The WHO = Rockefellers = half interest in IG Farben = the German pharmaceutical companies behind Hitler = Nazis. Basically Davide Rockefeller, a Nazi, runs the WHO which means, when you comes down to it, the place is not out for out anyone's health.
Oh, then there's Bill Gates who is the other big funder of the WHO. Gate, of course, is "the vaccine hero" looking out for all the kids of the world. Really? He paralyzed 47,500 children in India in 2011 with his oral polio vaccine. It's banned in the US because it causes polio. But Bill forced it on little brown kids in India maybe because he things they don't mind a lifetime of not being able to walk. And Gates' vaccines will kill kids twice as much as real polio. But he runs the WHO with that Nazi Rockefeller so the WHO covered up Gates' cirme against little kids, by calling polio, "non-polio paralysis." http://foodfreedomgroup.com/2012/04/17/india-vaccine-induced-polio/
And what do you know - David Rockefeller's son was head of Doctors Without Borders USA until his recent accidental airplane crash.
Yeah, yeah, we got all that.
Nazis Weaponized Ebola US is causing all this.
Got it. Even got what it means that "Tulane University conducts bioweapons research on behalf of the U.S. Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases (USAMRIID)," because Tulane screwed with the polio vaccine, too. Tulane = CIA partner = weaponizing the polio vaccine = AIDS when the vaccines were forced on Africa. [Reference: http://stuartjeannebramhall.com/2014/04/20/the-cias-medical-manhattan-project-2/ ]
And polio is popping up all over Africa. Doesn't Gates help out those black kids, too with his Oral Polio Vaccine? Rather than putting Gates in prison, the answer is to ADD the old polio vaccine that you inject. You know, don't cut Bill out but add in the vaccines that caused AIDS. Boy, they sure don't want black people. See the documentary. [Reference: http://www.hotdocumentaries.com/origin-of-aids-the-polio-vaccine/ ]
Any news on that? Any arrests? Getting the idea this guys think they can do anything, like continuing genocide after their genocide during WWII, and get away with it? Just call it "helping stop disease," and they' keep killing in the millions.
Okay, okay. And no one can forget that it was the U.S. Army MedicalResearch Institute of Infectious Diseases (USAMRIID) at Fort Detrick who made the weaponized vaccines that killed people right after 9/11. Man, was that convenient for getting states to okay Bush's pandemic laws without looking at them. Bush = pandemic laws = martial law but then Bush = Nazi, and his family has been trying fascist coups since 1933 [Reference: http://salem-news.com/articles/december032011/bush-drugs.php ] so no surprise there. The laws include taking everything not nailed down.
"... the National Cancer Institute (NCI-Frederick) and 37 mission partners are located at Fort Detrick, about 20 minutes from Bethesda, Maryland. The Fort is home to theUnited States Army Medical Research and Materiel Command (ISAMRMC).The primary missions include biomedical research and development.This is where the AIDS virus was developed, but not from monkeys.
"...the AIDS virus was in fact developed by the National Cancer Institute, in cooperation with the World Health Organization (WHO), in a laboratory at Ft. Detrick in Maryland. From 1970–74, this laboratory facility was part of the U.S. Army's germ warfare unit, known as the Army Infectious Disease Unit, or Special Operations Division, also referred to as the Army's Chemical and Biological Warfare Laboratory. Post 1974, the facility was renamed the National Cancer Institute (NCI). According to researcher William Cooper (former Navy Intelligence officer), noted in Larry Jamison's article Is The AIDS Virus Man Made?, this work was supervised by the CIA under a project called MK-NAOMI. [Reference: http://www.conspiracyplanet.com/channel.cfm?channelid=34&contentid=4890&page=2 ]
So, rush out for the Ebola vaccine if you want. But remember who's cooking them up with frogs legs, juice of anus gland, and just a pinch of oil spill. Vaccines = Nazis = bioweapons.
Vancouver, BC – In an ExopoliticsTV interview with Alfred Lambremont Webre, ITCCS field Secretary Kevin Annett announced the final verdict of the International Common Law Court of Justice in Brussels, convicting Pope Francis, Jesuit General General “guilty as charged of aiding and abetting Crimes against Humanity, including murder and human trafficking, and of personal involvement in those crimes.” The Final Judgment of the Common Law Court is below, along with an exclusive report by Kevin Annett on “Who's really behind child trafficking? Following the big money across the globe.”
