Vancouver, BC – In an ExopoliticsTV interview with Alfred Lambremont Webre, ITCCS field Secretary Kevin Annett announced the final verdict of the International Common Law Court of Justice in Brussels, convicting Pope Francis, Jesuit General General “guilty as charged of aiding and abetting Crimes against Humanity, including murder and human trafficking, and of personal involvement in those crimes.” The Final Judgment of the Common Law Court is below, along with an exclusive report by Kevin Annett on “Who's really behind child trafficking? Following the big money across the globe.”
Republic of Kanata: The Winnipeg Proclamation of Independence establishing the Federated Republic of Kanata and Articles of the Constitution of The Federated Republic of Kanata
In his interview, Kevin Annett also discussed Constitutional Convention planned for October 27-31, 2014 in Winnipeg, Manitoba to establish the Republic of Kanata as one positive outgrowth of the ongoing Common Law Court of Justice trials and verdicts against the Crown of England, Roman Catholic and Anglican Churches, and Government of Canada.
READ FULL ARTICLE
VIDEO - Kevin Annett: Pope Francis, Jesuit Superior General, Archbishop of Canterbury guilty of child genocide - Intl. Common Law Court. Republic of Kanata Convention announced
ARKANSAS, USA – In an ExopoliticsTV interview with Alfred Lambremont Webre, advocate Eric Williams discussed Sovereignty, Personal Freedom, and the Grand Jury as conceived under the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. constitution.
A partial transcript of Eric Williams remarks is as follows:
First, why does everyone insist on making the assertion of political Sovereignty so complicated when it is actually so very simple?
Back in 1970, I was prosecuted by the IRS in Federal Court in Los Angeles, for criminal willful failure to file or pay income tax. At the trial, at the very outset, I challenged the IRS prosecutor to present evidence that I was among those he claimed had various citizenship obligations. When my case was called, there were only five people in the court room .... After I say the prosecutor has no proof of BC in his file......
When neither the Court Judge nor the Prosecutor could establish that I had volunteered myself into being a U.S. citizen, no matter that to the best of my knowledge I was born in California. (Being born in the United States does NOT cause such individual to be designated a citizen due to such birth.) Because the IRS could not establish that I had voluntarily submitted myself to the jurisdiction of the IRS or Federal (or state) government , the Judge said he was taking the matter under consideration and that I would be notified. That was forty-four years ago, I am still waiting.
Some people assume that because my event was forty-four years ago that challenging the political jurisdiction would not now work. During the past year there have been several people who have presented letters to the IRS challenging the ability of the IRS to present evidence that they had volunteered themselves into subservience to the IRS or federal or state governments. I am not aware that any of such letters have failed to ward off the IRS or State tax collectors. Some of these individuals are still using their DL and SS# under the Law of necessity recognized by the Supreme Court in a case called Holy Trinity Church v. United States (1892?) , where the Supreme Court wrote that when the strict application of the letter of a law or Constitutional provision would result in an absurd outcome, the law of Constitutional provision must be applied in a manner to avoid the absurd outcome.
. My challenge was and is based on the 13th and 14th Amendments, which have not changed.
Because so much of what was prevalent back in the 1960s did not work, I went back to the beginning of this country, back to July 4, 1776, Prior to that date, everyone here in the Thirteen Colonies was under the dominion of King George III.
However, on that date, when King George was kicked out, at that moment there was absolutely no government here in what had a moment prior been under King George. At that moment on that day everyone present became politically equal. There were no more Aristocrats and there were no more commoners. Everyone became individually sovereign over their own person, with no authority to command the subservience of any other person.
It helps if we think of it mathematically. Think of each individual person's authority over others as being equal to ZERO. When each person's authority over others is equal to ZERO, how many ZEROs would be required to be added up to come up with a total greater than ZERO?
This establishes, with a mathematical certainty, that although the Founding Fathers could certainly get together and create any manner of organization that they agreed upon, but there was ZERO possibility that the Founders could have had any authority or ability to imbue their creation with any authority to command the subservience of any individual who did not individually volunteer to submit his or her self to the government created under their Constitution. ZERO plus ZERO would still equal ZERO, and in 1866, the ratification of the Thirteenth Amendment instilled the acknowledgment of this mathematically certain fact into our Constitution.
This information is not at all complicated, it is very simple and does not require any significant study or research for anyone to be able to understand it! Neither does it require anyone to file any rescission documents with any government agency.
All we need to do is examine how our government manages our society to entice us individually, to volunteer ourselves into subservience to its rules.
It is very important for those who have been confused by all the conflicting information prevalent among the Freedom movement, to understand how vulnerable the human child is to indoctrination, and that this vulnerability does not significantly diminish as we grow older.
Thinking is very hard work and none of us like to do any more work than is necessary, so when others tell us what we want to hear. when they tell us they have a solution in regard to bow we got under control of the government, because our names are written in all capital letters, or because of gold fringe on the flag, and that the government has taken over ownership of us through its bundling and sale of our birth certificates, and that our republican form of government has been turned into a corporation, we presume that those who tell us these things have done their homework , but they have not, as I have revealed here in what I said earlier, about how ZERO plus ZERO will always equal ZERO!
When this mathematically certain fact is applied to all the information the effect of all these assertions just vanishes, because none of it overcomes ZERO plus ZERO equaling ZERO!
As this is irrefutably true, it is not possible for any of the reasons prevalent among the Freedom community to be true!
So how were we enticed to volunteer ourselves into political servitude?
1. The Constitution was written by Aristocratic men who were politicians who had been in charge of the commoners under the British Monarch for, literally, centuries. For all of them to willingly give up their Aristocratic positions, to agree to be politically equal to scrub women and stablemen, without a whimper, is just too much to believe. It is amazing to me that very few of the members of the Freedom movement have any qualms about the true intent of the Founders.
2. They were politicians. This means they were accomplished in manipulating others. This means that they knew very well how to write legislation so that there would be loop-holes for themselves and their friends to work around whatever they were imposing on the commoners. And, it also means they knew how to writs a Constitution where there would be no such loop holes, so why did they give us this sieve? For whose benefit were all those hole provided? Or, flip that, and consider, who was it that was intended to be enslaved under the Constitution?
3. Just take a look around! Try your mirror! The one that magnifies!
4. An argument can be made to establish that everything that has been and is being done is supported by the CONstitution! Everyone reads the comments and admonishments of the Founders written or presented by them outside of the CONstitution, as to how important it is to keep a watchful eye on the government, to keep it on track with the CONstitution, but why did they not write the CONstitution to more securely prevent the problems they perceived as arising if the populace was not unrealistically vigilant.
Is it reasonable that we should have to continually watch everything that politicians do in order to keep them in conformance to the Constitution? And when the rules set down in the CONstitution are written in a way that the politicians can reasonably support everything that they do as being Constitutional, how do we prevent them from instituting the micro-management of us that they have?
5. The commoners of that time wanted and expected a society where there would only be one political class. A republic is NOT such an organization! No where in the history of man is there one single society that has been "governed" by the commoners or where there was only one political class.
6. Why were those present back then and why are the Freedom advocates of today so adamant in their concerns and demands in regard to having and restoring a republican form of government back then and here in our time? Or, was there any such advocacy or demand on the part of the commoners back then? I don't recall ever hearing about any such issue by those commoners, so why did the Aristocratic Framers of the CONstitution include that provision, guaranteeing a republican form of government to the new states? And why do the filings of the New York Grand Jury put such adamant insistence that this CONsitutional provision which they seem to believe and claim has been in some way eradicated, be restored?
7. Where in the Federal Constitution is there any overt evidence declaring that this document created a republic? What is a republic? According to the content of there filings and the foot notes included therein, a republic is a form of society where the People are in charge. In charge of what or who? One of the foot notes included, taken from the New York State Codes, provides that the People are over the citizens. Does that foot note not indicate that there are two political classes? The People being the ruling class and the citizens being those ruled?
8. In regard to the words "citizen" and "People", some words have an inherent political meaning and some do not, but those words which do not can be imbued with a political meaning if the context in which they are set is political. And while we are considering this it is also advisable to be aware of the propensity of politicians to use certain words as "terms of art", which means with devious unrevealed intent.
9. It is self evident that the word "citizen" is a political word which constitutes an acknowledgment of subservience to a political superior no matter the context, such as, "All the citizens in the swimming pool or all the citizens watching the football game". Is there any doubt that both references to citizens indicate a subservience to a political superior?
10. If the word "people" were substituted would there be any such political subservience implication? "All the people in the swimming pool or all the people watching the football game"?
11. If we carefully read the Preamble to the Constitution, paying attention to this political context in which the word "People" is set, we have, in relevant part: "We the People of the United States, in order to secure the blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."
12. Is it not self evident that in this political context the word "People" is automatically imbued with a political meaning, that it is now a political "Term of Art", that devious politicians can use to subjugate innocent common people?
As they did in their condensing and rewording of the fifty amendments to the Constitution proposed by the commoners, where they used the word "people" in the five most critical of those amendments, and totally avoided using the word "citizen", because if they had used both of those political status establishing words, the commoners would have objected.
13. The purpose of the Preamble is very important but is usually overlooked. The Preamble establishes the purpose of the Constitution and declares the source of its authority, which is clearly stated to be The People of the United States, "to secure the Blessings of Liberty to THEM, and THEIR Posterity".
14. In order to have the authority to declare such purpose those doing so must be politically Sovereign! Those doing so must be subservient to no politically superior man or entity.
15. At that time was there anyone or any entity present in North America who had more political authority than the People of the United States? Clearly there was no such superior authority.
16. In the Preamble the Founding Fathers established that the People of the United States were Sovereign. This meant that neither They nor Their Posterity would be subject to comply with what they established in the Constitution. This indicates the purpose of the Constitution was to govern the government, to prevent it from treating the commoners as a politically subservient class.
However, a careful study of the Constitution, with a suspicious eye, will reveal that the Founding Fathers had a different intention.
17. The establishment in the Preamble of the Sovereign status of The People was open and notoriously done. Everyone then present knew that they were of the People of the United States so no problem was perceived, except by Patrick Henry, when Patrick Henry read the CONstitution he said he smelled a rat and he would have no more to do with it.
18. Now is where the Founding politicians get tricky and devious. These politicians creating this political document are going to unambiguously and surreptitiously create a subservient political class, citizen of the United States.
19. This is in Section Two of Article One, where it is made clear that U.S. citizenship is not acquired by birth because it provides that to serve in the House, the citizen must be twenty-five years old and seven years a citizen; and to serve in the Senate, Thirty years old and nine years a citizen.
20. Please take note here that there are no limiting eligibility requirements established for those of the ruling People class to serve in any of the offices of the Federal Government.
21. So there now, the Founders created heir subservient commoner class, causing the political entity, the United States of America to be a Republic.
22. Do these provisions give us cause to have some concerns about the actual parental intentions of the "Founding Fathers"?
23. Am I the only one who perceives a concern in regard to the word "republic" being used here in the Constitution and in the filings of the New York Grand Jury, because I see the word "republic" in the official names of about a hundred totalitarian dictatorships on this planet? Such as "The People's Republic of China", and "The Democratic People's Republic of [North] Korea".
