9/11 QUESTION FROM Jan Steyn October 2, 2012 4:15 pm pacific (Facebook):
"I like u guys but not responding to allegations this serious is not cool."
ALFRED LAMBREMONT WEBRE RESPONSE:
1. Brief response - What is wrong with the true, documented version of events, set out clearly and coherently at "9/11 War Crimes Tribunal expected to issue Indictments of Accused in 9/11 events on January 22, 2013"? You can read this true, documented version of how events around the Basiago affidavit occured at: http://bit.ly/S9QWBu
2. Extended response:
Mars & 9/11 DISINFO ARTICLE: This article is transparent disinformation by NWO outlet Veteran's Today and NWO meme-master Barrett. Caveat Lector, IMHO.
A. "Scroll & Key" - Cointelpro agent Kevin Barrett writes that I was a member of Scroll & Key Secret Society at Yale University, another Cointelpro fabrication that can be easily checked as historically false. Another Cointelpro disinformer, Michael Salla, makes the same false allegation in Salla's Cointelpro-filled article: "Andy Basiago - Life on Mars whistleblower or crackpot?" http://www.examiner.com/article/andy-basiago-life-on-mars-whistleblower-or-crackpot Barrett, Fetzer, Gordon Hull all write for an Cointelpro-run disinfo outlet Veteran's Today.
B. "James Fetzer, Barbara Honegger & the Basiago Affidavit" - Cointelpro agent Kevin Barrett distorts the sequence of events surrounding the Affidavit of Andrew D. Basiago, which he and James Fetzer conference organizers of a June 15-17, 2012 9/11 conference in Vancouver, BC tried unsuccessfully to exclude from the evidence before the 9/11 War Crimes Tribuna. Barrett conflates an unethical dinner lobby-button-holing attempt by 9/11 speaker Barbara Honegger of Judge Alfred Lambremont with what really occurred around the Affidavit of Andrew D. Basiago and the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal.
WHAT REALLY HAPPENED: The Basiago Affidavit: Circumventing an attempted suppression of 9/11 evidence
On February 23, 2012, Judge Webre approached the organizers of the planned June 15-17, 2012 conference with a proposal that former U.S. chrononaut Andrew D. Basiago be a speaker at the upcoming conference. Judge Webre stated, “In a word, we have a whistleblower from DARPA quantum access projects who is an eyewitness to DARPA/CIA possession of images of the controlled demolition of the twin towers on September 11, 2011 in 1971. We have an eyewitness to Donald H. Rumsfeld's personal knowledge of these images in 1971, as defence liaison for this DARPA project to the 1971 Nixon Cabinet, of which he was a member. Need I remind you that Donald H. Rumsfeld is, by prima facie evidence, a prime suspect in the 9/11 false flag operation? (Please see [my] articles below).
“That eyewitness [Andrew D. Basiago] is a member of the bar of the state of Washington and a 10-year colleague of mine and of impeccable credentials, Andrew D. Basiago. We both spoke at the 2009 Conspiracy Con, and have spoken at numerous US and international conferences and media on these issues.
“As long as you continue to gate-keep this evidence and information about 9/11 by keeping at least a presentation of this evidence from a public forum like The Vancouver Hearings, you are doing the public a great disservice, IMHO.”
Although Mr. Basiago was not invited to be a speaker at the June 15-17, 2012 conference, Judge Webre was invited to be a Judge on the 9/11 Tribunal and in his position as War Crimes Judge was asked to invite other distinguished jurists and public figures to join him on the 9/11 Tribunal.June 22, 2012 Invitation for submissions
One of Judge Webre’s first acts on the 9/11 Tribunal following the June 15-17, 2012 conference was to send a June 22, 2012 invitation to all speakers and to additional 9/11 witnesses (as was the Tribunal's right) to submit written Evidentiary Submissions and sworn Affidavits that would form the basis of the Tribunal’s Indictment of 9/11 Accused. The conference organizers, all 19 speakers, in addition to Leuren Moret and Andrew D. Basiago, received this invitation along with a Witness Docket listing everyone's names, email addresses and the September 22, 2012 date the invitation was sent. In addition, Judge Webre notified the organizers at and after the conference that he would be so doing.
In early September 2012, when the 9/11 Vancouver Hearings organizers notified Judge Webre they intended to review the affidavit of Andrew D. Basiago before it could be admitted into evidence before the Tribunal, Judge Webre understood immediately that this was an effort by the conference organizers to usurp 9/11 Tribunal independence, and gate-keep vital forensic evidence about 9/11 from the Tribunal.
Therefore, as was is the prerogative of the 9/11 Tribunal, Judge Webre filed the Affidavit of Andrew D. Basiago into the Witness Docket and sent a courtesy copy to the conference organizer, thereby entering the Basiago Affidavit into evidence and circumventing an attempted suppression of 9/11 evidence by the conference organizers.
3. 9/11, Time Travel & Life on Mars: Cointelpro operative Barrett conflates these subject as a disinformer. For the truth about:
(1) 9/11, Quantum Access & Time Travel - take some time out of your busy life and schedule and read this: "Four U.S. exotic black ops used in 9/11: Tesla time travel, antigravity UFO, directed energy weapons, mini-nukes" by Alfred Lambremont Webre
and (2) Life on Mars, take some serious reflection time and read:
"New data, law of evidence support view of Mars having indigenous, intelligent extraterrestrial life" by Alfred Lambremont Webre
4. LEGAL NOTE:
9/11 Tribunal - Public Roles as Witnesses & Judges - The Internet and email lists, etc has paradoxically both facilitated and made more difficult the role of a Tribunal of Conscience, witnesses and Judges. In a "brick and mortar" courtroom, it is easy to tell when a Tribunal is in session; when the Tribunal is adjourned. In the case of the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal, a Tribunal of Conscience, the issue of when the Tribunal is "in session" is more problematic to define.
Judges of the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal only speak for the Tribunal in official Notices of Decision, Indictments or other documents that are posted on the Tribunal website at www.911warcrimestribunal.org
Witnesses of the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal - The Evidentiary Statements and Affidavits of the 9/11 witnesses are their official Tribunal-related statements.
Privileged communications such as this email also are part of official Tribunal statements.
Any other public or private statements by 9/11 Tribunal Judges and/or witnesses, whether on the media, in email lists, social media, emails, etc, are merely statements by individuals in their own private capacity exercising their right of freedom of speech, and do not reflect in any way on the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal, its evidence, Proceedings and Judgments.
This rule is made to protect Judges and witnesses, for example, from outlandish claims and statements made by organizers and specific speakers of a June 15-17, 2012 9/11 Conference in Vancouver, BC.
Judges and witnesses who feel slandered or mistreated on an email list are perfectly free to wage in on that list and deconstruct the slander in their own rights as individuals if they so wish without in any way affecting the Tribunal. They are also free to ignore these slanders, and or to bring legal action as needed.
Oct. 2, 2012
URL OF THIS ARTICLE: