed areas of Argentina gained scientific credibility in 2009, when senior Argentine government scientist Prof. Andrés Carrasco went public with his research findings, fully published a year later , that glyphosate causes malformations in frog and chicken embryos at doses far lower than those used in agricultural spraying (see  Lab Study Establishes Glyphosate Link to Birth Defects, SiS 48).
.... Carrasco and his team of researchers went to give a talk in La Leonesa they were intercepted by a mob of about a hundred people. The attack landed two people in the hospital and left Carrasco and a colleague cowering inside a locked car. Witnesses said the angry crowd had ties to powerful economic interests behind the local agro-industry and that police made little effort to interfere with the beating ....
"Powerful economy interests behind the local ago-industry" producing GMO soy were not happy with Carrasco.
"We are very sad to hear the news of the death of Professor Andres Carrasco, whose research showed that glyphosate and Roundup cause malformations in embryos.
"Andres Carrasco was a brilliant and honest scientist and a fearless campaigner for truth. He will be sadly missed."
Andrés Carrasco, the scientist who confirmed the devastating effects of glyphosate, investigated sprayed people, and questioned science in the service of corporations, has died. We publish below the last interview he gave and also "Happiness can be a political issue?", the interview [with Carrasco] that [radio station] Decí Mu broadcast.
… The scientist Andrés Carrasco told how he decided to release his investigation into the lethal effects of glyphosate. He was in the south, fishing, just enjoying the beauty of the natural order. He knew his findings were crucial and felt that the perfect silence around him was a huge scream. "I had to do something."
The WHO is financed by contributions from member states and outside donors. .... Voluntary contributions will account for $3,015 million (76%), of which $800 million is regarded as highly or moderately flexible funding, with the remainder tied to particular programmes or objectives.
In a recent conference in California, Gates reveals a less public agenda of his philanthropy―population reduction, otherwise known as eugenics.
And the ‘Good Club’
.... The exclusive letter of invitation was signed by Gates, Rockefeller and Buffett. They decided to call themselves the “Good Club.” Also present was media czar Ted Turner, billionaire founder of CNN who stated in a 1996 interview for the Audubon nature magazine, where he said that a 95% reduction of world population to between 225-300 million would be “ideal.” In a 2008 interview at Philadelphia’s Temple University, Turner fine-tuned the number to 2 billion, a cut of more than 70% from today’s population. Even less elegantly than Gates, Turner stated, “we have too many people. That’s why we have global warming. We need less people using less stuff (sic).”16
.... In the talks a consensus reportedly emerged that they would “back a strategy in which population growth would be tackled as a potentially disastrous environmental, social and industrial threat.”18
[Are these people also involved in "global warming terror"?]
Gates and Rockefeller are also related through GAVI.
"Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation is a founding member of the GAVI Alliance (Global Alliance for Vaccinations and Immunization) in partnership with the World Bank, WHO and the vaccine industry. The goal of GAVI is to vaccinate every newborn child in the developing world.2
In Pakistan, the Bill and Melinda Gates foundation (BMGF) and Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunizations (GAVI) were blamed on an outbreak of acute flaccid polio has begun to surface in the region and killed 10k Pakistani children who were inoculated. [Emphasis added.]
While in Pakistan, Gates and GAVI teamed up with the World Bank and UN Population Fund [a Rockefeller creation] in the 1970′s under the Task Force on Vaccines for Fertility Regulation. The Task Force, “…acts as a global coordinating body for anti-fertility vaccine R&D.”
Did the WHO step in to stop the deaths or to investigate? No.
A government inquiry has found that polio vaccines for infants funded by the Global Alliance for Vaccination and Immunisation are causing deaths and disabilities in regional countries including Pakistan.
The Prime Minister’s Inspection Commission (PMIC) ... has recommended that Prime Minister Yousaf Raza Gilani immediately suspend the administration of all types of vaccines funded by the GAVI. ....
Geneva-based officials of GAVI, Jeffrey Rowland and Dan Thomas, were contacted by e-mail but they did not respond.
The report stated that five deaths have been reported in Japan this year soon after the vaccination was administered while 25 serious adverse reactions, including five deaths, were reported in Sri Lanka in 2008. Consequently, the vaccine was withdrawn. Bhutan also withdrew the vaccines after the deaths of children. The Association of Parents of Disabled Children from Bosnia and Herzegovina filed criminal charges after the GAVI-funded vaccines caused disabilities. ....