Republic of Kanata: The Winnipeg Proclamation of Independence establishing the Federated Republic of Kanata and Articles of the Constitution of The Federated Republic of Kanata
In his interview, Kevin Annett also discussed Constitutional Convention planned for October 27-31, 2014 in Winnipeg, Manitoba to establish the Republic of Kanata as one positive outgrowth of the ongoing Common Law Court of Justice trials and verdicts against the Crown of England, Roman Catholic and Anglican Churches, and Government of Canada.
READ FULL ARTICLE
VIDEO - Kevin Annett: Pope Francis, Jesuit Superior General, Archbishop of Canterbury guilty of child genocide - Intl. Common Law Court. Republic of Kanata Convention announced
ARKANSAS, USA – In an ExopoliticsTV interview with Alfred Lambremont Webre, advocate Eric Williams discussed Sovereignty, Personal Freedom, and the Grand Jury as conceived under the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. constitution.
A partial transcript of Eric Williams remarks is as follows:
First, why does everyone insist on making the assertion of political Sovereignty so complicated when it is actually so very simple?
Back in 1970, I was prosecuted by the IRS in Federal Court in Los Angeles, for criminal willful failure to file or pay income tax. At the trial, at the very outset, I challenged the IRS prosecutor to present evidence that I was among those he claimed had various citizenship obligations. When my case was called, there were only five people in the court room .... After I say the prosecutor has no proof of BC in his file......
When neither the Court Judge nor the Prosecutor could establish that I had volunteered myself into being a U.S. citizen, no matter that to the best of my knowledge I was born in California. (Being born in the United States does NOT cause such individual to be designated a citizen due to such birth.) Because the IRS could not establish that I had voluntarily submitted myself to the jurisdiction of the IRS or Federal (or state) government , the Judge said he was taking the matter under consideration and that I would be notified. That was forty-four years ago, I am still waiting.
Some people assume that because my event was forty-four years ago that challenging the political jurisdiction would not now work. During the past year there have been several people who have presented letters to the IRS challenging the ability of the IRS to present evidence that they had volunteered themselves into subservience to the IRS or federal or state governments. I am not aware that any of such letters have failed to ward off the IRS or State tax collectors. Some of these individuals are still using their DL and SS# under the Law of necessity recognized by the Supreme Court in a case called Holy Trinity Church v. United States (1892?) , where the Supreme Court wrote that when the strict application of the letter of a law or Constitutional provision would result in an absurd outcome, the law of Constitutional provision must be applied in a manner to avoid the absurd outcome.
. My challenge was and is based on the 13th and 14th Amendments, which have not changed.
Because so much of what was prevalent back in the 1960s did not work, I went back to the beginning of this country, back to July 4, 1776, Prior to that date, everyone here in the Thirteen Colonies was under the dominion of King George III.
However, on that date, when King George was kicked out, at that moment there was absolutely no government here in what had a moment prior been under King George. At that moment on that day everyone present became politically equal. There were no more Aristocrats and there were no more commoners. Everyone became individually sovereign over their own person, with no authority to command the subservience of any other person.
It helps if we think of it mathematically. Think of each individual person's authority over others as being equal to ZERO. When each person's authority over others is equal to ZERO, how many ZEROs would be required to be added up to come up with a total greater than ZERO?
This establishes, with a mathematical certainty, that although the Founding Fathers could certainly get together and create any manner of organization that they agreed upon, but there was ZERO possibility that the Founders could have had any authority or ability to imbue their creation with any authority to command the subservience of any individual who did not individually volunteer to submit his or her self to the government created under their Constitution. ZERO plus ZERO would still equal ZERO, and in 1866, the ratification of the Thirteenth Amendment instilled the acknowledgment of this mathematically certain fact into our Constitution.
This information is not at all complicated, it is very simple and does not require any significant study or research for anyone to be able to understand it! Neither does it require anyone to file any rescission documents with any government agency.
All we need to do is examine how our government manages our society to entice us individually, to volunteer ourselves into subservience to its rules.
It is very important for those who have been confused by all the conflicting information prevalent among the Freedom movement, to understand how vulnerable the human child is to indoctrination, and that this vulnerability does not significantly diminish as we grow older.
Thinking is very hard work and none of us like to do any more work than is necessary, so when others tell us what we want to hear. when they tell us they have a solution in regard to bow we got under control of the government, because our names are written in all capital letters, or because of gold fringe on the flag, and that the government has taken over ownership of us through its bundling and sale of our birth certificates, and that our republican form of government has been turned into a corporation, we presume that those who tell us these things have done their homework , but they have not, as I have revealed here in what I said earlier, about how ZERO plus ZERO will always equal ZERO!
When this mathematically certain fact is applied to all the information the effect of all these assertions just vanishes, because none of it overcomes ZERO plus ZERO equaling ZERO!