24. I have written about this in other comments on Jean's Blog, as to why the Founders included this Constitutional guarantee of a republican form of government in all the states, being so that all of those of the "former" aristocratic class could move to an outlaying territory and create a Dukedom for themselves where they could have control over their own subjects, except here we would call them states, and Governors rather than Dukedoms and Dukes, and citizens rather than subjects. What is the significant difference?
25. In regard to the filings of the New York Common Law Grand Jury, rejected by the New York State Courts, who was it that included in those rejected filings all of the exceedingly strong emphasis in regard to the demand therein that the CONstitutional guarantee that every state have a republican form of government be honored?
26. What has that got to do with the re-establishment of the Peoples Control over the Common Law Grand Juries? And why would the advocates of the Common Law Grand Juries want the provision establishing two political classes be honored by the Federal Government?
27. Wouldn't it be expected that whomever had the intellectual skills to create those beautifully crafted very emotionally stimulating documents, would have had the intellectual ability to see the need for a further examination of the propriety of the use of the word "republic" here, in a society purported to be Free, where all us commoners are led to believe there is only one political class, and where the Supreme Court wrote in the Dred Scott case in 1864, that the terms citizen of the United States and People of the United States, both had the same meaning. And when we observe the word "republic" so flagrantly obvious in the names of so many totalitarian dictatorships?
28. All of this ranting to restore the republic has caused great confusion here among the common people, especially in their very divergent opinions and beliefs as to what is Constitutional and what is Unconstitutional. We all agree that we want lower taxes and less government, but when "everyone" has a different opinion as to what constitutes "lower"and "less", how can we ever attain either?
29. Does not this dilemma indicate that we all need to back up and take an unbiased view of what would actually be a proper form of society? If we start at the beginning - well what then is the beginning?
30. Well, I contend that everyone who is reasonable will have to agree that when we humans are born that we then have no knowledge of human society or of anything and, of the utmost importance, we have no frame of reference against which we can compare what we are taught, to enable us to properly determine if such information is good for us or good for whomever was teaching it to us. Can there be any reasonable reason anyone could refuse to acknowledge this self evident fact?
31. While we are considering our birth condition, surly we can all acknowledge that when we are born we have no Naturally imbued authority to command anyone to obey us. Can there be any reasonable reason anyone could refuse to acknowledge this self evident fact? That when we are born our political authority over others is mathematically equal to ZERO?
32. Do not these two self evident facts clearly establish that as none of us are born with any individual authority to command others that it would then be totally ridiculous and impossible for any number of us to purport to have an ability to combine our non existing individual authority in order for a "majority" to create an authority to command the "minority" to obey them. That no matter how many ZEROs are added together, the total will always be ZERO.
33. From where could authority for a majority to command the minority to obey, reasonably arise?
34. As it is self evident that no one has any Natural authority to lay a tax on anyone then is it not then equally self evident that it would be impossible for such impotent individuals to combine their non-existing ZERO authority in order to create an authority to lay a tax on anyone?
35. Does not this reasoning clearly establish that the level of lower taxation that is proper is no taxation at all and likewise establish that what properly constitutes less government is no government at all?
36. If anyone listening does not agree with this logic, would you please point out its defective reasoning?
37. Well, many listeners will argue, "We must have some rules!" Yes, that sure does sound reasonable, but who will decide what those rules will be and who they will apply to? "Well we must at least outlaw abortion and child molestation, and we certainly can't allow people to gather rain water from the roofs of their houses!"
38, If we allow our emotions to control us we will soon wind up right back where we are. The one and only way is to acknowledge that zero plus zero always equals zero, and that this basic Principle is true no matter how emotionally large we make the zeros!
39. The way criminal behavior is controlled in a Truly Free society is through the Common Lay Jury.
40. In a Truly Free society, when a person contends they have been criminally victimized, the victim files a report with the Sheriff; the Sheriff presents the complaint to the Grand Jury, if the GJ agrees that it appears that a crime has been committed, the GJ will empanel a petit jury to hold a trial. After a full and proper examination, as determined by the jury and the defendant and victim, each of the jury members will consider the facts and determine that if the juror had been in the same situation as the accused, and had acted as had the accused, would the juror feel that he or she had acted properly or criminally? If the jurors reach a unanimous decision of guilt,, that same jury would decide the penalty and the community would enforce it.
So how do we individually become subservient to the government?
I am Eric Williams, The Radical In The Twilight Zone
VANCOUVER, BC – In an ExopoliticsTV interview with Alfred Lambremont Webre, Kevin Annett, field secretary of the International Common Law Court of Justice, described how Irish babies may have been ritually murdered : New eyewitnesses in Ireland and Holland describe more Ninth Circle killings, name George Soros, Prince Friso and Dutch Prime Minister Direct Action Units prepare to shut down Ninth Circle rituals at Montreal and Dublin churches Canadian common law courts convene under the authority of a new Republic of Kanata Child rape not a crime in Catholicism: Archbishop's admission to American court is a wake up call to why it all must end
Tuam, Ireland and Brussels:
The remains of nearly 800 babies found in a cistern at the Catholic St. Mary's Mothers and Babies Home near Tuam “bear marks of ritual killing” according to a source within the Garda, Ireland's police force.
“The forensic people have told us that the configuration of the remains and evidence of continual decapitation and dismemberment resemble the usual signs of ritualistic murder … These children weren't just cut up, they were massacred.”
The Irish government and Roman Catholic church have announced their own in-house “investigation” of the mass grave, and have closed off the site without declaring it to be a crime scene: the standard procedure in any institutional cover-up. Hundreds of protestors marched in Dublin today to the Irish Dail, or Parliament, demanding a full inquiry with the power to prosecute.
Meanwhile, as the Common Law trial of Pope Francis and others for child trafficking and murder proceeds in Brussels, a new Dutch witness has shed more light on the Ninth Circle Satanic network and its links to child killings in England, Belgium and Ireland.
The witness, a retired public official, has named nine top judges, politicians, Bilderberger member George Soros and Prince Friso, the brother of the present King of Holland, as participants in killings of children she observed in Oudergem, Belgium and Zwolle, Holland during 1996 and 2000. The witness gave her videotaped testimony last Monday to Court investigators.
“In some woods near Oudergem, they hunted those naked children through the forest and shot them down … then they cut off the penises of the dead boys and held them up as trophies. I saw Belgian soldiers patrolling the woods and protecting the men who did the hunting, men like Prince Friso, King Albert of Belgium and Mark Rutte, the Prime Minister. I recognized George Soros in the hunting party too, you know, the billionaire. He is good friends with Friso's wife, Mabel Wisse Smit.”
Friso, younger brother to Dutch King Willelm, died suddenly in a hospital last year while recovering from a “skiing accident”. His death came just before the public exposure of high level child murder by former Belgian Member of Parliament Laurent Louis.
The witness also described the presence of “a Catholic prelate” at a separate murder of three teenage juvenile offenders near Zwolle, Holland in 2004.
“A criminal syndicate called 'The Octopus' provides the children by taking them from juvenile detention centers. There were three of them that day, two boys and a girl. All of them were raped and tortured to death at a house near Zwolle owned by the gangsters. Friso was there, and some Catholic prelate I didn't recognize because he spoke English. But I remember Friso calling him 'The Irishman' and he also referred to the Nine or the Group of Nine or something.”
The witness was present at the killings and is a former member of the alleged “Octopus” crime syndicate that controls the drug trade in Holland and Belgium. She is the fourth insider to come forward to describe ritual killings by top officials in the Netherlands and Belgium.
Ninth Circle Rituals targeted for shut down
Montreal and Dublin:
Professionally trained sheriffs are preparing to shut down planned Ninth Circle sacrificial rituals at Catholic churches in Montreal, Canada and Dublin, Ireland this summer and autumn, and arrest and charge the participants with murder.
The sheriffs are presently undergoing training within Direct Action Units established by the Common Law Court of Justice in Brussels, and its dozens of local affiliates.
A statement from the Court's Sheriff's Office reads,
“We are targeting two cathedrals where the Ninth Circle ritual killing of babies are scheduled to take place on August 15 and at the new moon in September, those being Pro Cathedral in Dublin and Marie Reine du Monde Cathedral in Montreal. Everyone present will be arrested and arraigned before the Court for suspected child murder. We will use every force that's necessary to save the lives of those children.”
The Sheriff's Office will be notifying the Garda police in Dublin of their intentions and calling upon their assistance. In Montreal, the regular police, as agents of the criminally convicted “crown of england”, will be ordered to stand down and not interfere with the Sheriffs' actions, and will be charged with criminal collusion and obstructing justice if they do interfere.
A New Republic in Canada: Common Law Courts to receive Constitutional Legitimacy
In the wake of last year's criminal conviction and lawful annulment of Canada's head of state, Elizabeth Windsor, for Crimes against Humanity, patriots across Canada are gathering in Winnipeg this October at a Constitutional Convention to establish a sovereign Republic in Canada to replace so-called “Crown” authority.
The Convention will issue a Proclamation of Independence and a Constitution to be ratified by the people of Canada. It will also provide a legitimate basis for the establishment of de jure common law courts of record across Canada.
Kevin Annett, an adviser to the Winnipeg-based Provisional Council for the Republic, said today in a joint statement with Council Chairman Cameron Shields,
“One woman in London, Elizabeth Windsor, owns all of the lands and minerals of our country and has murdered and can murder children at her pleasure. She also calls herself the head of state of Canada. We will not live under such tyranny any longer, nor allow our children to. Under the law, there is no lawful authority in Canada any longer. We must create that authority and come under the rule of common law, and a true Republic. We ask every Canadian to join us.”
The Convention will take place between October 27-31, 2014. It will establish the constitutional basis for common law courts in Canada and for the legal disestablishment of the Crown of England and its sponsor, the Church of Rome.
The Council has issued a draft Proclamation and Constitution to Convention delegates. To receive a copy and attend the Convention, contact the Council at email@example.com .
A Final Comment: Child rape not a crime in Catholicism - Archbishop's admission is a wake up call
Catholic Archbishop Robert Carlson stated this week to American lawyers that he was “not aware that child rape is a crime”. Carlson is responsible for the concealment of priestly child trafficking in his Minneapolis diocese as far back as 1980. (NBC News, June 10, 2014)
Carlson's outrageous remarks are not an aberration or a cause to simply be outraged: they are in fact an honest description of official Catholic policy and attitude. The rape of children is not a crime under catholic “canon law” (see Crimen Sollicitationas, www.hiddennolonger.com , appendix 9), nor according to the depraved values of catholic clergy and officials.
When Carlson expresses doubt over whether it's wrong to rape a child, we should hardly be surprised. He has been raised in a religious culture that condones and belittles the crime because it profits massively from it to the tune of a multi-billion dollar a year in house child trafficking industry.
How long would any politician last if he made Carlson's remark? The Church of Rome, of course, can get away with murder and this kind of obscenity, and does, all the time.
So why is the world tolerating the continued existence of this church: the worst child killing institution in human history?
Give your answer in the streets, not simply in your re-awakened outrage.