The report states, “The procured vaccines are not tested in laboratories to confirm their efficacy and genuineness. This leaves room for use of spurious and counterfeit vaccines”.
GAVI’s partners include certain countries, the Bill and Melinda Gates Children’s Vaccine Programme, International Federation of Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association, Rockefeller Foundation, United Nations Children’s Fund [UNICEF], World Health Organisation and the World Bank, the report says.
The government of Switzerland may be requested to investigate GAVI’s activities to find out whether it is really a non-profit organisation, as it professes. The report wants the “propriety of the partnership of WHO and Unicef with GAVI to be questioned before the appropriate authority of the UN”.
WHO threatened Pakistan with removal of their visas if they did not continue vaccinating and called for "vaccination saturation." UNICEF went in with CIA on their vaccination teams, CIA claiming later they were just taking blood samples to look for Bin Laden. Pakistan, under pressure, ended up mandating the lethal vaccines and arresting parents who resisted bringing their children.
Birth defects and warnings not have have children.
Rockefeller and Gates are responsible for both.
One might assume they put out the WHO alert urging all women in Brazil to not get pregnant since this is what they both have been working tirelessly for everywhere - through vaccines, through food, through drugs, etc.
And they are the creators of GMO biotechnology and behind the GMO soy and glysophate that is causing tragedy in Brazil and Argentina, the heart of GMO soy production in the world.
GMO crops have never been proven safe for human or animal consumption. ....Tests show that tiny amounts of glyphosate compounds would do damage to a human umbilical, embryonic and placental cells in a pregnant woman drinking the ground water near a GMO field.13
Malformed newborns in Brazil are a heart-breaking human tragedy and a threat to human life itself. To stop this, one must stop it at its source.
But the high numbers of malformed newborns in Brazil also present a catastrophic investment threat to "powerful economic interests behind the local agro-industry" which cannot allow the world to find out what is really responsible for what is happening in Brazil. If the world realizes that GMOs and glysophate are responsible, GMOs are dead.
How does one prevent people from finding out the true source?
Throw them off the trail and pay them to go that way.
The announcement of Zika also instantly stops health departments and epidemiology departments from looking into what chemicals mothers may have been exposed to or what kind of food eat or what water source they live near. The questions become did they have headaches when they were pregnant and did they get bitten by a mosquito during those 9 months. Zika throws the stick in the wrong direction and sends the doctors and researchers off to fetch there. It would not be surprising if the WHO or Gates or the Rockefeller Foudation announce funding to the hilt for research on Zika so whole universities and government agencies take off in the search, committed to helping, with pockets full of money. And if anyone tries to report otherwise? Carrasco's car was beaten by a mob for 2 hours.
The symptoms of Zika according the CDC (which works with the CIA which was involved with UNICEF in killing children with vaccines in Pakistan) are many, minor, and common, something anyone might get during a year: fever, rash, joint pain, or conjunctivitis (red eyes), muscle pain and headaches. Those neglible symptoms, though, are not only ideal for what might be a non-existent virus or one unrelated to birth defects, in being so non-specific, but they would terrify a pregnant woman that she's caught "Zika." And when a doctor sees a deformed baby, and asks a woman if she ever had any of these symptoms, most will have had at least one. http://exopolitics.blogs.com/ebolagate/2014/08/cdc-and-cia-a-close-and-sick-relationship.html
And not only does a invisible virus distract from GMOs and glysophate already known to cause these exact birth defects, by pointing to a terrifying virus, the whole thing could be be turned into an opportunity for the Good Club.
If an invisible virus is blamed for the deformed babies, the WHO can not only warn that women in Brazil should not get pregnant at all, but as the "virus" spreads (with what proof?), similar warnings can be put out everywhere. The whole world could end up being warned not to have children.
Zika could, in false flag terms, be seen as the patsy. If people are distracted away from the real culprits - those behind GMO soy and glysophate - Zika becomes a savior of the biotech industry which is causing this nightmare for humanity. Is "Zika!" already an inside joke in posh clubs where the Good Club and their buddies gather to laugh at what they are doing to get rid of humanity without it knowing?
But terror around Zika offers the Rockefellers and Gates something beyond saving their bacon financially or a bit of humor for tricking the world so easily - it offers them an excuse for vaccines. They have been using terror for a long time to try to open a carte blanche vaccine door - rushed, untested, mandated vaccines. Will Zika help? It would be to save humanity, of course, by bringing healthy babies into the world. They may very well have some vaccines already ready.