As this is irrefutably true, it is not possible for any of the reasons prevalent among the Freedom community to be true!
So how were we enticed to volunteer ourselves into political servitude?
1. The Constitution was written by Aristocratic men who were politicians who had been in charge of the commoners under the British Monarch for, literally, centuries. For all of them to willingly give up their Aristocratic positions, to agree to be politically equal to scrub women and stablemen, without a whimper, is just too much to believe. It is amazing to me that very few of the members of the Freedom movement have any qualms about the true intent of the Founders.
2. They were politicians. This means they were accomplished in manipulating others. This means that they knew very well how to write legislation so that there would be loop-holes for themselves and their friends to work around whatever they were imposing on the commoners. And, it also means they knew how to writs a Constitution where there would be no such loop holes, so why did they give us this sieve? For whose benefit were all those hole provided? Or, flip that, and consider, who was it that was intended to be enslaved under the Constitution?
3. Just take a look around! Try your mirror! The one that magnifies!
4. An argument can be made to establish that everything that has been and is being done is supported by the CONstitution! Everyone reads the comments and admonishments of the Founders written or presented by them outside of the CONstitution, as to how important it is to keep a watchful eye on the government, to keep it on track with the CONstitution, but why did they not write the CONstitution to more securely prevent the problems they perceived as arising if the populace was not unrealistically vigilant.
Is it reasonable that we should have to continually watch everything that politicians do in order to keep them in conformance to the Constitution? And when the rules set down in the CONstitution are written in a way that the politicians can reasonably support everything that they do as being Constitutional, how do we prevent them from instituting the micro-management of us that they have?
5. The commoners of that time wanted and expected a society where there would only be one political class. A republic is NOT such an organization! No where in the history of man is there one single society that has been "governed" by the commoners or where there was only one political class.
6. Why were those present back then and why are the Freedom advocates of today so adamant in their concerns and demands in regard to having and restoring a republican form of government back then and here in our time? Or, was there any such advocacy or demand on the part of the commoners back then? I don't recall ever hearing about any such issue by those commoners, so why did the Aristocratic Framers of the CONstitution include that provision, guaranteeing a republican form of government to the new states? And why do the filings of the New York Grand Jury put such adamant insistence that this CONsitutional provision which they seem to believe and claim has been in some way eradicated, be restored?
7. Where in the Federal Constitution is there any overt evidence declaring that this document created a republic? What is a republic? According to the content of there filings and the foot notes included therein, a republic is a form of society where the People are in charge. In charge of what or who? One of the foot notes included, taken from the New York State Codes, provides that the People are over the citizens. Does that foot note not indicate that there are two political classes? The People being the ruling class and the citizens being those ruled?
8. In regard to the words "citizen" and "People", some words have an inherent political meaning and some do not, but those words which do not can be imbued with a political meaning if the context in which they are set is political. And while we are considering this it is also advisable to be aware of the propensity of politicians to use certain words as "terms of art", which means with devious unrevealed intent.
9. It is self evident that the word "citizen" is a political word which constitutes an acknowledgment of subservience to a political superior no matter the context, such as, "All the citizens in the swimming pool or all the citizens watching the football game". Is there any doubt that both references to citizens indicate a subservience to a political superior?
10. If the word "people" were substituted would there be any such political subservience implication? "All the people in the swimming pool or all the people watching the football game"?
11. If we carefully read the Preamble to the Constitution, paying attention to this political context in which the word "People" is set, we have, in relevant part: "We the People of the United States, in order to secure the blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."
12. Is it not self evident that in this political context the word "People" is automatically imbued with a political meaning, that it is now a political "Term of Art", that devious politicians can use to subjugate innocent common people?
As they did in their condensing and rewording of the fifty amendments to the Constitution proposed by the commoners, where they used the word "people" in the five most critical of those amendments, and totally avoided using the word "citizen", because if they had used both of those political status establishing words, the commoners would have objected.
13. The purpose of the Preamble is very important but is usually overlooked. The Preamble establishes the purpose of the Constitution and declares the source of its authority, which is clearly stated to be The People of the United States, "to secure the Blessings of Liberty to THEM, and THEIR Posterity".
14. In order to have the authority to declare such purpose those doing so must be politically Sovereign! Those doing so must be subservient to no politically superior man or entity.
15. At that time was there anyone or any entity present in North America who had more political authority than the People of the United States? Clearly there was no such superior authority.
16. In the Preamble the Founding Fathers established that the People of the United States were Sovereign. This meant that neither They nor Their Posterity would be subject to comply with what they established in the Constitution. This indicates the purpose of the Constitution was to govern the government, to prevent it from treating the commoners as a politically subservient class.
