9/11 Tribunal under attack for prosecuting 9/11 Accused beyond “the Usual Suspects”
By Alfred Lambremont Webre, JD, MEd; Judge, 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal
VANCOUVER, BC – Ask most seasoned 9/11 researchers to name the principal individuals involved at a responsible level of executive authority for the “inside job” of executing the false flag operation of September 11, 2001, and you will invariably get at least these four names: George W. Bush, U.S. President; Richard B. Cheney, U.S. Vice President; Donald H. Rumsfeld, U.S. Secretary of Defense on 9/11; and Benjamin Netanyahu, an agent of influence of a war crimes racketeering network within the State of Israel that carried out an act of war against the United States on 9/11. After all, Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld held constitutional authority on 9/11, and a Memorandum to the U.S. Congress, presented to the Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee in November 2006 demonstrated probable cause that Messrs. Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld had committed Treason against these United States under Article III of the U.S. Constitution for their actions in abetting the armed attack upon U.S. soil by advanced U.S. weapons on September 11, 2001.
Memo to U.S. Congress: prima facie evidence that Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld committed treason on 9/11
9/11 Vancouver Hearings named"The usual suspects"
So it was with some disappointment when, as Judge of the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal, I received and reviewed, together with my fellow Judge Constance Fogal, B.A, M.A, B.ED, LL.B, the sworn oral statements of nearly twenty Vancouver Hearings speakers and subsequent evidentiary submissions and affidavits of some of the speakers that at best named “the usual suspects” of Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld and at worst named the posse of FBI agents who picked up debris in front of the Pentagon following 9/11 so as to obfuscate the demolition explosions that really took place there.
The 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal would not render appropriate war crimes justice if it prosecuted only shills like Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld and the posse of FBI agents, sent to destroy public evidence by their administrative masters.
The mission of the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal is to identify, investigate, prosecute, try, convict and sentence key individuals of an international war crimes racketeering organization responsible for 9/11, and the global war of aggression and world-wide police state 9/11 was intended to bring about.
Affidavits of Leuren Moret and of Andrew D. Basiago
My evaluation, as Judge of the 9/11 Tribunal, was that the submissions and evidence proffered by the 9/11 Vancouver Hearings speakers, was grossly deficient in that none of the submissions identified individuals, mainly UK citizens, for whom there was evidence of probable cause to believe they acted as part of an executive within an international war crimes racketeering organization that caused the mammoth world-wide plan of 9/11 and the subsequent invasions of Afghanistan, the War on Terror, and impositions of domestic police states world wide to happen.
Hence, as is within the power of a Tribunal of Conscience, our 9/11 Tribunal made a proper judicial decision to seek further expert and direct eye witness 9/11 testimony that addressed our mission: the key individuals of the international war crimes racketeering organization behind 9/11, and not the U.S. and Israeli government and media shills pursued by the 9/11 movement to date.
The 9/11 Tribunal made the decision to admit the affidavits of Leuren Moret and Andrew D. Basiago, and published a letter stating: “Leuren Moret's submission and affidavit is vital because it identifies key 9/11 Accused who are U.K., French and Canadian nationals and who appear to be members of an executive within an international war crimes racketeering organization that gave orders for 9/11, the ‘top’ of a pyramidal network, as it were. As U.K., French and Canadian nationals, these 9/11 Accused in turn provide the Article 12 jurisdiction for 9/11 before the International Criminal Court. Ms. Moret's affidavit is able to build on the singularly important affidavit of our distinguished attorney whistleblower witness, former DARPA participant Andrew D. Basiago.”
Article 12 of the Rome Statue of the International Criminal Court (ICC) provides that one of the grounds for ICC jurisdiction is that the person accused of war crimes be a national of a state that is a party to the Rome Statute establishing the ICC. The speakers who walked out of the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal had mainly named 9/11 Accused who were USA or Israeli citizens, neither of whom are subject to ICC jurisdiction.
The 9/11 Tribunal is in active coordination of prosecution of 9/11 Accused with Judge Fernando Imposimato, honorary President of the Supreme Court of Italy and former Chief Investigative Judge of Italy. Judge Imposimato recently announced he was launching a drive to prosecute key 9/11 Accused at the ICC.