Hi! Thank you. Please understand that I have no formal position with either the International Tribunal into Crimes of Church and State (ITCCS) www.itccs.org or the International Common Law Court of Justice (ICLCJ) www.iclcj.com, a tribunal of conscience sponsored by the ITCCS.
Here are some approaches that may be useful to answering and may overlap on some your questions.
I would call the ITCCS and the ICLCJ "Tribunals of Conscience" which are citizen-based courts that come together when the constitutional courts are refusing to adjudicate issues of major importance.
Thus the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal on which I served as a Judge was a Tribunal of Conscience of citizens which came together to render justice to victims of U.S. and U.K war crimes in Iraq who made over 40 reports of war crimes to the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court (ICC) without getting any effective action.
Tribunals of Conscience typically operate under the jurisdiction of natural law, which is the source of a social law (criminal, civil, family, and commercial law, as well as judge made and jury-made common law).
Typically Tribunals of Conscience can be composed of Judges or a Jury that applies International humanitarian law (such as the Geneva conventions; Conventions against torture, etc.; criminal laws). In order for the procedures to be valid, due process must be observed at all times, including the publication and service of charges on defendants; opportunity for the defendant to represent themselves at the proceedings; clear legal procedures; following rules of evidence.
Judgments of a Tribunal of Conscience can be enforced by any competent court or other civil authority, or by an authority created by the Tribunal of conscience itself.
In the case of the KL War Crimes Tribunal, defendant Tony Blair was subjected to petitions for arrest made to the South African government by Archbishop Desmond Tutu and other groups of prominent South Africans citing the judgments of the KL War Crimes Tribunal when Tony Blair visited South Africa.
In the case of the ITCCS and ICLCJ defendant Pope Joseph Ratzinger, the ITCCS approached a European with the verdict and ITCCS court record of child genocide and child trafficking against Pope Joseph Ratzinger. That nation, which has a strong policy against these crimes, contacted Cardinal Bertone, then Vatican Secretary of State and stated that they would proceed to prosecute and arrest Pope Ratzinger on the basis of the crimes found in the ITCCS proceedings. Cardinal Bertone then conferred with Pope Ratzinger and the following week, Pope Ratzinger resigned, the first Pope to do so in 600 years. He sequestered himself on the grounds of the Vatican, secure from prosecution in his on mind on the basis of the flawed 1929 Lateran Treaty by which Mussolini granted the status of a nation-state to the Vatican, a religion.
The nation that acted on the basis of the ITCCS judgement did so because the proceedings and judgments of the ITCCS as a Tribunal of Conscience meet all procedural requirements. No civil authority was prosecuting the egregious child trafficking and child genocide crimes of defendants Government of Canada, Anglican Church, United Church of Canada and Roman Catholic Church. Hence the Tribunal of Conscience of the ITCCS could adjudicate and render enforceable judgments in these cases, providing due process proceedings were observed.
Common Law Community Training Manual
The ITCCS and ICLCJ observe due process have developed a common law training manual for their Judges, Jury members, Forensic Investigators, Common Law Sheriffs and Enforcers, who as of today number approximately 260 persons in 19 countries.
Common Law Community Training Manual Establishing the Reign of Natural Liberty: The Common Law and its Courts A Community Training Manual Issued by The International Tribunal into Crimes of Church and State (Brussels)
"What is assembling is the first court in history to bring judgment against the Vatican and the Crown of England as institutions. But our Court also signals the dawn of a new notion of justice: one defined by the people themselves, and especially by the historic victims of church and state, to bring about not only a judgment on their persecutors, but a new political and spiritual arrangement to undo the systems responsible for intergenerational crimes against humanity" - from the founding Charter of The International Common Law Court of Justice, September 1, 2012
I would urge all serious observers of the ITCCS and ICLCJ to read this manual in full to understand the role that natural law and common law plays in the operation of the courts proceedings, jurisdiction, authority, and judgments.
I hope this is helpful. Please let me know if I can furnish any other information.
Letter to a friend about the ITCCS and International Common Law Court of Justice (ICLCJ.com)
BREAKING NEWS UK May 17, 2014 - ITCCS.ORG supporter Barbara Watson reports "Update! I went to see Vivian Cunningham today; he asked me to say a big thank you for all the support given.
"Vivian is ok; the doctors told him that, due to his "improvement", he has been put on a pre-release programme! Therefore, he expects to be discharged sometime over the next two weeks."
At last report on May 9, 014, UK Grenadier soldier Vivian Cunningham had been committed to 6 months in a mental hospital for asking lawful questions about the status of UK Queen Elizabeth II under the International Common Law Court of Justice.
BRUSSELS - A Belgian court fined MP Laurent Louis 50,000 Euros and sentenced him to 20 months (suspended) for calling Belgian Prime minister a "pedophile" in Parliament, despite controlling Belgian law granting full legal immunity to speeches by Members on the floor of the Parliament. MP Laurent Louis had previously released a list of prominent pedophiles in Belgium including Members of Parliament, the Monarchy, and prominent lawyers, judges and bankers.
This ruling, which MP Laurent Louis is expected to appeal, may have some effect his campaign in the May 25, 2014 EU parliamentary elections.
As MP Laurant Louis speech in the Belgian Parliament is legally protected (as the Prime Minister himself admitted while in debate), it is unclear why this prosecution was brought other than for political purposes to derail MP Laurant Louis campaign.
MP Laurent Louis is an EU Politician who has endorsed the International Common Law Court of Justice trials against the UK Monarch, Vatican, Popes Ratziner & Bergoglio and the Jesuit Superior General for child genocide. www.iclcj.com.
Below is a translation of a Belgian news article announcing the court verdict.
20 months in prison required against the member Laurent Louis
Tuesday, May 13, 2014 at 4:18 p.m.
( Belga ) The Crown has requested , on Tuesday afternoon , a sentence of 20 months in prison (suspended) against the independent MP Laurent Louis , before the Criminal Court of Brussels. Louis Laurent is accused of contempt against the Prime Minister , slanders against a journalist and several others as well as concealment of parts of Dutroux case.
20 months in prison required against the member Laurent Louis
The prosecution said that all the charges were laid against Laurent Louis and requested a sentence of 20 months suspended sentence and a fine of 50,000 euros. Louis Laurent , independent MP and founder of the party " Standing Belgians ," is accused of contempt towards the Prime Minister Elio Di Rupo he was a pedophile , slander in respect of a newspaper reporter Le Soir that he described as " protector of pedophiles " and concealment of parts of the Dutroux case. At a press conference in April 2012 , Laurent Louis denounced the existence of pedophile networks in Belgium and showed two photos from the autopsy report of Julie and Melissa , victims of pedophile Marc Dutroux . About 70 people gathered Tuesday at noon in front of the Palais de Justice in Brussels in support of the hon. They hoped to come to attend the appearance of Corrections Laurent Louis , but access to the courthouse has been denied by the police , including a fairly large device was spot on. The action took place without incident. The trial continues on Tuesday afternoon with the arguments of the defense. ( Belga )
STAFFORDSHIRE, UK May 9, 2014- UK Grenadier soldier Vivian Cunningham has been committed to 6 months in a mental hospital for asking lawful quesions about the status of UK Queen Elizabeth II under the International Common Law Court of Justice Grenadier Cunningham is requesting assistance from extended family; friends and supporters. He has also expressed his appreciation of the assistance given to him by Kevin.
Cunningham has been committed under the notorious "Fixated Threat" law, which criminalizes opinion in England, and classifies the criticism of any political figure as a mental disorder.
FROM Barbara Watson "I have just spoken to Vivian Cunningham who informed me that the Hospital have carried out their threat and have detained him for another six months, under Section 3.
"Of course, he is requesting assistance from extended family; friends and supporters. He has also expressed his appreciation of the assistance given to him by Kevin.
"This is the direct number and other contact details:
St Georges Hospital Corporation Street Stafford Staffordshire ST16 3AG
Telephone: 01785 221319 ext 5045 (24hrs, 7 Days a Week)
ITCCS Urgent Appeal British soldier persecuted, institutionalized for discussing common law arrest warrants against Elizabeth Windsor Stafford, England, May 7, 2014, 4 pm GMT Vivian Cunningham, a serving soldier in the Irish Guards Regiment in Aldershot, Hampshire, has been detained, institutionalized and drugged against his will for mentioning to a senior officer the Common Law arrest warrants against convicted felon Elizabeth Windsor (aka "Queen Elizabeth").
Guardsman Cunningham is presently being detained without his consent for six months at the mental care unit of St. George's Hospital in Stafford (ph: 44 01785 25788). He has been injected with olanzapine, an atypical anti-psychotic drug, under the orders of a Captain Murrell (ph: 44 07909686198) and Doctors Khan and Sema.
Recently, Guardsman Cunningham reported to Captain Murrell the existence of the standing arrest warrant against Windsor, and her lawful conviction for crimes against humanity. According to Cunningham, Capt. Murrell responded by saying "Yes I believe the evidence you have shown me, but is it ok if you attend a medical assessment to make sure you are ok?". Cunningham agreed, and was then committed with a diagnosis of having suffered an "acute psychotic episode".
Clearly, Cunningham has been committed under the notorious "Fixated Threat" law, which criminalizes opinion in England, and classifies the criticism of any political figure as a mental disorder.
The ITCCS Executive states categorically that Guardsman Vivian Cunningham has been targeted by the British Crown for his circulating of evidence of Elizabeth Windsor's guilt under the law. Cunningham's persecution is directly related to the present Common Law Court's investigation of the British Crown and members of the "royal family" for child trafficking and murder.
The ITCCS Executive therefore calls upon all of its global affiliates and British members to protest at St. George's hospital in Stafford, and phone the facility and Capt. Murrell to demand an explanation for Cunningham's incarceration. Protests and occupations will commence at British embassies and businesses around the world, and will continue until Vivian Cunnigham is released unconditionally.
Vivian Cunningham is hereby declared a prisoner of conscience in England by the ITCCS.
QUENELLE GESTURE UPDATE ;-) Belgian MP Laurent Louis doing the "Quenelle Gesture", meaning "enough of the system", "disobedience" according to Debout Les Belges candidate in the May 25, 2014 EU elections Melanie Vritschan.
European Dissidents Congress and MP Laurent Louis being watercannoned May 4, 2014, Brussels
BRUSSELS - The European Dissidents Congress, a lawful public Congress organized by Debout Les Belges, a political party in Begium running many candidates for the May 25, 2014 EU Parliament elections, was violently broken up by police this past weekend using watercannon and injuring participants. Belgian MP Laurent Louis, sponsor of the Congress, had recently released a list of pedophiles in the Belgian Parliament and including the Monarchy, prominent lawyers and bankers. MP Laurent Louis, who supports the International Common Law Court of Justice prosecution of pedophiles in the Catholic and Anglican churches was forced by police to leave Brussels, although he is a registered candidate there for the upcoming EU elections.