However, a careful study of the Constitution, with a suspicious eye, will reveal that the Founding Fathers had a different intention.
17. The establishment in the Preamble of the Sovereign status of The People was open and notoriously done. Everyone then present knew that they were of the People of the United States so no problem was perceived, except by Patrick Henry, when Patrick Henry read the CONstitution he said he smelled a rat and he would have no more to do with it.
18. Now is where the Founding politicians get tricky and devious. These politicians creating this political document are going to unambiguously and surreptitiously create a subservient political class, citizen of the United States.
19. This is in Section Two of Article One, where it is made clear that U.S. citizenship is not acquired by birth because it provides that to serve in the House, the citizen must be twenty-five years old and seven years a citizen; and to serve in the Senate, Thirty years old and nine years a citizen.
20. Please take note here that there are no limiting eligibility requirements established for those of the ruling People class to serve in any of the offices of the Federal Government.
21. So there now, the Founders created heir subservient commoner class, causing the political entity, the United States of America to be a Republic.
22. Do these provisions give us cause to have some concerns about the actual parental intentions of the "Founding Fathers"?
23. Am I the only one who perceives a concern in regard to the word "republic" being used here in the Constitution and in the filings of the New York Grand Jury, because I see the word "republic" in the official names of about a hundred totalitarian dictatorships on this planet? Such as "The People's Republic of China", and "The Democratic People's Republic of [North] Korea".
24. I have written about this in other comments on Jean's Blog, as to why the Founders included this Constitutional guarantee of a republican form of government in all the states, being so that all of those of the "former" aristocratic class could move to an outlaying territory and create a Dukedom for themselves where they could have control over their own subjects, except here we would call them states, and Governors rather than Dukedoms and Dukes, and citizens rather than subjects. What is the significant difference?
25. In regard to the filings of the New York Common Law Grand Jury, rejected by the New York State Courts, who was it that included in those rejected filings all of the exceedingly strong emphasis in regard to the demand therein that the CONstitutional guarantee that every state have a republican form of government be honored?
26. What has that got to do with the re-establishment of the Peoples Control over the Common Law Grand Juries? And why would the advocates of the Common Law Grand Juries want the provision establishing two political classes be honored by the Federal Government?
27. Wouldn't it be expected that whomever had the intellectual skills to create those beautifully crafted very emotionally stimulating documents, would have had the intellectual ability to see the need for a further examination of the propriety of the use of the word "republic" here, in a society purported to be Free, where all us commoners are led to believe there is only one political class, and where the Supreme Court wrote in the Dred Scott case in 1864, that the terms citizen of the United States and People of the United States, both had the same meaning. And when we observe the word "republic" so flagrantly obvious in the names of so many totalitarian dictatorships?
28. All of this ranting to restore the republic has caused great confusion here among the common people, especially in their very divergent opinions and beliefs as to what is Constitutional and what is Unconstitutional. We all agree that we want lower taxes and less government, but when "everyone" has a different opinion as to what constitutes "lower"and "less", how can we ever attain either?
29. Does not this dilemma indicate that we all need to back up and take an unbiased view of what would actually be a proper form of society? If we start at the beginning - well what then is the beginning?
30. Well, I contend that everyone who is reasonable will have to agree that when we humans are born that we then have no knowledge of human society or of anything and, of the utmost importance, we have no frame of reference against which we can compare what we are taught, to enable us to properly determine if such information is good for us or good for whomever was teaching it to us. Can there be any reasonable reason anyone could refuse to acknowledge this self evident fact?
31. While we are considering our birth condition, surly we can all acknowledge that when we are born we have no Naturally imbued authority to command anyone to obey us. Can there be any reasonable reason anyone could refuse to acknowledge this self evident fact? That when we are born our political authority over others is mathematically equal to ZERO?
32. Do not these two self evident facts clearly establish that as none of us are born with any individual authority to command others that it would then be totally ridiculous and impossible for any number of us to purport to have an ability to combine our non existing individual authority in order for a "majority" to create an authority to command the "minority" to obey them. That no matter how many ZEROs are added together, the total will always be ZERO.
33. From where could authority for a majority to command the minority to obey, reasonably arise?
34. As it is self evident that no one has any Natural authority to lay a tax on anyone then is it not then equally self evident that it would be impossible for such impotent individuals to combine their non-existing ZERO authority in order to create an authority to lay a tax on anyone?
35. Does not this reasoning clearly establish that the level of lower taxation that is proper is no taxation at all and likewise establish that what properly constitutes less government is no government at all?