The Andrew D. Basiago Affidavit: Circumventing an attempted suppression of 9/11 evidence
The affidavit of Andrew D. Basiago contains credible sworn eye-witness testimony that the U.S. government’s DARPA time travel program possessed moving images of the 9/11 event as early as 1971 and that Donald H. Rumsfeld, who was to be U.S. Secretary of Defense on 9/11, was the defense attaché to DARPA’s time travel program at the same time he was a member of President Richard M. Nixon’s cabinet. There is probable cause to believe that Mr. Rumsfeld’s fellow cabinet member, Henry Alfred Kissinger, then U.S. National Security Advisor, and a person of interest to the 9/11 Tribunal, was given access to this DARPA time travel 1971 pre-identification of the 9/11 event, and that such 9/11 pre-identification information was unlawfully transmitted to U.K. citizens in the Merovingian and banking bloodline families, associates of Mr. Kissinger, who sit on an executive of an international war crimes racketeering organization that orchestrated the 9/11 global false flag operation.
Background on the affidavit of Andrew D. Basiago
On February 23, 2012, I approached the organizers of the planned June 15-17, 2012 conference with a proposal that former U.S. chrononaut Andrew D. Basiago be a speaker at the upcoming conference. I stated, “In a word, we have a whistleblower from DARPA quantum access projects who is an eyewitness to DARPA/CIA possession of images of the controlled demolition of the twin towers on September 11, 2011 in 1971. We have an eyewitness to Donald H. Rumsfeld's personal knowledge of these images in 1971, as defence liaison for this DARPA project to the 1971 Nixon Cabinet, of which he was a member. Need I remind you that Donald H. Rumsfeld is, by prima facie evidence, a prime suspect in the 9/11 false flag operation? (Please see [my] articles below).
“That eyewitness [Andrew D. Basiago] is a member of the bar of the state of Washington and a 10-year colleague of mine and of impeccable credentials, Andrew D. Basiago. We both spoke at the 2009 Conspiracy Con, and have spoken at numerous US and international conferences and media on these issues.
“As long as you continue to gate-keep this evidence and information about 9/11 by keeping at least a presentation of this evidence from a public forum like The Vancouver Hearings, you are doing the public a great disservice, IMHO.”
Although Mr. Basiago was not invited to be a speaker at the June 15-17, 2012 conference, I was invited to be a Judge on the 9/11 Tribunal and in his position as War Crimes Judge was asked to invite other distinguished jurists and public figures to join him on the 9/11 Tribunal.
June 22, 2012 Invitation for submissions
One of my first acts on the 9/11 Tribunal following the June 15-17, 2012 conference was to send a June 22, 2012 invitation to all speakers and to additional 9/11 witnesses (as was the Tribunal's right) to submit written Evidentiary Submissions and sworn Affidavits that would form the basis of the Tribunal’s Indictment of 9/11 Accused. The conference organizers, all 19 speakers, in addition to Leuren Moret and Andrew D. Basiago, received this invitation along with a Witness Docket listing everyone's names, email addresses and the September 22, 2012 date the invitation was sent. In addition, I notified the organizers at and after the conference that he would be so doing.
In early September 2012, when the 9/11 Vancouver Hearings organizers notified I they intended to review the affidavit of Andrew D. Basiago before it could be admitted into evidence before the Tribunal, I understood immediately that this was an effort by the conference organizers to usurp 9/11 Tribunal independence, and gate-keep vital forensic evidence about 9/11 from the Tribunal.
Therefore, as was is the prerogative of the 9/11 Tribunal, I filed the Affidavit of Andrew D. Basiago into the Witness Docket and sent a courtesy copy to the conference organizer, thereby entering the Basiago Affidavit into evidence and circumventing an attempted suppression of 9/11 evidence by the conference organizers.
The role of Veteran’s Today, Fetzer, Barrett
Almost immediately following the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal’s decision to admit the affidavits of Leuren Moret and Andrew D. Basiago into evidence, the co-organizers of the 9/11 Vancouver Hearings, Prof. James Fetzer, a former U.S. Marines intelligence officer, and Kevin Barrett, a polemical radio talk show host who had systematically criticized evidence I had published in the 9/11 area for the past several years, organized a campaign of slander and intimidation against the 9/11 Tribunal. For example they enrolled their nineteen 9/11 speakers in abusive and bullying email threads against my persona making it seem the addition of the Leuren Moret and Andrew D. Basiago affidavits was all an individual act of mine, whereas the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal at this stage consists of two distinguished judges and four independent 9/11 witnesses.