Statement of MP Laurent Louis
Laurent LOUIS Président de DEBOUT LES BELGES ! This Sunday, may 4, 2014 will remain forever engrained in my memory as the day where I was ashamed of my country, this country that I love so much. This may 4, DEBOUT LES BELGES has clearly demonstrated that our Belgium was not a democracy but a country ruled by small budding dictators who don't hesitate to launch their pumpers against women, children and elderly or disabled persons (see photos). A country in which misinformation reigns supreme, a country led by the Zionist lobby to get speakers Jews like Jacob Cohen for anti-Semites or a movement like standing the BELGIANS made up of Christians, Muslims, of laity, Belgian origins and varied, young people and women for a small group of extreme right-wing.
We have experienced this Sunday a denial of democracy but also a denial of Justice. You may not know how much I am proud of all the members, activists and sympathizers DEBOUT LES Belges. Events this Sunday do that strengthen the ties that unite us and boost our determination. Relating to those who are close to me, endangering grandmothers, young women and children, the State has made only strengthened my motivation to fight against this fascist power who leads us. Never I let fall battle and until the end I denounce the practices of our leaders.
After having been watered by the forces of disorder to defend our freedoms, but also for your safety, I preferred to take a step back before you speak to you.
First of all, you should know that yesterday's events made us lose a lot of money (more than 8,000 euros). For this reason, you will understand that we will be unable to reimburse people who had booked their place for the Congress of dissent. The vast majority of those present are also not demand so much they understood that they participated in a historic event.
Then, you should know that I would like to apologise to those who were waiting for plan B and who never saw it coming. Aircraft indeed, found another place to hold our Congress after the ban on Anderlecht but an order of the Governor banning any Congress throughout the Brussels territory made us all ruined. I was even escorted by police outside the Brussels territory under penalty of spending the night in jail. How beautiful democracy! Even more free to move where it wants in his country! So we decided to hold a small press conference in my offices of Braine-l'Alleud in Walloon Brabant. I thank Alain Soral and my friend Dieudonné de have joined us. The room cannot contain more than 50 people, we were able to invite all the fans who eagerly to meet these 2 tenors of dissent. You will understand that facing multiple prohibitions and shenanigans of the power in place, it is difficult to find perfect solutions.
I would also like to thank all people who have had the courage to face the police calmly and without any violence in defence of our fundamental freedoms. You can't imagine how much I'm proud of you. I extend my best wishes for a speedy recovery to this mother who was seriously injured in the eye and has had to be taken to the hospital to ask stitches after being hit in the face by the jets of water pumpers.
I would also like to thank you for having placed a beautiful quenelle to the police by refusing to obey his orders requiring him to give me the floor to arrange the dispersal of the crowd. The State will be able to see I wasn't alone and that behind me, you are thousands!
I would also like to thank all the personalities who have made the trip to attend this Conference and who have been reduced to silence by the Belgian dictators. Our french friends will have seen that the situation in Belgium is even more serious in France in respect of our freedoms. In France, we bludgeon not yet grandmothers, the handicapped and children. In Belgium, if! Unfortunately... I hope that these personalities may in the future have a better picture of my beautiful country!
Finally, I learned that the OCAM (coordinating body for threat analysis) was our DEBOUT LES BELGES movement at 3 on a scale of 4 in terms of threat (4 being the maximum...) This is say how our movement is important and that it bothers politicians we are fighting. These liars and corrupt politicians are afraid of us, it's a no-brainer. And they are right because after what we lived this Sunday, they can be certain that we will never let them in peace. We will fight them until what we were able to establish a genuine democracy in our country and make our citizens the dignity they deserve without a person on the side of the road.
My friends, I'm proud of you, proud to be president of this citizen, innovative and revolutionary movement. DEBOUT LES BELGES will win the elections, I am sure. I count on you to be a day of glory for our movement may 25! STANDING YOUTH, STANDING WHO THEM, STANDING THE VOICELESS, STANDING THE OPPRESSED, STANDING THE BELGIANS!
BREAKING NEWS: Brothers of "Pedophile" Belgian Prime Minister named in counterfeit ring
BRUSSELS - Prime Minister Elio Di Rupo of Belgium, first openly gay man to lead a sovereign state, and the first openly gay man to win the position in his own right pursuant to an election, has two of his brothers are under investigation for being involved in a counterfeit printing affair with the Italian mafia. Machines were discovered in his brother's hanger for printing counterfeit money. The Prime Minister's brother's counterfeit printing business was so flourishing that he went to Germany for technicians for his counterfeiting machines.
WILLIAM COOPER UPDATE Whistleblower William Cooper was assassinated by the NWO US government on Nov. 6, 2001. Now, I have been reliably informed, that his 1991 book "Behold A Pale Horse" is being systematically banned by covert US agents from libraries and bookstores in the USA [You can still access it on Kindle & Amazon.com (see below). Here is what William Cooper had to say about Alex Jones
VANCOUVER, BC – Kevin Annett, field secretary of the International Tribunal into Crimes of Church and State (ITCCS.ORG) revealed that a former Argentine government official is scheduled to testify against Pope Bergoglio (Francis I) as to his role in child trafficking during the Junta government and the dirty war in Argentina. The Argentine official’s testimony is scheduled to occur in common law court of justice proceedings against Pope Bergoglio slated to begin in Brussels early in 2014.
In his interview with Alfred Lambremont Webre on ExopoliticsTV, Kevin Annett also discussed plans by a United Nations NGO to move for stripping the Vatican of its observor status at the UN on the grounds that it is a criminal organization. The Vatican is currently answering queries at the UN on child trafficking and child abuse.
Kevin Annett also discussed the U.K.’s use of unlawful psychiatric incarceration against a ITCCS member of a common law court in Coventry, UK. Attempted psychiatric incarceration or psychiatric commitment has occurred against other NGOs such as EUCACH.ORG’s Melanie Vritschan in Brussels. Kevin Annett commented on the possible use of attempted psychiatric commitment by the King’s prosecutor in Brussels as a means of attempting to stop the common law court of justice proceedings against Pope Bergoglio for child trafficking.
VANCOUVER, B.C. - In an interview with Alfred Lambremont Webre, Becky Big Canoe of Ontario, Canada describes becoming sustainable in food and housing with EnviroNative Training Initatives.
EnviroNative Training Initiatives, which Becky Big Canoe founded, is a not-for-profit organization set up to design and deliver training programs in food security, entrepreneur skills and natural building. Their target clientele is First Nations women and at risk youth.
You can support this initiative in self sufficiency by voting at:
“Francis A. Boyle— the Hague & the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal” (Dissenting Op-Ed)
"What an absurd concept that Francis A. Boyle is a “hero” to anyone other than Francis A. Boyle. A close review of his record will reveal that his ‘accomplishments’ have been at the best subjective, and his many announcements of those ‘accomplishments’ have always either preceded or shortly followed a ‘new book’ as the case here". James Harrison Co-founder, North American Intertribal Missions (See below).
By Leuren Moret, M.A., PhD, ABD
As an international radiation expert witness and participant in 3 war crimes tribunals, and two of Tun Dr. Mahathir's War Crimes Conferences (2007, 2009), I have provided information below that may be useful in understanding the recent attacks by Francis A. Boyle on the judges and parties involved in the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal for Palestine. Below are my comments, including an Op-Ed statement by James Harrison, Co-founder of the North American Intertribal Missions. Leuren Moret
BC - The objective of the attack on the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal described
in this article was to use “Meme warfare” to start an internecine war upon
targeted Judges of the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal, and thereby
destabilize the Tribunal, a non-profit NGO citizen’s tribunal of conscience sworn
to carry out a vision architected by former Malaysian Prime Minister Dr. Tun
Mahathir Bin Mohamad.
That internecine war, induced by a standard covert operating
Cointelpro procedures of U.S., U.K. and Israeli intelligence agencies known as
“Meme warfare”, had the specific objectives of (1) destabilizing the Tribunal
by making it a “shooting gallery for shooting down or disqualifying Judges” so
that multiple Judges could be disqualified as “Zionists” on specious grounds;
(2) discrediting the Tribunal as an objective adjudicatory body in the area of
war crimes; (3) discrediting it as a functioning body to deliver credible justice
in the area of Israel war crimes in Palestine 1948 – Present.
The Tribunal to date had issued two important judgments
against former Prime Minister Tony Blair, former U.S. President George W. Bush
and his cabinet members Cheney, Rumsfeld, Gonzales and their lawyers for war
crimes and torture in Iraq. The
Tribunal had scheduled the trial of Israel’s war crimes in Palestine for August
20-24, 2013 and for November 20-25, 2013. I had participated in both trials of
the Tribunal against Bush et al. and the first hearing on Israeli war crimes in
Palestine. I was scheduled as a Judge on the Tribunal for the hearing on
November 20-25, 2013.
Meme Warfare: How to overthrow the powers
that be on a low budget
to author “Meme Warfare” author Stephen DeVoy,
Meme - "A meme is a mental construct that
copies itself from mind to mind. It reproduces by inducing its carrier to
engage in behavior that causes the meme to copy to other minds. It is a mental
construct conjoined with a set of instructions which compel its host to engage
in activities that increase the probability of the entire instruction set being
copied from a host’s mind into the minds of others."
Memeplex - "A meme may have a higher chance
of replication across a longer expanse of time if it aggregates with other
memes. When aggregated, complementary memes enhance one another’s probability
of replication. Thus, just as DNA found advantage in aggregating into complex
aggregations of genes, some memes find advantage in aggregating into complexes
of memes. This more complex form is called the memeplex."
Meme Warfare "Meme warfare is the
subversion or destruction of a memeplex by means of memetic engineering. Meme
warriors design memes targeting existing memeplexes. Such memes are intended to
infect an existing memeplex, hinder an existing memeplex, or form a part of a
competing memeplex. In the later case, the goal may be to create a new memeplex
intended to replace the old memeplex."
Meme Warfare against the Tribunal Judges
& against Tribunal
The memeplex “Zionist”, falsely applied, was the weapon of
choice in the Meme warfare designed to destabilize the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes
On analysis of the evidence below, it appears that there are
four primary individuals who were overtly involved in the initiative to engage
in “Meme warfare” and destabilize the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal. These individuals appear to have consciously
or unconsciously engaged in Meme warfare to a varying degree with the objective
of destabilizing the Tribunal. It remains to be seen whether any of these
individuals was covertly influenced to do so by outside intelligence agencies
or groups, although some there is suggestive evidence of a coverup and a
conspiracy to destabilize the Tribunal. The individuals are present or past
members of the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Commission or present or past
The four individuals who, by the evidence, either consciously
or unconsciously engaged in Meme warfare to destabilize the Kuala Lumpur War
Crimes Tribunal are (in alphabetical order):
Former Prosecutor Francis Boyle, academic and
former Judge on the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal and Prosecutor on the War
Crimes Commission; Former Legal Counsel to the Palestinian Authority and Lt.
Former Prosecutor Matthias Chang, former
political adviser to Tun Dr. Mahathir bin Mohamad when Dr. Mahathir was Prime
Minister and former Prosecutor of the Legal Team of the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes
Commission. Self-professed high-ranking freemason inducted by a Grand Master
freemason in the UK.