36. If anyone listening does not agree with this logic, would you please point out its defective reasoning?
37. Well, many listeners will argue, "We must have some rules!" Yes, that sure does sound reasonable, but who will decide what those rules will be and who they will apply to? "Well we must at least outlaw abortion and child molestation, and we certainly can't allow people to gather rain water from the roofs of their houses!"
38, If we allow our emotions to control us we will soon wind up right back where we are. The one and only way is to acknowledge that zero plus zero always equals zero, and that this basic Principle is true no matter how emotionally large we make the zeros!
39. The way criminal behavior is controlled in a Truly Free society is through the Common Lay Jury.
40. In a Truly Free society, when a person contends they have been criminally victimized, the victim files a report with the Sheriff; the Sheriff presents the complaint to the Grand Jury, if the GJ agrees that it appears that a crime has been committed, the GJ will empanel a petit jury to hold a trial. After a full and proper examination, as determined by the jury and the defendant and victim, each of the jury members will consider the facts and determine that if the juror had been in the same situation as the accused, and had acted as had the accused, would the juror feel that he or she had acted properly or criminally? If the jurors reach a unanimous decision of guilt,, that same jury would decide the penalty and the community would enforce it.
So how do we individually become subservient to the government?
I am Eric Williams, The Radical In The Twilight Zone
VANCOUVER, BC – In an ExopoliticsTV interview with Alfred Lambremont Webre, Kevin Annett, field secretary of the International Common Law Court of Justice, described how Irish babies may have been ritually murdered : New eyewitnesses in Ireland and Holland describe more Ninth Circle killings, name George Soros, Prince Friso and Dutch Prime Minister Direct Action Units prepare to shut down Ninth Circle rituals at Montreal and Dublin churches Canadian common law courts convene under the authority of a new Republic of Kanata Child rape not a crime in Catholicism: Archbishop's admission to American court is a wake up call to why it all must end
Tuam, Ireland and Brussels:
The remains of nearly 800 babies found in a cistern at the Catholic St. Mary's Mothers and Babies Home near Tuam “bear marks of ritual killing” according to a source within the Garda, Ireland's police force.
“The forensic people have told us that the configuration of the remains and evidence of continual decapitation and dismemberment resemble the usual signs of ritualistic murder … These children weren't just cut up, they were massacred.”
The Irish government and Roman Catholic church have announced their own in-house “investigation” of the mass grave, and have closed off the site without declaring it to be a crime scene: the standard procedure in any institutional cover-up. Hundreds of protestors marched in Dublin today to the Irish Dail, or Parliament, demanding a full inquiry with the power to prosecute.
Meanwhile, as the Common Law trial of Pope Francis and others for child trafficking and murder proceeds in Brussels, a new Dutch witness has shed more light on the Ninth Circle Satanic network and its links to child killings in England, Belgium and Ireland.
The witness, a retired public official, has named nine top judges, politicians, Bilderberger member George Soros and Prince Friso, the brother of the present King of Holland, as participants in killings of children she observed in Oudergem, Belgium and Zwolle, Holland during 1996 and 2000. The witness gave her videotaped testimony last Monday to Court investigators.
“In some woods near Oudergem, they hunted those naked children through the forest and shot them down … then they cut off the penises of the dead boys and held them up as trophies. I saw Belgian soldiers patrolling the woods and protecting the men who did the hunting, men like Prince Friso, King Albert of Belgium and Mark Rutte, the Prime Minister. I recognized George Soros in the hunting party too, you know, the billionaire. He is good friends with Friso's wife, Mabel Wisse Smit.”
Friso, younger brother to Dutch King Willelm, died suddenly in a hospital last year while recovering from a “skiing accident”. His death came just before the public exposure of high level child murder by former Belgian Member of Parliament Laurent Louis.
The witness also described the presence of “a Catholic prelate” at a separate murder of three teenage juvenile offenders near Zwolle, Holland in 2004.
“A criminal syndicate called 'The Octopus' provides the children by taking them from juvenile detention centers. There were three of them that day, two boys and a girl. All of them were raped and tortured to death at a house near Zwolle owned by the gangsters. Friso was there, and some Catholic prelate I didn't recognize because he spoke English. But I remember Friso calling him 'The Irishman' and he also referred to the Nine or the Group of Nine or something.”
The witness was present at the killings and is a former member of the alleged “Octopus” crime syndicate that controls the drug trade in Holland and Belgium. She is the fourth insider to come forward to describe ritual killings by top officials in the Netherlands and Belgium.