The 9/11 Tribunal Witnesses
The four 9/11 witnesses with the 9/11 Tribunal presently include: Andrew D. Basiago, JD, MPhil (Cantab), Dean T. Hartwell, JD, Susan Lindauer, MA, and Leuren Moret, MA, PhD ABD.
Mr. Basiago, an attorney in Washington State, is a former U.S. chrononaut with DARPA's Project Pegasus 1968-72 and the CIA's Jump Room program 1980-83. Dean T. Hartwell has written three books about 9/11 including, Planes without Passengers: the Faked Hijackings of 9/11; Facts Talk but the Guilty Walk: the 9/11 No Hijacker Theory and its Indictment of our Leaders. Susan Lindauer is the author of Extreme Prejudice: The Terrifying Story of the Patriot Act and the Cover-Ups of 9/11 and Iraq. Ms. Lindauer, who has a Masters degree in public policy from the London School of Economics, has been a reporter with U.S. News & World Report, and has worked for Representative Peter DeFazio, D-Oregon; Representative Ron Wyden, D-Oregon and Senator Carol Moseley Braun, D-Illinois to whom she was press secretary and speech writer. Leuren Moret was an Expert Witness at the International Criminal Tribunal For Afghanistan At Tokyo, and a speaker at the 2007 Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Conference. She is on the organizing committee of the World Committee on Radiation Risk; has been an environmental commissioner for the City of Berkeley; a speaker at the 2007 Vancouver 9/11 conference and has conducted numerous interviews on 9/11.
9/11 War Crimes Tribunal Judges
Judges on the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal include Constance (Connie) Fogal, B.A, B.Ed, M.A., LL.B, and Alfred Lambremont Webre, JD, MEd. Connie Fogal is former leader of the Canadian Action Party, former Vancouver Parks Board Commissioner, former Director, Kitsilano and Vancouver Community Resource boards; lawyer with the Defence of Canadian Liberty Committee to oppose what Fogal sees as threats to Canadian constitutional sovereignty. Alfred Lambremont Webre is a Judge on the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal, submitted a Memorandum to the Chairman of the U.S. House of Representatives Judiciary Committee calling for the appointment of a special prosecutor to investigate 9/11 and was a co-architect of the Space Preservation Treaty.
Veteran’s Today: Operation Mockingbird front?
Barrett and Fetzer are coordinating a vicious ad hominem attack against the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal and its key witnesses through the pages of Veteran’s Today. The goal of this attack seems to be to discredit the sworn eye-witness testimony of Andrew D. Basiago that arguably provides probable cause for Donald H. Rumsfeld and Henry Alfred Kissinger’s mens rea around the 9/11 attacks as early as 1971. Mr. Kissinger’s mens rea, in turn leads to probable cause for the mens rea of his associates who are key individuals in the executive of an international war crimes racketeering organization, composed predominately of UK citizens.
Veteran’s Today, Barrett, and Fetzer seem to be tasked with keeping the 9/11 movement focused on the “usual suspects” in the U.S. and Israeli governments at the time of 9/11. Their defamatory articles, by attacking important breakthrough 9/11 witnesses such as Andrew D. Basiago, is designed to prevent the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal from identifying, investigating prosecuting, trying, convicting and sentencing 9/11 Accused who are UK citizens of the Merovingian and banking bloodlines, members of an executive of an international war crimes racketeering organization.
For the record, here is a sample Veteran’s Today attack article by Barrett against the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal. Barrett’s article is poorly researched and a distortion of existing Exopolitical research regarding the U.S. secret space program and the presence of life on Mars. Barrett even starts off the article stating that I was a member of Scroll and Key secret society at Yale University (a Skull & Bones knockoff), which is historically false.