Secretary-General Yaacob Merican & the
Kuala Lumpur Foundation to Criminalize War
The timeline of the Meme war against
the Judges of the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal starts for me when the
Foundation Secretary-General Dr. Yaacob Merican, began in May 2012, for some
unknown reason, to lean on me for outreach to recruit Judges and Prosecutors
for the Tribunal when that was really his job and function. Yaacob Merican
invited me to a sumptuous luncheon at a spectacular Islamic art gallery and in
front of a retinue of personnel from the Kuala Lumpur Foundation to Criminalize
War, asked me to recruit “Caucasian” Judges for the Tribunal. Internally, I felt that his request was
borderline political, but not unlawful. As I was a supporter of the non-profit peace
efforts of Tun Mahathir, I complied with Secretary-General Yaacob Merican’s
requests in good faith as part of my contributions to this charitable peace
effort. I saw my helping the Foundation
recruit non-Malaysian Judges and Prosecutors as in no way providing grounds for
my recusal as a “biased” Judge under the law.
In the law, judicial bias has to do with a tangible interest
that the Judge has in the outcome of litigation. In the case of the Tribunal’s trial
of Israeli war crimes in Palestine 1948-present, I am neither Israeli nor
Palestinian nor have any tangible interest in Palestine or Israel and therefore
I am not biased according to the law. I
am Director of Exopolitics Israel, Exopolitics Palestine, and Exopolitics Iran,
and a war crimes correspondent for Press TV and have covered the
Palestinian-Israeli conflict. These
functions do not disqualify me as a Judge.
According to the law in most nations, “Laws or court rules
provide for recusal of judges. Although the details vary, the following are
nearly universal grounds for recusal.
The judge is related to a party, attorney, or
spouse of either party (usually) within three degrees of kinship.
The judge is a party.
The judge is a material witness unless pleading
purporting to make the Judge a party is false (determined by presiding judge,
but see Substitution (law)).
The judge has previously acted in the case in
question as an attorney for a party, or participated in some other capacity.
The judge prepared any legal instrument (such as
a contract or will) whose validity or construction is at issue.
Appellate judge previously handled case as a
The judge has personal or financial interest in
the outcome. This particular ground varies by jurisdiction. Some require
recusal if there is any interest at all in the outcome, while others only
require recusal if there is interest beyond a certain value.
The judge determines he or she cannot act
Timeline of a Meme War
1. Feb. 11, 2013: I forwarded to Secretary-General
Yaacob Merican my report on new Judges for the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes
Tribunal, and suggested that he “consult with Prof. Boyle both as to additional
names for persons who can be KLWC Tribunal Judges as well as assisting the
Amicus Curiae team.” Former Proseutor Boyle had formerly
been a Judge of the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal before switching over to
the Prosecution. Secretary-General Yaacob’s concern at that point seems to have
been obtaining “Caucasian” Judges, who would presumably counter-balance the
predominantly “Malaysian” Tribunal Judges.
No mention was made of “Zionist”, “Pro-Israel”, or other similar Meme.
LETTER OF ALFRED L. WEBRE Feb. 11, 2013
From: Alfred Lambremont
Webre, JD MEd <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: Mon, Feb 11, 2013
at 12:34 PM
Subject: Re: KLFWC
Tribunal on Palestine May 2013
To: Yaacob Merican
Dear Dr. Yaacob - Hi!
Thank you very much for the news about the forthcoming KLWC Tribunal on
Palestine, tentatively scheduled for 5 to 10 May 2013. I have marked the
dates on my calendar.
My apologies for not
having written sooner. Here is my report.
I contacted the
following persons qualified to be Judges on the KLWC Tribunal.
Gail Davidson was
honored to be invited, and indicated she felt she was too busy to take on the
responsibilities of being a Judge on the KLWC Tribunal.
Baltazar Garzon - I was
unable to get a formal response from Judge Baltazar Garzon, who until recently
was the subject of a political trial brought against him in Spain (See article).
You may want to evaluate
whether you want to ask him to be on the KLWC Tribunal. This is the best
address I could get for him
Diaz-caÑabate, 10Madrid, 28007
011-34- 911 729 69
Ramsay Clark represented
Saddam Hussein, as you know. I have not yet been able to get a formal
acceptance from him. I suggest that the Commission contact Ramsay Clark
directly with the invitation to be a KLWC Tribunal Judge.
Ramsey Clark &
Lawrence W Schilling
36 E 12th St 6th Fl
New York, NY 10003-4604
Professor Boyle - My suggestion is that you may want to consult with
Prof. Boyle both as to additional names for persons who can be KLWC Tribunal
Judges as well as assisting the Amicus Curiae team.
Please let me know if
you need any information, etc.
Best wishes, Alfred
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at
11:42 PM, Yaacob Merican <email@example.com> wrote:
It has been quite some
time since we last heard from you. I hope that you are in the best of health
and that you are free, if things go according to plan, that is, to sit on the
KLWC Tribunal on Palestine tentatively scheduled to be held from 5 to 10 May
I recollect that
before your departure from K.L. after your last visit to Malaysia, you gave
assurance that you would forward to me some names of persons (at least two)
with international law qualifications (together with their résumés) for
consideration of the Trustees of the KLFCW to empanel two more additional
Caucasian judges on the KLWC Tribunal.
Time is getting closer
to the scheduled Palestine Tribunal Hearing and I would appreciate it very much
if I could have your nominations as soon as possible.
Would you also be able to
propose a name or two international lawyers of Professor Boyle's calibre, to
assist the Amicus Curiae team in the aforementioned Tribunal Hearing,
2. June 6, 2013: The next major milestone
occurs when Secretary-General Yaacob asks me if I know of “a pro-Israeli
international lawyer with a caliber at par with the Prosecution's Francis
Boyle.” [Former U.S. Representative] Cynthia McKinney is trying her level best
to secure for the Amicus Curiae team the services of a pro-Israeli
international lawyer with a caliber at par with the Prosecution's Francis
Boyle. Time is if the essence. Would you
know of anyone personally who would agree to act as such during the forthcoming
Intent of the request for a pro-Israeli
This request by Secretary-General Yaacob Merican is a key
issue in Meme warfare. To understand if his
request for “Pro-Israeli defense counsel” is part of Meme warfare, one must know who issued the original
request to obtain pro-Israel defense counsel and with what intent.
Did the request of pro-Israeli defense counsel
originate with Secretary-General Yaacob or from another individual or
organization that transmitted it to Secretary-General Yaacob?
Who was that outside individual or organization?
What was their intent?
Why did “Caucasian” suddenly become
Why was “time of the essence”?
What was the intent of this request?
If the intent of the original request was to set
up a Meme warfare situation around the meme “Zionist” to destabilize the
Judges, then Secretary-General Yaacob’s request constitutes Meme warfare.
Secretary-General Yaacob Merican’s request - It is this
request for “the services of a
pro-Israeli international lawyer with a caliber at par with the Prosecution's
Francis Boyle” that sets up the Meme warfare against three Judges of the
Tribunal. Judge Eric David and Judge Mike Hourigan, two of the Judges
recommended by Former U.S. Rep. Cynthia McKinney were attacked as “Zionist”, and
I was to be attacked as “Zionist” because I acceded to Secretary-General Yaacob
Merican’s innocent-seeming request and searched (unsuccessfully) for
From: Yaacob Merican
Date: Thu, Jun 6, 2013
at 7:02 PM
Subject: Re: KLFWC
Tribunal on Palestine May 2013
Lambremont Webre, JD MEd" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Many thanks for your
The KLWC Tribunal
Hearing on Palestine is confirmed to take place as scheduled from Wednesday 21
to Saturday 24 August 2013 in Kuala Lumpur.
Please schedule your
flight arrangements so that you would arrive in Kuala Lumpur at the latest by
the morning of Tuesday 20 August 2013.
Cynthia McKinney is
trying her level best to secure for the Amicus Curiae team the services of a
pro-Israeli international lawyer with a caliber at par with the Prosecution's
Francis Boyle. Time is if the essence.
Would you know of anyone personally who would agree to act as such during the
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at
8:47 AM, Alfred Lambremont Webre, JD MEd <email@example.com> wrote:
Dear Dr. Yaacob - Hi! I
was recently at the Kuala Lumpur Foundation to Criminalise War website and I
happened to notice the following:
Kuala Lumpur War Crimes
Tribunal–Hearing on Palestine
Date: 21 – 24 August,
2013 at 2nd Floor, No. 88, Jalan Perdana, Taman Tasik Perdana, Kuala Lumpur
Recently my attendance
was requested at a public event scheduled for August 24, 2013. I told the host of that event I could
tentatively not attend because there was a Kuala Lumpur Tribunal hearing
scheduled for that date.
My schedule starts
filling up about three months in advance.
Can you please advise me
via return email if I should set aside the dates of 21-24 August 2013 to attend
the above hearing as a Judge on the Tribunal?
Many thanks and best
To avoid a Pro-Palestinian “Kangaroo
I assumed, without asking Secretary-General Yaacob Merican,
that the order for pro-Israeli defense counsel was a good faith requirement to
avoid the trial seeming to be a “Kangaroo Court” in favor of the Palestinians,
which had been a major criticism leveled at the Tribunal to date
Therefore, with the help of my co-director at Exopolitics
Israel, I proceeded to contact Ambassador Alan Baker, former Israeli Ambassador
to Canada who lives in Israel and is an international lawyer. His associate Prof. Robbie Sabel, Professor
of International Law at Hebrew University in Jerusalem, declined to appear for
Israel. I contacted my former classmate Prof. Bruce Ackerman of Yale Law School
as well as my former teacher Prof. Guido Calabresi of Yale Law School. Both of
these scholars recommended Prof. Alan Dershowitz of Harvard, who Former
Prosecutor Francis Boyle had told me was the “default go-to person on Israel”
in the United States. Prof. Dershowitz reply, citing Former Prosecutor Francis
Boyle's libel of him and Harvard Law School as his principal reason for not
wanting to help recommend someone to represent Israel.
firstname.lastname@example.org via shaw.ca
Jun 7 to webre
“Thank you. I will think
about it. Part of me doesn't want to add any legitimacy to Boyle who is an
extreme supporter of terrorism and an extremist anti Israel agitator with no
credibility. . . He has called me a war criminal and has accused harvard law
school of complicity in war crimes. But I will respond to your inquiry.”
“Who appointed him to
prosecute the case?”
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 7, 2013, at 4:42 PM, "email@example.com"
> Dear Prof. Dershowitz - Hi! My classmate Prof. Bruce
Ackerman of Yale Law School suggested that I contact you with a specific
> I am a Judge on the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal. The
Tribunal has a hearing scheduled for August 21-24, 2013 on alleged Israeli war
crimes in its invasion of Gaza in January 2009.
> The Prosecutor is Prof. Francis Boyle of the Univ of
Illinois who has tried cases before the International Criminal Court.
> I was asked to locate a pro-Israel lawyer of Prof.
Boyle's stature who would like to serve as amicus curiae representing Israel.
> I would very much
appreciate your letting me know if can you kindly suggest of any names of
qualified lawyers who may be interested and contact info via return email.