Ninth Circle Rituals targeted for shut down
Montreal and Dublin:
Professionally trained sheriffs are preparing to shut down planned Ninth Circle sacrificial rituals at Catholic churches in Montreal, Canada and Dublin, Ireland this summer and autumn, and arrest and charge the participants with murder.
The sheriffs are presently undergoing training within Direct Action Units established by the Common Law Court of Justice in Brussels, and its dozens of local affiliates.
A statement from the Court's Sheriff's Office reads,
“We are targeting two cathedrals where the Ninth Circle ritual killing of babies are scheduled to take place on August 15 and at the new moon in September, those being Pro Cathedral in Dublin and Marie Reine du Monde Cathedral in Montreal. Everyone present will be arrested and arraigned before the Court for suspected child murder. We will use every force that's necessary to save the lives of those children.”
The Sheriff's Office will be notifying the Garda police in Dublin of their intentions and calling upon their assistance. In Montreal, the regular police, as agents of the criminally convicted “crown of england”, will be ordered to stand down and not interfere with the Sheriffs' actions, and will be charged with criminal collusion and obstructing justice if they do interfere.
A New Republic in Canada: Common Law Courts to receive Constitutional Legitimacy
In the wake of last year's criminal conviction and lawful annulment of Canada's head of state, Elizabeth Windsor, for Crimes against Humanity, patriots across Canada are gathering in Winnipeg this October at a Constitutional Convention to establish a sovereign Republic in Canada to replace so-called “Crown” authority.
The Convention will issue a Proclamation of Independence and a Constitution to be ratified by the people of Canada. It will also provide a legitimate basis for the establishment of de jure common law courts of record across Canada.
Kevin Annett, an adviser to the Winnipeg-based Provisional Council for the Republic, said today in a joint statement with Council Chairman Cameron Shields,
“One woman in London, Elizabeth Windsor, owns all of the lands and minerals of our country and has murdered and can murder children at her pleasure. She also calls herself the head of state of Canada. We will not live under such tyranny any longer, nor allow our children to. Under the law, there is no lawful authority in Canada any longer. We must create that authority and come under the rule of common law, and a true Republic. We ask every Canadian to join us.”
The Convention will take place between October 27-31, 2014. It will establish the constitutional basis for common law courts in Canada and for the legal disestablishment of the Crown of England and its sponsor, the Church of Rome.
The Council has issued a draft Proclamation and Constitution to Convention delegates. To receive a copy and attend the Convention, contact the Council at firstname.lastname@example.org .
A Final Comment: Child rape not a crime in Catholicism - Archbishop's admission is a wake up call
Catholic Archbishop Robert Carlson stated this week to American lawyers that he was “not aware that child rape is a crime”. Carlson is responsible for the concealment of priestly child trafficking in his Minneapolis diocese as far back as 1980. (NBC News, June 10, 2014)
Carlson's outrageous remarks are not an aberration or a cause to simply be outraged: they are in fact an honest description of official Catholic policy and attitude. The rape of children is not a crime under catholic “canon law” (see Crimen Sollicitationas, www.hiddennolonger.com , appendix 9), nor according to the depraved values of catholic clergy and officials.
When Carlson expresses doubt over whether it's wrong to rape a child, we should hardly be surprised. He has been raised in a religious culture that condones and belittles the crime because it profits massively from it to the tune of a multi-billion dollar a year in house child trafficking industry.
How long would any politician last if he made Carlson's remark? The Church of Rome, of course, can get away with murder and this kind of obscenity, and does, all the time.
So why is the world tolerating the continued existence of this church: the worst child killing institution in human history?
Give your answer in the streets, not simply in your re-awakened outrage.
Hi! Thank you. Please understand that I have no formal position with either the International Tribunal into Crimes of Church and State (ITCCS) www.itccs.org or the International Common Law Court of Justice (ICLCJ) www.iclcj.com, a tribunal of conscience sponsored by the ITCCS.
Here are some approaches that may be useful to answering and may overlap on some your questions.
I would call the ITCCS and the ICLCJ "Tribunals of Conscience" which are citizen-based courts that come together when the constitutional courts are refusing to adjudicate issues of major importance.
Thus the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal on which I served as a Judge was a Tribunal of Conscience of citizens which came together to render justice to victims of U.S. and U.K war crimes in Iraq who made over 40 reports of war crimes to the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court (ICC) without getting any effective action.
Tribunals of Conscience typically operate under the jurisdiction of natural law, which is the source of a social law (criminal, civil, family, and commercial law, as well as judge made and jury-made common law).