Is Zika even real? Did they create it? Does it even really matter if it terrifies the world into thinking it is? Real or fictional, it can be used to distract from the true destroyers of babies, the monstrous GMO industry.
And in terms of a virus, with the media providing the fear and the CDC and WHO announcing outbreaks anywhere they wish, they don't even need a real virus to announce an unknown, untested vaccine to save the world that may have no relation to "Zika" at all or with helping anyone.
I've studied the actual presidential directive, which you can find here.
In many respects, it's innocuous. It doesn't, for instance, tamper with the procedures for presidential succession in case, say, the chief executive and vice president are killed. And there's a value to requiring that every government agency prepare a plan to deal with a catastrophe.
But consider provision 2E of the directive:
"Enduring Constitutional Government," or "ECG," means a cooperative effort among the executive, legislative, and judicial branches of the Federal Government, coordinated by the President, as a matter of comity with respect to the legislative and judicial branches and with proper respect for the constitutional separation of powers among the branches, to preserve the constitutional framework under which the Nation is governed and the capability of all three branches of government to execute constitutional responsibilities and provide for orderly succession, appropriate transition of leadership, and interoperability and support of the National Essential Functions during a catastrophic emergency. (Italics mine.)
Do you see those five weasel words "as a matter of comity"? Just what elements of the legislative and judicial branches will be allowed to participate in "executing constitutional responsibilities" and "providing for orderly succession [and] appropriate transfer of leadership"?
In other words, who gets to call the shots? What does comity mean in this context? Informally, it means good-natured, good-faith camaraderie. In its jurisprudential sense, the American Heritage Dictionary defines it as "the principle by which the courts of one jurisdiction may accede or give effect to the laws or decisions of another."
The president will have FEMA and DHS with him. The "comity" will flow in his direction.
Obama promised to immediately get rid of Bush's presidential orders. He didn't get rid of one. And he added to them, writing many more than Bush had and his often link his to Bushes, especially in areas that have to do with a take over of the US.
And on closer viewing of Corsi's CSPAN interview on 51 and 20, he mentioned that about the same time as the Bush directives were signed, Bush signed documents with Merkel and the head of the EU about combining economies. The Slate article refers to this directive containing classified "annexes" that not even Congress was allowed to see.
And then there are the final two provisions of the NSPD, which mysteriously refer to unseen secret "annexes" to the directive. Needless to say, if what they've made public is so shameless in its disregard for the Constitution, the following two sections on secret provisions don't allay suspicion:
(23) Annex A and the classified Continuity Annexes, attached hereto, are hereby incorporated into and made a part of this directive.
(24) Security. This directive and the information contained herein shall be protected from unauthorized disclosure, provided that, except for Annex A, the Annexes attached to this directive are classified and shall be accorded appropriate handling, consistent with applicable Executive Orders.
So, how many secret annexes are there in addition to "annex A," and what kinds of things do they say that even the paranoia-inducing public document can't include?
Is the Merkel agreement "an annex"? Does it kick in in the event of an undefined 'catastrophic emergency"?
Such an agreement with Merkel and the head of the EU certainly goes the TTIP one better by making it entirely secret, bypassing Congress entirely, and combining the economies of the US and EU. It seems like the sort of economic news people would be interested in on both sides of the Atlantic.
Are the anti-TTIP groups and journalists covering these huge trade agreements aware of the Bush/Merkel/EU agreement? Are they aware of NSPD-51? Both occurred in 2007 and were organized by Bush. Is this economic stunner of Bush combining the EU and the US economies an annex inside NSPD-51? to be triggered by a declaration of an undefined catastrophic emergency? The collapse of the economy is listed in NSPD-51 as one such emergency, along with pandemic emergency, civil unrest, an attack on the US, and environmental disaster. We seem rich in potential emergencies, all of them riggable.
From the Slate article:
The document is also hazy on when our new continuity policies will be set in motion. The directive tells us that they'll kick in whenever the nation faces a "catastrophic emergency." But look how vaguely "catastrophic emergency" is first defined:
"Catastrophic Emergency" means any incident, regardless of location, that results in extraordinary levels of mass casualties, damage, or disruption severely affecting the U.S. population, infrastructure, environment, economy, or government functions.
These are profoundly, potentially calamitously, broad terms. Who defines what is extraordinary? Who defines how severe severely is? Is there any procedure to challenge the junking of constitutional government?