> Best wishes,
> Alfred Webre
> Alfred Lambremont Webre, JD, MEd
> Vancouver, B.C. V6N3E5 CANADA
> Tel/Fax: 604-733-8134
> Skype: peaceinspace
> Email: firstname.lastname@example.org
Meme warfare distortions and falsehoods
With that outreach my effort to recruit pro-Israeli defense counsel
ended. Please notice that I did not ask Prof. Dershowitz to participate in the
trial, merely to suggest the names of Pro-Israeli counsel who might be
interested in representing Israel. I asked Prof. Dershowitz, “I would very much appreciate your letting me
know if can you kindly suggest of any names of qualified lawyers who may be
interested and contact info via return email.”
In the heat of Meme warfare against me, both Former
Prosecutor Francis Boyle and Former Prosecutor Matthias Chang would falsely state
that I was a Zionist by falsely alleging that I had “asked Dershowitz to
represent Israel.” That is an
exaggeration and distortion of the facts that is standard in Meme warfare, and
demonstrative of how the minds and persona
of Former Prosecutor Francis Boyle and Former Prosecutor Matthias Chang had
become thoroughly infected with the “Zionist” Meme in this attack and how they
sought by Meme warfare to attach the Meme to me in people’s minds.
Through Judge Eric David, one of the two Judges that Cynthia
McKinney had recommended to Secretary-General Yaacob Merican, I later learned
that Cynthia McKinney had contacted Prof. Alan Dershowitz who had declined
to participate. Clearly both former U.S. Rep Cynthia McKinney and I were both
set up to search for “pro-Israel” defense counsel as part of Meme warfare
against the Judges of the Tribunal.
3. August 20, 2013 – Orchid Room, Hotel
Majestic, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Conversation with Former Prosecutor Francis
Boyle – I am seated next to Prosecutor Francis Boyle at a luncheon prior to
the trial of Israeli war crimes in Palestine 1948- present, which was to start
the next day. I casually mention to Former
Prosecutor Francis Boyle that I am very proud that the Kuala Lumpur Foundation
to Criminalize War had reached out to pro-Israeli Counsel to balance the trial
and tell him that I had contacted counsel in Israel, Professors at Yale and
Harvard Law School who had recommended Alan Dershowitz, but that Prof.
Dershowitz had chosen not to recommend anyone. Former Prosecutor Francis Boyle launched
into a lengthy, detailed dissertation on the feud between himself and specific professors at Yale Law
School and Harvard Law School including Prof. Dershowitz. At no time
during the luncheon did Former Prosecutor Francis Boyle raise any objection to
my having searched for pro-Israeli defense counsel on behalf of Israel or of having contacted Prof. Dershowitz.
August 20, 2013 - Meme Warfare against
Tribunal Judges The evening before the trial, Commissioner Michel Chossudovsky, a
controlling member of the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Commission, and Former
Prosecutor Boyle began to secretly conspiring to engage in Meme warfare and seek
the recusal of three Judges on false Meme warfare grounds of “Zionism” or New
World Order affiliations. We now know
this because Cynthia McKinney leaked the emails in which Chossudovsky stated he
wished to purge three of the Tribunal Judges (See emails below).
(1) Judge Eric David, a Judge that Cynthia McKinney had
nominated, on grounds that he was a Mossad agent, without providing any
(2) Judge Mike Hourigan because he had been at one time been
associated with the UN Tribunal on Ruanda; and
(3) Chief Judge of the Tribunal because he had been associated
with the UN Tribunal on Yugoslavia.
Boyle Meme warfare against Tribunal Judges
Readers can download the full email
exchange (PDF) leaked by former U.S. Rep. Cynthia McKinney showing clear Meme
warfare against Judges Eric David and Michael Hourigan in the day before the
trial on Israeli war crimes in Palestine at the following:
4. August 21 – 22,
2013 - Meme warfare against Judges at hearing
Former Prosecutor Francis Boyle and Commissioner
Michel Chossudovsky waged continual Meme warfare against Judge Eric David during the two-day hearing,
demanding his recusal on the grounds of being a Mossad agent without offering
any evidence thereof other than repetition of the Memeplex “Zionist”. Vowing to shut the Tribunal down, Former Prosecutor
Francis Boyle staged a sit-in of the Palestinian witnesses in the courtroom,
playing on their minds with Meme warfare as well.
The irony is that on August 20, 2013,
the Judges of the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal had held an initial chambers
discussion of the case, structured around a Defense motion to dismiss the
charges against the State of Israel. On the basis of the discussion, Judge Eric
David drafted a brilliant opinion in favor of the Palestinians, denying
Israeli’s motion for dismissal of the State of Israel as a defendant. Because
of the Meme warfare of Chossudovsky and Boyle, the Judges never got to consider
this motion publicly as a Tribunal.
Moreover, the internal discussion of
the Judges on August 20, 2013 showed that (1) the Tribunal would have voted
unanimously to find that Israel’s war crimes in Palestine constituted crimes
against humanity, and (2) the Tribunal would have voted 6-1 to find that
Israel’s war crimes in Palestine constituted genocide, the one dissenting vote
being Judge Eric David, who beleived the acts amounted to crimes against humanity, not genocide (consistent with his public positions).
Facts and actual judicial impartiality does not matter to
Meme warfare, however. What matters is the
destabilization of targeted Judges the Tribunal.
Final Judgement of the Tribunal
The Meme warfare of Former Prosecutor
Francis Boyle is documented in the Final Judgment of the Tribunal, which
readers can download and read (PDF).
the conclusion of the trial, Former Prosecutor Francis Boyle resigns as
5. November 1, 2013 – The next event
for me in the timeline of the destabilization of the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes
Tribunal is my receipt on Nov. 1, 2013 of a letter from Former Prosecutor
Matthias Chang demanding my recusal as a Judge, again using "Zionist" Meme warfare
against me. The timing of Former Prosecutor Matthias Chang’s letter is remarkable as
it is sent 20 days prior to the next scheduled hearing of the Kuala Lumpur War
Crimes Tribunal, as if a convenient legal maneuver to set up "Zionist" Meme warfare for my
recusal on the Nov. 20-25, 2013 trial of Israel’s war crimes in Palestine.
Former Prosecutor Matthias Chang’s letter is also includes a telltale Meme warfare
fundamental error – the same error that Former Prosecutor Francis Boyle stated -
that I had attempted to recruit Alan Dershowitz to represent Israel. In fact, I only asked Prof. Dershowitz if he could suggest postntial counsel for Israel.
The only person
I had told that I approached Prof. Alan Dershowitz to suggest names of possible
defense counsel for Israel was Former Prosecutor Francis Boyle, in the luncheon
at the Hotel Majestic.
1. Therefore was it
former Prosecutor Francis Boyle who contacted former prosecutor Matthias Chang
with erroneous information about me to continuing Meme warfare against me as a
Judge of the Tribunal?
2. Was this how former Prosecutor Matthias Chang who then took up
the Meme warfare against me on this false premise?
3. Or did former Prosecutor
Francis Boyle tell someone else in his network, such as Kuala Lumpur War Crimes
Commissioner Michel Chossudovsky who then contacted Former Prosecutor Matthias
Chang to continue Meme warfare?
Meme Warfare Mind Map
A Meme warfare mind map of the destabilization of the Kuala Lumpur
War Crimes Tribunal will be most enlightening and illustrative for all
tribunals of conscience worldwide to illustrate for informed citizenry how Meme warfare is used to destabilize tribbunals of conscience and NGOs.
Former Prosecutor Matthias Chang states, “It has come to my knowledge that you attempted to get the
services of Derzhowitz (sic) to represent Israel in the hearing which was
postponed and now to be reconvened in November.”
After this initial
falsehood, Former Prosecutor Matthias Chang’s subsequent emails degenerate into
a Meme warfare rant. Readers are welcome to access them by downloading the
following PDF. What is clear is that Former Prosecutor Francis Boyle and Former
Prosecutor Matthias Chang are conspiratorially engaged in Meme warfare to
destabilize me as a Judge as well as the Tribunal.
6. November 4, 2013 – The next milestone in the timeline of "Zionist" Meme warfare to destabilize targated Judges is a letter from the
Chief Judge of the Tribunal stating that since I had now “openly taken the position of being an
“Applicant/Complainant” before the Tribunal for a restraining order” against
Commissioner Chossudovsky, Former Prosecutor Chang and others, "it has now become highly improper for you to be
part of the panel of Judges at the Hearing."
The fact is that I had not served a formal motion on the
court. I only emailed a notice of
intent to file. Here the Tribunal Chief Judge, with no due
process, was apparently guided by Secretary-General Yaacob Merican, who generally presents the Chief Judge with administrative matters, into joining in the reality distortions of "Zionist" Meme warfare against the targeted
Readers can view
the Chief Judge’s letter (PDF), which appears to be more continuation of "Zionist" Meme
warfare against me as a Judge of the Tribunal below.
"I hereby serve notice of intent to apply to the Tribunal for a restraining order against Michael Chossudovsky, Mathias Chang, and all present and former members of the KLWCC and prosecution team, former KLWC Tribunal judges from directly or directly applying for or lobbying for the recusal of KLWC Tribunal Judges, based on a clear abuse of the recusal privilege in this case."
Very truly yours,
Alfred Lambremont Webre, JD, MEd Member, District of Columbia Bar JUDGE, KUALA LUMPUR WAR CRIMES TRIBUNAL Nov. 1, 2013 VANCOUVER, BC, CANADA
FULL LETTER OF ALFRED LAMBREMONT
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2013 10:00:54
Subject: Denial of request for
recusal and application for restraining order
Dear Dr. Yaacob - Hi! I have
received this mischievous email from Matthias Chang requesting my recusal
because I carried out your request as Chairman of the KLWC Commission to make
inquiries of defense counsel for the matter of Palestine, as I had done
previously in my searches for additional Judges for the War Crimes Tribunal, in
which I contacted Ramsey Clark and Baltazar Garzon.
When you contacted me to
search for defense council for Israel, I did not see any conflict in my
capacity as a Judge of a citizen's tribunal of conscience, and I as usual did
my best to fulfill your request as Chairman of the KLWC Commission.
As you and defense counsel
Jason Kay know, I contacted Ambassador Alan Baker, former Israeli Ambassador to
Canada who lives in Israel and is an international lawyer. His associate Prof. Robbie Sabel, Professor
of International Law at Hebrew University in Jerusalem, declined to appear for
Israel. I contacted my former classmate Prof. Bruce Ackerman of Yale Law School
as well as Prof. Guido Calabresi of Yale Law School. Both of these scholars recommended Prof. Alan
Dershowitz of Harvard. My sister, Jane M.N. Webre, Esq. had defeated Prof.
Dershowitz in an appeal case and had told me about his methods, so I contacted
Prof. Dershowitz reply
Here is Prof. Dershowitz
reply, citing Francis Boyle's libel of him and Harvard Law School as his
principal reason for not appearing for Israel.
email@example.com via shaw.ca
Thank you. I will think about
it. Part of me doesn't want to add any legitimacy to Boyle who is an extreme
supporter of terrorism and an extremist anti Israel agitator with no
credibility. . . He has called me a war criminal and has accused harvard law
school of complicity in war crimes. But I will respond to your inquiry.
Who appointed him to prosecute
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 7, 2013, at 4:42 PM,
"firstname.lastname@example.org" <email@example.com> wrote:
> Info: Dear Prof.