Now It Can Be Told! The REAL Reason Obama Was Nearly Devoured by Carnivorous Plesiosaurs on Mars by Dr. Kevin Barrett
Here is a response I wrote to that article:
9/11 QUESTION about Kevin Barrett's Veterans Today article of the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal
URL OF MY ARTICLE:
Barrett's enmity against the 9/11 Time Travel and the Life on Mars revelations goes way back when he invited me onto his radio program to talk about my 9/11 revelations that quantum access time travel was used in 9/11 as Donald H Rumsfeld and the CIA had moving images on 9/11 in 1971, 30 years prior to the event obtained through secret Tesla-based Time Travel. Barrett tried to suppress my revelations even then:
Secret DARPA time travel program may hold key to understanding the deep politics of 9/11
Four U.S. exotic black ops used in 9/11: Tesla time travel, antigravity UFO, directed energy weapons, mini-nukes
9/11 Tribunal Judges are not errand boys and girls for Conference Organizers. A Tribunal of Conscience is established under natural law and actually administers Justice. We Judges of a Tribunal of Conscience have judicial independence and can call any witnesses we deem necessary. That is why we called Leuren Moret and Andrew D. Basiago and Andrew D. Basiago's affidavit as is our obligation and our right for the reasons stated above. The moment that I as an officer of the Tribunal administered the first Oath to 9/11 witness Splitting the Sky on June 15, 2012, the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal came into being with as a separate judicial entity.
The 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal returned all of the evidence to the 19 complaining speakers and urged them to start thier own tribunals of conscience, saying there can never be too many tribunals of conscience. This is all on our 9/11 Tribunal website.
NOTA BENE: The 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal is going above and beyond the "Usual Suspects": of George W. Bush; Donald H. Rumsfeld, Richard B. Cheney (who are shills) and breaking the corporate shield to find the criminal culpability in the individuals in an international war crimes racketeering organization that are the secret executive racketeering network behind 9/11 and these false flag wars, etc. Many of them are UK, French, and Canadian citizens of Merovingian and banking bloodlines. The Indictment of the Tribunal will be issued January 22, 2013. That is another reason why the Tribunal, its Judges and witnesses are now the subject of disinformation attacks from operatives like Barrett, Fetzer, who are tasked to keep the 9/11 movement on the "Usual Suspects" and away from the banking bloodlines and ICC jurisdiction, which a UK 9/11 Accused citizen would fall under. Now do you get the larger picture?
What is the 9/11 War Crime Tribunal’s Plan of Action?
As published on Oct. 3, 2012, the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal’s Plan of Action is:
9/11 WAR CRIMES TRIBUNAL - ACTION PLAN
DATE: Tuesday, January 22,
ACTION: Issuance of Indictment & Report by 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal
Press Conference - 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal & 9/11 Witnesses
January 23, 2013 Forward
9/11 War Crimes Tribunal & 9/11 Witnesses
Menu of Strategic Actions - Confer, Prioritize, Materialize.
A. INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS
Filing of Indictment & Report with Prosecutor of International Criminal Court (ICC)
Filing of Indictment & Report with Organization of American States (OAS)
Filing of Indictment & Report with European Union (EU)
Filing of Indictment & Report with Parliaments of U.K. and Canada (Government & Opposition)
Filing of Indictment & Report with United Nations General Assembly President &
Filing of Indictment & Report with the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Commission
B. U.S. CONGRESS
Filing of Indictment & Report with Chairman, U.S. House of Representatives
Judiciary Committee for the appointment of a 9/11 Special Prosecutor
Filing of Indictment & Report with Chairman, U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee for the appointment of a 9/11 Special Prosecutor
C. STATE & CITY OF NEW YORK
Filing of Indictment & Report with Attorney General, State of New York
Filing of Indictment & Report with District Attorney, Manhattan, New York
Filing of Indictment & Report with U.S. Attorney, Manhattan, New York
D. WASHINGTON, DC
Filing of Indictment & Report with U.S. Attorney General, Washington, DC
Filing of Indictment & Report with U.S. Attorney, Washington, DC
E. WILD CARDS
Filing of Indictment & Report with cooperating District Attorneys in the USA.
Filing of Indictment & Report with cooperating Public Prosecutors in the European National Jurisdictions.
Filing of Indictment & Report with cooperating Public Prosecutors in the UK.
Filing of Indictment & Report with a cooperating Crown Prosecutors in Canada.
DATE: October 2, 2012
WEBSITE: 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal
Alfred Lambremont Webre, JD, MEd is a Judge of the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal. This article is published under guidelines in the Tribunal’s ruling set out at:
9/11 War Crimes Tribunal - Public Roles as Witnesses & Judges