Worse, "catastrophic emergency"—woefully vague to start out with—is later expanded to include even "localized acts of nature and accidents" as well as "technological or attack-related" emergencies.
In other words, even if you don't believe the most sinister paranoid coup theories, the document does nothing to allay one's fears that it could be used in a sinister way.
Economic journalists might also want to look carefully at the pandemic laws put in place by Bush.
They set up plunder of the country. They include total asset stripping of the US, including all industries, all communications, all transportation, and on and on. A possible choice for the vaccines - if they are not sprayed on people - would be an ebola-rabies vaccine manufactured by this former Nazi bioweapons company and mentioned here. These vaccines are licensed to Exxell BIO of St Paul, Minnesota, which appears to be a shell, or front company. People might want to say no thanks. But that would trigger $1000 a day fines for anyone resisting these untested, unknown vaccines and an additional $1000 a day for not obeying any order.
These pandemic laws are fertile ground then for economic journalists given their total stripping of the US and the curiosity of their non-relationship to health.
Bush's state pandemic laws, spurred on by the anthrax attack after 9/11 coming out of USAMRIID at Fort Detrick, arrange for:
* .... federal officials would “issue regulations to prioritize and allocate resources.
The pandemic laws reassure that:
.... government bureaucracy “shall act as necessary and appropriate.”
All three, 51 and 20, the WHO agreement on entering the country in the event of their own declaration of a pandemic emergency, and the Merkel agreement to combine economies of the EU and US, were all signed by Bush in 2007 without Congressional approval.
While the pandemic laws includes shocking life threatening provisions, they belong very naturally alongside the Bush, Merkel, EU agreement because they are economic. They may be one of the biggest and most significant economic laws ever. Someone crafted them. Someone intends to profit by them. Who?
Economic journalists might approach them that way. How much is slave labor worth in dollars or yuan? How much are the assets of the US worth? These laws offer an economic journalist a field day.
Did Dr. Faust sell out to the pharmaceutical industry to get him to write the atrocious piece of "medical" nonsense, Something to Sneze At, subtitled, "Natural remedies that claim to “boost your immune system” don’t work, and it’s a good thing they don’t."
It's hard to decide which is the kinder way to view a doctor who says "Don't boost your immune system" - as a doctor giving out false medical information trashing natural remedies to push drugs and vaccines for Pharma, or as a doctor that ignorant and misinformed about how the body works, and how drugs and vaccines work.
Dr. Faust begins with contempt for the human body in article title and moves right into two false statements in his subtitle - "Natural remedies that claim to “boost your immune system” don’t work, and it’s a good thing they don’t."
Let's see what natural remedies can do.
It only takes a single search for "turmeric, immune system, NIH" to come up with the following article from the Journal of Clinical Immunology. Its abstract is so replete with turmeric's effects on the immune system, that it's been broken down here into numbered items so its numerous immune benefits are not missed. (Turmeric, by the way, can be easily grown at home.)
Curcumin (diferuloylmethane) is an orange-yellow component of turmeric (Curcuma longa), a spice often found in curry powder.
1. Traditionally known for its an antiinflammatory effects, curcumin has been shown in the last two decades to be a potent immunomodulatory agent that can modulate the activation of T cells, B cells, macrophages, neutrophils, natural killer cells, and dendritic cells.
2. Curcumin can also downregulate the expression of various proinflammatory cytokines including TNF, IL-1, IL-2, IL-6, IL-8, IL-12, and chemokines, most likely through inactivation of the transcription factor NF-kappaB.
3. Interestingly, however, curcumin at low doses can also enhance antibody responses.
4. This suggests that curcumin's reported beneficial effects in arthritis, allergy, asthma, atherosclerosis, heart disease, Alzheimer's disease, diabetes, and cancer might be due in part to its ability to modulate the immune system.
5. Together, these findings warrant further consideration of curcumin as a therapy for immune disorders.
So, the premise of Dr. Faust's subtitle is false. It should read "Natural remedies that claim to “boost your immune system” DO JUST THAT and IN MULTIPLE WAYS, IT'S GOOD THING they do!"
Now, there are Dr. Faust's statements about the immune system to look at more closely.
"We have two complementary immune systems: innate and acquired."
Dr. Faust's statement is a strange distortion. Our innate immune system develops over time as it "acquires" learning. It's one system, not two. The means to that acquired immunity is through breast milk and through exposure to pathogens.