Dershowitz - Hi! My classmate Prof. Bruce Ackerman of Yale Law School suggested
that I contact you with a specific question.
> I am a Judge on the Kuala
Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal. The Tribunal has a hearing scheduled for August
21-24, 2013 on alleged Israeli war crimes in its invasion of Gaza in January
> The Prosecutor is Prof.
Francis Boyle of the Univ of Illinois who has tried cases before the
International Criminal Court.
> I was asked to locate a
pro-Israel lawyer of Prof. Boyle's stature who would like to serve as amicus
curiae representing Israel.
> I would very much
appreciate your letting me know if can you kindly suggest of any names of
qualified lawyers who may be interested and contact info via return email.
> Best wishes,
> Alfred Webre
> Alfred Lambremont Webre,
> Vancouver, B.C. V6N3E5
> Tel/Fax: 604-733-8134
> Skype: peaceinspace
> Email: firstname.lastname@example.org
> IMPORTANT - DISCLAIMER:
This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to which it is
addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and
exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is
not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering
this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
dissemination or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you
receive this communication in error, please notify us immediately by telephone
at 604-733-8134 and/or email and delete the original message. Thank you.
> Name: Judge Alfred
> email: email@example.com
I do not consider my actions
to be grounds for recusal, far from it. I consider Mr. Chang's letter to be
that of a mischievous interloper, in continuation of the considerable mischief
perpetrated on the Tribunal at our last sitting in this matter by the former
prosecutor, Francis Boyle. Indeed, Mr. Boyle's reputation for libel and
unfounded slander preceded him at Harvard at Prof. Dershowitz states above. I
consider Mr. Chang's letter to be a continuation of lobbying outside the court
room by parties in the KLWC Commission (such as Michel Chossudovsky, who
lobbied extensively for the recusal of 3 Judges including the Chief Judge at
our last sitting) or formerly part of the KLWC Commission (such as Mr. Chang)
to attempt to deter this Tribunal in its difficult case in the matter of
As legal authority, I cite the
Judgment of the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal of 22 August 2013, Case No. 3-
CHG-2013, Case No. 4- CHG - 2013, KLWCC vs. Amos Yaron and State of Israel,
I point to the statement of
the Tribunal of "Deep concern and regret that there has been a serious
breach of decorum and improper conduct on the part of Mr. Boyle, co-counsel for
Application for restraining
order against present and former members of the KLWCC, prosecution, and persons
associated with the Perdana Peace Foundation and Criminalizewar
I hereby serve notice of
intent to apply to the Tribunal for a restraining order against Michael
Chossudovsky, Mathias Chang, and all present and former members of the KLWCC
and prosecution team, former KLWC Tribunal judges from directly or directly
applying for or lobbying for the recusal of KLWC Tribunal Judges, based on a
clear abuse of the recusal privilege in this case.
Very truly yours,
Alfred Lambremont Webre, JD,
Member, District of Columbia
JUDGE, KUALA LUMPUR WAR CRIMES
Nov. 1, 2013
VANCOUVER, BC, CANADA
LETTER FROM FORMER KLWCC
---------- Forwarded message
From: matthias chang
Date: Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 6:18
Subject: Kuala Lumpur war
To: Alfred Webre
<firstname.lastname@example.org>, Alfred Webre <email@example.com>,
Alfred Webre <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Its been a long time since I
met you and or heard from you.
So this email may surprise
Correct me if I am wrong.
It has come to my knowledge
that you attempted to get the services of Derzhowitz to reprsent Issrael in the
hearing which was postponed and now to be reconvened in November.
Obviously, I agree absolutely
that Israel is entitled to the best Defence Counsel. I believe that charges
were sent to Israel etc by the Prosecution and told that they can appoint the
counsel of their choice failing which a defence counsel would be assigned in
their absence as was the case with the trial against Bush and Blair. This is so
stated in gthe Charter of the Tribunal.
This is obviously a correct
procedure that obtains even in the court of law of all jurisdiction.
However, I find it most
troubling that you as a Judge of the tribunal took the trouble to recruit
Derzhowitz as defence counsel. If it is true, it is a gross dereliction of duty
and your perceived impartiality as a Judge of the tribunal. No Judge of any
tribunal or court should be involved in the selection and appointment of any
counsel whether for the defence or the prosecution. It is not and cannot be the
duty of a Judge of any tribunal.
It is unheard of. If in
happens in the Court of Law in CANADA OR ANY OTHER JURISDICTION, the judge is
in contempt of his own court. Such a Judge may even be censured and or removed
by the Chief Justice of the country. I am sure you are more than aware this
amounts to a gross misconduct.
It is unheard of and I am
truly shock that you would do this and still remain as a Judge on the tribunal.
You should immediately disqualify yourself as you have by your action brought
disrepute to the entire proceedings.
This is a disgrace and it is
unacceptable. And you are a lawyer!
If you disagree with my views
as stated above, please cite me any case authorities or legal principle that a
presiding judge can involved himself / herself in the selection and appointment
of a counsel whether for the prosecution or the defence.
I suggest to you as a friend
and a fellow lawyer that you decline to sit as a Judge of the War Crimes
Tribunal and not attend the proceedings by informing the Registrar of the
Tribunal or the Chairman of the tribunal soonest possible.
Your action has caused grave
embarrassment to Tun Mahathir Mohamad. He cannot obviously be involved in such
matters as the Tribunal, Commission are all independent. But this independence
and impartiality has now been compromised and brought into disrepute.
Please DO THE RIGHT thing and
resigned as a Judge of the tribunal.
I look forward to your reply
Meme Warfare: Denial of due process
In the end I was
denied any due process by the Chief Judge of the Tribunal that had now been
thoroughly destabilized by "Zionist" Meme warfare undertaken against targeted Judges by Secretary-General Merican, Former Prosecutor Chang, Commissioner Chossudovsky, and Former Prosecutor Boyle.
had in fact made no formal motion before the court and was simply replying to the
email of one of the principals in the "Zionist" Meme warfare conspiracy against the
Judges of the Tribunal, namely Former Prosecutor Matthias Chang.
My not appearing
as a Judge at the trial of the Israel war crimes against Palestine (Nov. 20-25, 2013), however, is a convenient coverup to those who set me up with the
task of searching for “Pro-Israel” defense counsel and thus set up the trigger for "Zionist" Meme warfare designed to destabilize three Judges and the Tribunal. One wonders why the Chief
Judge was pushed precipitously to rule on a legal motion that did not exist and
never was made by me? Usually these
matters were brought by Secretary-General Yaacob Merican to the Chief
Judge. If this is the case, then it is
clear the intent of this improper proceeding was yet another coverup of the
original source of the "Zionist" Meme warfare.
By the evidence, it appears
that I was railroaded in an improper judicial proceeding when no motion had been made. I was politically “pushed under the bus”, not afforded due process, as an attempted
maneuver in "Zionist" Meme warfare to destabilize me as a Judge of the Tribunal.
Nov. 8 & 9, 2013 & Meme Warfare Aftermath:
Former Prosecutors Francis Boyle and Matthias Chang continue
their Meme warfare – Former Prosecutor Francis Boyle continues to circulate
Meme warfare emails with attacking “Zionist” warfare against Alfred Lambremont
Webre and Tun Dr. Mahathir bin Mohamad, stating “What did Mahathir know and
when did he know it?”
In an expected
spasm of destabilizing Meme warfare, Former Prosecutor Matthias Chang openly
begins Meme warfare against Former Prosecutor Francis Boyle, calling Former
Prosecutor Boyle a “Zionist”.
Continuing Report on the Four Perpetrators of Meme Warfare
1. Former Prosecutor Francis Boyle - Continues to circulate Meme warfare attacks
on the targeted Judges and on the Tribunal, and now has added Kuala Lumpur
Foundation Secretary General Dr. Yaacob Merican and Kuala Lumpur Foundation Chairman
Tun Dr. Mahathir bin Mohamad to his targets of “Zionist” Meme warfare, stating
“What did Mahathir know and when did he know it?” in email broadcasts on the
2. Former Prosecutor Matthias Chang - Has begun “Zionist” Meme warfare
against Former Prosecutor Francis Boyle, openly calling Former Prosecutor
Francis Boyle a “Zionist” in a Nov. 9, 2013 email broadcast:
<email@example.com> via bounce.secureserver.net
"Boyle, US" <firstname.lastname@example.org>,
I think no one should lose any sleep over the rabid rants
of Francis Boyle.
His latest email shows and exposes what he really is - an
outright Zionist agent of the most vicious kind trying to scuttle the tribunal
proceedings from taking place by making all kind of accusations against his
former colleagues all of whom had made tremendous sacrifices for the cause of
3. Commissioner Michel Chossudovsky - Is playing sly political flip
flop on the Tribunal. Kuala Lumpur War
Crimes Commissioner Chossudovsky (the only Jew on the Commission) first
published a vicious “Zionist” Meme warfare attack on the Tribunal right after the
August 21-22, 2013, and since then deleted that article from the www.globalresearch.ca website. Was that deletion part of Commissioner’s
coverup of his part in engaging in “Zionist” Meme warfare against the Tribunal
designed to destabilize the Tribunal?
Then, on Nov. 1,
2013 (the same date as Former Prosecutor Chang’s Meme warfare letter attacking
Judge Alfred Webre), Commissioner Chossudovsky praised the Tribunal's past
judgments against George W. Bush et al. as war criminals while lamenting that Lawyers
Against the War were unsuccessful in blocking Dick Cheney’s Oct. 31, 2013 visit
to Toronto. In 2010 Cheney cancelled a trip to Toronto because of war crimes
allegations by Lawyers Against the War.
4. Secretary-General Dr. Yaacob Merican – After expediting an improper
in camera decision by the Tribunal
Chief Judge on a motion that Judge Webre never made, Secretary-General Dr.
Yaacob Merican has gone into stealth coverup mode, refusing to answer questions put to him by Former Prosecutor Chang
as to why he started the “Zionist” Meme warfare attack to destabilize three
targeted Judges of the Tribunal.
It seems a reasonable
conclusion from the evidence at hand that clear from the evidence that these
four individuals: Former Prosecutor Francis Boyle, Former Prosecutor Matthias Chang,
Commissioner Michel Chossudovsky, and Secretary-General Dr. Yaacob Merican all
acted to create a dynamic of “Zionist” Meme warfare that was unrelated to any
real facts and whose purpose and mission was to destabilize the Tribunal and
three Judges thereof, Judge Eric David, Judge Michael Hourigan, and Judge
Alfred Lambremont Webre.
Who will investigate the four Perpetrators of “Zionist” Meme
Who will step in
to investigate the roles of Former Prosecutor Francis Boyle, Former Prosecutor
Matthias Chang, Commissioner Michel Chossudovsky, and Secretary-General Dr.
Yaacob Merican and seek accountability for their roles in the “Zionist” Meme
warfare that destabilized targeted Judges and the Tribunal.
What if one or more
of these officials has acted on behalf of an intelligence agency in a
Cointelpro role, as some now have come to suspect?