Typically Tribunals of Conscience can be composed of Judges or a Jury that applies International humanitarian law (such as the Geneva conventions; Conventions against torture, etc.; criminal laws). In order for the procedures to be valid, due process must be observed at all times, including the publication and service of charges on defendants; opportunity for the defendant to represent themselves at the proceedings; clear legal procedures; following rules of evidence.
Judgments of a Tribunal of Conscience can be enforced by any competent court or other civil authority, or by an authority created by the Tribunal of conscience itself.
In the case of the KL War Crimes Tribunal, defendant Tony Blair was subjected to petitions for arrest made to the South African government by Archbishop Desmond Tutu and other groups of prominent South Africans citing the judgments of the KL War Crimes Tribunal when Tony Blair visited South Africa.
In the case of the ITCCS and ICLCJ defendant Pope Joseph Ratzinger, the ITCCS approached a European with the verdict and ITCCS court record of child genocide and child trafficking against Pope Joseph Ratzinger. That nation, which has a strong policy against these crimes, contacted Cardinal Bertone, then Vatican Secretary of State and stated that they would proceed to prosecute and arrest Pope Ratzinger on the basis of the crimes found in the ITCCS proceedings. Cardinal Bertone then conferred with Pope Ratzinger and the following week, Pope Ratzinger resigned, the first Pope to do so in 600 years. He sequestered himself on the grounds of the Vatican, secure from prosecution in his on mind on the basis of the flawed 1929 Lateran Treaty by which Mussolini granted the status of a nation-state to the Vatican, a religion.
The nation that acted on the basis of the ITCCS judgement did so because the proceedings and judgments of the ITCCS as a Tribunal of Conscience meet all procedural requirements. No civil authority was prosecuting the egregious child trafficking and child genocide crimes of defendants Government of Canada, Anglican Church, United Church of Canada and Roman Catholic Church. Hence the Tribunal of Conscience of the ITCCS could adjudicate and render enforceable judgments in these cases, providing due process proceedings were observed.
Common Law Community Training Manual
The ITCCS and ICLCJ observe due process have developed a common law training manual for their Judges, Jury members, Forensic Investigators, Common Law Sheriffs and Enforcers, who as of today number approximately 260 persons in 19 countries.
Common Law Community Training Manual Establishing the Reign of Natural Liberty: The Common Law and its Courts A Community Training Manual Issued by The International Tribunal into Crimes of Church and State (Brussels)
"What is assembling is the first court in history to bring judgment against the Vatican and the Crown of England as institutions. But our Court also signals the dawn of a new notion of justice: one defined by the people themselves, and especially by the historic victims of church and state, to bring about not only a judgment on their persecutors, but a new political and spiritual arrangement to undo the systems responsible for intergenerational crimes against humanity" - from the founding Charter of The International Common Law Court of Justice, September 1, 2012
I would urge all serious observers of the ITCCS and ICLCJ to read this manual in full to understand the role that natural law and common law plays in the operation of the courts proceedings, jurisdiction, authority, and judgments.
I hope this is helpful. Please let me know if I can furnish any other information.
Letter to a friend about the ITCCS and International Common Law Court of Justice (ICLCJ.com)
BREAKING NEWS UK May 17, 2014 - ITCCS.ORG supporter Barbara Watson reports "Update! I went to see Vivian Cunningham today; he asked me to say a big thank you for all the support given.
"Vivian is ok; the doctors told him that, due to his "improvement", he has been put on a pre-release programme! Therefore, he expects to be discharged sometime over the next two weeks."
At last report on May 9, 014, UK Grenadier soldier Vivian Cunningham had been committed to 6 months in a mental hospital for asking lawful questions about the status of UK Queen Elizabeth II under the International Common Law Court of Justice.
BRUSSELS - A Belgian court fined MP Laurent Louis 50,000 Euros and sentenced him to 20 months (suspended) for calling Belgian Prime minister a "pedophile" in Parliament, despite controlling Belgian law granting full legal immunity to speeches by Members on the floor of the Parliament. MP Laurent Louis had previously released a list of prominent pedophiles in Belgium including Members of Parliament, the Monarchy, and prominent lawyers, judges and bankers.
This ruling, which MP Laurent Louis is expected to appeal, may have some effect his campaign in the May 25, 2014 EU parliamentary elections.
As MP Laurant Louis speech in the Belgian Parliament is legally protected (as the Prime Minister himself admitted while in debate), it is unclear why this prosecution was brought other than for political purposes to derail MP Laurant Louis campaign.
MP Laurent Louis is an EU Politician who has endorsed the International Common Law Court of Justice trials against the UK Monarch, Vatican, Popes Ratziner & Bergoglio and the Jesuit Superior General for child genocide. www.iclcj.com.