That is, our immune system is guided and supported to become effective through breast milk and through getting sick.
Dr. Faust wishes us to believe innate and acquired immunity are the two types of immune systems, one bad and one good. While there are two types of immune systems, the distinction is between TH1 immunity and TH2 immunity.
"The immune system has two “sides”. One is Th1, which is the usual response to diseases caught naturally. A healthy immune system has a “bias” towards Th1. Th2 is the “other” side, and people who have allergies, asthma and disease with an auto-immune origin have what is known as a Th2-skewed immune system. (New England J. Med 1992, Vol 326, No 5, 298-304 was one of the first references, now there are hundreds).
"When a mother is pregnant, her pregnancy is controlled by cytokines, and requires a predominance of Th2 cytokines in order not to reject the baby. (Acta Paediatra 1997; 86: 916-918) A “Th1 driven” immune system would treat the baby as a graft, thereby miscarrying. Drugs are used to suppress the immune systems of transplant recipients for the same reason.
"When a baby is born, it’s immune system is initially Th2-skewed, by virtue of the mother’s immune system. The mother’s immune system changes very quickly, and her breast milk will help to change the baby’s balance, and will also “buffer” and assist in the development of the baby’s immune system." ....
"The first years of life [is] the time when the “difference” between “vaccine” and “natural” immunity is so important, because most diseases promote a Th1 immunity. [Th1 is good. Getting most diseases is good for the immune system.] The portal of entry, and learning pathways teaches and matures the immune system, and helps in the prevention of both allergy-development" and auto-immune disease. The “antigen” is processed, with the help of immunological factors in breast milk and the baby’s cued-in immune system through the mucous membranes and the various “layers” of the immune system, producing an end-point called antibodies." [Emphases added. And the comment: The baby's immune system experiences "learning" through exposure to viruses and bacteria, not through vaccination which throws the infant's immune system in the direction of TH2 immunity associated with autoimmunity and allergies.]
Dr. Faust continues his attack on the body's natural immunity.
"Innate immunity is the body’s natural, knee-jerk reaction to an unknown infection. Innate immunity is fast, broad, and incredibly nonspecific. When it gets activated, you know the feeling all too well—fever, cough, runny nose, and body aches. In short: inflammation. You can already see why you might not want to “boost” this part of the immune system. [Emphasis added.]
Dr. Faust's slur for an innate system, are interesting to look at close up. The breast-feeding versus vaccine article above turns each slur on its head where one sees a "knee-jerk," and "fast, broad, and incredibly nonspecific" reaction to disease, as compliments because breastfed baby's immune system delivers rapid, wide, and amazingly diverse and inclusive protection with support from breast milk:
"... blocking infection by pneumococcus bacteria, the cause of pneumonia, .... significantly fewer ear and upper respiratory tract infections than babies who don’t nurse, .... protects against cancer (the relative risk of childhood lymphoma is nine times higher in bottle-fed infants), .... targets not only cancer cells but all kinds of immature, rapidly growing cells, and leaves mature stable cells alone. .... possible enhancement of cognitive development, it also protected the baby from .... :
lower respiratory infections,
urinary tract infection,
sudden infant death syndrome,
insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus,
That is a short overview of some of what an innate or immature immune system can do when supported by breast milk.
Dr. Faust said the body's immune system is responsible for illness and inflammation. Are immunologists laughing right now since the immune system actually prevents illness? And reading the abstract on curcumin, above, makes clear the immune system limits inflammation and that natural remedies help make it more effective.
Butlers' work on breast feeding is a great antidote to Dr. Faust's ignorance of immunology and makes clear that breast milk acts as part of the immune system of a baby and the protective effects continue into the baby's later life.
"Butler points to more research on breast feeding and its substantial, unique, and numerous protective effects:
“We conclude that breastfeeding is prophylactic against atopic disease – including atopic eczema, food allergy, and respiratory allergy – throughout childhood and adolescence” (Lancet 1995;346: 1065-69)
“Human milk is rich in protective proteins which play a part in the prevention of microbial infection in suckling infants. These include IgA, lactoferrin, lysozyme, antiproteases, complement, and many other factors.” (Arch Dis child 1998;87:235-239)
“Children who are not breast fed tend to have weaker immune systems and are at greater risk from infectious diseases” (BMJ, 1999, Volume 318, pg 688)
“Breastfeeding may, in addition to the well-known passive protection against infections during lactation, have a unique capacity to stimulate the immune system of the offspring possibl[y] with several long-term positive effects” (Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 1998; 81: 523-537
"Breastfed babies have a better inteferon~ y production (marker of Th1 response) than bottle-fed babies (Annals of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology, 1998, Volume 81, pg 527) Anti-idiotypic antibodies as well as T and B lymphocytes are transferred via the milk and seem to actively stimulate the immune system of the offspring – numerous anti-inflammatory factors, cytokines and growth factors in the milk might also direct the immune system of the infants with lasting effects. (pg 529)
Dr. Faust's demonization of the body's natural capacity for dealing with illness now shifts into actual name calling.