As a Judge on a
Tribunal that, by clear prima facie
evidence, has been destabilized by “Zionist” Meme warfare being directed
against the Tribunal and its Judges, I feel it my duty to uphold my Oath of
Office by letting the wider public community that supports the Kuala Lumpur War
Crimes Tribunal know of the facts of this “Zionist” Meme warfare.
Nov. 10, 2013
This is part II of a
series of articles on the covert control methods of the Illuminati used in
conjunction with other New World Order operations to target specific Truth
movement organizations and workers. The
article connects dots, and the reader, as always, is free to perceive those
dots as connected or not connected.
Readers can access Part I in “Jon
Stewart carries out Satanic Illuminati hit on Daily Show?: October 23, 2013” http://bit.ly/18XgqhG
For a documentation of the ethnic cleansing of Palestine by Israel starting in
1948, please see Paper, Ilan (2007-09-07). The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine
(Kindle Locations 41-42). Oneworld Publications (academic). Kindle Edition.
By his action, the Bishop of Rome, Jorge Bergoglio, faces arrest and
indictment as the head of a Criminal Organization, under terms of the
United Nations Convention against Transnational Criminal Organizations
"Pope Francis is telling every Catholic in the world to break the
laws of their own country and give aid and comfort to child rapists.
That's not simply a grossly immoral act but a war crime, since he's
attacking the laws and sovereignty of other nations, and threatening the
safety of their people" commented George Dufort, the Belgian-based
Secretary of the International Common Law Court of Justice, which
successfully prosecuted former Pope Benedict and other Vatican officials
In response to Bergoglio's statement, the ITCCS has today released
the following plan of action to its affiliates in twenty one countries,
1. The ITCCS Central Office has applied for a Bench Warrant from the
Prosecutor's Office of the International Common Law Court of Justice,
for the immediate arrest of Jorge Bergoglio and his associates on a
charge of high treason, war crimes and a criminal conspiracy against
humanity and the Law of Nations. Jorge Bergoglio and his associates are
to be immediately detained and brought to public trial for these crimes,
under the auspices and authority of the Law of Nations and The
International Common Law Court of Justice.
2. On Sunday, August 4, 2013, a Global Proclamation will be issued,
declaring the Roman Catholic Church to be a Transnational Criminal
Organization under the law, and ordering its active disestablishment,
including by seizing its funds and property, and arresting its officers
and clergy: actions authorized against criminal bodies by the
aforementioned United Nations Convention.
3. Members and clergy of the Roman Catholic Church are hereby ordered
to refrain from funding or participating in the Church of Rome, on pain
of arrest as associates of a Criminal Organization. The public is
encouraged to assist in the seizure of Roman Catholic church wealth and
property in accordance with international law.
This Statement is issued in twelve languages and will be enacted in
twenty one countries, including in Italy and at the Vatican as part of
the International Convergence and Reclamation planned for September
20-22, 2013 in Genoa and Rome.
VANCOUVER, B.C. In a wide-ranging interview with Alfred Lambremont Webre, Kevin Annett of the International Tribunal into Crimes of Church and State (ITCCS.org) discussed international actions planned in Italy to challenge the Lateran Treaty (1929) between the then Mussolini dictatorship and the Vatican that granted the Vatican nation state status, made any protest against the Vatican in Italy a crime, established an annual state subsidy from the state of Italy to the Vatican (as well as from over 100 other nations, according to Rev. Annett), and made Roman Catholicism the state religion of Italy.
In the interview, Rev. Annett stated that the solution to Vatican's history of systematic genocide and crimes against humanity (in a recent action at the International Criminal Court against the Vatican, the Center for Constitutional rights filed over 22,000 exhibits) was the disestablishment of the Vatican as a secular world nation state power, and end to its status as a nation state (originally granted by Mussolini in the Lateran Treaty) and abolishment of all papal nuncios to nations throughout the world, leaving the Roman Church as solely a religious organization.
Rev. Annett stated as well that since the installation of Pope Francis I, the only changes at the Vatican with regard to child genocide and crimen solicitatus law protecting pedophile priests have been cosmetic.
Historic Commencement of The International Common Law Court of Justice: The Case of Genocide in Canada November 06, 2012 by itccs Public Announcement and Instructions to Citizen Jurors Brussels: Monday, November 5, 2012 6:30 pm GMT
The first evidence in the opening case in the docket of our Court is now posted online for examination and a verdict by our Citizen Jurors and the world community.
This first posting addresses the evidence of intentional genocide by the churches and government of Canada, and the Crown of England and the Vatican, according to the first three of the five defined crimes in the indictment. The final two crimes will be addressed in the second online posting of this case, to occur around November 15, 2012.
Further instructions will be issued to our citizen Jurors and other Court officers.
We urge the world community to follow the evidence and participate in the sentencing and enforcement procedures of the Court that will follow the verdict, after the other four cases in the Docket.
We also ask you to post this youtube link widely, and share it with your political representatives, media, libraries and educational institutions, as well as your communities.
The Prosecutors Office of The International Common Law Court of Justice (Brussels-London-Dublin-New York-Ottawa)
United Nations, Iran highlight Harper government coverup of genocide of
Canada's Indigenous: Rev. Kevin Annett and Alfred Lambremont Webre, JD,
VANCOUVER, BC – In a video-taped colloquy of October 19, 2012, Rev. Kevin Annett, Acting Secretary of the International Tribunal into Crimes of Church and State (itccs.org) and Alfred Lambremont Webre, JD, MEd, war crimes Judge, discuss the recent condemnations by the United Nations and by the mainstream media in Iran highlighting the continuing cover-up by the government of Stephen Harper of documented racial genocide of its Indigenous population in violation of the Geneva Conventions and other norms of international humanitarian law.
The Harper Canadian government, which is out of step with its own NATO allies in precipitously breaking diplomatic relations with Iran at the behest of the Israeli lobby in Canada, is attempting to spin its own criminal liability for murder, conspiracy, genocide and crimes against humanity in the continuing deaths and disappearances of Indigenous children, women and men as a component of its relations with Iran, and thus avoid the international condemnation by the United Nations and criminal proceedings for genocide at the International Criminal Court.
According to Rev. Kevin Annett. “The Aboriginal Peoples Television Network (APTN),which attacked PressTV interviews with former Canadian national native chiefs and with Alfred Lambremont Webre, is funded by the Harper government and staffed by non-Indigenous Canadians with a few token Indigenous Canadians. APTN is now a propaganda front in the Harper government’s war against Iran, furthering the coverup of genocide by the government of Canada against its Indigenous people, as documented by the United Nations and the International Tribunal into Crimes of Church and State (ITCCS).”
According to Rev. Kevin Annett and the Tribunal website, Monday October 15, 2012, “marks the formal online convening of the five sworn judges of our Court, from Canada, the United States and Belgium. They are joined by fifty-eight sworn citizen jurors from Canada, the USA, Ireland, England, Holland, Italy and Australia, who have been prepared to receive the evidence in the first of five cases in the Docket of our Court.
“This first case involves the evidence that the government and churches of Canada entered into a criminal conspiracy to commit genocide and other crimes against indigenous people and their children for over a century; and that such crimes were committed by the defendants and their organizations, and continue today.
“Thirty two officers of church and state have been issued Public Summonses by our Court to reply to these charges, and only one of them, John Milloy, has replied. Neither Mr. Milloy nor any of the other summoned parties have contested or denied the charges made against them, including Pope Benedict, Queen Elizabeth and Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper. Our Prosecutor's Office has therefore filed a motion with the Court that a guilty plea be entered on behalf of all of the defendants named in our Summonses, in their absence, since they do not contest or deny the charges made against them.”
2. VIDEO: PRESSTV - Canada has ethnic cleansing of aboriginals on agenda: Native ex-chief. The Canadian government seeks to systematically exterminate the population of the First Nations as part of its historical agenda of ethnic cleansing, a Canadian aboriginal former chief tells Press TV. http://youtu.be/ceZtHLieAKs
Hello. My name is Kevin Annett - Eagle Strong Voice, and I am the chief consultant for the Prosecutor's Office of the International Common Law Court of Justice.
Today is Monday, October 15, 2012, and marks the formal online convening of the five sworn judges of our Court, from Canada, the United States and Belgium. They are joined by fifty eight sworn citizen jurors from Canada, the USA, Ireland, England, Holland, Italy and Australia, who have been prepared to receive the evidence in the first of five cases in the Docket of our Court.
This first case involves the evidence that the government and churches of Canada entered into a criminal conspiracy to commit genocide and other crimes against indigenous people and their children for over a century; and that such crimes were committed by the defendants and their organizations, and continue today.
Thirty two officers of church and state have been issued Public Summonses by our Court to reply to these charges, and only one of them, John Milloy, has replied. Neither Mr. Milloy nor any of the other summoned parties have contested or denied the charges made against them, including Pope Benedict, Queen Elizabeth and Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper. Our Prosecutor's Office has therefore filed a motion with the Court that a guilty plea be entered on behalf of all of the defendants named in our Summonses, in their absence, since they do not contest or deny the charges made against them.
The aim of our Prosecutor`s Office is to achieve a final verdict of guilty against all of the persons and organizations named in our Public Summons of September 21, which is posted online at www.itccs.org .
For the record, our Office will demand the strongest sentences against these parties, including extensive prison terms, the expropriation of their property and assets, the citizens' arrest of their accomplices and others engaged in these ongoing crimes, the occupation and seizure of catholic and protestant church property, and the legal and practical dis-establishment of the criminal church bodies named in the main indictment. These sentences will be duly enforced by our own sworn Common Law Peace Officers and regular law enforcement officers deputized by our Court.
The defendants will not buy their way out of responsibility for the deaths of children and these other crimes against humanity, as they have up until now. Nor will they and their organizations be allowed to terrorize the innocent any longer.
The volume of evidence gathered against the defendants is considerable, comprising nearly two hundred exhibits that will be presented as primary evidence by our Prosecutor`s office in the course of our argument. For this reason, it is necessary to present the evidence as a single package, and not in piecemeal form, so that the citizen jurors and the public can receive the most accurate and truthful presentation of the evidence of genocide in Canada.
Accordingly, and for the sake of the judicial and historical record, it has been decided by the Court's Panel of Judges to allow our Prosecutor's Office until Thursday, November 1 at 5 pm Greenwich Mean Time to compile all of our exhibits and evidence in a condensed, viewable form, and to commence their complete presentation to the Court at that day and hour. This presentation will be posted that same day on You Tube, google video and www.itccs.org .
I am therefore authorized to announce that the Prosecutor's Office of the International Common Law Court of Justice will commence our opening argument and presentation in the first case in our Docket, The People and Kevin Annett v. the officers of the government of Canada, the crown of England, the Vatican and other church corporations, on Thursday, November 1, 2012 at 9 am pacific time, 12 noon central, and 5 pm Greenwich mean time.
The duly sworn citizen jurors will hold themselves ready to convene on that day and hour. And you, the public, are invited to join us that day and view the online evidence in this historic court of justice.
VIDEO: PRESSTV - Canada has ethnic cleansing of aboriginals on agenda: Native ex-chief. The Canadian government seeks to systematically exterminate the population of the First Nations as part of its historical agenda of ethnic cleansing, a Canadian aboriginal former chief tells Press TV.