Below is a translation of a Belgian news article announcing the court verdict.
20 months in prison required against the member Laurent Louis
Tuesday, May 13, 2014 at 4:18 p.m.
( Belga ) The Crown has requested , on Tuesday afternoon , a sentence of 20 months in prison (suspended) against the independent MP Laurent Louis , before the Criminal Court of Brussels. Louis Laurent is accused of contempt against the Prime Minister , slanders against a journalist and several others as well as concealment of parts of Dutroux case.
20 months in prison required against the member Laurent Louis
The prosecution said that all the charges were laid against Laurent Louis and requested a sentence of 20 months suspended sentence and a fine of 50,000 euros. Louis Laurent , independent MP and founder of the party " Standing Belgians ," is accused of contempt towards the Prime Minister Elio Di Rupo he was a pedophile , slander in respect of a newspaper reporter Le Soir that he described as " protector of pedophiles " and concealment of parts of the Dutroux case. At a press conference in April 2012 , Laurent Louis denounced the existence of pedophile networks in Belgium and showed two photos from the autopsy report of Julie and Melissa , victims of pedophile Marc Dutroux . About 70 people gathered Tuesday at noon in front of the Palais de Justice in Brussels in support of the hon. They hoped to come to attend the appearance of Corrections Laurent Louis , but access to the courthouse has been denied by the police , including a fairly large device was spot on. The action took place without incident. The trial continues on Tuesday afternoon with the arguments of the defense. ( Belga )
STAFFORDSHIRE, UK May 9, 2014- UK Grenadier soldier Vivian Cunningham has been committed to 6 months in a mental hospital for asking lawful quesions about the status of UK Queen Elizabeth II under the International Common Law Court of Justice Grenadier Cunningham is requesting assistance from extended family; friends and supporters. He has also expressed his appreciation of the assistance given to him by Kevin.
Cunningham has been committed under the notorious "Fixated Threat" law, which criminalizes opinion in England, and classifies the criticism of any political figure as a mental disorder.
FROM Barbara Watson "I have just spoken to Vivian Cunningham who informed me that the Hospital have carried out their threat and have detained him for another six months, under Section 3.
"Of course, he is requesting assistance from extended family; friends and supporters. He has also expressed his appreciation of the assistance given to him by Kevin.
"This is the direct number and other contact details:
St Georges Hospital Corporation Street Stafford Staffordshire ST16 3AG
Telephone: 01785 221319 ext 5045 (24hrs, 7 Days a Week)
ITCCS Urgent Appeal British soldier persecuted, institutionalized for discussing common law arrest warrants against Elizabeth Windsor Stafford, England, May 7, 2014, 4 pm GMT Vivian Cunningham, a serving soldier in the Irish Guards Regiment in Aldershot, Hampshire, has been detained, institutionalized and drugged against his will for mentioning to a senior officer the Common Law arrest warrants against convicted felon Elizabeth Windsor (aka "Queen Elizabeth").
Guardsman Cunningham is presently being detained without his consent for six months at the mental care unit of St. George's Hospital in Stafford (ph: 44 01785 25788). He has been injected with olanzapine, an atypical anti-psychotic drug, under the orders of a Captain Murrell (ph: 44 07909686198) and Doctors Khan and Sema.
Recently, Guardsman Cunningham reported to Captain Murrell the existence of the standing arrest warrant against Windsor, and her lawful conviction for crimes against humanity. According to Cunningham, Capt. Murrell responded by saying "Yes I believe the evidence you have shown me, but is it ok if you attend a medical assessment to make sure you are ok?". Cunningham agreed, and was then committed with a diagnosis of having suffered an "acute psychotic episode".
Clearly, Cunningham has been committed under the notorious "Fixated Threat" law, which criminalizes opinion in England, and classifies the criticism of any political figure as a mental disorder.
The ITCCS Executive states categorically that Guardsman Vivian Cunningham has been targeted by the British Crown for his circulating of evidence of Elizabeth Windsor's guilt under the law. Cunningham's persecution is directly related to the present Common Law Court's investigation of the British Crown and members of the "royal family" for child trafficking and murder.
The ITCCS Executive therefore calls upon all of its global affiliates and British members to protest at St. George's hospital in Stafford, and phone the facility and Capt. Murrell to demand an explanation for Cunningham's incarceration. Protests and occupations will commence at British embassies and businesses around the world, and will continue until Vivian Cunnigham is released unconditionally.
Vivian Cunningham is hereby declared a prisoner of conscience in England by the ITCCS.