"The mainstay of treatment for symptomatic cold viruses is to suppress, not boost, our crude and clunky innate immune responses. [Emphasis added.]
Dr. Faust then recommends drugs, his pharma slip now becoming apparent.
"That’s why we take fever reducers and antihistamines."
Later he says:
"So, the next time you feel a cold coming on, maybe what you really want is just a little teensy bit of innate immune suppression, not an immunity boost." [Emphasis added.]
What is going on here? Has Pharma gotten frightened that people are now understanding that improving their immune function - boosting it - is how to stay well or get well? Did Pharma make a Faustian bargain of some kind with Dr. Faust to propose something as absurd as warning people away from boosting their immunity? How else to explain "just a little teensy bit of innate immune suppression, not an immunity boost." Suppress your immune system, the doctor says. But "just a little teensy bit." Is he talking to little children?
Does he think he can say just anything at all because the public is so ignorant they will accept it from a "doctor"? Have years of telling concerned patients that it's okay to inject brain-damaging mercury into a newborn baby or give their babies the same dosage in vaccines as 200 pound man, emboldened doctors to say anything at all and expect they'll be believed?
That's not clear but what is certain is that Dr. Faust is promoting two classes of drugs, both with serious problems:
"Over-the-counter medications like ibuprofen [suppresses fevers] and antihistamines should help you feel better."
Has Pharma noticed that mothers and fathers are increasingly avoiding fever-reducers like aspirin and ibuprofen because of their dangers, short and long term? Is Pharma worried because parents are rediscovering what families once took for granted - that fevers that are not dangerously high, when allowed to run their course, are nature (the immune system)'s way of killing viruses and bacteria. Fever "reducers" block that - that is, fever reducers suppress natural immune protection.
Is blocking the natural immune system's ability to overheat and kill viruses and bacteria "just a little teensy bit" of suppression Dr. Faust was referring to? If so, he might want to read what aspirin did to millions in 1918. Bayer and Death: 1918 and Aspirin The series uses government documents, medical research, personal accounts from 1918, and NIAID press releases the CDC has ignored (that a flu was not the cause of killing millions) to show things were not what the public continues to be told, and aspirin and vaccines were heavily involved.
Aspirin and ibuprofen are non-steroidal anti-Inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Dr. Faust might want to read this study on hospitalizations and deaths since he is recommending ibuprofen.
“Over 100,000 people are hospitalized for GI bleeding and of those 16,500 die every year. And these values are considered ‘conservative.’
“Also the figures only include prescription NSAIDs used to treat only arthritis and only in the United States. If prescription and over the counter NSAID-related hospitalizations and death rates were counted for not only arthritis, but for all conditions, and throughout the world, the figures would no doubt be enormous. Taking those figures and applying them over the many years that this class of drug that has been available since the early 1970s and the numbers would be horrific.”
The New England Journal of Medicine article by M. Wolfe, et al., “Gastrointestinal Toxicity of Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs”, (June 17, 1999, Vol. 340, No. 24, pp. 1888-1889), shows this alarming statistic relative to other causes of deaths:
Having recommended that people not allow their body's immune system to work but to subject it to frequently lethal NSAIDs, Dr. Faust continues to criticize any boosting of immunity:
"Even if a natural immunity boost were possible, the very notion of this is misguided."
Curcumin proves it is not just possible but an on-going reality that natural immunity can be boosted and by natural remedies.
Mothers and fathers have not been giving their sick children chicken soup (and now, also, turmeric balls) for no reason. Chicken soup has many recognized health benefits and turmeric is anti-inflammatory, antipyrrhetic (lowers fevers), anti-spasmodic, anti-bacterial, etc. but unlike NSAIDs, it has zero association to deaths or hospitalizations. (Usually turmeric balls are a simple mix of turmeric with honey but this recipe shows people have begun making special ones. http://templeturmeric.com/ingredients/turmeric-zoom-balls-recipe/ There is even matzo ball soup with turmeric now, combining chicken soup and turmeric).
Dr. Faust goes on to suggest that boosting the body's immunity can kill us.
"In extreme cases, overreacting to infections can even cause changes in our vascular system, leading to sepsis and shock—our blood vessels become too flimsy in response to inflammation initiated by, you guessed it, our natural innate immune responses.
What medically naive readers may not realize is that Dr. Faust is describing something that never happens when a person takes vitamin C or turmeric or garlic or chicken soup or any number of non-toxic natural immune boosters. Instead, Dr. Faust is actually describing a severe vaccine reaction where the body is so overwhelmed with the foreign antigens, heavy metals, detergents, formaldehyde, aluminum, and often mercury in them, the body produces a dangerous cytokin storm.
Jun 2, 2011 (CIDRAP News) – A study from Australia suggests that a vaccine-induced surge of cytokines (pro-inflammatory chemical messengers) might have been a factor in the unusual rate of fever and seizures seen in Australian children who received the Fluvax seasonal flu vaccine last year.
The adverse events prompted suspension of use of the vaccine in children under age 5 in Australia in 2010, and the problem remains unexplained.
Writing in Vaccine, researchers in Perth, Australia, report that 190 children presented at a tertiary pediatric hospital for treatment of adverse events that occurred within 12 hours after vaccination with Fluvax or Fluvax Junior, made by CSL Ltd. Most of the children had a rapid onset of fever and vomiting, and 28 (14.7%) of them were hospitalized.
Shiv Chopra, a scientist who oversaw vaccine safety at Health Canada, says that vaccines act in the body like cluster bombs.
After pushing ibuprofen and antihistamines, saying they will help people "feel better," but not saying ibuprofen is an NSAID and NSAIDs run a close second to AIDS in numbers of deaths they cause each year, he goes on to reassure:
"Meanwhile, sit back while your acquired B and T cells do the rest."
But Dr. Faust doesn't seem to know that the antihistamines he just recommended, suppress the body's T cells!
It would be hard to choose the most distorted scientific information in Dr. Faust's article because this article is one mistaken idea of immunology after another.
Dr. Faust sums it all up with ....
"And if you aren't yet sick, stay up-to-date on your vaccines, including the yearly influenza vaccine."
Finally, he is speaking the truth. "If you aren't yet sick" - after avoiding natural remedies that boost your immunity, and after taking various drugs Dr. Faust recommend which suppress your T cells and can even be deadly - then he suggests moving on to taking vaccines, "including the yearly influenza vaccine."
Dr. Faust, having slogged through so much nonsense about immunity being dangerous and moving even further into the absurd of suggesting that boosting it with safe vitamins and nutrients can cause sepsis (blood poisoning) and shock (and one can die from either), followed by his recommendations for potentially lethal NSAIDs, and for antihistamines that suppress T-cells, while telling people to sit back and let their T-cells do the work, has created an even greater sense of either his having received no worthwhile medical training in immunology or drug toxicity, or any medical training at all, or he represents the general ignorant state of Rockefeller medicine which ignores the incredible power of the human body and of love.
Dr. Faust's baby-talking article certainly seems designed to undermine natural remedies by suggesting, counter to all medical science, that boosting immunity can be deadly. All told, given the misinformation and fear-mongering he promotes around having a strong immune system, it is hard not to wonder if he were simply handed his stunningly fallacious article by the CIA which has taken over media and is deeply involved in vaccines.
Dr. Faust, you took an oath to do no harm. You can kill people with your absurd advice. This is not a game, no matter what Faustian bargain you may have struck.
And who is Slate that they promote such a medically horrendous piece?
Fortunately, mothers' bodies and mothers' love are protecting their children.
And mothers' and fathers' knowledge about the dangers of synthetic drugs and GMO vaccines and GMOs in food (all tied to the Rockefellers) is exploding internationally and people are understanding the incredible immune system, its close connection to nature, and its need to learn from natural diseases rather than suppressing them, in order to develop fully.
Rather than providing profits to an industry getting rich from generating illnesses, parents are choosing nature and good health.
"The marketplace for the pharmaceutical industry is the human body - - but only for as long as the body hosts diseases. Thus, maintaining and expandingdiseases is a precondition for the growth of the pharmaceutical industry." [Emphasis added.]